Re: Non-DD's in debian-legal

2006-06-14 Thread Adam McKenna
On Thu, Jun 15, 2006 at 10:27:08AM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote: > it's also possible to raise a variety of invalid concerns > in ways that require responses > their comments are only influential in so far as they persuade developers. These statements apply to both DD's and non-DD's. --Adam -- A

Re: Non-DD's in debian-legal

2006-06-14 Thread Anthony Towns
On Tue, Jun 13, 2006 at 03:11:42PM -0700, Adam McKenna wrote: > If people who aren't members are raising valid concerns that need to be > addressed before development can proceed, we shouldn't reject that input on > the basis of membership and call it "blocking development". Right. But it's also p

Re: severities of blocking bugs

2006-06-14 Thread Thomas Bushnell BSG
Ian Jackson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Thomas Bushnell BSG writes ("Re: severities of blocking bugs"): >> Ian Jackson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> > As opposed to writing to demand that the maintainer spend their free >> > time to help you fix your problem ! >> >> How does adjusting the seve

Re: installing a package from "Config-files" state earlier than the most recent stable release

2006-06-14 Thread Steve Langasek
On Wed, Jun 14, 2006 at 10:27:54AM -0400, Justin Pryzby wrote: > Package upgrades skipping a stable release are advertised as "not > guaranteed to work", which allows maintainers to drop support for > upgrades from versions earlier than oldstable in their uploads to > unstable. However I've never

Re: Bug#373606: ITP: sms2 -- Biological sequence manipulation suite

2006-06-14 Thread Nacho Barrientos Arias
Date: Wed, 14 Jun 2006 23:32:24 +0900 Charles Plessy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Package: wnpp > Severity: wishlist > Owner: Charles Plessy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Package name: sms2 Be careful naming source and provided packages to avoid namespace pollution :) Cheers, -- Nacho Barrien

Re: severities of blocking bugs

2006-06-14 Thread Ian Jackson
Thomas Bushnell BSG writes ("Re: severities of blocking bugs"): > Ian Jackson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > As opposed to writing to demand that the maintainer spend their free > > time to help you fix your problem ! > > How does adjusting the severity of a bug report amount to a demand > that t

Re: Renaming a package

2006-06-14 Thread Ian Jackson
Daniel Kobras writes ("Re: Renaming a package"): > On Fri, Jun 09, 2006 at 02:15:06PM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote: > > I don't think it this patch is correct as is, but something similar > > might not be unreasonable if it had to be turned on with a command > > line option. > > [Context: When renamin

Re: Bug#363486: dpkg: [update-alternatives] New categories for: WORD, EXCEL, MEDIA-PLAYER etc.

2006-06-14 Thread Martijn van Oosterhout
On 6/14/06, Jari Aalto+usenet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: One thing, when etc/mailcap entry reads: application/msexcel; oocalc '%s'; edit=oocalc '%s What happens then 'oocalc' is not available? How is the error handling done, so that e.g. 'xmessage' is displayed under Window mamager to notify

Re: installing a package from "Config-files" state earlier than the most recent stable release

2006-06-14 Thread Frank Küster
Justin Pryzby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Does this mean that maintainers should be expected to support the > maintscript "install" "$2" cases for ancient versions, or is there > some other convention of which I remain unaware? I can't speak for any general conventions. But we had quite a lot o

Re: Cleaning /var/lib/dpkg/available

2006-06-14 Thread Brendan O'Dea
On Wed, Jun 14, 2006 at 02:03:21PM +0200, Daniel Kobras wrote: >On Wed, Jun 14, 2006 at 01:34:36PM +0200, Jérôme Warnier wrote: >> I've been upgrading my machines since Woody to Sarge, then to Etch. Now, >> my /var/lib/dpkg/available are huge (15MB), and it seems they never get >> cleaned. >> How a

Bug#373606: ITP: sms2 -- Biological sequence manipulation suite

2006-06-14 Thread Charles Plessy
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Charles Plessy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Package name: sms2 Version : 2.303 Upstream Author : Paul Stothard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> URL : http://www.bioinformatics.org/SMS/index.html License : GPL Description : Biologica

installing a package from "Config-files" state earlier than the most recent stable release

2006-06-14 Thread Justin Pryzby
Package upgrades skipping a stable release are advertised as "not guaranteed to work", which allows maintainers to drop support for upgrades from versions earlier than oldstable in their uploads to unstable. However I've never heard a requirement that package versions earlier than the most recent

Re: Bug#363486: dpkg: [update-alternatives] New categories for: WORD, EXCEL, MEDIA-PLAYER etc.

