Josselin Mouette wrote:
>> Is there a way to use fc-match to locate a Type1 font (pfb) and also its
>> associated font metrics (the afm file)?
>
> I may be wrong, but as fontconfig was designed for Xft which doesn't
> make use of the .afm file but only uses the .pfb directly, I think
> fontconfig
Hi
I do still have the problem with ADS that it does not accept any input from
keyboard after the upgrade to xorg 7.0. I am using it in a chroot
environment, without problems but I would like to get it working as before
the upgrade. All other programs are working perfectly with xorg 7.0
I
Drew Parsons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Frank wrote:
>> > On Wed, May 03, 2006 at 10:26:21PM +1000, Drew Parsons wrote:
>> >> Wouter asked:
>> >> >
>> >> > Just out of curiosity, could you point me to arguments in favour of
>> >> > Xprint?
>> >>
>> >> http://www.dailynews.co.th/
>> >>
>> The
Frank wrote:
> > On Wed, May 03, 2006 at 10:26:21PM +1000, Drew Parsons wrote:
> >> Wouter asked:
> >> >
> >> > Just out of curiosity, could you point me to arguments in favour of
> >> > Xprint?
> >>
> >> http://www.dailynews.co.th/
> >>
> The
> CUPS queues print those thai (?) letters very nice
On Wed, 2006-05-03 at 15:23 +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> On Wed, May 03, 2006 at 10:26:21PM +1000, Drew Parsons wrote:
> > Wouter asked:
> > > On Tue, May 02, 2006 at 09:22:45PM -0400, David Nusinow wrote:
> > > > This library isn't truly abandoned by upstream, but essentially it's not
> > > > g
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Jacob Luna Lundberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: ifpgui
Version : 0.10.7
Upstream Author : Jim Campbell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://ifpgui.sourceforge.net/
* License : GPL, BSD
Programming Lang: C++
Desc
Alexis Sukrieh wrote:
As you might have noticed, the last policy version (3.7.0) says that
web application packages must not put CGIs under `/usr/lib/cgi-bin'
anymore:
Given that apache2 has almost a magnitude more installations than all
the other web servers in Debian (sans apache 1) combine
On Wed, May 03, 2006 at 10:20:27PM +0800, Dan Jacobson wrote:
> Somewhere during an hours long apt-get dselect-upgrade, some package,
> I can't tell which, changed the permission of /tmp from 1777 to 755.
> stat(1) at best reports the time some file was moved in or out of
> /tmp, obscuring the time
Ondrej Sury <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Tue, 2006-05-02 at 19:33 -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
>> You can't right now because GnuTLS support is only available for 2.1. 2.2
>> and later will need substantial reworking of that support, and without it,
>> the OpenSSL licensing issues cause too man
Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-05-03 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> It seems the gnokii package is unmaintained and its maintainer doesn't do
> anything.
> Should the package be orphaned so other interested developers can take it?
It is already orphaned (with a pending ITA). Please so some research
before pos
Hello Roberto,
On Wed, 2006-05-03 at 22:09 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> It seems the gnokii package is unmaintained and its maintainer doesn't do
> anything.
> Should the package be orphaned so other interested developers can take it?
The package is currently up for adoption by the current
Re: Joey Hess 2006-05-03 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > I won't discuss here the goodwill of this change, I just want to
> > point out that by now, 110 packages are RC bug candidates because of
> > this [2] (422 files installed inder `/usr/lib/cgi-bin').
>
> Policy uses a "should" for this, so at most th
On Thu, Apr 27, 2006 at 12:53:01PM +0200, cobaco (aka Bart Cornelis) wrote:
> On Sunday 23 April 2006 20:26, Russ Allbery wrote:
> > Jari Aalto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > > What we need and what should have been done a long time ago, is to
> > > modularize profile to /etc/profile.d/ where e
On Wed, May 03, 2006 at 01:48:33PM +0200, Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña wrote:
>
> In any case, you could use noshell (already available in Debian) or nologin
> (see #298782) instead of /bin/false.
nologin is now distributed with login.
I've closed the ITP.
Kind Regards,
--
Nekral
--
To UNS
It seems the gnokii package is unmaintained and its maintainer doesn't do
anything.
Should the package be orphaned so other interested developers can take it?
Prueba el correo Terra ( http://www.terra.es/correo ); Seguro, rápido, fiable.
Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> On Wed, 03 May 2006, Ondrej Sury wrote:
> > (added openldap2.2 + gnutls to SummerOfCode2006 page)
> >
> > Status of sending notification mails:
> > [fr] PhilBat: (421, 'Too many concurrent SMTP connections; please try
> > again later.')
> > [en] PhilippKern, RaphaelHertzog
Hi,
I will be in Helsinki from 8/5 till 14/5.
If someone wants to meet for a drink or some keysigning drop me an email.
Greetings, Joost Damad
--
The planet Andete is famous for it's killer edible poets.
pgp5MB0sA5Ouh.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Package: general
Severity: minor
Somewhere during an hours long apt-get dselect-upgrade, some package,
I can't tell which, changed the permission of /tmp from 1777 to 755.
stat(1) at best reports the time some file was moved in or out of
/tmp, obscuring the time of chmod, so I can't check in dpkg.
