Hi!
I've just tried to upgrade my testing distro, and aptitude is happy to
remove gnome and all its dependents because the required version of
sound-juicer has not migrated yet. Does anyone know why?
Julian
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trou
On Tue, 13 Sep 2005 17:50:50 +0200, Steffen Joeris
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>You can ask for support at the credativ GmbH.
>
>There are several DebianDevelopers, look at www.credativ.com .
>Do not hesitate to contact us for questions.
Just for the record: Credativ is surely a good company, but t
On Tue, 13 Sep 2005, David Moreno Garza wrote:
On Tue, 2005-09-13 at 09:35 +0800, Guanglei Xiong wrote:
I am wondering if anyone can help me to check this package. Thanks!
debian-devel mailing list is not the best place to ask this kind of
questions.
You'd get more answers on debian-mentors.
David Moreno Garza @ 2005-09-13 (Tuesday), 18:06 (-0500)
> Talking with adn on IRC, I've decided to launch an script that will
> close every opened ITP and RFP bug on the BTS with a lifetime greater
> than 600 days by tonight
Wouldn't it make more sense to close bugs that hasn't recieved more info
Benjamin Mesing <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> After having read this - wouldn't it be easier to report the user
> doing the spamming, and simply reverting all changes done by this
> user.
There are a limited number of wiki which have this functionality.
Neither the current nor the new wiki have t
Thomas Bushnell BSG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> There is no good reason to close old RFPs unless the upstream source
> has diseappeared.
> Old ITPs should be turned into RFPs, not closed.
I don't agree. If there's no current interest in having the package
created, having the bug open actually
Nathanael Nerode <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>There is no good reason to close old RFPs unless the upstream source
>>has diseappeared.
>
> The spectacular amount of clutter they provide -- rendering the wnpp bug list
> unreadable unless you ignore them all -- combined
On Tue, 2005-09-13 at 09:35 +0800, Guanglei Xiong wrote:
> I am wondering if anyone can help me to check this package. Thanks!
debian-devel mailing list is not the best place to ask this kind of
questions.
You'd get more answers on debian-mentors.
--
David Moreno Garza <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | ht
On Tue, 2005-09-13 at 19:47 -0700, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
> There is no good reason to close old RFPs unless the upstream source
> has diseappeared.
>
> Old ITPs should be turned into RFPs, not closed.
Well, actually the wnpp bugs are probably the dirtiest part on the BTS:
Understanding dirti
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>There is no good reason to close old RFPs unless the upstream source
>has diseappeared.
The spectacular amount of clutter they provide -- rendering the wnpp bug list
unreadable unless you ignore them all -- combined with their total
uselessness? Seems like a pair of go
Como consigo lista de mails de uruguay y/o del
mundo?
Como te lo pago?
Soy de paysandu uruguay
Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña wrote:
It would be really great if other DDs could review the FAQ fully and
point out:
a- missing FAQ items, that is, things that people commonly ask about Debian
that are not there and we should write about.
I am taking the liberty to write this even though
David Moreno Garza <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Talking with adn on IRC, I've decided to launch an script that will
> close every opened ITP and RFP bug on the BTS with a lifetime greater
> than 600 days by tonight (or if anything goes wrong -I have an exam
> tomorrow noon-, by tomorrow night).
On Wed, 14 Sep 2005, AdeodatoSimó wrote:
> shlibs:Depends=libasound2 (>> 1.0.9), libc6 (>= 2.3.5-1), libfreetype6
> (>= 2.1.5-1), libglu1-xorg | libglu1, libmodplug0c2 (>= 1:0.7-4.1), libogg0
> (>= 1.1.2), libpng12-0 (>= 1.2.8rel), libspeex1, libtheora0, libvorbis0a (>=
> 1.1.0), libxext6 |
Hello,
(question for d-d in the last paragraph)
libxine1 ships lots of plugins; if one allows dh_shlibdeps run over
all of them, one gets a pretty big Depends line (though *not*
unbearable in a desktop, IMHO). To avoid this, the maintainer lowers
some of these dependencies to Recommends
On Sun, Sep 11, 2005 at 06:12:02PM -0500, Peter Samuelson wrote:
>
> [Justin Pryzby]
> > In which case, should the shared libraries go into a separate package?
>
> I wouldn't bother unless there are multiple binary packages already
> which will require the library, and they don't already depend o
[ Note: This mail was originally sent to -doc, as I have only received one
answer so far I'm resending to -devel in order to get more people to help out
with this documentation effort ]
The Debian FAQ [0] has been, unfortunately, unmaintained for quite some time
and needs a thorough review.
