Radio amateur also doesn't go well in en_AU. Amateur radio's better.
andrew
On 4/10/06, Benjamin Seidenberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Andrew M.A. Cater wrote:
> > On Sun, Apr 09, 2006 at 09:48:48AM +1000, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
> >
> >> On Sat, Apr 08, 2006 at 04:46:10PM +0200, Bill Allombert w
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: "Jaldhar H. Vyas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: libcgi-application-plugins-perl
Version : 0.1
Upstream Author : Jaldhar H. Vyas (collector) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : N/A
* License : GPL/Artistic
Description
Hi,
At the moment, the following environment variable needs to be allowed
in order to preserve previous pbuilder behavior:
DEB_*
BUILD*
PATH
It's one possibility to ask every user to configure their sudo
configuration using visudo to allow these. Is there anything besides
documenting that pbuil
On Sun, 9 Apr 2006, Shaun Jackman wrote:
* Creative Labs Nomad Jukebox
libnjb - Creative Labs Nomad Jukebox library
gnomad2 - Manage a Creative Labs Nomad Jukebox
I have a Creative Zen touch which use these so I can take them. I would
rather work with someone to comaintain them though.
n
Andrew M.A. Cater wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 09, 2006 at 09:48:48AM +1000, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
>
>> On Sat, Apr 08, 2006 at 04:46:10PM +0200, Bill Allombert wrote:
>>
>>> Package: debian-policy
>>> Version: 3.6.2.2
>>> Severity: wishlist
>>>
>>> Background:
>>> --
>>> The menu structure
* Creative Labs Nomad Jukebox
libnjb - Creative Labs Nomad Jukebox library
gnomad2 - Manage a Creative Labs Nomad Jukebox
neutrino - GNOME shell for managing your Creative Labs Nomad Jukebox
* LaTeX
glosstex - prepare glossaries and lists of acronyms
pic2fig - convert PIC drawings to FIG drawings
Re: Andreas Metzler 2006-04-09 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > I'm not aware of any package inserting its system users into
> > /etc/aliases, and in fact, my sid chroot doesn't even have that file.
>
> They shouldn't, unless they want to receive mail for the system-user
> account.
If they _don't_ want to
On Sun, 2006-04-09 at 19:53 +0200, Andreas Metzler wrote:
> Ron Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Sun, 2006-04-09 at 12:25 +0200, Andreas Metzler wrote:
> [...]
> >> And now I am wondering whether this will break existing packages.
>
> > Maybe not *packages*, but possibly non-Debian softwa
On Sun, Apr 09, 2006 at 08:16:07PM +0200, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
> ok, done.
>
> I'd also like to alert debian-python about #351149 and #351150. Those
> were fixed in a quite short period, but Lustin did not found any
> sponsor. I don't know how hard he searched, but at least his packages
> loo
Le Dim 9 Avril 2006 19:56, Pierre Habouzit a écrit :
> Le Dim 9 Avril 2006 14:18, Kurt Roeckx a écrit :
> > On Fri, Apr 07, 2006 at 09:47:25PM +0200, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
> > > what's the policy about them ?
> > >
> > > should the packages be built for python 2.3 and 2.4 ? only for
> > > 2.3 ? on
Christoph Berg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Re: Andreas Metzler 2006-04-09 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> #1 sane packages redirect mail via /etc/aliases
>> #2 un-aliased mail to systemusers (e.g. spam) is not accepted and
>> dumped into /var/mail/systemuser but rejected immediately (at SMTP
>> time).
> I
Ron Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, 2006-04-09 at 12:25 +0200, Andreas Metzler wrote:
[...]
>> And now I am wondering whether this will break existing packages.
> Maybe not *packages*, but possibly non-Debian software.
non-Debian software, running in the Debian system-user id range?
Le Dim 9 Avril 2006 14:18, Kurt Roeckx a écrit :
> On Fri, Apr 07, 2006 at 09:47:25PM +0200, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
> > Le Ven 7 Avril 2006 20:33, Kurt Roeckx a écrit :
> > > > A lot of the others simply need to desupport old versions of
> > > > Python.
> > >
> > > python2.1 and 2.2 are supposed to
> I'm sure somebody on the new pkg-fonts-devel list will take care of this.
> If nobody else steps forward, I will, but I'll need somebody to look over
> my shoulders as I've not packaged a library before.
Neither have I..:-)
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Re: Andreas Metzler 2006-04-09 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> #1 sane packages redirect mail via /etc/aliases
> #2 un-aliased mail to systemusers (e.g. spam) is not accepted and
> dumped into /var/mail/systemuser but rejected immediately (at SMTP
> time).
I'm not aware of any package inserting its system u
This should have been fixed by udev 0.085-1 and initramfs-tools 0.53, so
unless somebody will report more problems soon I will close the bug.
