Re: but I want the GNU versions of packages

2003-06-30 Thread Colin Watson
On Mon, Jun 30, 2003 at 06:58:11PM +0200, Mathieu Roy wrote: > It proves that the user interface of gawk is more friendly, nothing > more. > > And users that do not know the difference between mawk and gawk are > not necessarily looking for performance, but may prefer a software > with a user fri

Re: inews path question

2003-06-30 Thread Colin Watson
On Mon, Jun 30, 2003 at 08:26:48PM +0200, Vincent Zweije wrote: > On Mon, Jun 30, 2003 at 05:17:15PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote: > || What program should a user use to post a message from the command-line, > || then? I've always used inews for this, and I think it's quite reasonable > || for user

Re: Application files in $HOME

2003-06-30 Thread Matthias Urlichs
Hi, Mathieu Roy wrote: > Gimp and many others software creates dotfiles. Because from the start > you configure it (cache size, temp dir). > Why should I want a per-user configuration option for temp file location? > For their size? Apart from web browser cache, what can be so big? > So? Browse

Re: but I want the GNU versions of packages

2003-06-30 Thread Andrew Suffield
On Mon, Jun 30, 2003 at 06:58:11PM +0200, Mathieu Roy wrote: > And users that do not know the difference between mawk and gawk are > not necessarily looking for performance, but may prefer a software > with a user friendly interface. Then they have no business using awk. -- .''`. ** Debian GN

Re: but I want the GNU versions of packages

2003-06-30 Thread Josselin Mouette
Le lun 30/06/2003 à 18:58, Mathieu Roy a écrit : > It proves that the user interface of gawk is more friendly, nothing > more. > > And users that do not know the difference between mawk and gawk are > not necessarily looking for performance, but may prefer a software > with a user friendly interf

Re: ITP: email -- Send email from command line, either via MTA or SMTP, with optional encryption

2003-06-30 Thread Jaldhar H. Vyas
On Mon, 30 Jun 2003, Steve Langasek wrote: > I object to this ITP. The software in question is both trivial and > non-free. Those features which are not a subset of mime-construct > (<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>) are either irrelevant to Debian > systems (direct SMTP-based mailing) or a bad idea (encoura

Re: but I want the GNU versions of packages

2003-06-30 Thread Josef Spillner
On Monday 30 June 2003 15:36, Josip Rodin wrote: > And this proves exactly what? Someone who knows shit all about awk sure as > hell ain't gonna learn it from that help output. Nor are they supposed to! More along the lines of behaving nicely on the command line, i.e. to support --help and --vers

Re: Upstream requires forked Date::Manip

2003-06-30 Thread Kenneth Pronovici
> The upstream maintainer of XMLTV, which I package for Debian, has > temporarily forked the Perl Date::Manip module. He says: > >Over the past six months or so I've accumulated various bug fixes to >the Date::Manip module, most of them because of xmltv bug reports >sent by users. Ra

Re: inews path question

2003-06-30 Thread Colin Watson
On Mon, Jun 30, 2003 at 05:45:10PM +0200, Vincent Zweije wrote: > From the (admittedly years old) impression I got from inn, inews > should be seen as the news injector (inject-news), corresponding to > what sendmail is for mail, meant as a backend to other programs that > allow you to post message

Re: inews path question

2003-06-30 Thread Andreas Metzler
On Mon, Jun 30, 2003 at 05:45:10PM +0200, Vincent Zweije wrote: > From the (admittedly years old) impression I got from inn, inews > should be seen as the news injector (inject-news), corresponding to > what sendmail is for mail, meant as a backend to other programs that > allow you to post message

Re: Bug#198957: ITP: email -- Send email from command line, either via MTA or SMTP, with optional encryption

2003-06-30 Thread Lukas Geyer
Millis Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I've already spoken to the upstream author, and he does not see > mwilling to convert to a DFSG license. Probably the only thing I can > do is to make it suitable for the non-free section for the time > being. Can you indicate to me how the license shoud

Re: Attn: Mass bug filing: libtool requires updating

2003-06-30 Thread Lucio
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi everybody! I am an Italian security admin, and I can progam in c /c++ / java. I like very much debian, so i would like to start helping the project. I would like to partecipate to development, is there someone I could help? I would prefer to work on