I u
On Tue, 2005-09-13 at 11:02 +0200, Henning Makholm wrote:
> > But my intention was not to read the whole list and do this by hand!
> > This should be done by the same script which sends the sem automated
> > mails to the BTS.
>
> As there is a consensus that it is a good idea to close long-inactiv
Scripsit "Joe Smith" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> From: "Henning Makholm" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>What I don't understand is that the maintainer script blithely went on
>>doing its thing after addgroup failed the first time. The postinst
>>does have an -e flag -- what is happening here?
> Umm... does addg
On Tuesday 13 September 2005 20:36, Mohammed Adnène Trojette wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 13, 2005, Christoph Berg wrote:
> > Maybe some usertags-hack?
>
> That is exactly what we are working on, with Clément Stenac and Marc
> 'HE' Brockschmidt. Here[1] is a list of tags we intend to use.
>
> [1] http://wi
Hi,
* Mohammed Adnène Trojette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-09-13 22:21]:
> On Tue, Sep 13, 2005, Christoph Berg wrote:
> > Maybe some usertags-hack?
>
> That is exactly what we are working on, with Clément Stenac and Marc
> 'HE' Brockschmidt. Here[1] is a list of tags we intend to use.
>
> [1] http
* Wouter Verhelst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [050913 21:35]:
[ vote for RFPs ]
> > Currently everyone interested in such a package could send a "me too"
> > mail to the report...
> That isn't going to do much good if nobody ever reads them.
>
> For a "me too" thing to be useful, it needs to be immediatel
- Original Message -
From: "Henning Makholm" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Newsgroups: gmane.linux.debian.devel.general
Sent: Tuesday, September 13, 2005 6:41 AM
Subject: Re: Fw: Bug#328053: configure on install problem: cannot add user
while name_regex don't match username "sympa"
Scripsit
On Tue, Sep 13, 2005 at 08:06:22PM +0200, Alexander Schmehl wrote:
> * David Moreno Garza <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [050913 19:11]:
> > > Perhaps we should have some voting mechanism, to let users tell us
> > > which missing packages are most wanted?
> > Probably something like a rfp-request-seconded tag
Thanks to the work already done for sarge, it will be possible to have
quite some clean libpng packages for etch. A little remains to do:
1. Removal of the entire libpng source package. All packages still
depending on it will have to be rebuilt.
2. Removal of libpng3-dev. It will
On Tue, Sep 13, 2005 at 08:31:55PM +0200, Enrico Zini wrote:
>
> Applications linked with libstdc++5 and using GTK segfault when using
> SCIM[1] as input method, and neither GTK nor SCIM nor the apps seem to
> be to blame.
>
> Since various days I've been experiencing weird and annoying crashes
Hello,
Applications linked with libstdc++5 and using GTK segfault when using
SCIM[1] as input method, and neither GTK nor SCIM nor the apps seem to
be to blame.
Since various days I've been experiencing weird and annoying crashes on
openoffice and epiphany. I was kind of ignoring them, but now
On Tue, Sep 13, 2005 at 09:50:00PM +1000, Brian May wrote:
> > "Steve" == Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Steve> On Sun, Sep 11, 2005 at 09:46:26PM -0700, Thomas Bushnell
> Steve> BSG wrote:
> >> I don't care about the callback. The package maintainers have
> >> t
I got an advice that it is not ok to send advertising material over the
ML. Sorry for that I only wanted to help.
Greetings
Steffen
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: Andreas Metzler in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> cu and- no idea whether "with the version number rolled back"
> only refers to the Debian package version or the actual
> sourcecode. -reas
The internal version was also rolled back, at least for the
mozilla-firefox update.
*** 1.0
Andrew Pollock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The debian/changelog for dhcp3 has a malformed first entry, which I'd like
> to fix if possible.
> I'm trying to determine the date and uploader of dhcpd (0.5.5-1) to
> experimental, sometime around or before September 1996.
> Is there anything useful s
> "Radu Spineanu" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> At least something that has the ability to put ITPs,RFPs in separate
>> pages,
>
> You mean like http://www.us.debian.org/devel/wnpp/?
>
Yes, something like that. But change the information shown on each page
depending of the type of wnpp entry.
Fo
* David Moreno Garza <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [050913 19:11]:
> > Perhaps we should have some voting mechanism, to let users tell us
> > which missing packages are most wanted?
> Probably something like a rfp-request-seconded tag on the bug could
> work. Although rfp-request is somehow redundant.