2006-06-14 Thread Jari Aalto+usenet
* Wed 2006-06-14 Thibaut Paumard * Message-Id: 1150288566.1225.141.camel AT pc-paumard.mpe-garching.mpg.de > Le mercredi 14 juin 2006 à 01:33 +0200, Hendrik Sattler a écrit : > >> Why not have something that starts the proper program according to the given >> mimetype? E.g.: >> x-mime-handler app

Re: Kernel bootsplash without recompiling

2006-06-14 Thread Paul van der Vlis
Loïc Minier schreef: > On Wed, Jun 14, 2006, Paul van der Vlis wrote: > >>I don't like the fact that I need to recompile the kernel to get a >>bootsplash. I don't ask for a bootsplash by default, but I would like a >>way to enable it with a standard kernel. > > Ubuntu starts Linux with a frameb

Re: Move to python 2.4 / Changing the packaging style for python packages

2006-06-14 Thread Raphael Hertzog
On Wed, 14 Jun 2006, Pierre Habouzit wrote: > Le Mar 13 Juin 2006 07:12, Anthony Towns a écrit : > > Apps can do either: > > > >     Package: foo > >     Depends: python (>= 2.4), python-bar > > > >     /usr/bin/foo: #!/usr/bin/env python > > doesn't it breaks if python-bar only provides 2.3 modul

Re: Kernel bootsplash without recompiling

2006-06-14 Thread Loïc Minier
On Wed, Jun 14, 2006, Paul van der Vlis wrote: > I don't like the fact that I need to recompile the kernel to get a > bootsplash. I don't ask for a bootsplash by default, but I would like a > way to enable it with a standard kernel. Ubuntu starts Linux with a framebuffer atop of the VGA16 video d

Re: Move to python 2.4 / Changing the packaging style for python packages

2006-06-14 Thread Pierre Habouzit
Le Mer 14 Juin 2006 15:23, Pierre Habouzit a écrit : > Le Mar 13 Juin 2006 07:12, Anthony Towns a écrit : > > Apps can do either: > > > >     Package: foo > >     Depends: python (>= 2.4), python-bar > > > >     /usr/bin/foo: #!/usr/bin/env python > > doesn't it breaks if python-bar only provides 2

Re: Move to python 2.4 / Changing the packaging style for python packages

2006-06-14 Thread Pierre Habouzit
Le Mar 13 Juin 2006 07:12, Anthony Towns a écrit : > Apps can do either: > >     Package: foo >     Depends: python (>= 2.4), python-bar > >     /usr/bin/foo: #!/usr/bin/env python doesn't it breaks if python-bar only provides 2.3 modules ? because in an apt PoV the dependencies will be fullfiled

Re: Cleaning /var/lib/dpkg/available

2006-06-14 Thread Jérôme Warnier
Le mercredi 14 juin 2006 à 14:03 +0200, Daniel Kobras a écrit : > dpkg --forget-old-unavail Well, no, it doesn't help. -- Jérôme Warnier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> BeezNest

Re: Kernel bootsplash without recompiling

2006-06-14 Thread Paul van der Vlis
Miriam Ruiz schreef: > gensplash and fbsplash might be an option to consider too: > > http://gentoo-wiki.com/HOWTO_fbsplash Interesting... >From the site: http://dev.gentoo.org/~spock/projects/gensplash/ --- This means that if you don't care about having an image in the background of yo

Re: Kernel bootsplash without recompiling

2006-06-14 Thread Paul van der Vlis
Paul Wise schreef: > On Wed, 2006-06-14 at 13:41 +0200, Paul van der Vlis wrote: > > >>I don't like the fact that I need to recompile the kernel to get a >>bootsplash. I don't ask for a bootsplash by default, but I would like a >>way to enable it with a standard kernel. > > > splashy is a bette

Re: Bug#363486: dpkg: [update-alternatives] New categories for: WORD, EXCEL, MEDIA-PLAYER etc.

2006-06-14 Thread Gabor Gombas
On Wed, Jun 14, 2006 at 01:53:29AM +0300, Jari Aalto+mail.linux wrote: > Command line usage (or from Window manager menu): > > call: x-spreadsheet How would this be different from using the already-existing run-mailcap command? And what happens if 95% of time I want to use one application as

Re: Kernel bootsplash without recompiling

2006-06-14 Thread Paul van der Vlis
Jérôme Warnier schreef: > Le mercredi 14 juin 2006 à 13:41 +0200, Paul van der Vlis a écrit : > >>Hello, >> >>I don't like the fact that I need to recompile the kernel to get a >>bootsplash. I don't ask for a bootsplash by default, but I would like a >>way to enable it with a standard kernel. >> >

Re: Bug#363486: dpkg: [update-alternatives] New categories for: WORD, EXCEL, MEDIA-PLAYER etc.

