On Mon, Oct 13, 2003 at 06:51:01PM -0500, John Hasler wrote:
> Joel Baker writes:
> > I'm going to gloss over the utter mistake of your first statement
>
> I am on a dialup with a "dynamic" IP number: I am allowed to borrow a
> number from my ISP at need. There is no IP number over which I have a
Simon Richter wrote:
Hi,
Is anyone interested in adopting libical? It has been orphaned for
193 days (#187030). I wouldn't mind removing it, but mozilla
build-depends on it (perhaps this can be changed, tho?).
Mozilla builds fine without libical.
What does happen, then? Will it still be able to
Frans Pop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> OK, but why are there _two_ identical messages for both klogd and anacron?
Probably once for the real package "sysklogd" and once for the virtual
package "system-log-daemon", since the dependencies explicitly list both.
--
Aaron M. Ucko, KB1CJC (amu at al
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Joe Drew <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>On Mon, 2003-10-13 at 06:57, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
>> However, if you read the paper in http://people.d.o/~hmh, and implement the
>> demultiplexer, we could probably modify one of the above methods to work
>> well, w
Joel Baker writes:
> I'm going to gloss over the utter mistake of your first statement
I am on a dialup with a "dynamic" IP number: I am allowed to borrow a
number from my ISP at need. There is no IP number over which I have any
administrative control. Thus I have no IP in that I would be unable
On Mon, 2003-10-13 at 01:47, David B Harris wrote:
> > If you think 35 characters is too long, feel free to start filing
> > thousands and thousands of bugs on all the other packages, suggesting
> > that they remove little bits and pieces.
>
> (And if you don't, please don't bother people about it
Julian Mehnle writes:
> Consider your ISP's smarthost's IP address "your IP". It makes no
> difference.
It would if the proposed system was unusable by those of us without static
IPs, which was the impression I was getting. Evidently that impression was
incorrect: good.
> No, you understood it
On Mon, 2003-10-13 at 06:57, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> However, if you read the paper in http://people.d.o/~hmh, and implement the
> demultiplexer, we could probably modify one of the above methods to work
> well, while we implement ours...
After hearing your talk about init systems at
Hi,
> > Is anyone interested in adopting libical? It has been orphaned for
> > 193 days (#187030). I wouldn't mind removing it, but mozilla
> > build-depends on it (perhaps this can be changed, tho?).
> Mozilla builds fine without libical.
What does happen, then? Will it still be able to read i
On Mon, Oct 13, 2003 at 04:26:35PM -0500, John Hasler wrote:
> Joel Baker writes:
> > I'm sorry, but your individual desire to be able to send mail from
> > anywhere on the planet, claiming to be anyone on the planet...
>
> What makes you think I want to claim to be "anyone on the planet"?
> I hav
John Hasler wrote:
> Joel Baker writes:
> > If adding .1 to your SA score for lacking a repudiation protocol, and
> > 3 (or 5, or whatever) for claiming to be from a domain that denies
> > that it origionates mail to the rest of the world from your IP...
>
> I have no IP. Outgoing mail from home
On Sat, Oct 11, 2003 at 11:32:33PM +0100, Jochen Voss wrote:
>
> > Also, how do you display the names of the continents so that all of your
> > non-English-speaking users can understand them? :)
> I did not try a fresh install of Debian for a long time. How
> do we display the language names now
Joel Baker writes:
> I'm sorry, but your individual desire to be able to send mail from
> anywhere on the planet, claiming to be anyone on the planet...
What makes you think I want to claim to be "anyone on the planet"?
I have a valid domain and I want replies and bounces to go to it.
> If adding
Magosányi Árpád <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> In the policy manual there is no mention of the Uploader field of
> debian/control. (version 3.6.1.0)
> In the developers' reference I read:
> * Add the co-maintainer's correct maintainer name and address to the
> Uploaders field in the global part of
Thanks. Sorry for the short notice, I hadn't realized how
outdated gltron and the ITAs were until I started getting
comments from friends like "gentoo has newer games" and "gltron
is so old." Needless to say, it was rather embarassing,
especially since the sarge release is tentatively December 1st
Ari,
On Mon, Oct 13, 2003 at 02:17:43PM +1000, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> * Ari Pollak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-10-12 17:14]:
> > It seems that the Debian gltron maintainer, Gregory J. Oschwald, has
> > been MIA for at least a year now. I can't find him anywhere in the
> > developers DB, and haven
On Mon, Oct 13, 2003 at 09:44:47PM +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Le lun 13/10/2003 à 21:36, Steve Langasek a écrit :
> > > All this additional information can be provided as well by pkg-config,
> > > which is much more flexible and doesn't cause random breakages.
