On Sat, May 24, 2003 at 06:32:26PM -0400, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> It's not noise at all when it's something that we and others (desperately!)
> want to know about.
Then read through the prepatch diffs, everything adding checks to
ioctl methods or similar is likely one them.
On Sat, May 24, 2003 at 08:10:20PM -0400, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> > in task_struct then perhaps so assuming that we care about it enough to do
> > it in such a way. Otherwise I don't see your point.
>
> Are task_struct and mm_struct exposed to modules?
Yes.
> they should need to be, but I am no
On Sun, May 25, 2003 at 01:51:05AM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> SuSE don't have a single kernel source either. They have a set of
> a few hundred common patches plus some more patches (e.g. 200
> for s390) that are used only for one architecture, usually both 32 and
> 64 bit. Single patches can b
On Sat, May 24, 2003 at 09:57:50PM -0500, Adam Majer wrote:
> PS. Personally, I would prefer to travel for a DebConf in
> Cuba than in US. Really.
Who wouldn't? You got the sun, the beaches and the ocean... what more
could you ask for than a debconf on a beach?
--
Duncan Findlay
pgpeaqvWUV3fv.p
On Sat, May 24, 2003 at 07:46:53PM -0400, Geordie Birch wrote:
> On Sun, May 25, 2003 at 03:32:57AM +1000, Russell Coker wrote:
> >
> > For avoiding entering the US there are better reasons such as the following:
> > http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article1689.htm
>
> May 20, 2003. Fren
> On Sat, May 24, 2003 at 05:37:31PM +0900, Masato Taruishi wrote:
>
> > > Masato Taruishi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > Ah, the main point of this package is to create a local ad-hoc package
> > > > which can coexist with its official package. Escpecially, I can manage
> > > > my temporary o
Matt Zimmerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> In general, this is not a problem. The exception is coordinated disclosure,
> where it is important that fixes be available for all architectures in order
> to minimize exposure. In those cases, it would be helpful to coordinate
> with all of the ker
Matt Zimmerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, May 25, 2003 at 07:37:10AM +1000, Herbert Xu wrote:
>>
>> How does this automate the arch-specific merges where conflicts arise?
>
> 1. unpack pristine kernel source
> 2. apply Debian patch
> 3. dry-run arch-specific patch
> 4. if no conflicts,
Florian Thiel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Package: wnpp
> Version: N/A; reported 2003-01-13
> Severity: wishlist
>
> * Package name: firehol
There was no further activity on this ITP.
I've packaged FireHOL myself, found a sponsor and mailed Florian 3 weeks
ago [1]. If there is no answer in
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
> Christoph Hellwig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Why can't Debian have just one tree for multiple architectures like
> > SuSE and RedHat (sometimes) do. Okay suse supports 'only' i386,
> > x86_64,ppc,ppc64,s390,s390x,ia64 but their kernel also has p
On Sun, May 25, 2003 at 07:58:09AM +1000, Herbert Xu wrote:
> Matt Zimmerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > By 'independent packages', do you mean that we should have separate
> > kernel-source source packages for each architecture? This would seem to
> > be a step backward.
>
> No, they are ind
On Sun, May 25, 2003 at 03:32:57AM +1000, Russell Coker wrote:
>
> For avoiding entering the US there are better reasons such as the following:
> http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article1689.htm
May 20, 2003. French reporters covering Electronic Entertainment Expo (E3)
arrested, forcibl
On Sun, May 25, 2003, Andreas Schuldei wrote:
> > What are other developers' feelings on the matter these days?
>
> I would rather not come.
Neither would I. Given what happened to Sklyarov, I don't fancy going
to the USA at all. And like many others, I won't object, I merely won't
attend.
Sa
* Aaron M. Ucko ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [030519 04:26]:
> What are other developers' feelings on the matter these days?
I would rather not come.