--
ciao,
Marco
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
* Alexander Sack wrote:
> Any idea why libical has been removed from the archive? e.g. sunbird
> uses/includes it too, so maybe it makes sense to have it back in the
> archive.
At that time, libical was upstream-dead, had bugs and almost every project
that neede it used a customized and modified
On Fri, Apr 07, 2006 at 09:47:25PM +0200, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
> Le Ven 7 Avril 2006 20:33, Kurt Roeckx a écrit :
> > > A lot of the others simply need to desupport old versions of
> > > Python.
> >
> > python2.1 and 2.2 are supposed to be removed soon, but both
> > currently fail to build. Ther
On 9 Apr 2006, Adam Majer wrote:
> My question is, is it now appropriate to use the changelog as a
> crutch to close bugs that have nothing to do with the upload?
Adam,
Apparently you still haven't understood my changelog nor my email: I
haven't closed any bug that have nothing to do with the u
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: "Jérémy Bobbio" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
* Package name: zope-cachefu
Version : 1.0-beta
Upstream Author : Geoff Davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://plone.org/products/cachefu
* Lice
On Sun, 2006-04-09 at 12:25 +0200, Andreas Metzler wrote:
> Sam Morris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Andreas Metzler wrote:
> >> Hello,
> >> system users like proxy, sshd or identd usually do not receive any
> >> mail at all. And system-users that _do_ receive mail are usually
> >> redirected to a
On Sunday 09 April 2006 10:45, Michael Banck wrote:
> Hi,
[libuninameslist]
> On Sun, Apr 09, 2006 at 11:26:15AM +0300, K?stutis Bili?nas wrote:
> > I'd be very glad if someone of you could sponsor them for me.
>
> Thanks for your contribution to Debian, but sponsorship requests should
> go to -m
On 4/4/06, Loïc Minier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> gtk+-2.0.pc's Libs only has -lgtk, it requires gdk, atk, and cairo
> because of grep -ir #include /usr/include/gtk-2.0 | grep -v 'atk' (it
> needs at least the Cflags). Some people go as far as saying that since
> the headers are included fro
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Charles Plessy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Package name: dialign
Version : 2.1.1
Upstream Author : Burkhard Morgenstern, Said Abdeddaim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
URL : http://dialign.gobics.de/
License : LGPL
Description :
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Tristan Hill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: paythyme
Version : 20050502
Upstream Author : Thyme Software Limited <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://www.paythyme.org
* License : GPL
Programming Lang: C, Python
Desc
On Sun, Apr 09, 2006 at 11:41:34AM +0200, Alexander Sack wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 05, 2006 at 10:13:54PM +0200, Søren Boll Overgaard wrote:
> > some KDE module[2]. Additionally, libical is not currently in Debian, while
> > it
> > appears to have been at some point. So, as mentioned previously, I am a
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Tristan Hill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: thyme
Version : 2.6.4
Upstream Author : Thyme Software Limited <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://clocksoft.co.uk/development-tools/
* License : GPL, LGPL
Programming Lang
On Wed, Apr 05, 2006 at 10:13:54PM +0200, Søren Boll Overgaard wrote:
> some KDE module[2]. Additionally, libical is not currently in Debian, while it
> appears to have been at some point. So, as mentioned previously, I am at a
> loss
Any idea why libical has been removed from the archive? e.g. s
Sam Morris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Andreas Metzler wrote:
>> Hello,
>> system users like proxy, sshd or identd usually do not receive any
>> mail at all. And system-users that _do_ receive mail are usually
>> redirected to a real user by /etc/aliases.
>> I do wonder whether it would be safe t
Andreas Metzler wrote:
Hello,
system users like proxy, sshd or identd usually do not receive any
mail at all. And system-users that _do_ receive mail are usually
redirected to a real user by /etc/aliases.
I do wonder whether it would be safe to reject any mail for
system-accounts (uid <1000 || u
Hello,
system users like proxy, sshd or identd usually do not receive any
mail at all. And system-users that _do_ receive mail are usually
redirected to a real user by /etc/aliases.
I do wonder whether it would be safe to reject any mail for
system-accounts (uid <1000 || uid >63434) unless it is r
Hi,
On Sun, Apr 09, 2006 at 11:26:15AM +0300, K?stutis Bili?nas wrote:
> I'd be very glad if someone of you could sponsor them for me.
Thanks for your contribution to Debian, but sponsorship requests should
go to -mentors, no need to CC -devel.
thanks,
Michael
--
anyone else such an irssi f
ITP: #361538
* Package name: libuninameslist
Version : 20050712
Upstream Authors: George Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://fontforge.sourceforge.net
* License : BSD
Description : a library of Unicode annotation data
The library contains a large
Stephen Samuel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It seems to me that, in this case (and correct me if I'm wrong), the
> package hasn't been updated from upstream for a long time, and so the
> difference between the old version and the new version fixes the stack
> of old bugs (( even though it wasn't
34 matches
Mail list logo
