On Fri, 2005-08-26 at 08:39 +0200, Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 25, 2005 at 11:02:08PM -0500, Ron Johnson wrote:
> > On Thu, 2005-08-25 at 22:12 -0400, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
> > > Some people are not comfortable with having that kind of information
> > > easily available on th
The following is a listing of packages for which help has been requested
through the WNPP (Work-Needing and Prospective Packages) system in the
last week.
Total number of orphaned packages: 186 (new: 3)
Total number of packages offered up for adoption: 89 (new: 8)
Total number of packages requeste
[Robert Lemmen]
> db.debian.org contains (optional) fields for the location of each
> developer, an information which currently is only used to generate
> edwards's fancy maps. there are other potential uses for this, like
> making it possible to find fellow debian developers at some place that
>
Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Thu, Aug 25, 2005 at 07:18:52PM -0700, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
>> We are talking about Debian Developers, who are supposed to read their
>> email. We can easily give people fair warning, and then make the
>> change.
>
> The only r
On Thu, Aug 25, 2005 at 11:02:08PM -0500, Ron Johnson wrote:
> On Thu, 2005-08-25 at 22:12 -0400, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
> > Some people are not comfortable with having that kind of information
> > easily available on the Internet. The default must be opt-in, or not
> > at all.
>
> While I wholehea
[Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña]
> Any free GIS anyone?
Lots of Free GIS software around. Check out
http://pkg-grass.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/wiki.pl>. :)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, Aug 25, 2005 at 07:18:52PM -0700, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
> We are talking about Debian Developers, who are supposed to read their
> email. We can easily give people fair warning, and then make the
> change.
The only requirements for DDs is to read debian-devel-announce. And
based on t
On Thu, Aug 25, 2005 at 05:11:01PM +0200, Robert Lemmen wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 25, 2005 at 04:51:07PM +0200, W. Borgert wrote:
> > I don't like opt-out. Better opt-in:
> >
> > 4. Invent a new field "public location info" and developers
> >who care, could enter what they think is appropriate.
>
On Thu, Aug 25, 2005 at 04:01:26PM +0200, Robert Lemmen wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 25, 2005 at 02:50:51PM +0100, Oliver Elphick wrote:
> > You haven't explained why letting other DDs know this information, which
> > is available to them already, requires the whole world to know it.
> >
> > If you have s
Bernd Eckenfels <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
>> Why not simply hide it behind the password screen?
>
> the developer databasequery interface and details is hidden behind a
> password, already?
Right, so whatever new thing he wants, if that's what he want
On Thu, Aug 25, 2005 at 03:55:03PM -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Marco d'Itri) writes:
>
> > On Aug 25, Frans Pop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >> < waldi> there is no package to do the configuration
> > This looks like something which can be easily fixed before the release
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
> Why not simply hide it behind the password screen?
the developer databasequery interface and details is hidden behind a
password, already?
Greetings
Bernd
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact
On Thu, 2005-08-25 at 22:12 -0400, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 25, 2005 at 05:11:01PM +0200, Robert Lemmen wrote:
> >
> > i fully agree that generally an opt-in system is better, but in this
> > case it is far more complicated to implement, and it's not really
> > anything big that we are t
Robert Lemmen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> db.debian.org contains (optional) fields for the location of each
> developer, an information which currently is only used to generate
> edwards's fancy maps. there are other potential uses for this, like
> making it possible to find fellow debian devel
Russ Allbery <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Thomas Bushnell BSG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> I understand why it must be optional, but I'm unclear why that means
>> that the default must be opt-in. Can you explain?
>
>> We are talking about Debian Developers, who are supposed to read their
>>
Thomas Bushnell BSG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I understand why it must be optional, but I'm unclear why that means
> that the default must be opt-in. Can you explain?
> We are talking about Debian Developers, who are supposed to read their
> email. We can easily give people fair warning, an
Theodore Ts'o <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Some people are not comfortable with having that kind of information
> easily available on the Internet. The default must be opt-in, or not
> at all.
I understand why it must be optional, but I'm unclear why that means
that the default must be opt-in.
On Thu, Aug 25, 2005 at 05:11:01PM +0200, Robert Lemmen wrote:
>
> i fully agree that generally an opt-in system is better, but in this
> case it is far more complicated to implement, and it's not really
> anything big that we are talking about here. if you want to hide where
> you are living from
Joey Hess wrote:
> Both completly automated installs as well as an install that is
> automated through initial dhcp and then uses the existing
> network-console stuff that was developed for s390 to let you ssh into
> the installer.