2006-06-14 Thread Thibaut Paumard
Le mercredi 14 juin 2006 à 01:33 +0200, Hendrik Sattler a écrit : > > >> If you open a file in a file browser, or you open it thru a web > > >> browser or something, it might have a mime type assosiated with > > >> it. So what I think you suggest is that based on the mime-type > > >> we start an a

Re: Kernel bootsplash without recompiling

2006-06-14 Thread Miriam Ruiz
gensplash and fbsplash might be an option to consider too: http://gentoo-wiki.com/HOWTO_fbsplash Miry --- Paul Wise <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escribió: > On Wed, 2006-06-14 at 13:41 +0200, Paul van der Vlis wrote: > > > I don't like the fact that I need to recompile the kernel to get a > > bootspl

Re: debian Packages

2006-06-14 Thread Paul Wise
On Wed, 2006-06-14 at 12:59 +0100, Indraveni wrote: > I want to know when will the deb packages for egroupware-1.2.2 and > Bugzilla 2.16 version debian packages will be released. egroupware 1.2 is available, you will have to wait for 1.2.2, or contact the maintainer to help her/him out with it:

Re: Kernel bootsplash without recompiling

2006-06-14 Thread Paul Wise
On Wed, 2006-06-14 at 19:55 +0800, Paul Wise wrote: > Your other questions were answered by Jérôme Warnier. I forgot the following pages related to boot splashscreens: http://packages.debian.org/unstable/graphics/kernel-patch-bootsplash http://packages.debian.org/experimental/graphics/splashy ht

Re: Cleaning /var/lib/dpkg/available

2006-06-14 Thread Daniel Kobras
On Wed, Jun 14, 2006 at 01:34:36PM +0200, Jérôme Warnier wrote: > I've been upgrading my machines since Woody to Sarge, then to Etch. Now, > my /var/lib/dpkg/available are huge (15MB), and it seems they never get > cleaned. > How am I supposed to clean them? Isn't there any automated tools in > Deb

debian Packages

2006-06-14 Thread Indraveni
Hi, I want to know when will the deb packages for egroupware-1.2.2 and Bugzilla 2.16 version debian packages will be released.Thanks &  RegardsIndraveni Send instant messages to your online friends http://in.messenger.yahoo.com Stay connected with your friends even when away from PC. Link: http:/

Re: Kernel bootsplash without recompiling

2006-06-14 Thread Paul Wise
On Wed, 2006-06-14 at 13:41 +0200, Paul van der Vlis wrote: > I don't like the fact that I need to recompile the kernel to get a > bootsplash. I don't ask for a bootsplash by default, but I would like a > way to enable it with a standard kernel. splashy is a better alternative to the kernel-patch

Re: Kernel bootsplash without recompiling

2006-06-14 Thread Jérôme Warnier
Le mercredi 14 juin 2006 à 13:41 +0200, Paul van der Vlis a écrit : > Hello, > > I don't like the fact that I need to recompile the kernel to get a > bootsplash. I don't ask for a bootsplash by default, but I would like a > way to enable it with a standard kernel. > > For many many people all the

Kernel bootsplash without recompiling

2006-06-14 Thread Paul van der Vlis
Hello, I don't like the fact that I need to recompile the kernel to get a bootsplash. I don't ask for a bootsplash by default, but I would like a way to enable it with a standard kernel. For many many people all these boot-messages are confusing. For me this is really an important point in using

Cleaning /var/lib/dpkg/available

2006-06-14 Thread Jérôme Warnier
Hi, I've been upgrading my machines since Woody to Sarge, then to Etch. Now, my /var/lib/dpkg/available are huge (15MB), and it seems they never get cleaned. How am I supposed to clean them? Isn't there any automated tools in Debian to do that? Thanks -- Jérôme Warnier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> BeezNe

Bug#373571: ITP: mugshot -- Client for integration between Mugshot and the Linux desktop

2006-06-14 Thread Heikki Henriksen
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Heikki Henriksen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Package name: mugshot Version : 1.1.5 Upstream Author : Mugshot Developers (http://developer.mugshot.org/) URL : http://mugshot.org License : GPL-2 & Mugshot Client License Agreem

Re: Compiling packages for the standard distribution with -Os instead of -O2

2006-06-14 Thread Reuben Thomas
I thought it might be worth pointing out that this has already been done on a large scale, in Mac OS X. That is precisely why PPC and i386 gcc are now largely fixed. Also, that the Mac OS team did considerable testing, and now build almost everything with -Os. I heard this at a presentation fr

Re: Coordinated effort to update python packages

2006-06-14 Thread Pierre Habouzit
Le Mar 13 Juin 2006 20:38, Raphael Hertzog a écrit : > For NMUers, always start by filling a bug report refering to this > announce, register the bug number and your intent to work on it in > the wiki page, do the work, send the patch to the BTS and upload the > package appropriately (using a DELA

Bug#373416: ITP: tworld -- Chip's Challenge Game Engine Emulation

2006-06-14 Thread Gerfried Fuchs
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Gerfried Fuchs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * Package name: tworld Version : 1.3.0 Upstream Author : Brian Raiter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * URL : http://www.muppetlabs.com/~breadbox/software/tworld/ * License : GPL Programming Lang: