Nick Phillips <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > documents. It clearly asserts otherwise, and one might assume that > developers voting for it would agree with that. If it won a majority, > it would therefore seem to be the case that the majority of developers > agreed with it. In which case those asserting that it needed > supermajority wouldn't have a leg to stand on. So we'd be in a right > mess.
Clearly if the 3:1 supermajority requirement means anything, it cannot be obviated merely by a simple majority declaring "there is no contradiction". Thomas -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
