pthread development problem

Hi, I've got a little problem developping an application with many threads involved. I know there is definetly something going wrong in my code because basically, what happens is that as soon as I launch my threads I cannot close any socket, in any of all the threads (even the one creating them). I

Re: POSIX capabilities patch

On Sun, 16 Nov 2003, Marco d'Itri wrote: > On Nov 15, Miquel van Smoorenburg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >too early to put that into init upstream ? > I don't know. It was a quick hack I made because I wanted to play with > capabilities. I suppose that there is a reason if whoever designed this >

Some observations regardig the progress towards Debian 3.1

> Debian 3.0 contains 7 CDs with binaries and Debian 3.1 might contain 10 > or more CDs. How do you explain to a user why there are 10 CDs, but this > popular package is not included, and that package he needs is not > included? > > Saying "The maintainer didn't care enough about the package you ne

Re: Some observations regardig the progress towards Debian 3.1

On Sat, Nov 15, 2003 at 09:51:55PM -0600, Steve Langasek wrote: > On Sun, Nov 16, 2003 at 02:35:57AM +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote: > > > The problem with your pragmatic approach is that every of your users has > > other packages he cares about. A package you care zero about might be > > the killer a

Re: Anyone know anything about 3dwm?

On Sat, Nov 15, 2003 at 10:03:42AM -0600, Steve Greenland wrote: > On 14-Nov-03, 19:52 (CST), Sam Hocevar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Sat, Nov 15, 2003, Andrew Pollock wrote: > > > > > I'm trying to prepare a QA upload of the 3dwm source package, and close a > > > few of the trivial bugs a

Re: Some observations regardig the progress towards Debian 3.1

On Sun, 16 Nov 2003, Adrian Bunk wrote: > But this problem needs either be fixed in any way or Debian should > officially announce that it's now a hackers-only distribution, since > it's due to the lack of stable releases not usable for serious systems. > > _Why_ do these threads pop up without an

Re: Some observations regardig the progress towards Debian 3.1

On Sun, Nov 16, 2003 at 02:35:57AM +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote: > The problem with your pragmatic approach is that every of your users has > other packages he cares about. A package you care zero about might be > the killer application for some users. > This might not be a problem if it happens fo

Re: Some observations regardig the progress towards Debian 3.1

On Sat, Nov 15, 2003 at 05:42:20PM +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote: > below are some subjective opservations and opinions regarding the > progress towards Debian 3.1 . This is off-topic for -release. Please restrict any replies to -devel or private mail. Cheers, aj -- Anthony Towns <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Re: gimp1.2: gimp package suggest non-free software

On Thu, Nov 13, 2003 at 10:36:12PM +1100, Zenaan Harkness wrote: > On Thu, 2003-11-13 at 19:32, Roberto Suarez Soto wrote: > > Regarding options available to choose and women breasts' size, > > quantity is always quality ;-) [...] > Sometimes I wonder how I'd feel if some spoke of men in such a

Re: Bug#220888: ITP: python-eyed3 -- Python module for id3-tags manipulation

On Sat, 2003-11-15 at 22:01, Alexander Winston wrote: > On Sat, 2003-11-15 at 07:20, Alexander Wirt wrote: > > Package: wnpp > > Severity: wishlist > > > > * Package name: python-eyed3 > > Version : 0.5.1 > > Upstream Author : Travis Shirk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > * URL

Re: Bug#220888: ITP: python-eyed3 -- Python module for id3-tags manipulation

On Sat, 2003-11-15 at 07:20, Alexander Wirt wrote: > Package: wnpp > Severity: wishlist > > * Package name: python-eyed3 > Version : 0.5.1 > Upstream Author : Travis Shirk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > * URL : http://www.travisshirk.net/eyeD3/ > * License : GPL > Desc

Re: Some observations regardig the progress towards Debian 3.1

On Sat, Nov 15, 2003 at 08:48:04PM +0100, Josip Rodin wrote: > On Sat, Nov 15, 2003 at 05:42:20PM +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote: > > Please read it, and make your own opinions on where I'm right and where > > I'm wrong, even if you might not agree with my opinions on other issues > > or if you don't agr

Re: Some observations regardig the progress towards Debian 3.1

On Sun, Nov 16, 2003 at 12:34:27AM +, Colin Watson wrote: > On Sat, Nov 15, 2003 at 03:42:26PM -0600, Steve Langasek wrote: > > On Sat, Nov 15, 2003 at 05:42:20PM +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote: > > > For testing to work good, it's required to have unstable in a good > > > state. Often new so-version