Re: Bug#198957: ITP: email -- Send email from command line, either via MTA or SMTP, with optional encryption

2003-06-30 Thread Bas Zoetekouw
Hi Steve! You wrote: > I object to this ITP. The software in question is both trivial and > non-free. Those features which are not a subset of mime-construct > (<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>) are either irrelevant to Debian > systems (direct SMTP-based mailing) or a bad idea (encouraging users to > store

Re: debootstrapping and sysvinit

2003-06-30 Thread Tobias Wolter
On 2003-06-29T12:40:56+ (Sunday), Miquel van Smoorenburg wrote: > In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, > Junichi Uekawa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> I've received several reports that debootstrap of sid has not been > >> possible recently due to sysvinit. > > I've noticed that waldi already did

Re: Bug#197886: make still broken after 12 days

2003-06-30 Thread Steve Langasek
On Mon, Jun 30, 2003 at 09:27:20AM -0500, Adam Heath wrote: > On Mon, 30 Jun 2003, Samium Gromoff wrote: > > I`ll proceed in the time order of events: > > > > Tue, 17 Jun 2003 15:52:38 +0400: > > I`ve produced a testcase for make which causes it to bail out > > with a > > *** Virt

Re: Bug#198158: architecture i386 isn't i386 anymore

2003-06-30 Thread Joel Baker
On Sun, Jun 29, 2003 at 02:13:48PM -0400, Nathan Hawkins wrote: > On Thu, Jun 26, 2003 at 04:24:23PM -0400, Matt Zimmerman wrote: > > On Thu, Jun 26, 2003 at 09:44:30AM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > > > > On Wed, Jun 25, 2003 at 02:04:54PM -0500, Gunnar Wolf wrote: > > > > ports - NetBSD giv

Re: Upstream requires forked Date::Manip

2003-06-30 Thread Marco d'Itri
On Jun 30, Graham Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >i dont know anything about perl, but might it be possible to add the >forked module to the xmltv package, in some way that doesnt conflict >with the libdate-manip-perl that exists in debian? Sure, it can be installed in a private directory a

Re: Bug#198957: ITP: email -- Send email from command line, either via MTA or SMTP, with optional encryption

2003-06-30 Thread Adam Heath
On Mon, 30 Jun 2003, Millis Miller wrote: > What other package would you suggest that does the same functionality then > insteard? I specifically was interested in this one because of the mime > encoding of the signature/encryption functionality. apt-cache show bash

Re: S390 and libXinerama

2003-06-30 Thread Sam Hocevar
On Mon, Jun 30, 2003, Julien LEMOINE wrote: > gcc -o osd_clock osd_clock.o -L. -L/usr/X11R6/lib -lX11 -lXext -lpthread -lXt > -lXinerama -lxosd > /usr/lib/gcc-lib/s390-linux/3.3/../../../../lib/libxosd.so: undefined > reference to `XineramaIsActive' Did you try to put -lXinerama after -lxosd

Re: Upstream requires forked Date::Manip

2003-06-30 Thread Martin Schulze
Graham Wilson wrote: > i dont know anything about perl, but might it be possible to add the > forked module to the xmltv package, in some way that doesnt conflict > with the libdate-manip-perl that exists in debian? Should be possible if you use a different directory (one with a higher priority)

Re: Bug#198957: ITP: email -- Send email from command line, either via MTA or SMTP, with optional encryption

2003-06-30 Thread Eduard Bloch
#include * Adam Heath [Mon, Jun 30 2003, 12:05:06PM]: > Well, if we had voting on NEW packages, this would be first on my list of > software never to be allowed into debian. The name is wrong, and the author > appears to have a bubble on his neck that needs to be burst, if he thinks > otherwise.