> > $ pkg-config libgnomecanvas
On Mon, Oct 13, 2003 at 08:06:33PM +0200, Julian Mehnle wrote:
> John Hasler wrote:
> > Julian Mehnle writes:
> > > No, but this again is one of these broken "e-mail vs. real world"
> > > analogies. You can't receive mail through such a letter box, but a
> > > sender address is inherently meant to
Le lun 13/10/2003 à 21:36, Steve Langasek a écrit :
> > All this additional information can be provided as well by pkg-config,
> > which is much more flexible and doesn't cause random breakages.
>
> $ pkg-config libgnomecanvas-2.0 --libs
> -Wl,--export-dynamic -lgnomecanvas-2 -lart_lgpl_2 -lpangof
Hello,
I purchased "NEW LOOK HIS & HERS" Pattern #
6307. The front pattern piece for all of the fronts for the tops was
missing. I'm going to Wal Mart to get another one, but thought I should
let you know what happened.
Thank you,
Cindy Bulick
On Mon, Oct 13, 2003 at 09:02:06PM +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Le dim 12/10/2003 à 03:31, Steve Langasek a écrit :
> > If I was comfortable that .la files were completely dispensable on
> > GNU/Linux systems, I wouldn't hesitate to do that, but I'm not. They
> > *do* provide additional inform
Le dim 12/10/2003 à 03:31, Steve Langasek a écrit :
> If I was comfortable that .la files were completely dispensable on
> GNU/Linux systems, I wouldn't hesitate to do that, but I'm not. They
> *do* provide additional information that's useful to people linking
> applications statically; and while
Hi!
On 2003-10-13 15:26 +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> >It is a separate upstream package.
> Then feel free to package it, as long as I keep udev I don't mind. :-)
Okay :-) We only have to get the dependencies right, as long as
libsysfs provides only a shared lib, udev should build-depend on it. I
Hi!
In the policy manual there is no mention ofthe Uploader field of
debian/control. (version 3.6.1.0)
In the developers' reference I read:
* Add the co-maintainer's correct maintainer name and address to the
Uploaders field in the global part of the debian/control file
It seemed to me that onl
I am Mr. Kolapo Omidire,company secretary/Manager, internal and
external services of COMMERCIAL BANK OF AFRICA.I was the accounts officer of
late Mr. Alan a national of your country, who used to work with The
Nigerian Mining Corporation(NMC) here in Nigeria who was banking with
our bank.
On
John Hasler wrote:
> Julian Mehnle writes:
> > No, but this again is one of these broken "e-mail vs. real world"
> > analogies. You can't receive mail through such a letter box, but a
> > sender address is inherently meant to be a valid address through which
> > you can be contacted (among other c
>> dpkg: sysklogd: dependency problems, but removing anyway as you request:
>> klogd depends on sysklogd | system-log-daemon; however:
>> Package sysklogd is to be removed.
>> Package system-log-daemon is not installed.
>> Package sysklogd which provides system-log-daemon is to be removed.
>
Julian Mehnle writes:
> No, but this again is one of these broken "e-mail vs. real world"
> analogies. You can't receive mail through such a letter box, but a
> sender address is inherently meant to be a valid address through which
> you can be contacted (among other criteria).
I can no more be c
John Hasler wrote:
> Julian Mehnle writes:
> > It does very well make sense to specify a "sender address" for an
> > e-mail, and that's exactly what the SMTP "MAIL FROM" command AKA
> > envelope-from (and the "Sender:" header) is meant to be. Even RFCs
> > (2)821 and (2)822 articulate it that way.
Julian Mehnle writes:
> Michael Poole wrote:
>> Mail is not sent from any particular address at all; it is sent by a
>> person or program. It is delivered to one or more addresses. The
>> From: address and SMTP and envelope sender addresses are for human
>> understanding and status reporting.