加入以下网赚 一个月轻松100元

debian-devel:您好! 本人从事网赚已半年，这半年几乎所有的公司都做过，比如：钱友、小站、冲浪的DEGOO、。 但是我觉得那些效率都不高，所以自己研究了最好的以下几个网赚公司，都是收到钱 更多赚钱网站 请到http://snow870726.35123.net/ 咨询 如果你对网络赚钱 有所怀疑 那么请用以下 两个公司 Opt-in-pays Linkburst 都是只要你账户里面有0。01美元 就付款的 ☆Opt-in-pays 邮件+点击,无最小付款,付款方式: paypal/支票/egold. 下线提成: 50%-25%-12.5%-6.25%-3

Re: Some observations regardig the progress towards Debian 3.1

On Sat, Nov 15, 2003 at 03:42:26PM -0600, Steve Langasek wrote: > On Sat, Nov 15, 2003 at 05:42:20PM +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote: > > > During the last months, the number of RC bugs of packages in unstable > > was constant at 700 bugs including 500 RC bugs in packages that are in > > testing [2]. >

Re: zebra not in sarge

* Bao C. Ha <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-11-15 17:34]: > I have just noted that zebra is not in sarge. Is it going to be > phased out? Besides quagga, are there any other good routing > daemons? zebra has been replaced by quagga in sarge. -- Martin Michlmayr [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: debian-installer beta 1

* Miquel van Smoorenburg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-11-10 00:02]: > >We are pleased to announce the first beta release of > >debian-installer, the new installation system for sarge. > > We want screenshots! http://articles.linmagau.org/modules.php?op=modload&name=Sections&file=index&req=viewarticl

Re: Some observations regardig the progress towards Debian 3.1

On Sat, Nov 15, 2003 at 03:42:26PM -0600, Steve Langasek wrote: > On Sat, Nov 15, 2003 at 05:42:20PM +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote: > > For testing to work good, it's required to have unstable in a good > > state. Often new so-versions of libraries enter unstable, and e.g. KDE > > 3.2 might soon go into

Re: POSIX capabilities patch

On Nov 15, Miquel van Smoorenburg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>Sorry: http://www.linux.it/~md/software/ssd.tgz . > >Should that go into /sbin/init itself, so that you can boot with >initcaps=eip,cap_setpcap+eip on the command line ? Or is it still >too early to put that into init upstream ? I

Re: Example of really nasty DD behavior

On Sat, Nov 15, 2003 at 11:55:46PM +0100, Duck wrote: > I was writing an ITP when you posted that and suddendly, saw all my > work preparation turned into ashes. Duck, perhaps you should have written the ITP earlier. Instead of complaining, why don't you thank your fellow developer and offer to c

Re: Some observations regardig the progress towards Debian 3.1

In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: >Given a person with the hardware and time I'm certain support can be >added in a single day. The big problem is getting access to the >hardware directly or indirectly through a tester. Given that I've spend about 20 hours trying to get deb

Already done by someone else

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Coin, Somenone already did the job and forgot the BTS usage. (see #163252 for more details) So, i'm closing those ITPs. Duck -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Processed by Mailcrypt 3.5.8

Example of really nasty DD behavior

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Filip Van Raemdonck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote : > libxklavier & gswitchit packages are uploaded and waiting to be added by > ftp-master. This nasty behavior shows that being an officiel Debian developer does not mean quality. I was writing an ITP

zebra not in sarge

Hello, I have just noted that zebra is not in sarge. Is it going to be phased out? Besides quagga, are there any other good routing daemons? Thanks. Bao -- Best Regards. Bao C. Ha Hacom OpenBrick Distributor USA http://www.hacom.net voice: (714) 530-8817 fax: (714) 530-8818 8D66 6672 7A9B 6879

Re: Some observations regardig the progress towards Debian 3.1

Karsten Merker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Sat, Nov 15, 2003 at 07:15:42PM +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote: > > > The problems with porting debian-installer to different archs is > > minimal. As shown on the D-I debcamp in Oldenburg porting to a new > > architecture can be done over a week

Re: Some observations regardig the progress towards Debian 3.1

On Sat, Nov 15, 2003 at 05:42:20PM +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote: > During the last months, the number of RC bugs of packages in unstable > was constant at 700 bugs including 500 RC bugs in packages that are in > testing [2]. > Yes, there's the common argument "Don't talk, fix bugs.". Unfortunately >

Re: Changes in t1lib.