Re: Bug#198957: ITP: email -- Send email from command line, either via MTA or SMTP, with optional encryption

2003-06-30 Thread Thomas Viehmann
Millis Miller wrote: > I've already spoken to the upstream author, and he does not see mwilling to > convert to a DFSG license. Probably the only thing I can do is to make it > suitable for the non-free section for the time being. Can you indicate to me > how the license shoudl be changed to be

Re: Bug#198957: ITP: email -- Send email from command line, either via MTA or SMTP, with optional encryption

2003-06-30 Thread Millis Miller
What other package would you suggest that does the same functionality then insteard? I specifically was interested in this one because of the mime encoding of the signature/encryption functionality. Millis

Re: but I want the GNU versions of packages

2003-06-30 Thread Mathieu Roy
Josip Rodin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a tapoté : > On Mon, Jun 30, 2003 at 12:42:28PM +0200, Mathieu Roy wrote: > > Great, for a default application... > > (ok, man mawk...) > > > > I wonder what makes the following more convenient for a default > > application to me... > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ g

Re: [VAC] June 9 - August 30 [UPDATE]

2003-06-30 Thread Daniel Burrows
Just an update-- As I mentioned previously, I am working for NASA over the summer. The contract they gave me assigns copyright to any computer code I write this summer to NASA; since it's only for 2.5 months, I didn't bother making a fuss about it. However, that does mean that I won't be doi

Re: ITP: email -- Send email from command line, either via MTA or SMTP, with optional encryption

2003-06-30 Thread Steve Langasek
I object to this ITP. The software in question is both trivial and non-free. Those features which are not a subset of mime-construct (<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>) are either irrelevant to Debian systems (direct SMTP-based mailing) or a bad idea (encouraging users to store pgp passphrases on disk). With

Bug#199414: ITP: pr-tnt -- a packet radio terminal program for usage with TNCs

2003-06-30 Thread Christoph Berg
Package: wnpp Version: unavailable; reported 2003-06-30 Severity: wishlist * Package name: pr-tnt Version : 1.9.1 Upstream Author : Matthias Hensler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * URL : http://excelsior.kullen.rwth-aachen.de/WSPse/Packet.php3 * License : GPL Descripti

Bug#199410: ITP: ire-rotj -- The Reign of the just is a demo game for IRE

2003-06-30 Thread Alexandre Pineau
Package: wnpp Version: unavailable; reported 2003-06-30 Severity: wishlist * Package name: ire-rotj Version : 1.00 Upstream Author : J.P. Morris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * URL : http://ire.sourceforge.net/modules/messiah.htm * License : BSD Description : The Re

Re: inews path question

2003-06-30 Thread Vincent Zweije
On Mon, Jun 30, 2003 at 06:13:08PM +0200, Andreas Metzler wrote: || On Mon, Jun 30, 2003 at 05:45:10PM +0200, Vincent Zweije wrote: || No, the proper place would not be /usr/sbin, "helper binary" does not || match the FHS criteria for /usr/sbin/ || http://www.pathname.com/fhs/2.2/fhs-4.10.htm

Bug#199404: ITP: cpufreqd -- A speedstep applet clone

2003-06-30 Thread Mattia Dongili
Package: wnpp Version: unavailable; reported 2003-06-30 Severity: wishlist * Package name: cpufreqd Version : 1.0 Upstream Author : Mattia Dongili <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * URL : http://www.sourceforge.net/projects/cpufreqd * License : GPL Description : A spe

Re: Bug#198957: ITP: email -- Send email from command line, either via MTA or SMTP, with optional encryption

2003-06-30 Thread Adam Heath
On Fri, 27 Jun 2003, Millis Miller wrote: > Package: wnpp > Version: N/A; reported 2003-06-27 > Severity: wishlist > > * Package name: email > Version : 1.9.0 > Upstream Author : Dean Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > * URL : http://www.cleancode.org/email > * License

Re: but I want the GNU versions of packages

2003-06-30 Thread Josip Rodin
On Mon, Jun 30, 2003 at 12:42:28PM +0200, Mathieu Roy wrote: > Great, for a default application... > (ok, man mawk...) > > I wonder what makes the following more convenient for a default > application to me... > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ gawk --help > [...] And this proves exactly what? Someone wh

Re: Attn: Mass bug filing: libtool requires updating

2003-06-30 Thread christophe barbe
On Sun, Jun 29, 2003 at 07:52:57PM +0100, Scott James Remnant wrote: > Version 3.39-1 of the file utility changed the format of the output line > for MIPS shared libraries again. > > Older versions of libtool.m4 use the file utility and a regular > expression to determine if something is a shared