Serial USB console is another possibility (d-i has the core suppor
Riku Voipio wrote:
> I've tired using Debian on nfsroot/nbd on a Linksys wap54g. Unfortunatly
> I ran out of ram often, and swapping over nfs patches have disappeared
> into the time, while swapping over NBD gained some serious lockups..
> An usb-slot seems to be necessary with current memory re
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Jose Luis Tallon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: libsieve2
Version : 2.1.7
Upstream Author : Aaron Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://libsieve.sourceforge.net/
* License : MIT(legacy code) and GNU LGPL
Descrip
On 8/25/05, jdgamble <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, 26 Aug 2005 00:50:06 +0200, The Fungi wrote:
>
> >> I am new to this whole thing of creating deb packages. I am trying to
> >> make a deb file from the source of http://gotmail.sf.net so that they can
> >> post it with their sf project fil
On Fri, 26 Aug 2005 00:50:06 +0200, The Fungi wrote:
>> I am new to this whole thing of creating deb packages. I am trying to
>> make a deb file from the source of http://gotmail.sf.net so that they can
>> post it with their sf project files.
> [...]
>
> The gotmail application has already been
Thiemo Seufer wrote:
Andreas Barth wrote:
[snip]
DEBIAN PACKAGE FROM REPOSITORY:
11 .rodata 000840cb 0021a180 0021a180 ...
21 .data 000233c0 003f1d60 003f1d60 ...
MY OWN RECOMPILED DEBIAN PACKAGE:
11 .rodata 000a43ad 001f318
On Fri, Aug 26, 2005 at 12:21:07AM +0200, Stephane Chauveau wrote:
>
> I am not really surprised because I just compared the linker scripts
> from 2.15 and 2.16.
> They have a different section ordering and the official debian package
> clearly follows the 2.16 ordering. Also, there was no diffe
jdgamble wrote:
I'm not sure if this is the right group to post to, but I am trying to
learn how to make deb packages and I seem to go around in circles
confusing myself.
I am following this HowTo
http://www.debian.org/doc/maint-guide/ and I keep getting errors from
lintian and linda that I do
On Thu, Aug 25, 2005 at 06:06:10PM -0400, jdgamble wrote:
> I'm not sure if this is the right group to post to, but I am trying to
> learn how to make deb packages and I seem to go around in circles
> confusing myself.
[...]
It is not. The debian-mentors list is devoted to this particular
topic, s
Kurt Roeckx wrote:
On Thu, Aug 25, 2005 at 07:47:17PM +0200, Thiemo Seufer wrote:
The immediate suspect is binutils, particularily ld. It might be
interesting to do test compiles with an older binutils version
(2.15 vs. 2.16?) and see if the problem is reproducible.
The package in que
I'm not sure if this is the right group to post to, but I am trying to
learn how to make deb packages and I seem to go around in circles
confusing myself.
I am following this HowTo
http://www.debian.org/doc/maint-guide/ and I keep getting errors from
lintian and linda that I do not know how to fix
On 8/25/05, Goswin von Brederlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Olaf van der Spek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > I guess this is all related to IO though?
> > Why don't you extract the files to another place and then simply
> > link/unlink them instead of tar/rm?
>
> Something might alter the fi
On Thu, Aug 25, 2005 at 05:57:30PM +0200, Robert Lemmen wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 25, 2005 at 12:17:28PM -0300, Ben Armstrong wrote:
> > You're still describing the "what" and not the "why". In your original
> > proposal you talked about "fellow Debian developers" needing access for
> > keysignings, dr
On Thu, Aug 25, 2005 at 05:11:01PM +0200, Robert Lemmen wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 25, 2005 at 04:51:07PM +0200, W. Borgert wrote:
> > I don't like opt-out. Better opt-in:
> >
> > 4. Invent a new field "public location info" and developers
> >who care, could enter what they think is appropriate.
>
On Thu, Aug 25, 2005 at 07:39:08PM +0200, Robert Lemmen wrote:
> anyway, i did get your point: you would very much wish for that
> information to stay non-public unless one explicitely makes it public.
Yes, please.
