On Fri, Feb 24, 2006 at 05:40:04PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
Hi,
> FWIW, the policy on kernel patches for sarge was that if it didn't apply to
> the kernel sources we shipped, it didn't need to be included as a package in
> stable. We're obviously not shipping a 2.6.12 kernel for etch, so I
>
On Fri, Feb 24, 2006 at 05:34:44PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
Hi,
> > Yeah, it's a sort of kernel, but it's not the linux kernel... And it seems
> > the
> > kernel team is about the linux kernel, not just any kernel, isn't it?
>
> The dom0 kernel is a Linux kernel built for the Xen hypervisor
On Fri, Feb 24, 2006 at 04:22:23PM +0100, Guido Trotter wrote:
> > The debian kernel team will maintain xen images with the linux-2.6
> > source. I currently prepare both xen 3.0 and unstable packages, which
> > can be hopefully uploaded today. Maintainer will be the kernel team, as
> > there are
On Fri, Feb 24, 2006 at 06:32:10PM +0100, Guido Trotter wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 24, 2006 at 06:06:22PM +0100, Bastian Blank wrote:
> > It is a sort of kernel.
> Yeah, it's a sort of kernel, but it's not the linux kernel... And it seems the
> kernel team is about the linux kernel, not just any kernel
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: "Krzysztof Krzyzaniak (eloy)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: libalgorithm-c3-perl
Version : 0.01
Upstream Author : Stevan Little, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL :
http://mirrors.kernel.org/cpan/modules/by-module/Algorithm/Algorit
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Charles Stevenson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: mindy
Version : 2.4.1
Upstream Author : Gwydion Dylan Hackers
* URL : http://www.gwydiondylan.org/
* License : CMU
Description : A Dylan interpreter.
Mindy is
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Charles Stevenson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: gwydion-dylan-dev
Version : 2.4.1
Upstream Author : Gwydion Dylan Hackers
* URL : http://www.gwydiondylan.org/
* License : CMU
Description : Gwydion Dylan Develo
Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Please just add the recommended --host and --build makefile snippet and
> feed that to configure in *all* packages. It is better in the long run,
> and for many packages that is enough to have it cross-compile correctly.
Okay, will do.
T
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Charles Stevenson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: gwydion-dylan
Version : x.y.z
Upstream Author : Name <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://www.gwydiondylan.org/
* License : CMU
Description : The Gwydion Dylan Run
On Fri, Feb 24, 2006 at 02:09:14PM -0800, Charles Stevenson wrote:
> * Package name: libghc6-http-dev
This already exists in unstable.
See http://packages.qa.debian.org/h/haskell-http.html
Also, libghc6-http-dev is not an appropriate source package.
And finaly, I am concerned that you don't
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Charles Stevenson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: libghc6-http-dev
Version : x.y.z
Upstream Author : Name <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://www.example.org/
* License : (GPL, LGPL, BSD, MIT/X, etc.)
Description
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Charles Stevenson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: libghc6-crypto-dev
Version : x.y.z
Upstream Author : Name <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://www.example.org/
* License : (GPL, LGPL, BSD, MIT/X, etc.)
Description
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Charles Stevenson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: libghc6-newbinary-dev
Version : x.y.z
Upstream Author : Name <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://www.example.org/
* License : (GPL, LGPL, BSD, MIT/X, etc.)
Descriptio
On Fri, 24 Feb 2006, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> If config.sub is not needed, I am almost sure that --host is not needed. Nor
> is --build, or --target. They are not supposed to be able to work without
> config.sub to canonize them.
Very well, I have verified this now to be _wrong_.
