On Thu, Aug 25, 2005 at 12:43:14AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: > On Wed, Aug 24, 2005 at 11:39:13PM -0700, Matt Taggart wrote: > > > There are some architectures where 2.4 has been abandonded uptream, > > > and these are being removed from the arcive > > > powerpc (ok, thats one, not some) > > > hppa is as well. It is still useful to have the 2.4 kernel-images in the > > archive since they are still more stable on some machines. > > Is it? There were no hppa 2.4 kernels included in sarge, because we > were told by Thibaut that the upstream branch was rotting and not worth > including. Is there really a reason to think it will be in *better* > shape for etch?
If its abandonded upstream, I would guess not. -- Horms -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