Alexis Sukrieh wrote:
> As you might have noticed, the last policy version (3.7.0) says that
> web application packages must not put CGIs under `/usr/lib/cgi-bin'
> anymore:
>
> Quoting lintian:
>
> This is done to avoid conflicts with the cgi-bin script alias,
> which is reserved for the
hey alexis,
On Wed, May 03, 2006 at 05:46:26PM +0200, Alexis Sukrieh wrote:
> As you might have noticed, the last policy version (3.7.0) says that
> web application packages must not put CGIs under `/usr/lib/cgi-bin'
> anymore:
> CGIs must be put under /usr/lib/cgi-lib now.
i'd hold off on that
Le Mer 3 Mai 2006 18:55, Martin Michlmayr a écrit :
> * Pierre Habouzit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-05-03 15:49]:
> > IMHO, in his case, he should remove the forward, tag the bug
> > upstream, and mention in the bug history that this is related to
> > the upstream bug "foo". set the forwarded state o
On Tuesday 02 May 2006 19:45, Daniel Ruoso wrote:
> Em Seg, 2006-05-01 às 17:54 +, Gonéri Le Bouder escreveu:
> > I did some test. My repository is here:
> > http://gloria.rulezlan.org/debian/ update_tarballs.pl updates the index_*
> > files and the tarballs.
> > For the moment it doesn't creat
* Pierre Habouzit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-05-03 16:30]:
> after more pondering, what really miss for me, is a BTS
> "closed-upstream" tag, meaning that the bug is closed on the remote
> BTS, but not necessarily "fixed".
I don't think this distinction is helpful. Also, it's exactly
opposite to w
* Pierre Habouzit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-05-03 15:49]:
> IMHO, in his case, he should remove the forward, tag the bug
> upstream, and mention in the bug history that this is related to the
> upstream bug "foo". set the forwarded state of a bug does not makes
> sense to me, if you dont adhere to
Wouter Verhelst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, May 03, 2006 at 10:26:21PM +1000, Drew Parsons wrote:
>> Wouter asked:
>> > On Tue, May 02, 2006 at 09:22:45PM -0400, David Nusinow wrote:
>> > > This library isn't truly abandoned by upstream, but essentially it's not
>> > > getting any new dev
Le Mer 3 Mai 2006 17:54, Stefano Zacchiroli a écrit :
> On Wed, May 03, 2006 at 11:56:32AM +0200, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
> > It currently only support bugzilla (which would still help kde,
> > gnome, X.org, linux kernel, samba, mozilla, gcc Maintainers to cite
> > only them), but is written so th
On Wed, May 03, 2006 at 11:56:32AM +0200, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
> It currently only support bugzilla (which would still help kde, gnome,
> X.org, linux kernel, samba, mozilla, gcc Maintainers to cite only them),
> but is written so that adding new backend is not a difficult task.
Could you plea
Hello,
As you might have noticed, the last policy version (3.7.0) says that
web application packages must not put CGIs under `/usr/lib/cgi-bin'
anymore:
Quoting lintian:
This is done to avoid conflicts with the cgi-bin script alias,
which is reserved for the local use of webmasters.
CGI
Wouter Verhelst wrote:
On Wed, May 03, 2006 at 10:26:21PM +1000, Drew Parsons wrote:
Wouter asked:
On Tue, May 02, 2006 at 09:22:45PM -0400, David Nusinow wrote:
This library isn't truly abandoned by upstream, but essentially it's not
getting any new development. Cairo is considered the way fo
Le Mer 3 Mai 2006 14:44, Martin Michlmayr a écrit :
> * Christoph Berg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-05-03 14:28]:
> > Automatically setting the 'fixed-upstream' tag is certainly a very
> > nice idea that no one will object to.
>
> Unfortunately, there are always corner cases. What if upstream marks
>
On Wed, 03 May 2006, Rogério Brito wrote:
> One way to mitigate the memory consumption is to, among other things,
> compile packages with optimization of GCC set to -Os, instead of -O2,
What -Os is likely to give you is much better cache locality, which might
make the code run that much faster on
Le Mer 3 Mai 2006 14:28, Christoph Berg a écrit :
> Automatically setting the 'fixed-upstream' tag is certainly a very
> nice idea that no one will object to.
>
> For 'upstream', I don't really see a benefit of setting it since the
> bug is already marked as forwarded. I would just leave it alone n
Hi there.
I think that this may be interesting to anybody that has to work with
computers that are not the latest/more recent as most people in richer
countries seem to have.
It seems to be that a good amount of people upgrade their computers in a
regular basis and, then, don't notice how things
On Wed, May 03, 2006 at 10:26:21PM +1000, Drew Parsons wrote:
> Wouter asked:
> > On Tue, May 02, 2006 at 09:22:45PM -0400, David Nusinow wrote:
> > > This library isn't truly abandoned by upstream, but essentially it's not
> > > getting any new development. Cairo is considered the way forward and
Hi,
if your program uses fontconfig to find the fonts, then you don't need
defoma. Otherwise, install defoma-doc and have a look at
/usr/share/doc/defoma-doc/defoma-script.html/ch2.html
about how to get a list of the installed fonts and how to write your
configuration file.
