also sprach martin f krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005.05.21.0149 +0200]: > So the diversion here are leftovers which weren't deleted. Oh oh, > fluxbox, things are looking bad.
So apart from
test -d /etc/X11/fluxbox && rm -rf /etc/X11/fluxbox
in postrm, which could potentially delete data installed by the
user, 0.9.11-1 *did* try to clean up the diversions:
postrm:
if [ "$1" = "remove" ]
then
dpkg-divert --package fluxbox --remove --rename --divert \
/usr/bin/bsetroot.blackbox \
/usr/bin/bsetroot
dpkg-divert --package fluxbox --remove --rename --divert \
/usr/share/man/man1/bsetroot.blackbox.1.gz \
/usr/share/man/man1/bsetroot.1.gz
fi
Obviously, this is never called during an upgrade. I also wonder why
these two were removed when bsetbg was the topic of the triggering
bug #263512. Sorry, Matt, don't mean to put you in the spotlight,
I am just investigating...
So now we have two challenges:
- clean up this mess. fluxbox should install the diversions in
preinst/upgrade and preinst/install for bsetroot and bsetbg
- it must not remove the diversions before removing its own files.
I think this may have been the problem triggering #263512.
- the goal is 0.9.11-2 to own diversions for the two tools and
their manpages, such that it can coexist with blackbox.
Anything I've overlooked?
--
Please do not send copies of list mail to me; I read the list!
.''`. martin f. krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
: :' : proud Debian developer, admin, user, and author
`. `'`
`- Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing a system
Invalid/expired PGP subkeys? Use subkeys.pgp.net as keyserver!
"distrust all those who love you extremely
upon a very slight acquaintance and without any visible reason."
-- lord chesterfield
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