On Sun, May 25, 2003 at 07:37:10AM +1000, Herbert Xu wrote:
> Matt Zimmerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Given an explicit kernel-patch-debian, containing architecture-agnostic
> > differences between kernel.org source and Debian's kernel source,
> > arch-specific merges could be mostly au
On Sat, May 24, 2003 at 08:44:26PM +0200, Guido Guenther wrote:
> On Sat, May 24, 2003 at 01:42:22PM -0400, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> > So this means that maintainers of the architecture patches must be sure
> > to merge in these fixes, otherwise they may inherit security
> > vulnerabilities (for ex
On Sat, May 24, 2003 at 08:42:39PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Sat, May 24, 2003 at 02:34:17PM -0400, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> > What benefit is there in not announcing these problems? Security
> > through obscurity? How can we inform our users of their exposure when
> > we are not infor
Christoph Hellwig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Why can't Debian have just one tree for multiple architectures like
> SuSE and RedHat (sometimes) do. Okay suse supports 'only' i386,
> x86_64,ppc,ppc64,s390,s390x,ia64 but their kernel also has patches
> for sparc,sparc64,mips and m68k although I
Matt Zimmerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I think that we can live with multiple source packages given a little bit of
> infrastructure which more closely follows the way that kernel development
> happens. We need to be able to introduce specific patches to all of our
> kernels while minimizi
Hello,
I created a new package for stunnel 4, it is available at :
http://people.debian.org/~speedblue/stunnel/
I will wait a little before take over the package.
Best Regards.
--
Julien LEMOINE / SpeedBlue
pgpNIXSuf9fJZ.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Matt Zimmerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Given an explicit kernel-patch-debian, containing architecture-agnostic
> differences between kernel.org source and Debian's kernel source,
> arch-specific merges could be mostly automated, and security fixes could be
> made in one place.
How does thi
Manoj said:
>Oh, as a sponsor of the GR, I suppose I should clarify that I
> am not going to accept this amendment; I consider it a bad one. This
> makes our vote method fail the monoticity criteria
> (http://www.electionmethods.org/evaluation.htm). See Scenario 2 below.
>
>
>I'll
On Sun, May 25, 2003 at 04:29:13AM +1000, Russell Coker wrote:
> On Sun, 25 May 2003 04:18, Bernd Eckenfels wrote:
> > On Sat, May 24, 2003 at 07:55:08PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > > Some m68k architectures might be a hard, I agree. But having a package
> > > that works on as many machine
On Sat, May 24, 2003 at 11:37:09AM -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> Guido, you're not going about it the right way. It's a three-way
> merge. You take a kernel.org tree, diff it against the architecture
> tree that you're interested in, and then wiggle it into applying to the
> kernel source pac
On Sat, May 24, 2003 at 01:42:22PM -0400, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> So this means that maintainers of the architecture patches must be sure to
> merge in these fixes, otherwise they may inherit security vulnerabilities
> (for example)? How can we track when this has happened when there are so
> many
On Sat, May 24, 2003 at 02:34:17PM -0400, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> What benefit is there in not announcing these problems? Security through
> obscurity? How can we inform our users of their exposure when we are not
> informed ourselves about security problems?
Noise. You can's accnounce every po
Russell Coker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I don't assume that everyone agrees, just the 49.X% that voted for him.
This figure is not as meaningful as it might seem; we still use a
non-preferential voting system, in which votes for non-mainstream
candidates are effectively wasted. :-/
> The mos
On Sun, 25 May 2003 04:18, Bernd Eckenfels wrote:
> On Sat, May 24, 2003 at 07:55:08PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > Some m68k architectures might be a hard, I agree. But having a package
> > that works on as many machines as possible would be very cool.
>
> well, I there is a shared debian-
On Sat, May 24, 2003 at 08:18:40PM +0200, Bernd Eckenfels wrote:
> On Sat, May 24, 2003 at 07:55:08PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > Some m68k architectures might be a hard, I agree. But having a package
> > that works on as many machines as possible would be very cool.
