On Wed, Feb 08, 2006 at 08:58:39PM -0800, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
> Anthony Towns writes:
> > In any event, there is in fact a meaning in that case: the 3:1
> > suerpmajority would still apply to issues where the majority of developers
> > felt that the proposed resolution did contradict the so
Anthony Towns writes:
> In any event, there is in fact a meaning in that case: the 3:1
> suerpmajority would still apply to issues where the majority of developers
> felt that the proposed resolution did contradict the social contract or
> DFSG -- and that the social contract/DFSG happened to be
On Wed, Feb 08, 2006 at 07:56:45PM -0800, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
> Nick Phillips <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > documents. It clearly asserts otherwise, and one might assume that
> > developers voting for it would agree with that. If it won a majority,
> > it would therefore seem to be the cas
Nick Phillips <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> documents. It clearly asserts otherwise, and one might assume that
> developers voting for it would agree with that. If it won a majority,
> it would therefore seem to be the case that the majority of developers
> agreed with it. In which case those asse
On Wed, Feb 08, 2006 at 11:50:51AM -0500, Raul Miller wrote:
> On 2/8/06, Nick Phillips <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > The GR as amended might appear to contradict the Social Contract, or the
> > DFSG, but it certainly *does not* modify them, and hence cannot be said to
> > require a supermajority.
On Wed, Feb 08, 2006 at 08:47:36PM +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 08, 2006 at 09:21:36PM +1300, Nick Phillips wrote:
> > What it says, for those who can't (or can't be bothered) to read it is
> > essentially this:
> >
> > We will include GFDL'd works that have no bad bits unless we h
I thought I saw some stuff on their web page about helix being GPL now.
Not so?
Britton
On Wed, 08 Feb 2006 22:14:39 +0100, "Daniel Baumann"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> Britton Kerin wrote:
> > is anyone working on packaging helix player? I'd like to see
> > RealPlayer packaged also, though it
Britton Kerin wrote:
> is anyone working on packaging helix player? I'd like to see
> RealPlayer packaged also, though it would have to go in
> non-free of course.
I'm working on the rest of the helix-tools and real-player too. I'm in
contact with Real to fix the helix-player license and to get a
On Wed, Feb 08, 2006 at 09:21:36PM +1300, Nick Phillips wrote:
> What it says, for those who can't (or can't be bothered) to read it is
> essentially this:
>
> We will include GFDL'd works that have no bad bits unless we have
> permission to remove them.
>
> Or rewritten slightly more clearly (
On Wed, Feb 08, 2006 at 11:18:10AM -0900, Britton Kerin wrote:
>
> is anyone working on packaging helix player? I'd like to see
> RealPlayer packaged also, though it would have to go in
> non-free of course.
>
> I saw an old resolved RFP for helix, but searching in synaptic
> doesn't show up any
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Marco Nenciarini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: wengophone
Version : 0.99+svn4179
Upstream Author : Wengo SAS
* URL : http://dev.openwengo.com/
* License : GPL with exception for ssl linking
Description : A fre
is anyone working on packaging helix player? I'd like to see
RealPlayer packaged also, though it would have to go in
non-free of course.
I saw an old resolved RFP for helix, but searching in synaptic
doesn't show up any matches for helix.
Britton
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTE
On 2/8/06, Nick Phillips <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The GR as amended might appear to contradict the Social Contract, or the
> DFSG, but it certainly *does not* modify them, and hence cannot be said to
> require a supermajority.
This comment seems insincere.
If the GR is adopted by Debian, ther
HI all!
When I go to
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?pkg=info
it tells me
... to the source package texinfo's bug page ...
But when I go to
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?pkg=texlive-base-bin
I don't see te link to the source package.
Furtherm
Hi Noèl,
thanks in advance. I would have started on that myself, but in our shop
time is a problem...
cheers,
wjl aka Wolfgang Lonien
--
Key ID 0x728D9BD0 - public key available at wwwkeys.de.pgp.net
'94 Honda NTV still running on fuel -
everything else here proudly runs Debian GNU/Linux
--
T
Hai ,
I want to create a debian based Live cd ... From the nete I got the tool
called "mklivecd " .. Its a deb package ..I have installed on my system..
But I didnt get excat procedure to build a live cd with my own root file
system ( may the host root file system) ...
>From whr can I get the sp
Best stock for Year 2006 - read the story and you will s e e f o r y o u
r s e l f.
Breaking news alert issue - big news coming.
A $1,000 dollar investment could yield a $4,000 dollar profit in
just ONE trade if you trade out at the top.
The stocks we profile show a significant increase in st
On Thu, Jan 19, 2006 at 09:11:11PM -0500, Christopher Martin wrote:
> The important question here is one of legitimacy. Who exactly has the
> authority to determine these matters of interpretation? Specifically, who
> decides what is in accordance with the DFSG? The developers do, through
> GRs
18 matches
Mail list logo