Au
On Fri, 24 Feb 2006, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Frank Küster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Pjotr Kourzanov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>In a number of packages (e.g., busybox, dash and many more) the
> >> debian/rules Makefile calls ./configure without --host argument. This
> >> makes the life q
On 2/24/06, Russ Allbery <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Gustavo Franco <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > On 2/20/06, Lars Wirzenius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >> In the past six months, I've filed about 260 bug reports based on what
> >> piuparts has found. About 40% of those have been fixed so far
On Fri, 24 Feb 2006 18:04:03 +0100
Guido Trotter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The reason I think xen would be better served having its own
> committed team, repository, etc, is that it would be easier for
> anyone interested in xen to follow just mailing lists dedicated to it
> and its repository
Frank Küster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Pjotr Kourzanov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>In a number of packages (e.g., busybox, dash and many more) the
>> debian/rules Makefile calls ./configure without --host argument. This
>> makes the life quite difficult for cross-compilation - for every
>
Gustavo Franco <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On 2/20/06, Lars Wirzenius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> In the past six months, I've filed about 260 bug reports based on what
>> piuparts has found. About 40% of those have been fixed so far. Below is
>> a summary of the common problems, hopefully the
On 2/24/06, Peter Samuelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> [Gustavo Franco]
> > I think some of these problems can be detected by lintian, adding
> > some more checks there. It could bring more visibility to so common
> > errors. Comments ?
>
> A better way to phrase "Comments?" would be: "Here is
[Gustavo Franco]
> I think some of these problems can be detected by lintian, adding
> some more checks there. It could bring more visibility to so common
> errors. Comments ?
A better way to phrase "Comments?" would be: "Here is a proof-of-
concept patch to lintian to demonstrate which of these
On 2/20/06, Lars Wirzenius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> In the past six months, I've filed about 260 bug reports based on what
> piuparts has found. About 40% of those have been fixed so far. Below is
> a summary of the common problems, hopefully the list will help everyone
> to find and especially
On Fri, 24 Feb 2006, Frank Küster wrote:
> Per Olofsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Frank Küster:
> >> Were can I read up on how and why I should do this?
> >
> > /usr/share/doc/autotools-dev/README.Debian.gz
>
> Thanks - but I think this should be documented at a more visible place.
> If it's
Hello,
On Fri, Feb 24, 2006 at 10:38:24AM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
> [Ccing maintainers of mdns stuff, please followup to debian-devel]
>
> With avahi in unstable we seem to have a fairly capable set of
> zeroconf/mdns tools in Debian now, albeit with some holes. There are for
> example some thing
Lazy to attend exam or classes?
We have Diplomas, Degrees, Masters' or Doctorate
to choose from any field of your interest.
Only 2 weeks require to delivers the prestigious non-accredited
universities paper to your doorstep.
Do not hesitate to give us a call today!
1-484-693-8861
n7b
--
T
Michelle Konzack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> The first one load a BLOB/Firmware into a Hardware which runs
> ON the Hardware and not in the OS.
The OS *all* runs "ON the Hardware".
But Debian's determination is about what we distribute. We don't
distribute non-free things as part of Debian ma
Adam McKenna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Fri, Feb 24, 2006 at 09:56:46AM -0800, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
>> I think this is clearly incorrect. The DFSG and the SC do not say
>> anything about the requirements for main that I can see.
>>
>> And it is the *job* of the tech-ctte to resolve d
On Fri, Feb 24, 2006 at 09:56:46AM -0800, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
> I think this is clearly incorrect. The DFSG and the SC do not say
> anything about the requirements for main that I can see.
>
> And it is the *job* of the tech-ctte to resolve disputes.
I don't enjoy speaking with you, and I
Adam McKenna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Thu, Feb 23, 2006 at 01:30:25PM -0800, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
>> Help me out then. You seemed to suggest that not putting ndiswrapper
>> in main would be to "ignore rules that are very clearly laid out in
>> the SC and DFSG."
>
> I suggested that
Per Olofsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Frank Küster:
>> Were can I read up on how and why I should do this?
>
> /usr/share/doc/autotools-dev/README.Debian.gz
Thanks - but I think this should be documented at a more visible place.