>
> well, I there is
On Sat, May 24, 2003 at 11:37:09AM -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> Guido, you're not going about it the right way. It's a three-way
> merge. You take a kernel.org tree, diff it against the architecture
> tree that you're interested in, and then wiggle it into applying to the
> kernel source pac
On Fri, May 23, 2003 at 09:20:28PM +1000, Herbert Xu wrote:
> So unless someone can come up with a solution to this problem,
> we will have to live with multiple Debian source packages for now.
>
> This does make security fixes more difficult than it would be otherwise,
> however, I do not think
On Sat, May 24, 2003 at 07:51:17PM +0200, Karsten Merker wrote:
> Because it simply did not work out - not all architectures are in sync with
> Linus' tree
Oh, I know that well enough.
> and if I understood "our" port maintainer correctly, there are
> some architecture-specific things Linus does
On Sat, 2003-05-24 at 11:52, Joe Drew wrote:
> On Saturday, May 24, 2003, at 03:28 AM, Colin Walters wrote:
> > Pyblosxom is so-named because it was inspired by the blosxom package.
>
> Does pyblosxom offer any features which blosxom proper doesn't?
Plugins, sane code, xmlrpc support, different
On Sat, May 24, 2003 at 07:55:08PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> Some m68k architectures might be a hard, I agree. But having a package
> that works on as many machines as possible would be very cool.
well, I there is a shared debian-kernel cvs then all architecture
maintainers can commit, a
On Sat, May 24, 2003 at 01:25:38PM -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> > Sure, it's more work but I think it's worth it.
>
> Because no one's done it?
Hey, if that was an argument. The question is whether people want it..
> We can't count on it because the architecture ports become available at
>
Em Sat, 24 May 2003 06:11:18 -0400, David B Harris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escreveu:
> On Sat, 24 May 2003 10:19:38 +0200
> Enrico Zini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > http://www.debian.org/devel/, "Projects" section:
> > >
> > > * Debian Web Pages
> > [...]
> > > * Alioth: Debian GForge
> >
On Sun, 25 May 2003 02:24, Ed Cogburn wrote:
> >>Well, didn't work that way last time...
> >
> > They got their second choice.
>
> I never chose Little Napolean and he wasn't on my alternate list either.
Something between 49% and 50% of US voters wanted the Shrub as president.
> Please stop ass
On Sat, May 24, 2003 at 05:37:31PM +0900, Masato Taruishi wrote:
> > Masato Taruishi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Ah, the main point of this package is to create a local ad-hoc package
> > > which can coexist with its official package. Escpecially, I can manage
> > > my temporary on-going impr
On Sat, May 24, 2003 at 11:37:09AM -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> Guido, you're not going about it the right way. It's a three-way merge.
> You take a kernel.org tree, diff it against the architecture tree that
> you're interested in, and then wiggle it into applying to the kernel
> source pac
On Sat, May 24, 2003 at 07:03:22PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Sat, May 24, 2003 at 11:37:09AM -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> > Guido, you're not going about it the right way. It's a three-way
> > merge. You take a kernel.org tree, diff it against the architecture
> > tree that you're
On Sat, May 24, 2003 at 09:24:16PM +1000, Herbert Xu wrote:
> Guido Guenther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > It's very hard to get these bug fixes anyway since when I do a
> > _complete_ diff between kernel-source-2.X.Y in the archive and the
> > kernel source for architecture foo I'll _always_
On Sat, 24 May 2003, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> On Fri, May 23, 2003 at 09:48:02PM -0500, Adam Heath wrote:
> > On Sat, 24 May 2003, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> >
> > > The script can't even get everything a Debian Developer does for Debian.
> > > While most, if not all, active Debian Developers do pac
On Sat, May 24, 2003 at 11:37:09AM -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> Guido, you're not going about it the right way. It's a three-way
> merge. You take a kernel.org tree, diff it against the architecture
> tree that you're interested in, and then wiggle it into applying to the
> kernel source pac
Hello,
from time to time, especially while upgrading a lot of packages I notice
debconfig questions for packages I do not know. This is of course quite
likely given the size of debian archive and the fact, that task packages
introduce a lot of packages one has not selected explecitely.