Curre
Matthew Garrett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> (From debian-security-announce)
> Martin Schulze <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Several problems have been discovered in Mozilla, the we browser of
>> the Mozilla suite. Since the usual praxis of backporting apparently
>> does not work for this package,
On Tue, 2005-09-13 at 19:36 +0200, Mohammed Adnène Trojette wrote:
> [1] http://wiki.debian.org/WNPPBugsTagging
This is a great work, thanks.
Is there any plan to start using it and tagging?
Cheers,
--
David Moreno Garza <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | http://www.damog.net/
<[EMAIL P
On Tue, Sep 13, 2005, Christoph Berg wrote:
> Maybe some usertags-hack?
That is exactly what we are working on, with Clément Stenac and Marc
'HE' Brockschmidt. Here[1] is a list of tags we intend to use.
[1] http://wiki.debian.org/WNPPBugsTagging
Please no Cc:, I read the list.
--
Mohammed Adn
On Tue, 2005-09-13 at 19:06 +0200, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt wrote:
> > Maybe it would a good idea to create a new web interface for the wnpp bugs.
> > At least something that has the ability to put ITPs,RFPs in separate
> > pages,
>
> You mean like http://www.us.debian.org/devel/wnpp/?
But the prop
Re: David Moreno Garza in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Probably something like a rfp-request-seconded tag on the bug could
> work. Although rfp-request is somehow redundant.
Maybe some usertags-hack? But then, the people who know how that works
could as well package the RFP themselves...
Christoph
--
[
On Tue, 2005-09-13 at 13:05 +0200, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
> Perhaps we should have some voting mechanism, to let users tell us
> which missing packages are most wanted?
Probably something like a rfp-request-seconded tag on the bug could
work. Although rfp-request is somehow redundant.
Cheers,
"Radu Spineanu" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Do you have a proposal for a better way on how our users can request /
>> suggest software to be packaged?
>>
>> I don't think RFPs per se are useless - actually I have a list of some
>> 20 RFPs I would like to take a deeper look to, as soon as I have
On Sep 13, 2005, at 5:19 AM, Benjamin Mesing wrote:
After having read this - wouldn't it be easier to report the user
doing
the spamming, and simply reverting all changes done by this user
(probably the users spamming will not have add valuable content)?
Who is in charge of the wiki, I would
> http://wiki.debian.net/?spamInWikiPages
> http://wiki.debian.net/?DealingWithSpam
After having read this - wouldn't it be easier to report the user doing
the spamming, and simply reverting all changes done by this user
(probably the users spamming will not have add valuable content)?
Who is in
You can ask for support at the credativ GmbH.
There are several DebianDevelopers, look at www.credativ.com .
Do not hesitate to contact us for questions.
Greetings
Steffen
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
On Tue, Sep 13, 2005 at 02:35:18PM +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> (From debian-security-announce)
> Martin Schulze <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Several problems have been discovered in Mozilla, the we browser of
> > the Mozilla suite. Since the usual praxis of backporting apparently
> > does
On Tue, Sep 13, 2005 at 11:21:21AM -0400, Shawn (Shu Xiang) Yu wrote:
> Where can I find a company that provide better developer support on Debian.
> We are trying to find a company and pay fees to get support if we have
> problem during develop code under the Linux. We need them to provide the
>
Sorry. I need to ask one more question.
Where can I find a company that provide better developer support on Debian.
We are trying to find a company and pay fees to get support if we have
problem during develop code under the Linux. We need them to provide the
development tools.
Thanks!!!
--
T
Alexander Schmehl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi!
>
> * Brian Nelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [050913 02:46]:
> [ long RFPs ]
>> Or don't even open RFP bugs in the first place because they're
>> thoroughly useless?
>
> Do you have a proposal for a better way on how our users can request /
> suggest s
On Tue, Sep 13, 2005 at 03:01:24PM +0100, Steve Kemp wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 13, 2005 at 09:25:22AM -0400, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
>
> > I am concerned that a version of Mozilla claiming to be an earlier will
> > eventually break user-installed extensions.
>
> ..
>
> > There really has to be
> Hi!
>
> Do you have a proposal for a better way on how our users can request /
> suggest software to be packaged?
>
> I don't think RFPs per se are useless - actually I have a list of some
> 20 RFPs I would like to take a deeper look to, as soon as I have some
> time - it's just that it's difficu
On Tue, Sep 13, 2005 at 09:25:22AM -0400, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
> I am concerned that a version of Mozilla claiming to be an earlier will
> eventually break user-installed extensions.
