On Wed, Jan 05, 2005 at 11:36:45AM +1100, Russell Coker wrote:
> If you have any serious point to make then it can be made without reference
> to
> such people. However all your messages recently have been ad-hominem
> attacks, trying to compare me to Rumsfeld and now claiming that I have a
>
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: cssed
Version : 0.3.0
Upstream Author : Iago Rubio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://cssed.sf.net/
* License : GPL
Description : a CSS editor
Application to help create and maintain CSS style sheets for w
hi thorsten,
On Sat, Jan 01, 2005 at 04:14:03PM +0100, Thorsten Sauter wrote:
> I plan to orphan some of my packages. At the moment I have not enough
> time for those packages.
>
>cacti - Frontend to rrdtool for monitoring systems and services
i'm a cacti user myself and would be happy to ta
Russell Coker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> If you have any serious point to make then it can be made without
> reference to such people. However all your messages recently have
> been ad-hominem attacks, trying to compare me to Rumsfeld and now
> claiming that I have a "problem with reality".
Um
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
BASF's virusscanner has blocked your mail since it contains executable
files which may contain viruses and which are therefore blocked in general!
If you need to send important files please put them into a zip archive.
Der Virenschutz-Scanner der BASF hat die Nachricht geblockt da
On Tue, Jan 04, 2005 at 11:25:29PM +, Jonathan McDowell wrote:
> We've spent most of the past year thinking a release might be just
> round the corner. We can only cry wolf so many times before the world
> stops believing us and finds an option that actually works.
You ought to hear the j
On Tue, Jan 04, 2005 at 03:34:20PM +0100, Martin Schulze wrote:
> > One of the biggest disadvantages of Debian for me is the long time
> > it takes for a new stable version.
> >
> > What about saying something like: the next stable release comes in
> > the beginning of 2006?
>
> The relea
On Tue, Jan 04, 2005 at 10:35:37PM +, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> It shouldn't be forgotten that the biggest blocker after these things
> is probably a general failure to actually care all that much. How
> many people are actually behaving as if a release is just around the
> corner? How can
On Tue, Jan 04, 2005 at 03:41:41PM +0100, Christoph Berg wrote:
> ...which Debian provides for its stable distribution at any time,
> even if the last stable release was ages ago. How does a fixed
> release date help there?
Besides Florian's point, you have to consider that Debian needs peopl
On Tue, Jan 04, 2005 at 08:08:47PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
> Ken Bloom wrote:
> > http://wiki.debian.net/?RunDinstallHourly (part of the ReleaseProposals
> > topic on wiki.debian.net) discusses the concept of speeding up the release
> > process by running dinstall hourly instead of once per day. Th
Ken Bloom wrote:
> http://wiki.debian.net/?RunDinstallHourly (part of the ReleaseProposals
> topic on wiki.debian.net) discusses the concept of speeding up the release
> process by running dinstall hourly instead of once per day. This seems (to
> my amateur eyes) like a technically simple change to
On Tue, 04 Jan 2005, Dominic Hargreaves wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 04, 2005 at 10:26:36AM +0100, Eduard Bloch wrote:
> > Background: most of them (compressed) need about 5kB size. This is
> > rudicuolous... a package of ~5kB that about ~5kB meta data to be
> > included in the archive.
>
> I can see that
On Tue, Jan 04, 2005 at 07:45:12PM -0500, Roberto Sanchez wrote:
> >I subscribe to debian-security (+ d-s-announce) and get reports whenever
> >there's anything released.
> >I know what is installed on my boxes, so I know if this announcement
> >affects me.
> >
> You are probably in the minority, t
Neil McGovern wrote:
On Tue, Jan 04, 2005 at 02:58:42PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I would strongly caution against using Sarge for a production system
until there is security team support. See this message I posted to d-u
when someone pointed out that they were running sarge on some servers:
On Wednesday 05 January 2005 07:58, Thomas Bushnell BSG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Russell Coker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > Save for the fact that it was Rumsfeld who said this, not Bush or bin
> > > Laden:
> >
> > It's the same thing.
> >
> > References to Goebbels will invoke Godwin's l
Package: xmms-xmmplayer
Description: XMMS plugin that uses MPlayer to play video files
CC me I am not on the list
I know longer use this package so if someone wants to maintain it that
uses it let me know.
