Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: James Vega <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: fish
Version : 1.9.1
Upstream Author : Axel Liljencrantz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://roo.no-ip.org/fish/
* License : GPL
Description : a friendly interactive she
* Bernhard Fischer [Fri, 20 May 2005 18:23:14 +0200]:
> Hi,
Hi Bernhard, I'm not a dpkg person at all, but the following advice
sounds like common sense to me, and perhaps it even helps. ;-)
> Attached patch implements support for transparent terminals in dselect.
> It also contains various
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: "Roberto C. Sanchez" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: releaseforge
Version : 0.7.1
Upstream Author : Phil Schwartz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://releaseforge.sourceforge.net/
* License : GPL
Description : alt
Wouter Verhelst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Fri, May 20, 2005 at 03:45:10PM -0400, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
>> Quoting Nico Golde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>>> Why is the latest version in debian lower than the one before?
>>> Regards Nico
>> Becuase it is, in fact, a different program. The hig
On Fri, May 20, 2005 at 03:45:10PM -0400, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
> Quoting Nico Golde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> >Why is the latest version in debian lower than the one before?
> >Regards Nico
>
> Becuase it is, in fact, a different program. The higher numbered releases
> are of a non-free version
also sprach martin f krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005.05.21.0149 +0200]:
> So the diversion here are leftovers which weren't deleted. Oh oh,
> fluxbox, things are looking bad.
So apart from
test -d /etc/X11/fluxbox && rm -rf /etc/X11/fluxbox
in postrm, which could potentially delete data insta
I agree with Steve. Just add perl to the list. Who the heck would have
removed perl anyway? When I have a chance, I'll try upgrading my
system and see how it goes.
Andrew Donnellan
On 5/20/05, Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, May 19, 2005 at 08:17:49PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
>
[ported to -devel from -release, -release on Bcc]
In the 0.9.11-1 changelog:
- Removed diverts (Closes: Bug#263512)
So the diversion here are leftovers which weren't deleted. Oh oh,
fluxbox, things are looking bad.
Thanks Steve for keeping a clear head when mine was in the clouds.
So the
hey,
On Thu, May 19, 2005 at 02:49:13AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> I see the same three options. Joey has said he is working on a final woody
> point release for the last weekend in May; you'll probably need to
> coordinate with him and get something uploaded soon if you want to try for
> thi
On Fri, May 20, 2005 at 05:38:47PM +0200, Sebastien J. Gross wrote:
> On Fri, May 20, 2005 at 04:09:15PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Package: apt-file
> > Version: N/A; reported 2005-05-20
> > Severity: important
> >
> > apt-file should provide sane defaults:
>
> And user can read recomma
hey,
On Thu, May 19, 2005 at 08:35:03AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > > 3 does not sound so bad to me; it's arguably user error anyway to replace
> > > a
> > > package-provided directory with a symlink in this manner
>
> > If you consider this an user error, then what is the officially blesse
On Fri, May 20, 2005 at 09:55:08PM +0200, Rudi Effe wrote:
> the unfree packages have been renamed to unrar-nonfree. the unrar
> package in main is free - but does not support some current rar
> features.
"Some current rar features" is an understatement -- it doesn't support RAR
3.x archives at
Hey man, stop throwing away your money
http://www.legahe.com/ss/
Now, it's finally possible for you to enlarge your penis
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Em Qua, 2005-05-11 Ãs 03:07 -0500, Jaime Ochoa MalagÃn escreveu:
> Hi everybody,
Hello,
>
> I'm only have a doubt, if someone make a mirror of the official debian
> (including non-free) and all that packages are ditributed is in danger
> to being sued?
Non-free is only *distributed* by Debian,
Am Freitag, 20. Mai 2005 21:49 schrieb Nico Golde:
> Ah ok thats good news.
> Regards and thanks
> Nico
the unfree packages have been renamed to unrar-nonfree. the unrar
package in main is free - but does not support some current rar
features.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wit
Hello Roberto,
* Roberto C. Sanchez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-05-20 21:48]:
> Quoting Nico Golde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> >I had a look on the unrar package and the version number
> >confuses me a little bit.
> >On http://packages.qa.debian.org/u/unrar.html you can see
> >the past uploads and wha
Quoting Nico Golde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Hi,
I had a look on the unrar package and the version number
confuses me a little bit.