Some of th
Russell Coker wrote:
On Sat, 24 May 2003 09:51, Alan Shutko wrote:
The citizens of the US have a little more power than the rest of the
world, in that you have a *vote* as to who gets to fuck the rest of the
world.
Well, didn't work that way last time...
They got their second choice.
I never chos
Quoting Laurent Bonnaud <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > Either upgrade to Roxen 2.1
>
> OK. I upgraded to the latest roxen2 package in sid. Now I have another
> question: would it be possible to update roxen to depend on pike7.4
> instead of pike7 ?
Same answer. Roxen 2.1 won't work with pike 7.4... I'
On Saturday, May 24, 2003, at 03:28 AM, Colin Walters wrote:
Pyblosxom is so-named because it was inspired by the blosxom package.
Does pyblosxom offer any features which blosxom proper doesn't?
On Sat, May 24, 2003 at 04:06:30PM +0200, Guido Guenther wrote:
> On Sat, May 24, 2003 at 09:24:16PM +1000, Herbert Xu wrote:
> > OK, barring any major objections, that's how it will be for 2.4.21.
> > I will make kernel-source-2.4.21 be identical to the upstream tar ball
> > except for the non-fre
Andreas Metzler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I still don't get why you wouldn't simply generate a modified version
> and install it _instead_ of the original package, unless foo also
> include a switch-debdivert-foo package that enables to choose to
> switch to officila package faster than 'dpkg
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Petter Reinholdtsen) writes:
> [Tollef Fog Heen]
> > So, why do you think having a more even distribution is a good
> > thing?
>
> Because in Debian there is a few people with high "load" in debian,
> and many with less "load".
>
I think this is the wrong way to see it. Since
Package: wnpp
Version: N/A; reported 2003-05-24
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: libemail-mime-encodings-perl
Version : 1.0
Upstream Author : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* URL :
http://search.cpan.org/CPAN/authors/id/S/SI/SIMON/Email-MIME-Encodings-1.0.tar.gz
* License
Package: wnpp
Version: N/A; reported 2003-05-24
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: libemail-localdelivery-perl
Version : 0.04
Upstream Author : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* URL :
http://search.cpan.org/CPAN/authors/id/S/SI/SIMON/Email-LocalDelivery-0.04.tar.gz
* License
Package: wnpp
Version: N/A; reported 2003-05-24
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: libemail-filter-perl
Version : 1.0
Upstream Author : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* URL :
http://search.cpan.org/CPAN/authors/id/S/SI/SIMON/Email-Filter-1.0.tar.gz
* License : Same as Perl.
Package: wnpp
Version: N/A; reported 2003-05-24
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: libemail-simple-perl
Version : 1.4
Upstream Author : Simon Cozens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL :
http://search.cpan.org/CPAN/authors/id/R/RC/RCLAMP/Email-Simple-1.4.tar.gz
* License
Hi,
Jesus Climent wrote:
> On Wed, May 21, 2003 at 11:47:52PM +0200, Bernd Eckenfels wrote:
> > On Wed, May 21, 2003 at 12:31:14PM -0700, Brian Nelson wrote:
> > > >* New Upstream Version (closes: #176227, #188308, #90276)
> > >
> > > Changelog abuse. This is only a valid entry if all 3 of t
On Fri, May 23, 2003 at 01:58:31PM -0300, Ben Armstrong wrote:
> > > Why Debian Desktop subproject is on official website
> > > and many others[1] aren't?
> >
> > You're on crack. http://www.debian.org/devel/debian-desktop/
> >
> > It's hard to discern useful information when you start out by sho
On Wed, May 21, 2003 at 11:47:52PM +0200, Bernd Eckenfels wrote:
> On Wed, May 21, 2003 at 12:31:14PM -0700, Brian Nelson wrote:
> > >* New Upstream Version (closes: #176227, #188308, #90276)
> >
> > Changelog abuse. This is only a valid entry if all 3 of these bugs were
> > requests for a ne
On Sat, May 24, 2003 at 09:24:16PM +1000, Herbert Xu wrote:
> OK, barring any major objections, that's how it will be for 2.4.21.