Re: inews path question

2003-06-30 Thread Vincent Zweije
>From the (admittedly years old) impression I got from inn, inews should be seen as the news injector (inject-news), corresponding to what sendmail is for mail, meant as a backend to other programs that allow you to post messages, but not supposed to be called directly by the end user. As such, the

Re: Bug#198957: ITP: email -- Send email from command line, either via MTA or SMTP, with optional encryption

2003-06-30 Thread Matthew Palmer
On Mon, 30 Jun 2003, Millis Miller wrote: > I've already spoken to the upstream author, and he does not see mwilling > to convert to a DFSG license. Probably the only thing I can do is to make > it suitable for the non-free section for the time being. Can you indicate > to me how the license shoud

Re: Bug#198957: ITP: email -- Send email from command line, either via MTA or SMTP, with optional encryption

2003-06-30 Thread Neil McGovern
On Sun, Jun 29, 2003 at 09:49:46PM -0400, Anthony DeRobertis wrote: > On Friday, Jun 27, 2003, at 11:05 US/Eastern, Luca - De Whiskey's - De > Vitis wrote: >> On Fri, Jun 27, 2003 at 12:32:59AM +0100, Millis Miller wrote: >>> * License : Custom >> Its license is non-free, not "Custom": >>

S390 and libXinerama

2003-06-30 Thread Julien LEMOINE
Hello, I am the maintainer of osdclock, and there is a problem with Xinerama on S390 build [1]. There is several undefined references to Xinerama symbols. I don't know where are theses symbols. Extract from S390 buildd : gcc -o osd_clock osd_clock.o -L. -L/usr/X11R6/lib -lX11

Bug#199390: ITP: quilt -- Scripts for working with series of patches

2003-06-30 Thread Martin Quinson
Package: wnpp Version: unavailable; reported 2003-06-30 Severity: wishlist * Package name: quilt Version : 0.24 Upstream Author : Andreas Gruenbacher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Martin Quinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> *

Re: Bug#197886: make still broken after 12 days

2003-06-30 Thread Adam Heath
On Mon, 30 Jun 2003, Samium Gromoff wrote: > I`ll proceed in the time order of events: > > Tue, 17 Jun 2003 15:52:38 +0400: > I`ve produced a testcase for make which causes it to bail out > with a > *** Virtual memory exhausted. Stop > message on a perfectly valid, sane

Re: but I want the GNU versions of packages

2003-06-30 Thread Colin Watson
On Mon, Jun 30, 2003 at 09:31:39AM +0200, Roland Mas wrote: > Dan Jacobson (2003-06-28 07:57:55 +0800) : > > Gentlemen, after I installed "Debian GNU/Linux", I found I had to > > take extra steps to get the GNU version of a program installed, as > > some other leading brand alternative was in its s

Re: Bug#189329: ITP: gnome-swallow - meta-applet to embed any application in the GNOME panel

2003-06-30 Thread Josselin Mouette
Le ven 27/06/2003 à 15:25, Stefano Zacchiroli a écrit : > On Thu, Jun 26, 2003 at 05:53:27PM +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote: > > The swallow applet can "eat" any X11 window into the GNOME 2 panel. The > > application then displays inside the panel instead of being in a window

Re: Package Lists and Size

2003-06-30 Thread Artur R. Czechowski
On Sat, Jun 28, 2003 at 03:21:05PM +, Bruno Rodrigues wrote: > With which apt version ? > I don't find any usr/lib/apt/methods/rsync :( http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2003/debian-devel-200306/msg00176.html Regards Artur -- [00:54] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a poza tym, to ja sobie zakł

Re: [Stefano =)] Bug#198619: Could not perform configuration on libpam0g

2003-06-30 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, Adam Heath wrote: > this is a bug in apt. dpkg correctly handles this case(it breaks the dep loop > randomly, which means postinsts of the affected packages need to be aware of > the issue. > > The apt developer has refused to fix apt to work around this non-problem in > the past, I suggest

Re: but I want the GNU versions of packages

2003-06-30 Thread Mathieu Roy
Morgon Kanter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a tapoté : > This one time, at band camp, Dan Jacobson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Last year I discovered mawk sitting there until I banished it away with > > apt-get install gawk. > > Mawk is smaller and faster, so it makes sense that it's the default > awk