If it's not the policy, developer's reference.
Regards, Frank
-
On Fri, Feb 24, 2006 at 06:06:22PM +0100, Bastian Blank wrote:
Hi,
> It is a sort of kernel.
Yeah, it's a sort of kernel, but it's not the linux kernel... And it seems the
kernel team is about the linux kernel, not just any kernel, isn't it?
> Just to say, how connected xen to linux is:
>
> Fo
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>on 2: we would need a whole spam-mail including all headers so we can
> find charakteristika to filter on, so i now take all nominated
> postings, and try to find patterns with some black
> shell-magic.
Is "sa-learn --spam
Hi,
Joey Hess wrote:
With avahi in unstable we seem to have a fairly capable set of
zeroconf/mdns tools in Debian now, albeit with some holes. There are for
example some things like mod_dnssd that are not packaged yet and some
interesting patches that aren't applied to some apps. And adding mdn
On Fri, Feb 24, 2006 at 06:06:22PM +0100, Bastian Blank wrote:
> I won't reject the help of volunteers but I strongly think that the
> kernel team needs to have its hands on them.
How many members of the kernel team are planning to do active work on
Xen, kernel and userspace?
Greetings
Marc
--
On Fri, Feb 24, 2006 at 04:56:35PM +0100, Guido Trotter wrote:
> On the other hand Xen is not the
> kernel, so isn't it better if there is a team for it, even if strongly
> connected
> with the kernel one?
It is a sort of kernel. And no, I don't think i
Frank Küster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Were can I read up on how and why I should do this? AFAIR, the policy
/usr/share/doc/autotools-dev/README.Debian.gz has advice on how to run
configure scripts sanely.
--
Aaron M. Ucko, KB1CJC (amu at alum.mit.edu, ucko at debian.org)
Finger [EMAIL PRO
On Fri, Feb 24, 2006 at 05:41:53PM +0100, Isaac Clerencia wrote:
Hi,
> I agree. I just would like to ask that, please, don't disband just because of
> disagreement with the kernel team, but try to cooperate anyway.
>
I don't think we want to! And I hope there is no disagreement (we still don't
Frank Küster:
> Were can I read up on how and why I should do this?
/usr/share/doc/autotools-dev/README.Debian.gz
--
Pelle
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Fri, 24 Feb 2006, Bastian Blank wrote:
On Fri, Feb 24, 2006 at 04:54:24PM +0100, Julien Danjou wrote:
As far as I understand, you will just maintain Xen kernel images. (for
dom0 only ?).
No. The kernel team will maintain xen (in variants 3.0 and unstable).
Bastian, as far as I know, you
On 2/24/06, Sjoerd Simons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 24, 2006 at 10:38:24AM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
> > [Ccing maintainers of mdns stuff, please followup to debian-devel]
> >
> > With avahi in unstable we seem to have a fairly capable set of
> > zeroconf/mdns tools in Debian now, albe
Frederic Peters a écrit :
> Joey Hess wrote:
>
>>If people agree let me know and I can do the standard alioth dance.
>
> I would be interested in participating in such a group.
>
I'm interested too.
Regards,
--
Jérémie
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On Friday, 24 February 2006 17:34, Guido Trotter wrote:
> Yes, we could, of course... But on the other hand I believe that the xen
> hypervisor and userspace tools are actually different from the linux kernel
> (as they support multiple kernels and operating systems), even though the
> linux kernel
Joey Hess wrote:
> If people agree let me know and I can do the standard alioth dance.
I would be interested in participating in such a group.
