On Tue, Sep 23, 2003 at 07:51:51PM -0400, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> sysklogd tries to be better; it adapts to the current configuration rather
> than leaving it up to the user to update a logrotate.d file if they change
> the configuration.
# If you want to rotate other logfiles daily,
On Tue, Sep 23, 2003 at 07:43:04PM -0400, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> > Please do this instead. I'm not sure why sysklogd does it's own
> > rotation[...]
> Because sysklogd doesn't have a fixed set of log files.
I prefer to have a default logrotate script which has some
"missingok,notifempty"
statem
On Tue, Sep 23, 2003 at 04:46:01PM -0700, Mark Ferlatte wrote:
> Matt Zimmerman said on Tue, Sep 23, 2003 at 07:43:04PM -0400:
> > On Tue, Sep 23, 2003 at 02:59:02PM -0700, Mark Ferlatte wrote:
> >
> > > Please do this instead. I'm not sure why sysklogd does it's own
> > > rotation[...]
> >
> >
Matt Zimmerman said on Tue, Sep 23, 2003 at 07:43:04PM -0400:
> On Tue, Sep 23, 2003 at 02:59:02PM -0700, Mark Ferlatte wrote:
>
> > Please do this instead. I'm not sure why sysklogd does it's own
> > rotation[...]
>
> Because sysklogd doesn't have a fixed set of log files.
It does have a _defa
On Tue, Sep 23, 2003 at 02:59:02PM -0700, Mark Ferlatte wrote:
> Please do this instead. I'm not sure why sysklogd does it's own
> rotation[...]
Because sysklogd doesn't have a fixed set of log files.
--
- mdz
On Tue, 23 Sep 2003 22:45:11 +0100
Steve Kemp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 23, 2003 at 11:18:27PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > While /var/log/mail.log is rotated nicely on my (woody) boxes,
> > I have no idea which package is responsible for that.
> > Any suggestions ?
>
>
Steve Kemp said on Tue, Sep 23, 2003 at 10:45:11PM +0100:
> > While /var/log/mail.log is rotated nicely on my (woody) boxes,
> > I have no idea which package is responsible for that.
> > Any suggestions ?
>
> /etc/cron.weekly/sysklogd
>
> This script rotates all the files which are output
On Tue, 23 Sep 2003 23:18:27 +0200 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> While /var/log/mail.log is rotated nicely on my (woody) boxes,
> I have no idea which package is responsible for that.
> Any suggestions ?
>
> That would help me to solve bug #212237.
Perhaps /etc/cron.weekly/sysklogd, from packag
On Tue, Sep 23, 2003 at 11:18:27PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> While /var/log/mail.log is rotated nicely on my (woody) boxes,
> I have no idea which package is responsible for that.
> Any suggestions ?
logrotate.
--
gram
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Tue, Sep 23, 2003 at 11:18:27PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> While /var/log/mail.log is rotated nicely on my (woody) boxes,
> I have no idea which package is responsible for that.
> Any suggestions ?
/etc/cron.weekly/sysklogd
This script rotates all the files which are output from
Hello, fellow developers !
While /var/log/mail.log is rotated nicely on my (woody) boxes,
I have no idea which package is responsible for that.
Any suggestions ?
That would help me to solve bug #212237.
Any help is welcome.
Thanks
Racke
--
LinuXia Systems => http://www.linuxia.de/
E
Package: wnpp
Version: unavailable; reported 2003-09-23
Severity: wishlist
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
* Package name: libdate-ical-perl
Version : 1.72
Upstream Author : Rich Bowen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://search.cpan.org/dist/Date-ICal/
* L
On Tue, 23 Sep 2003 21:07:46 +0200
Josip Rodin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 23, 2003 at 10:43:30AM -0700, Steve Lamb wrote:
> > Same here though I am sticking with SA-Exim because it saves the mail
> > in a certain range so I can throw it at the Bayesian classifier.
> I usually do
On Tue, Sep 23, 2003 at 10:43:30AM -0700, Steve Lamb wrote:
> > For now I'm using the SA-Exim method because even though it's clumsy (needs
> > the .so file compiled from source so distribution isn't as trivial as an
> > apt-get invocation), I used it before the Exiscan patch was available and it
>
Steve Lamb dijo [Tue, Sep 23, 2003 at 10:29:51AM -0700]:
> Gunnar Wolf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Steve Lamb dijo [Mon, Sep 22, 2003 at 07:21:05PM -0700]:
> > > Gunnar Wolf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > [1] http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc0821.txt
>
> > > And what does RFC2821 have to say
On Tue, 23 Sep 2003 16:45:55 +0200
Josip Rodin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> For now I'm using the SA-Exim method because even though it's clumsy (needs
> the .so file compiled from source so distribution isn't as trivial as an
> apt-get invocation), I used it before the Exiscan patch was available
On Tue, 23 Sep 2003 08:39:02 -0400
"H. S. Teoh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 22, 2003 at 08:46:15PM -0700, Steve Lamb wrote:
> > Except it never hits SA nor do I even have procmail installed. Can't
> > stand the ugly beast.