>
Julian Mehnle writes:
> It does very well make sense to specify a "sender address" for an e-mail,
> and that's exactly what the SMTP "MAIL FROM" command AKA envelope-from
> (and the "Sender:" header) is meant to be. Even RFCs (2)821 and (2)822
> articulate it that way. Nowhere do these RFCs state
Michael Poole wrote:
> Julian Mehnle writes:
> > Don't you agree on my understanding of a sender address (or source
> > mailbox) being the address (or source mailbox) the sender sends
> > from? If so, please state it explicitly, so I have something I can
> > argue against. :-)
>
> Mail is not sen
Hi!
The doubled restart of syslog-ng is already reported as bug #204631
Will try to sort out RSN.
A levelezőm azt hiszi, hogy Josip Rodin a következőeket írta:
> On Sun, Oct 12, 2003 at 04:54:07PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
> > I just got the following messages replacing syslog by syslog-ng from
>
hello
I have set up a box that uses reiserfs as the root filesystem
I have noticed 3 facts that seem to be bugs (but I could not tell for sure)
1-
I use a stock kernel by Herbert XU, which uses initrd; when initrd's
/sbin/init is run, eventually it mounts the root from the hard disk, and
it alway
Julian Mehnle writes:
> Don't you agree on my understanding of a sender address (or source
> mailbox) being the address (or source mailbox) the sender sends
> from? If so, please state it explicitly, so I have something I can
> argue against. :-)
Mail is not sent from any particular address at a
On Oct 13, Martin Pitt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> BTW, I may have been missing something as I did not read the beginning
>> of this thread, but I don't see the point of packaging sysfsutils:
>It is a separate upstream package.
Then feel free to package it, as long as I keep udev I don't mind
Andreas Metzler wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 13, 2003 at 02:47:44PM +0200, Julian Mehnle wrote:
> > There you have it. It's the "source mailbox", and while it can be
> > used to report errors, it can *not only* be used to report errors.
> > I'm relieved that the RFC doesn't contradict my common sense
> >
On Mon, Oct 13, 2003 at 02:47:44PM +0200, Julian Mehnle wrote:
> Andreas Metzler wrote:
>> Julian Mehnle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> Andreas Metzler wrote:
If I send an e-mail over mail.nusrf.at with envelope-from
[EMAIL PROTECTED] I am _not_ forging anything or making
"unauthoriz
On Sun, Oct 12, 2003 at 04:54:07PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
> I just got the following messages replacing syslog by syslog-ng from dselect
> (Woody).
> Should this be reported as a bug? Against which package (syslog, syslog-ng,
> apt)?
>
> The following packages will be REMOVED:
> sysklogd
> Th
Andreas Metzler wrote:
> Julian Mehnle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Andreas Metzler wrote:
> > > If I send an e-mail over mail.nusrf.at with envelope-from
> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] I am _not_ forging anything or making
> > > "unauthorized use of domains"
> >
> > Yes, you are. The envelope-from ad
--
ST Online Antivirus MAIL
vysledky AV testu
--
--
ST Online Antivirus MAIL
AV tests resuluts
--
ST Online Antivirus MAIL detekoval v mailovej sprave adresovanej do Vasej
e-mailovej schranky po
--
ST Online Antivirus MAIL
vysledky AV testu
--
--
ST Online Antivirus MAIL
AV tests resuluts
--
ST Online Antivirus MAIL detekoval v mailovej sprave adresovanej do Vasej
e-mailovej schranky po
On Mon, Oct 13, 2003 at 01:45:07PM +, Robert Millan wrote:
> GNU Sysutils is intended to compliment coreutils. These utilities
> are ones that are either primarily useful to system administrators,
> or would need to be installed by a system administrator to be useful
> (Usually because they req
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: gsysutils
* URL : http://savannah.gnu.org/projects/sysutils
* License : GPL
Description : Set of utilities useful to system administrators
GNU Sysutils is intended to compliment coreutils. These utilities are ones that
Adam Majer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Sat, Oct 11, 2003 at 04:00:34PM +0200, Sam Hocevar wrote:
>>My openvrml packages have been failing to build on arm [1], mips [2]
>> and mipsel [3] for some time. From the build logs, it looks like g++ is
>> eating all the memory and the OOM killer ki
On Mon, Oct 13, 2003 at 12:05:24PM +0200, Andrea Mennucc wrote:
> I would be delighted to have a faster boot: my boot times (excluding
> BIOS) are 60sec-90sec (using the ditributed kernel by Herbert XU), and
> this is very long (particularly for my Freevo-box)