Its had two bugs in the year since I packaged it and one new upstream
release 8 months ago
Hi,
I submitted a RFP(bug #288655).
Thanks for the suggestion,
Giuseppe
On Tue, Jan 04, 2005 at 11:25:29PM +, Jonathan McDowell wrote:
> We've spent most of the past year thinking a release might be just round
> the corner. We can only cry wolf so many times before the world stops
> believing us and finds an option that actually works.
I started using Linux (and D
On Tue, Jan 04, 2005 at 10:35:37PM +, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> Andrew Pollock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > That said, this (rather large) blocker shouldn't be the issue it has
> > been for this release for the next one. The two biggest blockers to
> > releasing any time soon have been the ins
On Tue, Jan 04, 2005 at 02:58:42PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> I would strongly caution against using Sarge for a production system
> until there is security team support. See this message I posted to d-u
> when someone pointed out that they were running sarge on some servers:
>
> http:/
I demand that Glenn Maynard may or may not have written...
> On Tue, Jan 04, 2005 at 06:22:20PM +, Darren Salt wrote:
>>> On Tue, Jan 04, 2005 at 01:48:12AM +, Darren Salt wrote:
>> [fetching firmware on finding hardware which needs it: wget or packaged?]
Fetch every time and fetch on
On Tue, Jan 04, 2005 at 10:38:03PM +0100, Ingo Juergensmann wrote:
> Please note that year 2005 has come to an end and
> the year 2005 is now - even in my mail address!
Does the new address bring with it a more constructive attitude towards
volunteers who have contributed countless hours over
Andrew Pollock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> That said, this (rather large) blocker shouldn't be the issue it has been
> for this release for the next one. The two biggest blockers to releasing any
> time soon have been the installer and the security infrastructure. I'm
> actually not abreast of wh
On Wed, 05 Jan 2005 09:36:11 +1100, Andrew Pollock wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 04, 2005 at 10:16:27AM -0800, Ken Bloom wrote:
>> http://wiki.debian.net/?RunDinstallHourly (part of the ReleaseProposals
>> topic on wiki.debian.net) discusses the concept of speeding up the
>> release process by running dins
On Tue, Jan 04, 2005 at 10:16:27AM -0800, Ken Bloom wrote:
> http://wiki.debian.net/?RunDinstallHourly (part of the ReleaseProposals
> topic on wiki.debian.net) discusses the concept of speeding up the release
> process by running dinstall hourly instead of once per day. This seems (to
> my amateur
On Tue, Jan 04, 2005 at 04:25:00PM +0100, Martin Schulze wrote:
> Paul van der Vlis wrote:
> > >At least that's been the case including sarge. Hence, such
> > >a sentence would not mean anything.
> > >
> > >>I can understand something like "Debian releases when it's ready", but
> > >>many people
On Tue, Jan 04, 2005 at 09:55:21PM +, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> > If you want answers, mail me your questions privately. BTW: the questions I
> > asked within the thread are still unanswered as well. :)
> If you can't play politely, other people will not be inclined to play
> with you. Your con
A few days ago, Daniel Batista has posted about a problem with an
automatic email system on a ddtp.debian.org which is stuffing up the
Debian Descriptions Translation Project:
On Mon, Dec 27, 2004 at 11:02:29PM -0300, Daniel Mac?do Batista wrote:
> The replies depend of the subject in the email. F
Ingo Juergensmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If you want answers, mail me your questions privately. BTW: the questions I
> asked within the thread are still unanswered as well. :)
If you can't play politely, other people will not be inclined to play
with you. Your continued abuse of volunteers,
Hello.
ClanLib 0.7.8+svn20041230 has been uploaded to experimental.
If someone wants to test these packages before ftp-master approval,
fell free to fetch them from http://people.debian.org/~fenio/clanlib/
Any comments appreciated.
regards
fEnIo
--
_ Bartosz Fenski | mailto:[EMAIL PRO
On Tue, Jan 04, 2005 at 10:22:41PM +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Le mardi 21 décembre 2004 à 12:18 +0100, Ingo Juergensmann a écrit :
> > > FWIW: With your attitude and persistent accusations you're driving
> > > away even those who partially agree with you.
> > Sure, that's a risk.