..
> There really has to be a better way.
The time to make suggestions was probably when Joey asked f
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Michael Hanke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: kbibtex
Version : 0.1.1
Upstream Author : Thomas Fischer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://www.unix-ag.uni-kl.de/~fischer/kbibtex/
* License : GPL
Description : Bib
(From debian-security-announce)
Martin Schulze <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Several problems have been discovered in Mozilla, the we browser of
> the Mozilla suite. Since the usual praxis of backporting apparently
> does not work for this package, this update is basically version
> 1.7.10 with t
On Tue, Sep 13, 2005 at 02:55:40PM +0200, Martin Schulze wrote:
> --
> Debian Security Advisory DSA 810-1 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://www.debian.org/security/ Martin Schulze
> Sept
On Tue, 13 Sep 2005 12:41:07 +0200
Henning Makholm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Scripsit Stefan Hornburg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> > When I install sympa, it fails adding this user. Here are the messages :
> > Setting up sympa (4.1.5-2) ...
> > Adding system group: sympa.
> > addgroup: Please enter
Hello Shawn,
* Shawn (Shu Xiang) Yu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-09-13 14:40]:
> Sorry. Could you let me know where I can get help for Debian user?
Take a look at http://lists.debian.org/users.html and choose
the user list in your preferred language.
Regards Nico
--
Nico Golde - JAB: [EMAIL PROTECT
Sorry. Could you let me know where I can get help for Debian user?
Thanks.
- Original Message -
From: "Roberto C. Sanchez" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Tuesday, September 13, 2005 8:32 AM
Subject: Re: C compiler
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsu
On Tue, Sep 13, 2005 at 08:26:40AM -0400, Shawn (Shu Xiang) Yu wrote:
> Hello,
>
Hi,
Please don't hijack threads. Start a new thread by sending a new
message.
> I am new here. I just installed Debian on my system. When I try to compile a
> c code with gcc, I got error says "undefined reference
On Tue, 2005-09-13 at 08:26 -0400, Shawn (Shu Xiang) Yu wrote:
Hello,
I am new here. I just installed Debian on my system. When I try to compile a
c code with gcc, I got error says "undefined reference to 'sin'". This is
the same code run on Windows.
Anyone know how to fix it.
From "man
Hello,
I am new here. I just installed Debian on my system. When I try to compile a
c code with gcc, I got error says "undefined reference to 'sin'". This is
the same code run on Windows.
Anyone know how to fix it.
Thanks.
Shawn
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject o
On Sep 13, Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Oh, BTW, gnutls isn't a complete 100% solution either, IIRC packages
> exist that require openssl because the license is GPL incompatible.
No, it has been LGPL'ed since a long time.
--
ciao,
Marco
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
> "Steve" == Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Steve> On Sun, Sep 11, 2005 at 09:46:26PM -0700, Thomas Bushnell
Steve> BSG wrote:
>> I don't care about the callback. The package maintainers have
>> the job of deciding whether the packages implement the same ABI
>>
Здравствуйте!
Раговорный курс английского поможет вам не потерятся в любой ситуации.
Сегодня со скидками!!!
Звоните в Москве:
105-5186
два-три-восемь-три-три-восемь-шесть
Anna Baba
Grimshaw Gonord Gross
Shutov Thurston Paul Markin
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subj
[Alexander Schmehl]
> I don't think RFPs per se are useless - actually I have a list of
> some 20 RFPs I would like to take a deeper look to, as soon as I
> have some time - it's just that it's difficult to look at so many
> wnpps.
I agree. There are packages I would like to assist into the archi
Scripsit Stefan Hornburg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> When I install sympa, it fails adding this user. Here are the messages :
> Setting up sympa (4.1.5-2) ...
> Adding system group: sympa.
> addgroup: Please enter a username matching the regular expression configured
> via the name_regex configuration v
Hi!
* Brian Nelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [050913 02:46]:
[ long RFPs ]
> Or don't even open RFP bugs in the first place because they're
> thoroughly useless?
Do you have a proposal for a better way on how our users can request /
suggest software to be packaged?
I don't think RFPs per se are useles
* Anibal Monsalve Salazar [Tue, 13 Sep 2005 20:21:11 +1000]:
> Hello,
> I've been trying to fix #316466 without much success.
> I've already looked into the openssh package and implemented
> something similar to handling of ssh/use_old_init_script. However,
> I can get it to work after many ite
Hello,
I've been trying to fix #316466 without much success.
I've already looked into the openssh package and implemented
something similar to handling of ssh/use_old_init_script. However,
I can get it to work after many iterations.