Re: Windows macro virus

2003-06-30 Thread Matthew Palmer
On Sun, 29 Jun 2003, Dany Vanderroost wrote: > Dear Sir, Madam, > I have just received a windows macro virus/virus from you, That's odd, because debian-devel@lists.debian.org is a mailing list run on a Debian GNU/Linux machine, which is immune to windows macro virii. The list software also doesn

Re: precheck depends before package removal; notification period

2003-06-30 Thread Colin Watson
On Sun, Jun 29, 2003 at 05:33:36PM -0700, Mark Hedges wrote: > Shouldn't there be a policy to check for packages that depend on a > package BEFORE its removal from the distribution, and to notify > maintainers ahead of time that their packages will break? Such was > the case with the disappearance

Re: debootstrapping and sysvinit

2003-06-30 Thread Junichi Uekawa
> >> I've received several reports that debootstrap of sid has not been > >> possible recently due to sysvinit. > > > >I've noticed that waldi already did a NMU. > >I'm moved. It's free-software and cooperation at work. > > Yes, NMUing essential packages without bothering to contact the > maintain

Re: Please don't misuse the debian/changelog to close bugs!

2003-06-30 Thread Herbert Xu
Mark Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Messages that close bugs are, however, the place for documenting why > bugs are being closed and when those messages come from changelogs that > means that the changelogs ought to be more explicit too. IMHO the only reason why a bug should be closed is th

Bug#197886: make still broken after 12 days

2003-06-30 Thread Samium Gromoff
I`ll proceed in the time order of events: Tue, 17 Jun 2003 15:52:38 +0400: I`ve produced a testcase for make which causes it to bail out with a *** Virtual memory exhausted. Stop message on a perfectly valid, sane and real-world Makefile. link: http://mail.gnu.org/

Re: inews path question

2003-06-30 Thread Marco d'Itri
On Jun 29, Bernd Eckenfels <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Afaik the basic mode of operation and options are compatibel, >> inews even diverts the inews from cnews. Using alternatives sounds >> nice. >and of course it must be installed in /usr/sbin/ in that case, just like >/usr/sbin/sendmail.

Re: inews path question

2003-06-30 Thread Marco d'Itri
On Jun 27, Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >I maintain slrn, which can run inews to post news. We apparently have >three inews programs in debian; inewsinn puts it in /usr/bin/inews, >while inews and cnews put it in /usr/lib/news/inews. My question is how I'd say fix inews/cnews. inews has

Re: Bug#198957: ITP: email -- Send email from command line, either via MTA or SMTP, with optional encryption

2003-06-30 Thread Millis Miller
I've already spoken to the upstream author, and he does not see mwilling to convert to a DFSG license. Probably the only thing I can do is to make it suitable for the non-free section for the time being. Can you indicate to me how the license shoudl be changed to be suitable for the non-free sec

Re: but I want the GNU versions of packages

2003-06-30 Thread David B Harris
On Sat, 28 Jun 2003 07:57:55 +0800 Dan Jacobson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Gentlemen, after I installed "Debian GNU/Linux", I found I had to take > extra steps to get the GNU version of a program installed, as some > other leading brand alternative was in its stead. > > So what is the single com

Re: /etc/network/interfaces & point-to-point ethernet & broadcast address

2003-06-30 Thread Paul Hedderly
On Sat, Feb 15, 2003 at 07:59:49PM +0100, Marc Haber wrote: > > I have a package ready that allows ifupdown to do much more magic. > That package is in use for one and a half years at the site I work > for, but it needs the patch (better said, the current version of that > patch) from Bug #88948 a

Re: but I want the GNU versions of packages

2003-06-30 Thread Roland Mas
Dan Jacobson (2003-06-28 07:57:55 +0800) : > Gentlemen, after I installed "Debian GNU/Linux", I found I had to > take extra steps to get the GNU version of a program installed, as > some other leading brand alternative was in its stead. > > So what is the single command to apt-get install all the

Re: Problem with advocating new prospective delevolper.