> That's not
On Tue, Jan 04, 2005 at 06:22:20PM +, Darren Salt wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 04, 2005 at 01:48:12AM +, Darren Salt wrote:
> [fetching firmware on finding hardware which needs it: wget or packaged?]
> >> Fetch every time and fetch once. That looks like a difference to me...
>
> > How could "fet
> "Nico" == Nico Golde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Nico> i think this should be created be default, but thats the
Nico> decision of the maintainer.
Looking at the script, I was under the impression it is created by
default.
--
Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Le mardi 21 décembre 2004 à 12:18 +0100, Ingo Juergensmann a écrit :
> > FWIW: With your attitude and persistent accusations you're driving
> > away even those who partially agree with you.
>
> Sure, that's a risk.
That's not a risk, that's a reality. Now that you spat your flames on
this thread,
Giuseppe Scrivano wrote:
If you know a debian maintainer willing to adopt the package and upload it, please let me know his/her contact info.
Maybe consider to file a RFP. For a start go:
http://www.debian.org/devel/wnpp/index.en.html
--
GPG messages preferred. | .''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux **
Russell Coker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Save for the fact that it was Rumsfeld who said this, not Bush or bin
> > Laden:
>
> It's the same thing.
>
> References to Goebbels will invoke Godwin's law...
But I didn't reference Goebbel's or Hitler. You seem to have a
serious problem with rea
On Tue, 2005-01-04 at 14:58 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Quoting Thomas Jollans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > Well, you could argue that debian branches are not perfectly named but:
> > "stable" is best if you need *absolute* failsafety for critical jobs
> > "testing" is best if you want a stable s
Quoting Thomas Jollans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Paul van der Vlis wrote:
>
> > Hello,
> >
> > One of the biggest disadvantages of Debian for me is the long time it
> > takes for a new stable version.
> >
> > What about saying something like: the next stable release comes in the
> > beginning of 2
Hi,
First of all I am not a debian developer, so I always need a sponsor to upload
it, and I think that the package is not yet perfect. Maybe an expert person can
handle it better.
Thanks for the fast answer,
Giuseppe
Quoting Darren Salt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I demand that Stephan Niemz may or may not have written...
>
> > On Sun, Jan 02, 2005 at 20:02:25 -0600, Steve Greenland wrote:
> >> Converting to udev is an additional step, and caused me a lot more work
> >> than the basic 2.6 upgrade (mostly getting m
I've just uploaded gaim 1:1.1.1-2 to experimental, which introduces a
new arch-independent gaim-data package containing all of the /usr/share
stuff, and more interestingly to those who have been waiting and ITPing
various Gaim plugins, a gaim-dev package containing the includes and .pc
file nec
[Mason Loring Bliss]
> Ooh... This is arguably the most exciting Debian-related thing I've
> heard of in some time! A security team for Sarge. Dreamy!
Thank you. But it is not for sarge. It is for testing. When sarge
is released, the team will move on to sarge+1. :)
Joey Hess is the coordinato
On Tue, Jan 04, 2005 at 06:15:30PM +0100, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
> > This may change with a testing-security upload queue.
>
> Yes. The testing security team might help here too.
> https://alioth.debian.org/projects/secure-testing/>.
Ooh... This is arguably the most exciting Debian-related
Am Dienstag, den 04.01.2005, 18:47 +0100 schrieb Giuseppe Scrivano:
> Hi,
> I have created a package for the MyServer web server. MyServer is a fast,
> lightweight, and full featured web server. It can be remotely configured via
> the GUI. It is distributed under the terms of the GPL.
>
> Th
I demand that Glenn Maynard may or may not have written...
> On Tue, Jan 04, 2005 at 01:48:12AM +, Darren Salt wrote:
[fetching firmware on finding hardware which needs it: wget or packaged?]
>> Fetch every time and fetch once. That looks like a difference to me...
> How could "fetch every ti
Tim Cutts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Seriously. There's just no way you're going to change the way Debian
> > makes releases, or rather, doesn't. It's too big, and there are just
> > too damn many people involved, many of whom simply don't care about
> > releases. As long as we maintain our cu
http://wiki.debian.net/?RunDinstallHourly (part of the ReleaseProposals
topic on wiki.debian.net) discusses the concept of speeding up the release
process by running dinstall hourly instead of once per day. This seems (to
my amateur eyes) like a technically simple change to make even before we
rele
Hi,
I have created a package for the MyServer web server. MyServer is a fast,
lightweight, and full featured web server. It can be remotely configured via
the GUI. It is distributed under the terms of the GPL.