Cheers, WB
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "uns
On Thu, Aug 25, 2005 at 08:01:24PM +0200, Martin Pitt wrote:
> Michael Spang [2005-08-25 12:44 -0400]:
> > If they're not fixable (I don't see how this could be) perhaps we
> > need a Build-Conflicts field.
>
> Most probably not, since buildd chroots only install the required
> build-deps and buil
On 10392 March 1977, Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña wrote:
Note: Im speaking *for me*, not anyone else in the team!
>> As you may have noticed, the beloved target of many flamewars, the
>> NEW queue [1] has been reduced to an average of less than 10
>> packages. Packages are processed within days
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Kevin Coyner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: nmzmail
Version : 0.1.3
Upstream Author : Johannes Hofmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://www.ecademix.com/JohannesHofmann/#nmzmail
* License : GPL
Description :
On Thu, 25 Aug 2005, sean finney wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 25, 2005 at 12:44:13PM -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> > On Thu, 25 Aug 2005, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote:
> > > fluently. Are you saying that people who don't read the (IMHO rather
> > > arcane)
> > > sed regex syntax, "having probl
On Thu, Aug 25, 2005 at 08:07:42PM +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 25, 2005 at 07:47:17PM +0200, Thiemo Seufer wrote:
> > The immediate suspect is binutils, particularily ld. It might be
> > interesting to do test compiles with an older binutils version
> > (2.15 vs. 2.16?) and see if the p
On Thu, Aug 25, 2005 at 01:52:16PM -0300, Ben Armstrong wrote:
> If that's the case, we should improve developer access instead of
> backing your proposal.
which is exactly what i am trying to do, it just make smore sense to
also make it more accessible to non-dds
> Social networking systems exis
On Thu, Aug 25, 2005 at 07:47:17PM +0200, Thiemo Seufer wrote:
> The immediate suspect is binutils, particularily ld. It might be
> interesting to do test compiles with an older binutils version
> (2.15 vs. 2.16?) and see if the problem is reproducible.
The package in question was already build us
Hi Michael!
Michael Spang [2005-08-25 12:44 -0400]:
> Wouldn't those bugs just be indicative of an improperly packaged app or
> broken build system? I really don't see the point of using pbuilder to
> inefficiently work around a fixable problem.
Sure, these packages should be fixed. However, a
Andreas Barth wrote:
[snip]
> > DEBIAN PACKAGE FROM REPOSITORY:
> > 11 .rodata 000840cb 0021a180 0021a180 ...
> > 21 .data 000233c0 003f1d60 003f1d60 ...
> >
> > MY OWN RECOMPILED DEBIAN PACKAGE:
> > 11 .rodata 000a43ad 001f3180 0
Hi,
[full cite left for d-ds usage]
* Stephane Chauveau ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [050825 01:16]:
> I was profiling the memory usage of libgtk when discovered something
> very strange.
>
>
> As you may know, shared memory are usually mapped in 2 different memory
> segments.
> The first segment cont
On Thu, 2005-08-25 at 17:57 +0200, Robert Lemmen wrote:
> there are two reasaons:
> - while debian developers might have access to it, it's in a form that
> makes it hard to access it, so i doubt that anyone will look up who
> is living at some place when he gets there. making this more
> a
On Tue, 23 Aug 2005 01:42:18 +0200, Martin Pitt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Something like this is in fact considered. Probably Ubuntu won't use
pbuilder itself since it is not the most efficient implementation
around, but rebuilding the buildd chroots from scratch would help to
eliminate many FT
On Thu, Aug 25, 2005 at 12:44:13PM -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> On Thu, 25 Aug 2005, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote:
> > fluently. Are you saying that people who don't read the (IMHO rather arcane)
> > sed regex syntax, "having problems" with such syntax, shouldn't touch
>
> I am saying
Thus spake Maykel Moya:
> I'd not been able to use Google talk with Gaim and telnetting
> talk.google.com:5222 works.
>
> I'm supposing it has something to do with TLS, In Gtalk developer's page
> says it's a must.
>
> I took a look over gaim source package and, at first glance, it includes
> sup
Olaf van der Spek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I guess this is all related to IO though?
> Why don't you extract the files to another place and then simply
> link/unlink them instead of tar/rm?