2003-06-30 Thread Jose Carlos Garcia Sogo
On Fri, Jun 27, 2003 at 09:20:18AM +0200, Janusz A. Urbanowicz wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > I'm trying to advocate a developer, although my recomendation bounces from > nm.debian.org, with following message: I think you should send this to [EMAIL PROTECTED] inste

Re: inews path question

2003-06-30 Thread Andreas Metzler
Bernd Eckenfels <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sat, Jun 28, 2003 at 10:26:08AM +0200, Andreas Metzler wrote: >> Afaik the basic mode of operation and options are compatibel, >> inews even diverts the inews from cnews. Using alternatives sounds >> nice. > and of course it must be installed in /usr

Re: Bug#198957: ITP: email -- Send email from command line, either via MTA or SMTP, with optional encryption

2003-06-30 Thread Luca - De Whiskey's - De Vitis
On Sat, Jun 28, 2003 at 04:08:05PM +0100, Millis Miller wrote: > OK, let me see if I can address all the comments I've received so far. [...] Thanks, for your explanations, but i think that the most important issue here is the license. You'd better keep in touch with upstream author and try to con

Re: Upstream requires forked Date::Manip

2003-06-30 Thread Graham Wilson
On Sun, Jun 29, 2003 at 03:50:29PM -0500, Kenneth Pronovici wrote: > The upstream maintainer of XMLTV, which I package for Debian, has > temporarily forked the Perl Date::Manip module. He says: > >Over the past six months or so I've accumulated various bug fixes to >the Date::Manip module

Windows macro virus

2003-06-30 Thread Dany Vanderroost
This is an autoreply/autodetection message about your mail with subject "debian-devel-digest Digest V2003 #800" received from my server. Dear Sir, Madam, I have just received a windows macro virus/virus from you, it probably has one of your private files attached to it; I do not know and do not

Re: Upstream requires forked Date::Manip

2003-06-30 Thread Martin Quinson
On Sun, Jun 29, 2003 at 03:50:29PM -0500, Kenneth Pronovici wrote: > The upstream maintainer of XMLTV, which I package for Debian, has > temporarily forked the Perl Date::Manip module. He says: > >Over the past six months or so I've accumulated various bug fixes to >the Date::Manip module

Re: Mass bug filing: Build-Depends on libgdbmg1-dev and/or imlib-dev

2003-06-30 Thread Fabio Massimo Di Nitto
On Sat, 28 Jun 2003, Daniel Schepler wrote: > For libgdbmg1-dev (excluding packages with Build-Depends on > "libgdbm-dev | libgdbmg1-dev"): apache-perl libapache-mod-perl We have this already done in our CVS. It should be uploaded in a relatively short time. Thanks Fabio -- Our mission: make

RE: Counter-Proposal: Architecture Versions and Architecture Features

2003-06-30 Thread Julian Mehnle
Andreas Barth wrote: > * Julian Mehnle ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [030627 21:05]: > > [...] > > Thanks for your proposal. IMHO it is important that we are going to > adopt one or the other proposal rather soon, so that it could be used in > sarge. I agree. > Now to comments: > > > Every base arch (al

precheck depends before package removal; notification period

2003-06-30 Thread Mark Hedges
Shouldn't there be a policy to check for packages that depend on a package BEFORE its removal from the distribution, and to notify maintainers ahead of time that their packages will break? Such was the case with the disappearance of perlapi-5.6.1. --mark--

Re: Package Lists and Size

2003-06-30 Thread Corrin Lakeland
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Sun, 29 Jun 2003 03:21, Bruno Rodrigues wrote: > Corrin Lakeland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > To do this, just replace http with rsync in your sources.list > > With which apt version ? > I don't find any usr/lib/apt/methods/rsync :( Seems I was

Re: Accepted java-gnome 0.8.0cvs20030627-1 (source)

2003-06-30 Thread Aaron M. Ucko
If you're going to leave out any architecture-specific packages from your uploads, please still include at least the arch-all packages, since the autobuilders skip them. Thanks. -- Aaron M. Ucko, KB1CJC (amu at alum.mit.edu, ucko at debian.org) Finger [EMAIL PROTECTED] (NOT a valid e-mail addres