On Fri, Nov 14, 2003 at 09:20:53PM +0100, Andreas Metzler wrote: > As t1lib-dev (1.3.1) and libt1-dev (5.0.0) are not API compatible I'd > consider that a pseudo-package useless or even unwelcome. Good point. -- G. Branden Robinson|The errors of great men are Debian GNU/Linux

New Ideas on the side of kernel-source/image

Hi, given the recent flamewar about the new attempt to package the linux kernel here are some ideas that surfaced during several discussions on irc. I want to draw a conclusion here for intrested people who missed it and for future references. First some basically already existing stuff: 1. the

ttmkfdir and libfreetype6

Recently, while trying to get rid of packages on my system from the "oldlibs" section, I noticed that mkttfdir still depends on libttf2. The newer ttmkfdir version (3.0.9) that RedHat 9 uses works with the Freetype 2 library, and it has seen much more active development lately than the version we

Bug#220944: ITP: libxklavier -- high-level API for X Keyboard Extension (XKB)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist * Package name: libxklavier Version : 0.95 Upstream Author : Sergey V. Udaltsov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * URL or Web page : http://pdx.freedesktop.org/Software/LibXklavier * License : LGPL Descrip

Re: RFA: A lot of packages

Am Sam, 2003-11-15 um 16.52 schrieb Andrés Roldán: > I will make an upload today then. sorry to be so late but Christian Perrier made an upload for uptimed today: http://packages.qa.debian.org/u/uptimed/news/1.html Daniel

Bug#220942: ITP: gswitchit -- Xkb state indicator and switcher for GNOME panel

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist * Package name: gswitchit Version : 2.5.0 Upstream Author : Sergey V. Udaltsov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * URL or Web page : http://gswitchit.sourceforge.net/ * License : GPL Description : Xkb s

Re: Some observations regardig the progress towards Debian 3.1

On Sat, Nov 15, 2003 at 05:42:20PM +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote: > Please read it, and make your own opinions on where I'm right and where > I'm wrong, even if you might not agree with my opinions on other issues > or if you don't agree with everything below. Nice of you to vent steam onto the mailing

Re: POSIX capabilities patch

On Sat, 15 Nov 2003, Miquel van Smoorenburg wrote: > In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, > Marco d'Itri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >On Nov 15, Junichi Uekawa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >Sorry: http://www.linux.it/~md/software/ssd.tgz . > > Should that go into /sbin/init itself, so that you can bo

Bug#220937: ITP: icecream - non-interactive stream download utility

Package: wnpp Version: N/A; reported 2003-11-15 Severity: wishlist -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 * Package name: icecream Version : 0.8 Upstream Author : Gil Megidish <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * URL : http://icecream.sourceforge.net/ * License : GPL

Bug#220930: ITP: unace -- De-archiver for .ace files

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist * Package name: unace Version : 1.2b Upstream Author : Marcel Lemke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * URL : None. Google for "unace-1.2b.tar.gz" * License : Ambigous Description : De-archiver for .ace files I'm referring to the 1.2b r

Re: Some observations regardig the progress towards Debian 3.1

Moin Adrian! Adrian Bunk schrieb am Saturday, den 15. November 2003: > solved, the next one pups up. For testing to work good, it's required to > have unstable in a good state. Often new so-versions of libraries enter > unstable, and e.g. KDE 3.2 might soon go into unstable. If testing > should be

Re: MIPS port backlog, autobuilder machines and some arrogance

Marco d'Itri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Nov 15, Chris Cheney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >Another point is do we really want an arch/port to be maintained by only > >one person? IMHO there should be at least two people capable and > >actually running the buildds for each arch, possibl

Re: Some observations regardig the progress towards Debian 3.1

Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Hi, > > below are some subjective opservations and opinions regarding the > progress towards Debian 3.1 . > > Please read it, and make your own opinions on where I'm right and where > I'm wrong, even if you might not agree with my opinions on other issue

Re: POSIX capabilities patch

In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Marco d'Itri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >On Nov 15, Junichi Uekawa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >> >And if i enable SETPCAP for init, will init drop that capability? Will it > >> >pass it to all started programs? > >> See http://www.linux.it/~md/ssd.tgz . > >> N

Re: Some observations regardig the progress towards Debian 3.1

On Sat, Nov 15, 2003 at 05:42:20PM +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote: > - Debian 3.0 doesn't support much of the hardware curently available - > the old 2.4.18 kernel on the boot floppies doesn't even boot on many > new computers (some Promise IDE chipsets require a more recent 2.4 ^

Re: Anyone know anything about 3dwm?

