Jaldhar H. Vyas wrote:
>
> The West coast may be more expensive to get to for foreign visitors.
> But I like the other suggestion of Florida. Lot's of cheap flights to
> there.
i live on the west coast (san diego, specifically), but if there was a
debconf held in southern florida (fort lauderdal
On Sun, 25 May 2003, Sven Luther wrote:
> > So let me get this straight. Instead of a country where people are
> > occasionally subject to bureaucratic hassles, (assuming Russell and
> > Geordies' sources amount to anything more than innuendo which is not
> > clear.) you would rather go to a plac
On Sun, 25 May 2003, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> >> > On Thu, 22 May 2003 17:06, Miles Bader wrote:
> >> >> You mean the iraq war? What's the point? How is avoiding the
> >> >> U.S. going to help anything, regardless of how strongly you feel
> >> >> about the U.S. governments acts or positions?
>
This one time, at band camp, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
>Packages Developers
Looks like a normal distribution curve in gnuplot.
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://people.debian.org/~jaq
Package: wnpp
Version: unavailable; reported 2003-05-24
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: yavipin
Version : 0.9.6
Upstream Author : Jerome Etienne
* URL : http://yavipin.sf.net/
* License : GPL [1]
Description : daemon for creating secure tunnels
Yavipi
On Sat, 2003-05-24 at 15:27, Brian May wrote:
> On Fri, May 23, 2003 at 05:25:29PM -0400, Joe Drew wrote:
> > Do we need some method of deciding what constitutes 'the' Debconf?
>
> No, as everyone knows that the only true "Debconf" are the ones in
> Australia, with LCA.
Hehe, preach it brother
On Wed, May 21, 2003 at 04:04:50PM +0200, Paul Slootman wrote:
> You might have made the effort of filling in the fields; I can't believe
> the version is x.y.z, the upstream author is Name <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> etc. Especially the license...
Obviously the upstream author is very flexible... ;-
On Sun, May 25, 2003 at 12:19:57PM -0400, John Belmonte wrote:
> Aaron M. Ucko wrote:
> >Also, he seems to have no official status whatsoever; if he's serious
> >about wanting to maintain stuff, he is welcome to go through the NM
> >process.
>
> Part of the NM process can be packaging by way of a
On Sun, May 25, 2003 at 11:53:31PM +0200, Marc Haber wrote:
> Please note that the mailing list request was filed months ago - well
> before alioth went into service - and that your e-mail is the first
> reaction to the bug report filed.
Yes, I know.
> We actually discussed on the internal exim m
On Sun, May 25, 2003 at 11:53:31PM +0200, Marc Haber wrote:
> On Sun, 25 May 2003 23:03:36 +0200, Josip Rodin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >I'm perplexed about the mailing list request about Exim.
> >On one hand, exim is an important package, and there are already ample
> >precedents like debian-ap
On Sun, 25 May 2003 23:03:36 +0200, Josip Rodin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>I'm perplexed about the mailing list request about Exim.
>On one hand, exim is an important package, and there are already ample
>precedents like debian-apache, debian-ssh and debian-tetex-maint;
>but on the other hand, the
On Sun, May 25, 2003 at 11:36:23PM +0200, Bernd Eckenfels wrote:
> > but on the other hand, there's alioth.debian.org which allows for easier
> > creation and maintenance of per-package mailing lists.
>
> we should generally decide to migrate (all) mailinglists, or only create
> new project mailin
On Sun, May 25, 2003 at 04:30:08PM -0500, Adam Majer wrote:
> On Sun, May 25, 2003 at 04:50:03PM -0400, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> > For python, you only need to declare Depends: python to ensure that python
> > is installed and configured when your postinst runs.
>
> Wouldn't you need predepends?
On Sun, May 25, 2003 at 04:50:03PM -0400, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> On Sun, May 25, 2003 at 09:56:04PM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
>
> > I want to package GnuMed which is a Python application accessing
> > PostgreSQL server.
> >
> > http://bugs.debian.org/166282
> >
> > It comes with a Python
On Sun, May 25, 2003 at 03:36:39PM -0400, Jaldhar H. Vyas wrote:
> On Sat, 24 May 2003, Adam Majer wrote:
>
> > PS. Personally, I would prefer to travel for a DebConf in
> > Cuba than in US. Really.
> >
>
> So let me get this straight. Instead of a country where people are
> occasionally subject
On Sun, May 25, 2003 at 03:36:39PM -0400, Jaldhar H. Vyas wrote:
> On Sat, 24 May 2003, Adam Majer wrote:
>
> > PS. Personally, I would prefer to travel for a DebConf in
> > Cuba than in US. Really.
> >
>
> So let me get this straight. Instead of a country where people are
> occasionally subject
On Sun, May 25, 2003 at 10:34:59PM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote:
> Hi,
>
> $Subject. Enjoy.