Something might alter the files. That would only ward against some
chroot corruptions and silently kee
On Thu, Aug 25, 2005 at 12:17:28PM -0300, Ben Armstrong wrote:
> You're still describing the "what" and not the "why". In your original
> proposal you talked about "fellow Debian developers" needing access for
> keysignings, drinks, etc. Well, fellow DDs can already do this. But
> why does the p
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: John Goerzen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: haskell-fps
Version : 0.1
Upstream Author : Donald Bruce Stewart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://www.cse.unsw.edu.au/~dons/fps.html
* License : GPL
Description : Fa
On Thu, 25 Aug 2005, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote:
> fluently. Are you saying that people who don't read the (IMHO rather arcane)
> sed regex syntax, "having problems" with such syntax, shouldn't touch
I am saying that people who *can't* read the sed regex syntax, shouldn't
touch Debian initscripts,
On Thu, 25 Aug 2005, Robert Lemmen wrote:
> i fully agree that generally an opt-in system is better, but in this
> case it is far more complicated to implement, and it's not really
Then forget it, and leave it private as it is right now.
--
"One disk to rule them all, One disk to find them. On
On Thu, Aug 25, 2005 at 12:09:32PM -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
>>> mysqld_get_param () {
>>> /usr/sbin/mysqld --print-defaults |
>>> sed -ne "s/^.*--$1=\\([^ ]\\+\\).*\$/\\1/p"
>>> }
>> And harder to read. Making scripts more complex and harder to read for
> Huh? Anyone that
On Thu, 2005-08-25 at 16:51 +0200, W. Borgert wrote:
> I don't like opt-out. Better opt-in:
>
> 4. Invent a new field "public location info" and developers
>who care, could enter what they think is appropriate.
>
> I'm not sure, whether I would use the field.
Not just a single field, but a
I'd not been able to use Google talk with Gaim and telnetting
talk.google.com:5222 works.
I'm supposing it has something to do with TLS, In Gtalk developer's page
says it's a must.
I took a look over gaim source package and, at first glance, it includes
support for NLS (./configure include it by
On Thu, 25 Aug 2005, Marc Chantreux wrote:
> that is a point which surprise me : i understand the dash for a posix
> and lightweight attitude but why use bash as "modern shell" ? why not
> perl or zsh (which are both more powerfull) ?
Well, as long as you don't start using stuff that breaks ofte
On Thu, 2005-08-25 at 16:01 +0200, Robert Lemmen wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 25, 2005 at 02:50:51PM +0100, Oliver Elphick wrote:
> > You haven't explained why letting other DDs know this information, which
> > is available to them already, requires the whole world to know it.
> >
> > If you have some pro
On Wed, 24 Aug 2005, Mauro Calderara wrote:
> Aren't the init-scripts supposed to be posix-compilant? Often when
No. They are not even "supposed" to be scripts at all, it is pretty ok to
use binary initscripts (but most people don't, and it really helps for stuff
like that to be easy to debug, an
Hello,
I was wondering if the recurrence is implemented as there seems to be no
parsing in .
Is there another way how I could set a RRULE in a vevent?
bye, martin
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed, 24 Aug 2005, Andrew Porter wrote:
> Both require knowledge of a particular tools - one only one tool though.
> Once you have that knowledge I would suggest that the single command
> version is easier to read (though I personally would use awk).
awk is in /usr, and I recall I got problems w
On Thu, Aug 25, 2005 at 04:51:07PM +0200, W. Borgert wrote:
> I don't like opt-out. Better opt-in:
>
> 4. Invent a new field "public location info" and developers
>who care, could enter what they think is appropriate.
>
> I'm not sure, whether I would use the field.
i fully agree that gener
On Wed, 24 Aug 2005, Peter Palfrader wrote:
> > mysqld_get_param () {
> > /usr/sbin/mysqld --print-defaults |
> > sed -ne "s/^.*--$1=\\([^ ]\\+\\).*\$/\\1/p"
> > }
>
> And harder to read. Making scripts more complex and harder to read for
Huh? Anyone that has problem with that sed expre
On Thu, 25 Aug 2005, Paul TBBle Hampson wrote:
> The issue in the above is that the suggestion of two different versions of
> libcurl being a problem for prog A is only a problem if the sonames/sovers are
> not differentiated, and I suggest they _be_ differentiated. I mean, they
That is not enough
On Wed, 24 Aug 2005, Marc Chantreux wrote:
> that are not bugs so i wonder if package maintainers where pleased if i
> reportbug those lines as wishlist.