> I will make kernel-source-2.4.21 be identical to the upstream tar ball
> except for the non-free bits. A kernel-patch-i386 package will be
> introduced.
You won't her
Please take all of these political screeds off -devel!!
Regards.
Bob
--
_
|_) _ |_Robert D. Hilliard<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
|_) (_) |_) 1294 S.W. Seagull Way <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Palm City, FL 34990 USA GPG Key ID: 390D6559
Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
> Because in Debian there is a few people with high "load" in debian,
> and many with less "load". People with high load are more likely to
> burn out and disappear.
Do you have statistics to support that statement?
--
John Hasler
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (John Hasler)
Dancin
On Sat, May 24, 2003 at 11:25:03PM +1000, Russell Coker wrote:
> On Sat, 24 May 2003 22:15, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
> > Because in Debian there is a few people with high "load" in debian,
> > and many with less "load". People with high load are more likely to
> > burn out and disappear. It is
On Sat, 24 May 2003 22:15, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
> Because in Debian there is a few people with high "load" in debian,
> and many with less "load". People with high load are more likely to
> burn out and disappear. It is thus better to have more people with
> less load.
>
> Of course, the pa
On Fri, May 23, 2003 at 09:48:02PM -0500, Adam Heath wrote:
> On Sat, 24 May 2003, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
>
> > The script can't even get everything a Debian Developer does for Debian.
> > While most, if not all, active Debian Developers do packaging work,
> > there's other stuff to be done -- suc
[Tollef Fog Heen]
> So, why do you think having a more even distribution is a good
> thing?
Because in Debian there is a few people with high "load" in debian,
and many with less "load". People with high load are more likely to
burn out and disappear. It is thus better to have more people with
l
Guido Guenther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> It's very hard to get these bug fixes anyway since when I do a
> _complete_ diff between kernel-source-2.X.Y in the archive and the
> kernel source for architecture foo I'll _always_ (accidentally)
> pull out all the bug fixes you made. Only diffing spe
* Petter Reinholdtsen
| [James Troup]
| > Tor Slettnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
|
| I forwarded this email to his other address, which I came across in a
| mail from a common friend of our.
I've recently mailed with him, and for the time being, he is out of
time for doing Debian work.
--
Tollef Fo
On Wed, 21 May 2003 21:40:04 +1000, Craig small <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>The flow reports come out in text and
>show flow summaries (such as top n ASes, protocols, etc per m minutes).
>NetFlow is a packet protocol that is used by routers such as Cisco and
>Juniper.
Is there any tool that enable
On Sat, May 24, 2003 at 10:28:19AM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> The rules are quite simple: is there someone willing to write those
> pages ? I have this very same problem for DebianEdu, if I want a page on
> www.debian.org I have to prepare it but I have no time for that. I also
> don't have a
On Sat, 24 May 2003 10:19:38 +0200
Enrico Zini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > http://www.debian.org/devel/, "Projects" section:
> >
> > * Debian Web Pages
> [...]
> > * Alioth: Debian GForge
> > Certainly seems that they're listed.
>
> The Debian Usability Research seems to be missing:
>
On Thu, May 22, 2003 at 08:55:31PM -0700, Marc Singer wrote:
> This doesn't mean that we should not have a
> Debian conference in North America. I'm sure there are many North
> American DDs who'd like to meet more DDs in person. Having a
> conference in the US or Canada is not an endorsement of
On Sat, May 24, 2003 at 08:44:48AM +1000, Herbert Xu wrote:
> Guido Guenther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > This only works if we have a _clean_ kernel-source-2.X.Y package. One of
> > the reasons why maintaining kernel-patch-2.X.Y- packages is such a
> > pain is the asymmetry between i386 and
* Joe Drew ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [030524 01:11]:
> It's not entirely clear to me what makes Debconf into 'the' Debian
> conference. For example, if this conference in the US ends up
> happening, what's to say it isn't Debconf 3? The defining
> characteristics, so far as I can define them, are that
David B Harris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 24 May 2003 15:40:08 +0900
> Masato Taruishi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Ah, the main point of this package is to create a local ad-hoc package
>> which can coexist with its official package. Escpecially, I can manage
>> my temporary on-going improve
> Masato Taruishi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Ah, the main point of this package is to create a local ad-hoc package
> > which can coexist with its official package. Escpecially, I can manage
> > my temporary on-going improvement to some debian package as a debian
> > package. I didn't think to
On Fri, May 23, 2003 at 09:55:33PM -0400, David B Harris wrote:
> http://www.debian.org/devel/, "Projects" section:
>
> * Debian Web Pages
[...]