>
> http://lists.debian.org/debian-x86-64/
thanks Josip!
CCing debian-devel as there likely are people interested around.
--
Robert Millan
make: *** No rule to make target `war'. Stop.
Another world is
On Sun, May 25, 2003 at 11:03:36PM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote:
> but on the other hand, there's alioth.debian.org which allows for easier
> creation and maintenance of per-package mailing lists.
we should generally decide to migrate (all) mailinglists, or only create new
project mailinglists and not
Hi,
I'm perplexed about the mailing list request about Exim.
On one hand, exim is an important package, and there are already ample
precedents like debian-apache, debian-ssh and debian-tetex-maint;
but on the other hand, there's alioth.debian.org which allows for easier
creation and maintenance of
On Sun, May 25, 2003 at 09:56:04PM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
> I want to package GnuMed which is a Python application accessing
> PostgreSQL server.
>
> http://bugs.debian.org/166282
>
> It comes with a Python bootstrap routine. That means the postinst script
> would need a working Pytho
Now that GNOME (via pango) and KDE (via the upcoming Qt 3.2.0) have viable
support, I wonder if there is any interest in a sub-project for increasing
the support for Indian languages within Debian?
The goals of Debian-IN as I see it would be to
1. Package Indic software or write it as necessary.
Graham Wilson wrote:
> i would hope not, though, in this case, it does not matter, since aaron
> responded before moron did.
Passing a package off is not a race to post first. If I am passing a
package on, I will pick whomever I feel is best suited to maintain it.
And yes, that will generally be s
Hello,
I want to package GnuMed which is a Python application accessing
PostgreSQL server.
http://bugs.debian.org/166282
It comes with a Python bootstrap routine. That means the postinst
script would need a working Python and PostgreSQL server installed.
I think I would solve this by a si
On Sat, 24 May 2003, Adam Majer wrote:
> PS. Personally, I would prefer to travel for a DebConf in
> Cuba than in US. Really.
>
So let me get this straight. Instead of a country where people are
occasionally subject to bureaucratic hassles, (assuming Russell and
Geordies' sources amount to anyth
On Sun, 25 May 2003, Sven Luther wrote:
> Notice that the US governement never said that was their aim,
The aim is Kralizec -- the typhoon struggle.
--
Jaldhar H. Vyas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
La Salle Debain - http://www.braincells.com/debian/
On Fri, 23 May 2003, Don Armstrong wrote:
> On Fri, 23 May 2003, Jaldhar H. Vyas wrote:
> > My only objection to a conference in the US is the weather is
> > miserable.
>
> Which part of the US?
Sorry I should have said Northeast US. It's absolutely miserable here.
> Surely the weather in Los A
Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a tapoté :
> On 25 May 2003 12:20:45 +0200, Mathieu Roy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>
> > Mike Hommey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a tapoté :
> >> On Sunday 25 May 2003 07:27, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> >> > > Remember, the rest of the world does *not* owe you and yours
On Sun, May 25, 2003 at 06:41:34PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> On Fri, May 23, 2003 at 12:43:13AM +0200, Sylvain LE GALL wrote:
> > On Thu, May 22, 2003 at 03:58:35PM +0200, Sebastian Muszynski wrote:
> > > Hello all!
> > >
> > > I am getting a lintian error, binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath although
On Sun, May 25, 2003 at 11:59:32AM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> Have you seen US developers try to raise common cause here to
> boycott French products and conferences in France (because of what
> some consider their silly stnace in removing a dictator from power)?
> No? How many of yo
On Fri, May 23, 2003 at 11:16:21AM -0500, Graham Wilson wrote:
> On Fri, May 23, 2003 at 04:28:59PM +0200, Goulais, Raphael wrote:
> > On Friday 23 May 2003 03:52, Aaron M. Ucko wrote:
> > > Morgon Kanter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > > None taken. And no, I am not.
> > > [a DD]
> > >
> > > OK,
On 25 May 2003 12:20:45 +0200, Mathieu Roy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> Mike Hommey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a tapoté :
>> On Sunday 25 May 2003 07:27, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
>> > > Remember, the rest of the world does *not* owe you and yours a
>> > > living.
>> >
>> >Quite. But if they take delib
On Sun, May 25, 2003 at 07:00:07PM +0200, Mathieu Roy wrote:
That said, removing -p and -i option may be problematic. It should be
done upstream.
I'm tired of people complaining about the "unknown" entries. They're not
required and they are useless on these systems, so there's no point in
having t
Michael Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a tapoté :
> On Sun, May 25, 2003 at 04:51:17PM +0200, Jim Meyering wrote:
> >The problem is that the kernel provides no way to
> >get the required information.
>
> s/no way/no reasonable way/
>
> It is possible to parse /proc/cpuinfo (that's what the experiment
This one time, at band camp, Graham Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > None taken. And no, I am not.