On http://packages.qa.debian.org/u/unrar.html you can see
the past uploads and what confuses me is:
# [2004-07-05] Accepted 1:0.0.1-1 in unstable (low) (Niklas Vainio)
# [2
Hi,
I had a look on the unrar package and the version number
confuses me a little bit.
On http://packages.qa.debian.org/u/unrar.html you can see
the past uploads and what confuses me is:
# [2004-07-05] Accepted 1:0.0.1-1 in unstable (low) (Niklas Vainio)
# [2004-06-24] Accepted 3.3.6-2 in unstable
Body Wrap at Home to lose 6-20 inches in one hour.
With Bodywrap we guarantee:
you'll lose 6-8 Inches in one hour
100% Satisfaction or your money back
Bodywrap is soothing formula that contours,
cleanses and rejuvenates your body while
reducing inches.
http://soignee.weightlossfirm.c
Hi,
[i sent this to dpkg-devel a few weeks ago but got no reponse, so
retrying here; please keep me CC'ed, i'm not on d-d]
Attached patch implements support for transparent terminals in dselect.
It also contains various cosmetic fixes as well as a potential real bug
in lib/varbuf.c.
Please consi
"Michael K. Edwards" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[a lot of repetition that pretty much ignores what I said, and
especially where I said:]
>> So this is a tempest in a silly teapot. I'm happy to leave the thread
>> here, since the upshot is a no-relevance-to-important-issues.
So, since you ignor
On 5/20/05, Thomas Bushnell BSG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> "Michael K. Edwards" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Sorry about that; I skipped a step or two. Your "unilateral grant of
> > permission" is not in fact a recognized mechanism under law for the
> > conveyance of a non-exclusive copyri
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Tommaso Moroni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: kcheckers
Version : 0.6
Upstream Author : Artur Wiebe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://kcheckers.osdn.org.ua/
* License : GPL
Description : Qt-based checkers board
Luk Claes wrote:
> Hi Roberto
>
>
>>>I am looking for someone to sign my gpg key. I have contacted
>>>the three people listed as offering to sign keys in Ohio [0],
>>>but I have received no response after a few days. Anibal
>>>suggested I ask on d-d. So, if anyone is able to sign my gpg
>>>key
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Re: William J Beksi in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> ~ Description : Smart Common Input Method platform for KDE/QT
>
> skim is an input method platform based upon scim-lib under *NIX systems
> (including GNU/Linux and FreeBSD) optimized for KDE. It provi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Roberto
> I am looking for someone to sign my gpg key. I have contacted
> the three people listed as offering to sign keys in Ohio [0],
> but I have received no response after a few days. Anibal
> suggested I ask on d-d. So, if anyone is able to
Any software backups for lowest pricest.
http://lktr.29oz5j2dhck9h3k.sophbisoph8.com
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, May 19, 2005 at 08:17:49PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
> On Wednesday 18 May 2005 02:47, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > Is there a difference in packages removed if you run "aptitude install
> > aptitude" instead of "aptitude install aptitude dpkg"? I don't see any
> > reason why dpkg needs to be u
On Fri, May 20, 2005 at 07:31:57AM +0100, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> * Wesley J. Landaker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-05-19 18:08]:
> > One suggestion might be to include both new entries, and entries
> > that are about to be requested for removal. That seems like it might
> > be useful. What do you t
"Michael K. Edwards" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Sorry about that; I skipped a step or two. Your "unilateral grant of
> permission" is not in fact a recognized mechanism under law for the
> conveyance of a non-exclusive copyright license.
I'm sorry, can you point me to the statute here? The
El Viernes 20 Mayo 2005 10:55, Tollef Fog Heen escribió:
> * Martin Michlmayr
>
> | * Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-05-19 17:43]:
> | > I agree that this might be a good idea. debian-wnpp is quite
> | > cluttered with all the control messages from the BTS.
> | >
> | > What do other pe
* Martin Michlmayr
| * Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-05-19 17:43]:
| > I agree that this might be a good idea. debian-wnpp is quite
| > cluttered with all the control messages from the BTS.
| >
| > What do other people think of this? Do you want a shorter WNPP
| > posting with onl
On 5/19/05, Thomas Bushnell BSG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> "Michael K. Edwards" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > At this point, there seem to be quite a
> > few people who agree that the FSF's stance ("copyright-based license")
> > and the far-from-novel one that you advance ("unilateral licens
33 matches
Mail list logo