Andrew wrote: > I'm trying to prepare a QA upload of the 3dwm source package, and close a > few of the trivial bugs assigned to it (mainly binary package descriptions > being shite). I have tried several time to make any use of those packages but failed. Since they are not maintained anymore, I

Re: MIPS port backlog, autobuilder machines and some arrogance

On Nov 15, Chris Cheney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >Another point is do we really want an arch/port to be maintained by only >one person? IMHO there should be at least two people capable and >actually running the buildds for each arch, possibly more when they are >too busy with other things as

Re: POSIX capabilities patch

On Nov 15, Junichi Uekawa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >And if i enable SETPCAP for init, will init drop that capability? Will it >> >pass it to all started programs? >> See http://www.linux.it/~md/ssd.tgz . >> No kernel hacks needed. >I see a 404. Sorry: http://www.linux.it/~md/software/

Some observations regardig the progress towards Debian 3.1

Hi, below are some subjective opservations and opinions regarding the progress towards Debian 3.1 . Please read it, and make your own opinions on where I'm right and where I'm wrong, even if you might not agree with my opinions on other issues or if you don't agree with everything below. This is

Re: possible compromise for ITP: linux?

Eike Sauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Andrew Suffield schrieb: > > He doesn't need to, he can be slapped down. > > "Keine Gewalt!" ("No violence!") > > > We don't ignore minor issues just because there are major ones. > > So let's hope Robert can cope with minor issues > and only talk about

Re: possible compromise for ITP: linux?

Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Excuse the tautology, but I find it can be useful sometimes to look at > requirements separate from the implementation, and try to come up with > an alternate implementation that meets the same requirements. That other > thread is too long for me to know for

Re: possible compromise for ITP: linux?

Joe Wreschnig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Mon, 2003-11-10 at 19:31, Adam Heath wrote: > > On Tue, 11 Nov 2003, Santiago Vila wrote: > > > > > If Robert is such an incompetent developer as some people say and the > > > package does not build on the 11 different architectures, then the > > > p

Re: possible compromise for ITP: linux?

Santiago Vila <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Mon, 10 Nov 2003, Eike Sauer wrote: > > > What about letting Robert build and upload (if ftp-masters agree) > > his package, *if* he puts it in experimental, uses a description > > that contains a warning about the experimental status of the > > pack

Re: RFA: A lot of packages

On Fri, Nov 14, 2003 at 05:03:59PM +0100, Simon Richter wrote: > - uptimed (sponsor needed for Daniel Gubser, who helped out) I will sponsor Daniel; or failing that I'd take it over myself. Whichever you both prefer. Steve --

Re: Digital Alpha 2100 Sable 233MHz

Greg Folkert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Sun, 2003-11-09 at 15:47, Greg Folkert wrote: > > I have a DEC Alpha 2100 Dual Processor with 256MB Memory and ~60GB of > > drives space. It currently doesn't have any OS on it (well Tru64 Runtime > > Only no User licenses) > > > > I have a 1.5MBps SD

Bug#217980: Info received (was Bug#217980: Autobuilders and nut package)

Thank you for the additional information you have supplied regarding this problem report. It has been forwarded to the package maintainer(s) and to other interested parties to accompany the original report. Your message has been sent to the package maintainer(s): Arnaud Quette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Anyone know anything about 3dwm?

On 14-Nov-03, 19:52 (CST), Sam Hocevar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sat, Nov 15, 2003, Andrew Pollock wrote: > > > I'm trying to prepare a QA upload of the 3dwm source package, and close a > > few of the trivial bugs assigned to it (mainly binary package descriptions > > being shite). > >

Re: On linux kernel packaging issue

Eduard Bloch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > #include > * Tobias Wolter [Sun, Nov 09 2003, 04:52:54PM]: > > On 2003-11-09T16:19:21+0100 (Sunday), Eduard Bloch wrote: > > > * Tobias Wolter [Sun, Nov 09 2003, 03:47:15PM]: > > > >> # time bzip2 -9 < out.wav > /dev/null > > > > [...] > > > >> # time /

Re: RFA: A lot of packages

I will make an upload today then. Regards. Andrés Roldán <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I will take amap if no one disagrees. > > Simon Richter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> Hi, >> >> I'm totally swamped in work even though I haven't started learning for >> the next round of exams yet, so I'd

Re: On linux kernel packaging issue

Eduard Bloch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > #include > * Glenn McGrath [Sun, Nov 09 2003, 09:53:26AM]: > > > > We're all very interested in *real* evidence here, because there > > > hasn't been any in the past. If you don't have any evidence, you can > > > expect people to call bullshit on this.