> > > [a DD]
> > >
> > > OK, then, I'm going ahead and taking fltk1.1.
> >
> > Does this mean that debian policy is that DD have priority over a non-DD ?
>
> i would hope not, though, in th
On Sat, May 24, 2003 at 07:13:29PM +0200, Bernd Eckenfels wrote:
> from time to time, especially while upgrading a lot of packages I notice
> debconfig questions for packages I do not know. This is of course quite
> likely given the size of debian archive and the fact, that task packages
> introduc
On Fri, May 23, 2003 at 12:43:13AM +0200, Sylvain LE GALL wrote:
> On Thu, May 22, 2003 at 03:58:35PM +0200, Sebastian Muszynski wrote:
> > Hello all!
> >
> > I am getting a lintian error, binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath although i run
> > configure with --disable-rpath option. It is no automake pro
Aaron M. Ucko wrote:
Also, he seems to have no official status whatsoever; if he's serious
about wanting to maintain stuff, he is welcome to go through the NM
process.
Part of the NM process can be packaging by way of a sponsor. I would guess that
it's common for a person's advocate (required to
On Fri, May 23, 2003 at 04:28:59PM +0200, Goulais, Raphael wrote:
> On Friday 23 May 2003 03:52, Aaron M. Ucko wrote:
> > Morgon Kanter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > None taken. And no, I am not.
> > [a DD]
> >
> > OK, then, I'm going ahead and taking fltk1.1.
>
> Does this mean that debian po
On Sun, May 25, 2003 at 04:51:17PM +0200, Jim Meyering wrote:
The problem is that the kernel provides no way to
get the required information.
s/no way/no reasonable way/
It is possible to parse /proc/cpuinfo (that's what the experimental
patch in the debian coreutils-4.5.2-1 did) but that's a losin
On Sun, May 25, 2003 at 02:34:50PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > > When building kernel-image-s390, make-kpkg would first apply
> > > the arch specific patches and the the arch independent ones that
> > > have not been superceded by an arch specific one.
> >
> > Again that's a very bad idea. Arc
On Sun, May 25, 2003 at 04:09:51PM +1000, Russell Coker wrote:
> On Sun, 25 May 2003 15:11, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> > This approach does not scale. I cannot personally review the diffs for
> > every upstream release of all the software in Debian, nor can any other
> > individual or even a small g
On Sun, May 25, 2003 at 09:23:44AM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Sun, May 25, 2003 at 01:11:44AM -0400, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> > > Then read through the prepatch diffs, everything adding checks to
> > > ioctl methods or similar is likely one them.
> >
> > This approach does not scale.
>
Mathieu Roy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> About http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=183858
>
> Given the information I previously provided, I do not even understand
> how it's possible to think that the bug 183858 is a kernel issue.
The problem is that the kernel provides no way to
get
I've just compiled coreutils 4.5.3 and still got the bug.
So the bug is maybe really a kernel issue, but informations when
closing bug is still important. And the bug exists, even if it need to
be reassigned.
--
Mathieu Roy
Homepage:
http://yeupou.coleumes.org
Not a native english sp
About http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=183858
Given the information I previously provided, I do not even understand
how it's possible to think that the bug 183858 is a kernel issue.
I'm not familiar with the kernel neither with coreutils code.
That said, I explicitely said when th
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sunday 25 May 2003 06:19, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Sun, May 25, 2003 at 01:51:05AM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > As a real-world example, kernel-patch-s390 can provide
> > the ptrace bug fix from Martin Schwidefsky, while
> > kernel-patch-de
On Sun, May 25, 2003 at 08:20:39PM +1000, Russell Coker wrote:
> What is the status of the pcmcia support anyway?
Seems to work fine. Red Hat uses inkernel pcmcia at least.
There's some pcmcia drivers not (yet?) merged in the kernel but patching
them in is rather easy.
I'm not officially orphaning it yet, but if anybody cares about this
please take it, as I'm not using it much.
Package: lft
Priority: optional
Section: net
Version: 2.1-1
Depends: libc6 (>= 2.3.1-1), libpcap0.7
Size: 33910
Description: display the route packets take to a network host/socket
lft s
On Sun, 25 May 2003 19:33, Herbert Xu wrote:
> In the long term, we should have as few binary module packages as
> possible. They should either be integrated into our kernel-source
> if it is popular enough or made source-only so that the people who
> really need them can build them privately. I
Mike Hommey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a tapoté :
> On Sunday 25 May 2003 07:27, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> > > Remember, the rest of the world does *not* owe you and yours a
> > > living.