Regards,
Frederic
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Fri, Feb 24, 2006 at 05:20:17PM +0100, Isaac Clerencia wrote:
Hi,
> Well, if the kernel team answers "left to the kernel team" and you close the
> alioth project, I guess you can always move into the kernel team ;)
>
Yes, we could, of course... But on the other hand I believe that the xen
h
On Fri, Feb 24, 2006 at 10:38:24AM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
> [Ccing maintainers of mdns stuff, please followup to debian-devel]
>
> With avahi in unstable we seem to have a fairly capable set of
> zeroconf/mdns tools in Debian now, albeit with some holes. There are for
> example some things like m
Pjotr Kourzanov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Dear developers,
>
>In a number of packages (e.g., busybox, dash and many more) the
> debian/rules Makefile calls ./configure without --host argument. This
> makes the life quite difficult for cross-compilation - for every
> such package I need to a
On Friday, 24 February 2006 16:56, Guido Trotter wrote:
> So... what do you think we can do now? Can we join our efforts on xen or
> you strongly think it should be left to the kernel team, and we should just
> close the alioth project?
Well, if the kernel team answers "left to the kernel team" and
On Fri, Feb 24, 2006 at 05:05:33PM +0100, Bastian Blank wrote:
> No. The kernel team will maintain xen (in variants 3.0 and unstable).
Okay, I misunderstood.
You will maintain userland tools too ?
Is you work is already finished and available somewhere ?
Right, I am juste a little disapointed. :)
On Fri, Feb 24, 2006 at 04:54:24PM +0100, Julien Danjou wrote:
> As far as I understand, you will just maintain Xen kernel images. (for
> dom0 only ?).
No. The kernel team will maintain xen (in variants 3.0 and unstable).
Bastian
--
Vulcans worship peace above all.
-- McCoy, "Re
Hello Sven,
Sorry for the late reponse, but I am currently Off-Line.
Am 2006-02-13 15:54:23, schrieb Sven Luther:
> Like the mips binary which is part of the tg3 (or some other of those) driver
> and uploaded to to the mips core on the card in question ?
>
> Does that mean that we will also di
On Fri, Feb 24, 2006 at 04:54:24PM +0100, Julien Danjou wrote:
Hi,
> As far as I understand, you will just maintain Xen kernel images. (for
> dom0 only ?).
Actually I think he meant the hypervisors too... Anyway I also think that if the
kernel team is going to maintain the kernel images there sh
On Fri, Feb 24, 2006 at 04:37:56PM +0100, Bastian Blank wrote:
Hi,
> > This is great! In the meantime we are working on uploading xen 3.0 to
> > unstable,
> > and our packages I think are almost ready too!
>
> This is insufficient. Either maintain both 3.0 and unstable or none. In
> the meantim
On Fri, Feb 24, 2006 at 04:37:56PM +0100, Bastian Blank wrote:
> This is insufficient. Either maintain both 3.0 and unstable or none. In
> the meantime, the kernel team will maintain both.
As far as I understand, you will just maintain Xen kernel images. (for
dom0 only ?).
We just have to duplicat
On Fri, 24 Feb 2006 at 03:30:55 -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
Hi!
> Bastian Blank, a member of the Debian kernel team, is looking at integrating
> XenoLinux builds into the official linux-2.6 package. I think that's a much
> better option, and would strongly encourage anyone interested in Xen
> p
[Ccing maintainers of mdns stuff, please followup to debian-devel]
With avahi in unstable we seem to have a fairly capable set of
zeroconf/mdns tools in Debian now, albeit with some holes. There are for
example some things like mod_dnssd that are not packaged yet and some
interesting patches that
On Fri, Feb 24, 2006 at 04:22:23PM +0100, Guido Trotter wrote:
> This is great! In the meantime we are working on uploading xen 3.0 to
> unstable,
> and our packages I think are almost ready too!
This is insufficient. Either maintain both 3.0 and unstable or none. In
the meantime, the kernel team
Bastian Blank wrote:
Hi!
