Nathanael Nerode <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>There is no good reason to close old RFPs unless the upstream source
>>has diseappeared.
>
> The spectacular amount of clutter they provide -- rendering the wnpp bug list 
> unreadable unless you ignore them all -- combined with their total 
> uselessness?  Seems like a pair of good reasons to me.
>
> Count me in favor of deleting RFPs more than a year and a half old.

I have no problem with deleting RFPs because you know they don't make
sense any more.

But mere time isn't necessarily a good test here, the way it is for
the other wnpp transitions.  

However, it's not something I feel particularly strongly about.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to