The package can be found here:
http://people.myserverproject.net/~rocky10balboa/de
I demand that Stephan Niemz may or may not have written...
> On Sun, Jan 02, 2005 at 20:02:25 -0600, Steve Greenland wrote:
>> Converting to udev is an additional step, and caused me a lot more work
>> than the basic 2.6 upgrade (mostly getting my head around it, and
>> converting from usbmgr).
>
I demand that Jose Carlos Garcia Sogo may or may not have written...
> El lun, 03-01-2005 a las 21:35 +1100, Russell Coker escribió:
[snip]
>> Human lives are much more important than email. The discussion is over.
> Of course, but in each field, a bad equipped army is as bad as a bad
> equipped
On Tue, 2005-01-04 at 16:17 +0100, Paul van der Vlis wrote:
> Martin Schulze schreef:
> > Paul van der Vlis wrote:
[...]
> > At least that's been the case including sarge. Hence, such
> > a sentence would not mean anything.
> >
> >>I can understand something like "Debian releases when it's ready"
[Jan Niehusmann]
> Unfortunately, testing does not guarantee security updates. Sure,
> one day the updates will promote from unstable to testing. But this
> can take a long time, if, for example, some dependencies block the
> new version from testing.
>
> This may change with a testing-security up
On Tue, Jan 04, 2005 at 05:31:26PM +0100, Thomas Jollans wrote:
> stuff. If I needed something more production-ready, I'd use testing
> because you have (almost) garantee that the software will work and you
> will have security updates, too. (But not in the same quality as
Unfortunately, testin
Paul van der Vlis wrote:
Hello,
One of the biggest disadvantages of Debian for me is the long time it
takes for a new stable version.
What about saying something like: the next stable release comes in the
beginning of 2006?
I can understand something like "Debian releases when it's ready", but
On 4 Jan 2005, at 3:45 pm, Steve Greenland wrote:
On 04-Jan-05, 07:40 (CST), Paul van der Vlis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
One of the biggest disadvantages of Debian for me is the long time it
takes for a new stable version.
If you want Ubuntu or Progeny, you know where[1] to find them. :-)
Serious
On 04-Jan-05, 07:40 (CST), Paul van der Vlis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> One of the biggest disadvantages of Debian for me is the long time it
> takes for a new stable version.
If you want Ubuntu or Progeny, you know where[1] to find them. :-)
Seriously. There's just no way you're going to cha
Martin Schulze schreef:
Paul van der Vlis wrote:
At least that's been the case including sarge. Hence, such
a sentence would not mean anything.
I can understand something like "Debian releases when it's ready", but
many people have to work together. Maybe it's better to say: "a package
releases
Paul van der Vlis wrote:
> >At least that's been the case including sarge. Hence, such
> >a sentence would not mean anything.
> >
> >>I can understand something like "Debian releases when it's ready", but
> >>many people have to work together. Maybe it's better to say: "a package
> >>releases wh
Martin Schulze schreef:
Paul van der Vlis wrote:
Hello,
One of the biggest disadvantages of Debian for me is the long time it
takes for a new stable version.
What about saying something like: the next stable release comes in the
beginning of 2006?
The release date for a Debian release is not set
On Sunday 02 January 2005 18:32, Don Armstrong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [Way OT, but what the heck. If you must, flame me privately:]
>
> On Sun, 02 Jan 2005, Russell Coker wrote:
> > On Sunday 02 January 2005 16:34, Thomas Bushnell BSG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> > > What is this, "you go to
On Friday 31 December 2004 06:22, Marc Haber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On Wed, 29 Dec 2004 08:43:32 +1100, Russell Coker
> > Everyone who has a legitimate cause to send me email
> > knows to use English.
>
> Your arrogance is remarkable.
Why is it arrogant?
If you see anything I have written
* Christoph Berg:
> Re: Paul van der Vlis in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> You will understand that my most important point is security-support.