> The debian kernel team will maintain xen images with the linux-2.6
> source. I currently prepare both xen 3.0 and unstable packages, which
> can be hopefully uploaded today. Maintainer will be the kernel team, as
> there are heavy dependencies between xen and the kernel
Dear developers,
In a number of packages (e.g., busybox, dash and many more) the
debian/rules Makefile calls ./configure without --host argument. This
makes the life quite difficult for cross-compilation - for every
such package I need to add --host=$(DEB_HOST_GNU_TYPE) to every
configure inv
Hi,
* Cord Beermann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-02-24 14:31]:
> Hallo! Du (Cord Beermann) hast geschrieben:
>
> >The idea of having a reporting address is good, i'll will announce one
> >in the next days and then lets see what happens.
>
> ok, here it is: (alpha release, lets see what happens and i
Hallo! Du (Cord Beermann) hast geschrieben:
>The idea of having a reporting address is good, i'll will announce one
>in the next days and then lets see what happens.
ok, here it is: (alpha release, lets see what happens and if it is
useful.)
If you get spam via our lists, BOUNCE[1] it to
[EMAIL
Am Freitag, 24. Februar 2006 11:02 schrieb Matthew Grant:
> Ralph,
Hi Matthew,
> I am a Debian Maintainer who is seriously considering getting Xen into
> Debian and Ubuntu.
>
> I have been installing xen-unstable.hg from source on my AMD 64 and have
> been impressed with its relative stability.
>
Don Armstrong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Thu, 23 Feb 2006, Frank Küster wrote:
>> Don Armstrong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > On Wed, 22 Feb 2006, Frank Küster wrote:
>> >> Adeodato Simó <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >> > Correct, so one would put in foo.postrm:
>> >> >
>> >> > rmdir
On Fri, Feb 24, 2006 at 11:02:57PM +1300, Matthew Grant wrote:
> I am a Debian Maintainer who is seriously considering getting Xen into
> Debian and Ubuntu.
The debian kernel team will maintain xen images with the linux-2.6
source. I currently prepare both xen 3.0 and unstable packages, which
can
* Matthew Grant wrote:
> We would need the Debian security team to give us access to a patch
> repository for all the Linux security patches.
Those patches are in the kernel svn repository.
http://svn.debian.org/wsvn/kernel/dists/sarge-security/kernel/source/kernel-source-2.6.8-2.6.8/debian/patch
On Fri, Feb 24, 2006 at 11:02:57PM +1300, Matthew Grant wrote:
> I am a Debian Maintainer who is seriously considering getting Xen into
> Debian and Ubuntu.
> I have been installing xen-unstable.hg from source on my AMD 64 and have
> been impressed with its relative stability.
> I am prepared
Ralph,
I am a Debian Maintainer who is seriously considering getting Xen into
Debian and Ubuntu.
I have been installing xen-unstable.hg from source on my AMD 64 and have
been impressed with its relative stability.
I am prepared to sponsor your packages into Debian if we can get them
cleaned up
Hallo! Du (Nico Golde) hast geschrieben:
>At the moment the spam-report.pl script uses:
>
>
>
>To identify the message, this wouldn't work with a MUA so the idea came
>to my mind was to identify the Mail with the message-ID.
>Paskal Hakim asked what happens if someone fakes the message-ID in the
Michael Gilbert wrote:
> I've read a lot about the binary incompatibility concern between
> Debian and Ubuntu.
It is a design decision of ubuntu to ensure source code compatibility
only. Binary compatibility to debian/stable is not a release goal.
> I think that Ubuntu's motivation to provide the
On Thu, 23 Feb 2006, Michael Gilbert wrote:
> First of all, I think it is useful to analyze Ubuntu's motivation --
> releasing well-integrated bleeding-edge software. The easiest way to
> accomplish this goal is by branching from sid. This means that Ubuntu
> libraries differ from the stable Debi
Hallo! Du (Blars Blarson) hast geschrieben:
>The lists.debian.org spam "button" doesn't have much immediate effect.
correct, but we are working on it.
Cord
--
http://lists.debian.org
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMA
70 matches
Mail list logo