Why would they be displeased?
Anyway, just make triple sure to never use anything from /usr in a script
that otherwise only needs / to work.
Quoting Robert Lemmen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> 1. just make it public (after a warning period), anybody who doesn't
>want that can delete his information from the database. my preferred
>option!
I don't like opt-out. Better opt-in:
4. Invent a new field "public location info" and developer
On Thu, Aug 25, 2005 at 02:50:51PM +0100, Oliver Elphick wrote:
> You haven't explained why letting other DDs know this information, which
> is available to them already, requires the whole world to know it.
>
> If you have some proposals for letting non-DDs have the data, you need
> to explain wh
On Thu, 2005-08-25 at 15:37 +0200, Robert Lemmen wrote:
> hi everyone,
>
> db.debian.org contains (optional) fields for the location of each
> developer, an information which currently is only used to generate
> edwards's fancy maps. there are other potential uses for this, like
> making it possi
hi everyone,
db.debian.org contains (optional) fields for the location of each
developer, an information which currently is only used to generate
edwards's fancy maps. there are other potential uses for this, like
making it possible to find fellow debian developers at some place that
you are goi
On Aug 25, Thiemo Seufer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> All those popular mips WLAN devices use still 2.4 kernels, some people
> started to port some of them to 2.6, but the main hindrance are binary
> only (and thus 2.4 only) drivers.
It's not like they are already supported by debian anyway, then.
Marco d'Itri wrote:
> On Aug 25, Horms <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > There are some architectures where 2.4 is required, its
> > because of these that it seems that we are stuck with 2.4 for Etch.
> > alpha (installer), m68k (2.6 only works on amiga), s390 (installer),
> > mips, mipsel
> Wh
On Aug 25, Frans Pop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> < waldi> there is no package to do the configuration
This looks like something which can be easily fixed before the release.
--
ciao,
Marco
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Wed, Aug 24, 2005 at 11:14:53PM +0200, martin f krafft wrote:
> also sprach Gabor Gombas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005.08.24.2204 +0200]:
> > So IMHO udev is more generic than hotplug.
>
> This is Unix, not monolithic-land.
>
> Also, udev was set out to do nothing other than device node
> manageme
to, 2005-08-25 kello 09:35 +0200, Marc Chantreux kirjoitti:
> that is a point which surprise me : i understand the dash for a posix
> and lightweight attitude but why use bash as "modern shell" ? why not
> perl or zsh (which are both more powerfull) ?
I think it would be good for us to take pity
On 8/25/05, Goswin von Brederlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Olaf van der Spek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > On 8/23/05, Marc Haber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> On Tue, 23 Aug 2005 01:42:18 +0200, Martin Pitt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >> wrote:
> >> >Something like this is in fact considered.
On Thursday 25 August 2005 10:45, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> On Aug 25, Horms <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > There are some architectures where 2.4 is required, its
> > because of these that it seems that we are stuck with 2.4 for Etch.
> > alpha (installer), m68k (2.6 only works on amiga), s390
> > (
On 8/25/05, Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > "Gerrit" == Gerrit Pape <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>Gerrit> Gerrit> bincimap-run package provides the virtual package
>Gerrit> ``imap-server'' and conflicts with other packages
>Gerrit> providing ``imap-server''. This ens
On Thu, Aug 25, 2005 at 12:25:08AM +0200, martin f krafft wrote:
> > Moreover I wonder if when closing via mail should I write in
> > Changelog sth like: this upload fixes bug number 1234567 in
> > testing and unstable which has been closed via mail, and add tag
> > sarge to bug that remain opened
On Thu, Aug 25, 2005 at 12:43:14AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 24, 2005 at 11:39:13PM -0700, Matt Taggart wrote:
> > > There are some architectures where 2.4 has been abandonded uptream,
> > > and these are being removed from the arcive
> > > powerpc (ok, thats one, not some)
>
>
On Thu, 2005-08-25 at 10:41 +0200, Marc Chantreux wrote:
> at least, i think zsh is better because it's almost 200k thinner:
>
> % ls -sh =zsh4 =bash
> 616K /bin/bash 456K /bin/zsh4
I acutally use ksh for all my shell scripts (bash hasn't quite made it
yet IMHO) and that beats both -
636K /bin/
On Wed, Aug 24, 2005 at 10:16:02PM +0200, Gabor Gombas wrote:
> AFAIK the idea is to deprecate everything under /proc which is not
> strictly process-related information, but that transition will take many
> years (if ever completed, which I somewhat doubt).