> It never hits SA? Almost all Swen mails I got were cau
You are aware Mutt is perfectly capable of responding to the list. Learn
it, love it, USE IT!
On Tue, 23 Sep 2003 10:20:46 -0500
Gunnar Wolf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Steve Lamb dijo [Mon, Sep 22, 2003 at 07:21:05PM -0700]:
> > Gunnar Wolf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > [1] http://www.ie
Package: wnpp
Version: unavailable; reported 2003-09-23
Severity: wishlist
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
* Package name: libdate-leapyear-perl
Version : 1.7.1
Upstream Author : Rich Bowen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://search.cpan.org/dist/Date-Leap
Steve Lamb dijo [Mon, Sep 22, 2003 at 07:21:05PM -0700]:
> Gunnar Wolf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > [1] http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc0821.txt
>
> And what does RFC2821 have to say about it?
I would not trust every MTA to implement newer versions of the RFC -
However, it is up to you to decide
On Tue, Sep 23, 2003 at 08:39:02AM -0400, H. S. Teoh wrote:
> > > What are the exim rules you used to catch these things?
> >
> > exiscan-acl calling clamav and dropping it with a 550. A full log
> > line would be:
> >
> > 2003-09-22 07:38:05 1A1RpB-0007Xd-Of H=(smtp21.singnet.com.sg)
> > [1
Lars Wirzenius writes:
> I favor this approach over simple applications of violence, such as using
> an axe on any computer infected by a virus.
Psychiatry just for sending viruses? I don't know. Seems pretty extreme
to me. Are you sure simple beatings would not suffice?
--
John Hasler
[EMAIL
On Tue, Sep 23, 2003 at 02:31:22PM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 22, 2003 at 07:34:58PM -0400, H. S. Teoh wrote:
> > I've resorted to blocking port 25 to subnets from which these spams
> > originate. Currently I have about 45 subnets (/24 and a few /16) on my
> > blacklist, and so far 409
On Mon, Sep 22, 2003 at 08:46:15PM -0700, Steve Lamb wrote:
> On Mon, 22 Sep 2003 22:44:50 -0400
> "H. S. Teoh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Another major source is rr.com, which not only gives me tons of Swen, but
> > also other spam in general. I've blacklisted rr.com in /etc/hosts.deny,
> > bu
On Mon, Sep 22, 2003 at 07:34:58PM -0400, H. S. Teoh wrote:
> I've resorted to blocking port 25 to subnets from which these spams
> originate. Currently I have about 45 subnets (/24 and a few /16) on my
> blacklist, and so far 409 connections have been dropped.
The sad thing about this is that the
Hi,
Is there something similar for exim (woody version)? I don't care too
much about the incoming bandwidth, but more about the resources that the
spam and virus checks consume, especially during these spam virus waves.
So I could add a (hopefully) cheap check at MTA level to reject these
mails un
On Tue, Sep 23, 2003 at 12:28:44AM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
> Maybe I'm wrong, but I think an MTA rejecting a mail because of
> oversized body doesn't have to get the whole body before rejecting the
> mail.
You can issue a permanent error only after you have received the body.
modifications when using po-debconf (was: Re: Fwd: French translation for
PHPWiki)
Reply-To:
X-message-flag: Outlook is a good virus spreading tool. It can send mail, too.
X-Republicain: 1 vendïmiaire an CCXII (Raisin)
Below is a message which may be of some interest for developers who
are not u
On Tuesday 23 September 2003 01:45, Bernd Eckenfels wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 23, 2003 at 12:28:44AM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
> > Maybe I'm wrong, but I think an MTA rejecting a mail because of oversized
> > body doesn't have to get the whole body before rejecting the mail. Based
> > on this, it should
On ma, 2003-09-22 at 17:53, Matthias Urlichs wrote:
> The list of hardware required to stop this spam unfortunately seems to
> include a time machine.
Oh, that's not required at all. A simple couch will do.
The couch will require a team of psychiatrists surrounding it, of
course. They will then i
On Mon, Sep 22, 2003 at 05:09:30PM -0500, david nicol wrote:
| Shamless plug: sign up for totally spam-free forwarding address
| at http://pay2send.com
Ewww! *recoils in disgust*
"You don't pay to send, we make others pay to send to you." - if this
system become widespread, then you surely /wou
On Tue, Sep 23, 2003 at 12:14:02AM +0100, James Troup wrote:
> The queue daemon can no longer handle PGP 2.x keys; I don't know why
> and since a) the number of developers still using these kind of keys
> for uploads can be counted on the fingers of a mutilated hand, b)
> there are alternative meth
32 matches
Mail list logo