>
> is anyone trying to implement
On Mon, 13 Oct 2003, Andrea Mennucc wrote:
> there has been a lot of interest lately on tecniques to obtain a faster
> boot; for example
>
> http://www-106.ibm.com/developerworks/linux/library/l-boot.html
> http://www.fefe.de/minit/
> http://www.ussg.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0204.0/0674.html
Colin Watson wrote:
> In the first example, the fact that foo depends on bar while
> simultaneously conflicting with the version of bar in the suite you're
> looking at is the thing that's bad, because it means foo can't be
> installed. The second example is OK, even though foo and bar can't be
> i
hello
there has been a lot of interest lately on tecniques to obtain a faster
boot; for example
http://www-106.ibm.com/developerworks/linux/library/l-boot.html
http://www.fefe.de/minit/
http://www.ussg.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0204.0/0674.html
http://www.atnf.csiro.au/people/rgooch/linux/boo
Am Mo, den 13.10.2003 schrieb Martin Michlmayr um 07:37:
> Is anyone interested in adopting libical? It has been orphaned for
> 193 days (#187030). I wouldn't mind removing it, but mozilla
> build-depends on it (perhaps this can be changed, tho?).
I had a look at it, but upstream seems to be not
On Mon, Oct 13, 2003 at 12:34:46AM +0200, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
> * Riku Voipio
> I have mail-followup-set for a reason. In addition, it is normal
> policy on Debian lists not to Cc people unless explicitly requested.
Hmm. my mutt setup appears to be b0rken then. sorry about that.
need to loo
Package: wnpp
Version: unavailable; reported 2003-10-13
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: aspell-pt-br
Version :
Upstream Author :
* URL : http://people.debian.org/~rafael/br.ispell
* License : GPL
Description : The Brazilian Portuguese dictionary for
--
ST Online Antivirus MAIL
vysledky AV testu
--
--
ST Online Antivirus MAIL
AV tests resuluts
--
ST Online Antivirus MAIL detekoval v mailovej sprave adresovanej do Vasej
e-mailovej schranky po
Julian Mehnle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Andreas Metzler wrote:
>> Julian Mehnle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > It's about forging an e-mail sender's identity. By preventing the
>> > unauthorized use of domains as the sender domain of e-mails, most of
>> > the practiced cases of identity forger
Hi!
On 2003-10-13 1:45 +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> BTW, I may have been missing something as I did not read the beginning
> of this thread, but I don't see the point of packaging sysfsutils:
It is a separate upstream package.
> as it's part of the udev source package
Well, they copied the li
Hi, martin f krafft wrote:
> Herbert gets to pollute the kernel-source all he wants because
> apparently noone gives a flying food.
Disagree. Some people, myself among them, have stated their unhappiness.
To me personally, though, it doesn't matter that much. I'd rather spend
the time on gettng
* Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> Is anyone interested in adopting libical? It has been orphaned for
> 193 days (#187030). I wouldn't mind removing it, but mozilla
> build-depends on it (perhaps this can be changed, tho?).
Mozilla builds fine without libical.
--
- nobse
On Mon, 13 Oct 2003 01:44:57 -0400
David B Harris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Obviously if the short description is too long, something needs to go -
> and in that case, certainly not mentioning the toolkit is reasonable.
> However, in this particular case ("gtk/gnome client for masqdialer
> serve
On Mon, 13 Oct 2003 00:02:47 -0400
Joe Drew <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> David B Harris wrote:
>
> > As much as you may dislike it, people care about toolkit. I don't
> > understand the witch-hunt to remove references to such things.
>
> Short description is a limited resource. By all means, put
Is anyone interested in adopting libical? It has been orphaned for
193 days (#187030). I wouldn't mind removing it, but mozilla
build-depends on it (perhaps this can be changed, tho?).
Description: Development environment for libical
Libical is an Open Source implementation of the IETF's
On Sun, Oct 12, 2003 at 08:17:06PM -0500, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 12, 2003 at 02:32:39PM +0100, Dale Amon wrote:
> > On Sun, Oct 12, 2003 at 01:56:46PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> > > Dale Amon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > And if I'm a german living in america?
>
> > Then
61 matches
Mail list logo