It would probably have been easier to r
On Aug 25, Nathanael Nerode <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So can we configure udev to stop managing /dev? This would remove my qualms
Yes, as explained in README.Debian.
It's not well tested, but it should work (at least in unstable).
And another option is to make it use a different dev_root that
On Aug 25, Horms <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> There are some architectures where 2.4 is required, its
> because of these that it seems that we are stuck with 2.4 for Etch.
> alpha (installer), m68k (2.6 only works on amiga), s390 (installer),
> mips, mipsel
What does "installer" mean? IIRC SuS
Andrew Porter a écrit :
bash is actually pretty good if you know how to use it (and most of the
ksh93 comliant functions) - the problem is that most programmers don't.
The ${} constructs add a lot of power and allow the programmer to be
less reliant on external tools.
zsh provides some things i
On Wed, Aug 24, 2005 at 03:54:38PM +0200, Domenico Andreoli wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 19, 2005 at 12:07:09PM +1000, Paul TBBle Hampson wrote:
> > On Thu, Aug 18, 2005 at 11:00:41AM +0200, Domenico Andreoli wrote:
> > > with curl 7.14.0-5 currently in incoming, i added two new packages
> > > libcurl3-g
[Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña]
> Either case they should be REJECTED with a proper reasoning as to
> why they have been rejected.
And please add this information to the WNPP request, for the rest of
us to see it. It is hard to fix the remaining issues if we need to
track down a description of t
On Thu, Aug 25, 2005 at 01:32:40AM +0200, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
> Hi
>
> As you may have noticed, the beloved target of many flamewars, the
> NEW queue [1] has been reduced to an average of less than 10
> packages. Packages are processed within days, sometimes even within
> hours.
Thank you for th
On Thu, 2005-08-25 at 09:35 +0200, Marc Chantreux wrote:
> that is a point which surprise me : i understand the dash for a posix
> and lightweight attitude but why use bash as "modern shell" ? why not
> perl or zsh (which are both more powerfull) ?
bash is actually pretty good if you know how t
[Joerg Jaspert]
> You can find this list at
> http://ftp-master.debian.org/REJECT-FAQ.html in the future and that
> one will also be updated if we need to.
Nice list. What about linking it in from
http://ftp-master.debian.org/new.html>? :)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a s
On Thu, Aug 25, 2005 at 09:34:18AM +0200, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
> Well, it was an example. Another example involving X would be if you
> use a font server.
> Other examples could be ppp, which on my system would have to wait
> until fcdsl is loaded, while on other systems might wait for setseri
On Wed, Aug 24, 2005 at 11:39:13PM -0700, Matt Taggart wrote:
> > There are some architectures where 2.4 has been abandonded uptream,
> > and these are being removed from the arcive
> > powerpc (ok, thats one, not some)
> hppa is as well. It is still useful to have the 2.4 kernel-images in the
* Joerg Jaspert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-08-25 01:34]:
> As you may have noticed, the beloved target of many flamewars, the
> NEW queue [1] has been reduced to an average of less than 10
> packages. Packages are processed within days, sometimes even within
> hours.
Thanks for the great work!
>
First of all, thank you all for your answers.
i'll provide some documented, posix compliant, one piped patches as
wishlist.
Of course this would all be so much simpler if we could actually use the
power of modern shells (post 1993) in init scripts - subprocesses
wouldn't be required at all...
* Jon Dowland
| On Wed, Aug 24, 2005 at 08:52:36AM +0200, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
| > If you have an USB mouse, you need to have the driver for it loaded
| > before starting gdm (or the boot will fail), if it uses Xdmcp for
| > connecting to a terminal server, it will need networking to be up (and
Horms writes...
> There are some architectures where 2.4 has been abandonded uptream,
> and these are being removed from the arcive
> powerpc (ok, thats one, not some)
hppa is as well. It is still useful to have the 2.4 kernel-images in the
archive since they are still more stable on some ma
94 matches
Mail list logo