How can I get dpkg not to stop bpalogin during an upgrade?
Th
I had exactly the same problem with my wiki from a Chinese guy running a
crawler script which posted links to his own site.
Just add the word "spammed" to the top of the spammed page which can be
searched for and fixed.
On 13/9/2005, "Carlos Parra Camargo" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> The us
* Bill Allombert [Mon, 12 Sep 2005 17:39:36 +0200]:
> Some distributions/people rebuild a lot of Debian packages from Debian
> source while making no change to the source. While this is technically
> a binNMU they seldom bother to bump the version, which lead to two debs
> files with different con
On Tue, 13 Sep 2005 10:04:57 +0100
Stephen Gran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This one time, at band camp, Stefan Hornburg said:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I just received this bug report and would like to ask for comments on how to
> > handle this problem. There are enough other packages out there with
Scripsit Nico Golde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> * Lars Wirzenius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-09-13 10:37]:
>> There was a discussion about closing old RFPs on -project in the middle
>> of July (around the 13th, I think). I really should get acting on the
>> consensus of that thread and close the old RFPs.
This one time, at band camp, Stefan Hornburg said:
> Hello,
>
> I just received this bug report and would like to ask for comments on how to
> handle this problem. There are enough other packages out there with a similar
> setup.
>
> Ciao
> Racke
>
> Begin forwarded message:
>
> Date: Tu
On Sep 13, Olaf van der Spek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > There isn't? I thought this has been standard GPL lore for a very long
> > time - if you link to an *interface* which has a GPL-compliant
> > implementation, it does not matter if you also are incidentally runtime-
> > compatible with a
On Tuesday, September 13, 2005 9:08 AM, Aaron Fisher
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am having the same problem with a sources.list file that reads as
> follows
[...]
> deb http://security.debian.org stable updates
[...]
> Err http://security.debian.org stable/updates Packages
>
> 404 Not Found
Hi,
* Lars Wirzenius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-09-13 10:37]:
> ti, 2005-09-13 kello 01:45 +0200, Alexander Schmehl kirjoitti:
> > Close RFP after ... uhm... let's say 1 year inactivity and send the
> > submitter an apology, that we couldn't find a volunteer for the
> > requested package, should to
I am having the same problem with a sources.list file that
reads as follows
#deb file:///cdrom/ sarge main
deb ftp://ftp.iinet.net.au/debian/debian stable main
contrib non-free
#deb ftp://ftp.iinet.net.au/debian/debian-security
stable updates
deb http://security.debian.org stable upd
Carlos Parra Camargo wrote:
[...]
I've restored to the last revision all of them, is the first time that
happens?
http://wiki.debian.net/?spamInWikiPages
http://wiki.debian.net/?DealingWithSpam
Regards,
Andreas
--
Andreas Fester
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
WWW: http://www.littletux.ne
On Tue, Sep 13, 2005 at 09:15:10AM +0200, Carlos Parra Camargo wrote:
> The user "packceo" has been adding spam to the next pages of the wiki:
...
> I've restored to the last revision all of them, is the first time that
> happens?
no, it was not the first time.
see http://wiki.debian.net/?De
Carlos Parra Camargo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I've restored to the last revision all of them, is the first time
> that happens?
No, I did a "cleanup" of a group of pages a while ago, with new
revisions with the spam content removed instead of reverting to
earlier revisions.
This means unfor
Hello,
I just received this bug report and would like to ask for comments on how to
handle this problem. There are enough other packages out there with a similar
setup.
Ciao
Racke
Begin forwarded message:
Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2005 08:57:15 +0200
From: Jonathan ILIAS <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To
The user "packceo" has been adding spam to the next pages of the wiki:
http://wiki.debian.net/?ConvinceMichaelMediaWikiRocks
http://wiki.debian.net/?ConvinceMichaelMediaWikiRocks
http://wiki.debian.net/?Debconf6LayoutUpdate
http://wiki.debian.net/?DebianInstallerBrokenThings
On 9/13/05, Peter Samuelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> [Olaf van der Spek]
> > > I thought that if the interface matches the user can link whatever
> > > he wants, because he doesn't (re)distribute the results.
>
> [Steve Langasek]
> > There isn't universal agreement on this point, and it's
* Andreas Schuldei
| and because i never can remember if the first or the second file
| is the one the resulting patch should apply to, i also use
| "--fromfile=" pointing to the original.
diff $from $to, just like cp.
--
Tollef Fog Heen
83 matches
Mail list logo