Re: Bug#198158: architecture i386 isn't i386 anymore

2003-06-30 Thread David B Harris
On Sat, 28 Jun 2003 15:53:56 -0600 Joel Baker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > No it doesn't. I've yet to even hear of an architecture that NetBSD runs > > on but which Linux doesn't. They just have a different definition of > > "architecture" than us. (ie: our "hppa" may be three or four arches to >

Re: but I want the GNU versions of packages

2003-06-30 Thread Mathieu Roy
Sam Hocevar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a tapoté : > On Sat, Jun 28, 2003, Dan Jacobson wrote: > > > Do I look in Packages.gz for Conflicts:, and then look in Description: > > for "this is the GNU version of..."? > >No need for such a fastidious search. Use this instead: > > apt-get install `a

Re: but I want the GNU versions of packages

2003-06-30 Thread Michael Banck
On Sat, Jun 28, 2003 at 07:57:55AM +0800, Dan Jacobson wrote: > So what is the single command to apt-get install all the GNU versions > of everything? Just create and maintain a meta-package that Conflicts/Depends on the stuff you want. See the harden package, which has similar funcionality, AFAIC

Re: Mass bug filing: Build-Depends on libgdbmg1-dev and/or imlib-dev

2003-06-30 Thread Daniel Schepler
Adam Heath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Sat, 28 Jun 2003, Daniel Schepler wrote: > >> I don't know why my previous message on this topic didn't get >> through, so let me try again... > > murphy has been having load issues, amoung other things. > >> I'm planning to file bugs against source pack

Re: but I want the GNU versions of packages

2003-06-30 Thread Mathieu Roy
Dan Jacobson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a tapoté : > Gentlemen, after I installed "Debian GNU/Linux", I found I had to take > extra steps to get the GNU version of a program installed, as some > other leading brand alternative was in its stead. > > So what is the single command to apt-get install all th

Re: but I want the GNU versions of packages

2003-06-30 Thread Morgon Kanter
This one time, at band camp, Dan Jacobson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Last year I discovered mawk sitting there until I banished it away with > apt-get install gawk. Mawk is smaller and faster, so it makes sense that it's the default awk for a base system. Even in the GNU installer packages for

Re: Problem with advocating new prospective delevolper.

2003-06-30 Thread Mark Brown
On Fri, Jun 27, 2003 at 09:20:18AM +0200, Janusz A. Urbanowicz wrote: > I'm trying to advocate a developer, although my recomendation bounces from > nm.debian.org, with following message: That happened to me recently - I mailed [EMAIL PROTECTED] and the database got updated manually. Hopefully t

Re: debootstrapping and sysvinit

2003-06-30 Thread Miquel van Smoorenburg
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Junichi Uekawa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> I've received several reports that debootstrap of sid has not been >> possible recently due to sysvinit. > >I've noticed that waldi already did a NMU. >I'm moved. It's free-software and cooperation at work. Yes, NMUing

Bug#199358: ITP: gsoap -- The gSOAP Stub and Skeleton Compiler for C and C++

2003-06-30 Thread Thomas Wana
Package: wnpp Version: unavailable; reported 2003-06-30 Severity: wishlist * Package name: gsoap Version : 2.2.3 Upstream Author : Robert van Engelen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * URL : http://www.cs.fsu.edu/~engelen/soap.html * License : gSOAP Public License (based on

Windows macro virus

2003-06-30 Thread Dany Vanderroost
This is an autoreply/autodetection message about your mail with subject "debian-devel-digest Digest V2003 #799" received from my server. Dear Sir, Madam, I have just received a windows macro virus/virus from you, it probably has one of your private files attached to it; I do not know and do not

What is the default gcc version ?

2003-06-30 Thread Yann Dirson
Despite the build-essential list and gcc-defaults package pointing to gcc 3.3, at least 6 archs still used 3.2 this week (alpha ia64 powerpc m68k mips mipsel) and buildds on s390 and hppa still do not print the toolchain versions, so I can't tell for those 2 ones. That's half of our archs looking

Bug#199348: ITP: termpkg -- remote modem utilities

2003-06-30 Thread Oliver Kurth
Package: wnpp Version: unavailable; reported 2003-06-30 Severity: wishlist * Package name: termpkg Version : 3.3 Upstream Author : Joe Croft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * URL : http://www.linuxlots.com/~termpkg/ * License : GPL Description : remote modem utilities