In both cases you sh
* Martin Michlmayr ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [060503 14:45]:
> * Christoph Berg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-05-03 14:28]:
> > Automatically setting the 'fixed-upstream' tag is certainly a very
> > nice idea that no one will object to.
>
> Unfortunately, there are always corner cases. What if upstream mar
* Christoph Berg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-05-03 14:28]:
> Automatically setting the 'fixed-upstream' tag is certainly a very
> nice idea that no one will object to.
Unfortunately, there are always corner cases. What if upstream marks
something as fixed, you get a Debian bug report that the bug i
Package: wnpp
Owner: Michael Hanke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Severity: wishlist
*** Please type your report below this line ***
* Package name: python-visionegg
Version : 1.0
Upstream Author : Andrew D. Straw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://www.visionegg.org
* License
Wouter asked:
> On Tue, May 02, 2006 at 09:22:45PM -0400, David Nusinow wrote:
> > This library isn't truly abandoned by upstream, but essentially it's not
> > getting any new development. Cairo is considered the way forward and xprint
> > is widely (though not universally) considered a broken impl
Le Mer 3 Mai 2006 14:02, Alexander Sack a écrit :
> Anyway, I would have preferred to roll this out in a different
> fashion:
>
> 1. release it as a package so all maintainers can use the tool if
> they like.
I intended it like that at the begining. sadly, the tool uses a local
mirror of the d
Hi,
Re: Pierre Habouzit 2006-05-03 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> * as of tags, it only touches (like I explained) :
>- upstream: ensure it's always set
>- wontfix: try to guess if upstream tagged that bug wontfix, and
>set/unset it accordingly
>- fixed-upstream:
>
On Wed, May 03, 2006 at 01:21:41PM +0200, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
> btslink will *never* close or reopen bugs. So it's pretty harmless IMHO,
> this won't resurect a RC bug for which you made a debian-only patch and
> that is still not fixed upstream.
>
> So just tell me if somethings looks illogi
On Wed, May 03, 2006 at 02:45:56AM +0200, Uwe Hermann wrote:
> Security-wise it's probably a good idea to give as few users as possible
> a valid shell, all others should get /bin/false, right?
AFAIK, this is already being done in Red Hat, SuSE, FreeBSD and OpenBSD for
many system users. And is th
Le Mer 3 Mai 2006 12:23, Alexander Sack a écrit :
> On Wed, May 03, 2006 at 11:56:32AM +0200, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
> > Hi developers,
> >
> > Like many of you may have noticed, a quite big mail was processed
> > by the BTS today [1]. This was generated by a new service I'm
> > currently devel
On Wed, May 03, 2006 at 11:56:32AM +0200, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
>
> Hi developers,
>
> Like many of you may have noticed, a quite big mail was processed by
> the BTS today [1]. This was generated by a new service I'm currently
> developing, called bts-link.
>
>
> This tool lists every BT
Le Mer 3 Mai 2006 11:56, Pierre Habouzit a écrit :
> How to Help:
>
> You can also help me to make the btslink.cfg more complete and
> know about more bugzillas [7]
about that:
* private or mails to [EMAIL PROTECTED] are fine
* any bugzilla that is used for a project packaged in debi
Le Mer 3 Mai 2006 12:06, Steinar H. Gunderson a écrit :
> On Wed, May 03, 2006 at 11:56:32AM +0200, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
> > So basically to trig it, you just have to set the right forward
> > status for your bugs.
>
> What is the "right" forward status? An URL for the upstream bug?
Exactly.
On Wed, May 03, 2006 at 11:56:32AM +0200, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
> So basically to trig it, you just have to set the right forward status
> for your bugs.
What is the "right" forward status? An URL for the upstream bug?
/* Steinar */
--
Homepage: http://www.sesse.net/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, ema
On May 03, Uwe Hermann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I get tons of warnings like this when I run tiger(8):
Tools like this need to generate lots of warnings or people may start
thinking that they are useless...
> Security-wise it's probably a good idea to give as few users as possible
> a valid sh
On Tue, May 02, 2006 at 09:22:45PM -0400, David Nusinow wrote:
> This library isn't truly abandoned by upstream, but essentially it's not
> getting any new development. Cairo is considered the way forward and xprint
> is widely (though not universally) considered a broken implementation.
Just out
On Wed, 03 May 2006, Ondrej Sury wrote:
> (added openldap2.2 + gnutls to SummerOfCode2006 page)
>
> Status of sending notification mails:
> [fr] PhilBat: (421, 'Too many concurrent SMTP connections; please try
> again later.')
> [en] PhilippKern, RaphaelHertzog, AlphaPapa, AlexanderSchmehl,
> Stev
51 matches
Mail list logo