> >
> > Quite. But if they take delibrate action to hurt _any_
> > country, or its economy, they shall have to l
On Sun, May 25, 2003 at 07:33:04PM +1000, Herbert Xu wrote:
> Anthony Towns wrote:
> > Having kernel modules associated with the kernel source package they're
> > built for makes it a bunch easier to make sure they're deleted from
> > the archive along with the corresponding kernel images, and mak
On Saturday 24 May 2003 00:43, Matthew Palmer wrote:
> * The rest of the world is sick to death of US imperialism;
>
> * The US government ignores world opinion and does it's thing;
>
> * The rest of the world puts pressure on the US people to change things,
> since they've at least got half a chan
On Sunday 25 May 2003 07:27, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> > Remember, the rest of the world does *not* owe you and yours a
> > living.
>
> Quite. But if they take delibrate action to hurt _any_
> country, or its economy, they shall have to live with the consequences.
And what is US trying to d
Anthony Towns wrote:
>
> Having kernel modules associated with the kernel source package they're
> built for makes it a bunch easier to make sure they're deleted from
> the archive along with the corresponding kernel images, and makes sure
> that when someone uploads a new kernel image, new modul
On Sun, May 25, 2003 at 12:04:43AM -0400, Duncan Findlay wrote:
> On Sat, May 24, 2003 at 09:57:50PM -0500, Adam Majer wrote:
> > PS. Personally, I would prefer to travel for a DebConf in
> > Cuba than in US. Really.
>
> Who wouldn't? You got the sun, the beaches and the ocean... what more
> could
On Sun, 2003-05-25 at 02:14, Debian Font Manager wrote:
> retitle 180188 ITA: Defoma -- Debian Font Manager
I see defoma has become so complex it now is capable of maintaining
itself :)
On Sun, May 25, 2003 at 01:11:44AM -0400, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> > Then read through the prepatch diffs, everything adding checks to
> > ioctl methods or similar is likely one them.
>
> This approach does not scale.
Right, you got it. Similarly it doesn't scale to announce all these
bits. Ju
On Sun, 25 May 2003, Craig Small wrote:
> Fabio Massimo Di Nitto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > IPv6 is an official subproject founded by Craig Small, even if we host
> > experimental packages outside Debian for various reasons.
>
> I think that might be way, way too formal for what it is. I'm no
On Sun, 25 May 2003 15:11, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> On Sun, May 25, 2003 at 06:21:00AM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > On Sat, May 24, 2003 at 06:32:26PM -0400, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> > > It's not noise at all when it's something that we and others
> > > (desperately!) want to know about.
> >
>
retitle 180188 ITA: Defoma -- Debian Font Manager
N.B. Here follows the description as is in the stable distribution:
Defoma, which stands for DEbian FOnt MAnager, provides a framework of
automatic font configuration. An application whose configuration of
fonts requires users' hand can make the c
On Sat, May 24, 2003 at 09:24:16PM +1000, Herbert Xu wrote:
> OK, barring any major objections, that's how it will be for 2.4.21.
Is there any possibility of having the various foo-modules-2.4.xx packages
be built concurrently with kernel-image-2.4.xx too?
Something like:
kernel-i386_2.4
Fabio Massimo Di Nitto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> IPv6 is an official subproject founded by Craig Small, even if we host
> experimental packages outside Debian for various reasons.
I think that might be way, way too formal for what it is. I'm not too
fussed what it is called as it was setup pra
On Fri, 23 May 2003 20:01:48 -0500, Gunnar Wolf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> Not at all. I know that if your economy suffers, mine suffers doubly
> so. Mexico is so heavily dependent on the US economy that if you
> enter a mild recession we are in crisis... And it is not nice at
> all.
On Sat, 24 May 2003 08:43:12 +1000 (EST), Matthew Palmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
said:
> On Thu, 22 May 2003, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
>> On Thu, 22 May 2003 22:39:02 +1000, Russell Coker
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>> > On Thu, 22 May 2003 17:06, Miles Bader wrote:
>> >> You mean the iraq war? Wha
On Fri, May 23, 2003 at 04:28:59PM +0200, Goulais, Raphael wrote:
> On Friday 23 May 2003 03:52, Aaron M. Ucko wrote:
> > Morgon Kanter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > None taken. And no, I am not.
> > [a DD]
> >
> > OK, then, I'm going ahead and taking fltk1.1.
>
> Does this mean that debian po
On Fri, 23 May 2003, Gustavo Franco wrote:
> Hi,
>
> [1] = "Mono for Debian", ipv6 (is it official or unofficial?),
> "ddtp", ...
IPv6 is an official subproject founded by Craig Small, even if we host
experimental packages outside Debian for various reasons.
Thanks
Fabio
--
Our mission: make I
On Sun, May 25, 2003 at 06:21:00AM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Sat, May 24, 2003 at 06:32:26PM -0400, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> > It's not noise at all when it's something that we and others (desperately!)
> > want to know about.
>
> Then read through the prepatch diffs, everything adding
67 matches
Mail list logo