>
> ...which Debian provides for its stable distribution at any time, even
> if the last stable release was ages ago.
Where is the security support for woody's
Re: Paul van der Vlis in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> You will understand that my most important point is security-support.
...which Debian provides for its stable distribution at any time, even
if the last stable release was ages ago. How does a fixed release date
help there?
Christoph
--
[EMAIL PROTE
Paul van der Vlis wrote:
> Hello,
>
> One of the biggest disadvantages of Debian for me is the long time it
> takes for a new stable version.
>
> What about saying something like: the next stable release comes in the
> beginning of 2006?
The release date for a Debian release is not set by a ca
On Tue, Jan 04, 2005 at 01:07:42PM +, Dominic Hargreaves wrote:
> I can see that this is suboptimal. Given that this is how the modules
> are distributed upstream ie. individually, how should I avoid this?
> Would it be acceptable to package them all as one debian package somehow,
> and thus lo
On Jan 04, Paul van der Vlis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What about saying something like: the next stable release comes in the
> beginning of 2006?
Sure, here it is: "the next stable release comes in the beginning of
2006". Do you feel better now?
HTH, HAND.
--
ciao,
Marco
signature.asc
De
Em Ter, 2005-01-04 Ãs 22:04 +1100, Craig Small escreveu:
> On Mon, Jan 03, 2005 at 01:05:18AM -0200, Fernanda Giroleti Weiden wrote:
> > So, here goes my suggestion and a request: what do you think of using
> > the alternatives system for printing?
> We could do. I'm not sure how it would all work
Brian Thomas Sniffen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hamish Moffatt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> So if EEPROMs contain software, why "don't [you] get to distribute any
>> drivers"? I don't understand.
>
> You can get software out of an firmware-EEPROM on a hardware device.
> I don't think it's appr
Hello,
One of the biggest disadvantages of Debian for me is the long time it
takes for a new stable version.
What about saying something like: the next stable release comes in the
beginning of 2006?
I can understand something like "Debian releases when it's ready", but
many people have to work
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: yate
Version : 0.8.5
Upstream Author : Paul Chitescu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Diana Cionoiu
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://yate.null.ro/
* License : GPL
Description : YATE - Yet Another Telephony Engine
[To/CC set as this was also a personal mail to me; I suggest replies
just go to debian-devel]
On Tue, Jan 04, 2005 at 10:26:36AM +0100, Eduard Bloch wrote:
> I would not accept all your libsnowball* packages in Debian and hope
> your sponsor will see it the same way.
>
> Reason: poisoning the pa
On Tue, Jan 04, 2005 at 10:13:11PM +1100, Andrew Pollock wrote:
> Is there a webpage that shows the current queue of packages in Needs-Build
> state? igloo's pages are great, but they only let you know the position in
> the queue of a package, not what's before or after it (out of curiosity).
http
On Tue, Jan 04, 2005 at 10:13:11PM +1100, Andrew Pollock wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Is there a webpage that shows the current queue of packages in Needs-Build
> state? igloo's pages are great, but they only let you know the position in
> the queue of a package, not what's before or after it (out of curiosit
On Mon, Jan 03, 2005 at 01:05:18AM -0200, Fernanda Giroleti Weiden wrote:
> So, here goes my suggestion and a request: what do you think of using
> the alternatives system for printing?
We could do. I'm not sure how it would all work together though,
alternatives work fine with binaries but with da
Hi,
Is there a webpage that shows the current queue of packages in Needs-Build
state? igloo's pages are great, but they only let you know the position in
the queue of a package, not what's before or after it (out of curiosity).
Also, what is involved with putting a package back into the Needs-Bui
#include
* Dominic Hargreaves [Tue, Jan 04 2005, 01:10:05AM]:
> Package: wnpp
> Severity: wishlist
>
> * Package name: libsnowball-swedish-perl
> Version : 1.01
> Upstream Author : Ask Solem Hoel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> * URL : http://search.cpan.org/dist/Snowball-Swedis
On Thu, 2004-12-30 at 18:01 +0100, martin f krafft wrote:
> In the process of completion of my book (http://debianbook.info),
> I have one more question. Unfortunately, I am on a shitty GSM link
> right now and the available (crippled) means of research have not
> been able to produce an answer to
77 matches
Mail list logo