Re: Bug#217980: Autobuilders and nut package

On Sat, Nov 15, 2003 at 10:44:02AM +0100, Arnaud Quette wrote: > PS: the upload is scheduled this afternoon (+6h max) I see package is uploaded to incoming. Thanks :) BTW, it probably requires manual intervention from buildd maintainers. Cheers Artur -- [...] jestem wredna, żelazna małpa

Re: buildd dpkg was interrupted

Paul Telford <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > One of my packages just failed to build on m68k with the message: > > E: dpkg was interrupted, you must manually run 'dpkg --configure -a' to > correct the problem. Thats the buildd as already stated in the other mail, but... > I noticed that a coupl

Bug#220898: ITP: scsi-idle -- asdf

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist * Package name: scsi-idle Version : 2.4.23 Upstream Author : various * URL : http://www.lost-habit.com/scsi.html * License : GPL I picked it up from the 2.4.19 version, fixed the tools to compile with gcc-3.2 and plan to package

Source only uploads? -- A summary

Hi, last month, Wolfgang Borgert wondered [1] if we should decide to enable source-only uploads. The thread was lead quite emotionally and turned to be a flame war. Personally, I stopped following it when [DD X] wrote: "Be very wary of listening to [DD Y]. His comments are frequently disconnected

Re: Bug#155583: radiusd-freeradius history and future

In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Miquel van Smoorenburg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, >Sam Hartman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>I think dpkg-statoverride is not too bad in this case. I'll talk to >>the nis package maintainer and see if that's acceptable. If not, nis

Bug#220888: ITP: python-eyed3 -- Python module for id3-tags manipulation

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist * Package name: python-eyed3 Version : 0.5.1 Upstream Author : Travis Shirk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * URL : http://www.travisshirk.net/eyeD3/ * License : GPL Description : Python module for id3-tags manipulation python-eyed3 i

Bug#220890: ITP: eyed3 -- Display and manipulate id3-tags on the command-line

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist * Package name: eyed3 Version : 0.5.1 Upstream Author : Travis Shirk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * URL : http://www.travisshirk.net/eyeD3/ * License : GPL Description : Display and manipulate id3-tags on the command-line A command

Re: RFA: A lot of packages

> I'm totally swamped in work even though I haven't started learning for > the next round of exams yet, so I'd like to give away my packages: > > - python-imaging(*) > >Simon > > (*) Gerhard H=C3=83=E2=82=ACring expressed interest, but I have no definiti= > ve word. If Gerhard doesn't take

Re: MIPS port backlog, autobuilder machines and some arrogance

On Sat, Nov 15, 2003 at 12:54:18AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote: > On Fri, Nov 14, 2003 at 11:34:41AM +0100, Ingo Juergensmann wrote: > > As some of you know the mips port has some problems keeping up. > Daniel Stone and I have been trying for months to get feedback regarding > xfree86 > 4.3.0-0pr

Re: Bug#155583: radiusd-freeradius history and future

In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Sam Hartman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >I think dpkg-statoverride is not too bad in this case. I'll talk to >the nis package maintainer and see if that's acceptable. If not, nis >could install some flag file. The unix_chkpwd could start with root >privs, chuck fo

Re: Anyone know anything about 3dwm?

Hello, A minor fix for the common blurb of all the descriptions: On Sat, Nov 15, 2003 at 02:52:13AM +0100, Sam Hocevar wrote: > 3Dwm is the Three-Dimensional Workspace Manager. It defines a full user > environment with support for three-dimensional user interfaces using a 3D > widget kit. It a

Re: Bug#217980: Autobuilders and nut package (#217980)

Artur R. Czechowski wrote: Hello This bug causes autobuilders stop work. It is possible to fix it ASAP? http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.php?&pkg=lftp&ver=2.6.8-2&arch=hppa&stamp=1068852612&file=log&as=raw http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.php?&pkg=rrdcollect&ver=0.2.1-5&arch=mipsel&stamp=1068836320&fil

Re: MIPS port backlog, autobuilder machines and some arrogance

Another point is do we really want an arch/port to be maintained by only one person? IMHO there should be at least two people capable and actually running the buildds for each arch, possibly more when they are too busy with other things as appears the case with Ryan. Chris signature.asc Descript

Re: POSIX capabilities patch

> >And if i enable SETPCAP for init, will init drop that capability? Will it > >pass it to all started programs? > See http://www.linux.it/~md/ssd.tgz . > No kernel hacks needed. I see a 404. regards, junichi

Re: MIPS port backlog, autobuilder machines and some arrogance

On Fri, Nov 14, 2003 at 02:55:09PM +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote: > Op vr 14-11-2003, om 11:34 schreef Ingo Juergensmann: > [...] > > As a result and a sort of protest, I´ll stopped my m68k buildd, because I > > don´t know m68k that much to be of any help for this port anymore. Therefore > > my m68k