> * Alioth: Debian GForge
> Certainly seems that they're listed.
The Debian Usability Research seems to be missing:
http://deb-usability.alioth
Le Fri, May 23, 2003 at 02:22:08PM -0300, Gustavo Franco écrivait:
> You didn't understand my affirmation.Debian Desktop is on www.debian.org
> and many others aren't there, for example: "Mono for Debian" and "ipv6".
> What are the rules to be there? AFAIK, there are no documented rules.
The rules
On 24 May 2003 15:40:08 +0900
Masato Taruishi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ah, the main point of this package is to create a local ad-hoc package
> which can coexist with its official package. Escpecially, I can manage
> my temporary on-going improvement to some debian package as a debian
> package
[James Troup]
> Tor Slettnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
I forwarded this email to his other address, which I came across in a
mail from a common friend of our.
Package: wnpp
Version: unavailable; reported 2003-05-24
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: pyblosxom
Version : 0.7beta1-1
Upstream Author : Wari Wahab <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://roughingit.subtlehints.net/pyblosxom/
* License : Python
Description :
On Fri, May 23, 2003 at 10:02:42PM -0400, David B Harris wrote:
> The problem is that people who can get expenses reimbursed need to have
> a focus. Sponsors need to have a focus. There needs to be a "major"
> conference for these kinds of things; in other words, it has to be
> billed as something
2003$BG/(B05$B7n(B24$BF|(B(?)$B$N(B14$B;~(B32$BJ,$K(B Adam Heath
$B[)$/(B:
(B
(B> > Package: wnpp
(B> > Version: unavailable; reported 2003-05-24
(B> > Severity: wishlist
(B> >
(B> > * Package name: debdivert
(B> > License : GPL
(B> > Description : Debian
On Thu, May 22, 2003 at 06:15:48PM +0900, Miles Bader wrote:
> Hi Greg,
>
> Now that you've got this release out, have you given any thought to the
> message I sent earlier about merging gdb server versions?
Kindly get this on-topic shit out of this off-topic thread. ;-)
--
G. Branden Robinson
Hello!
Does this mean that the, IMHO brain-dead, 24-color limit has
been droped?
>From menu's changelog:
> * No more require icons to use the colors from cmap.xpm.
> Closes:#193231, #175430, #192218, #97080
> * No more install cmap.xpm. Closes:#172092
[]s!
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Gustav
On Fri, May 23, 2003 at 03:14:48PM -0400, Jaldhar H. Vyas wrote:
> My only objection to a conference in the US is the weather is miserable.
> I want to go somewhere warm!
Debian MiniConf @ Linux.conf.au, January 2004.
http://conf.linux.org.au/. Speakers lined up for the main conference
(which te
On Fri, May 23, 2003 at 05:25:29PM -0400, Joe Drew wrote:
> Do we need some method of deciding what constitutes 'the' Debconf?
No, as everyone knows that the only true "Debconf" are the ones in
Australia, with LCA.
;-).
--
Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On Sat, 24 May 2003, Masato Taruishi wrote:
> Package: wnpp
> Version: unavailable; reported 2003-05-24
> Severity: wishlist
>
> * Package name: debdivert
> * URL : http://www.some.org/
> License : GPL
> Description : Debian packaging aid to create patch packages
>
Package: wnpp
Version: unavailable; reported 2003-05-24
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: debdivert
* URL : http://www.some.org/
License : GPL
Description : Debian packaging aid to create patch packages
This package aims to create packages which replace files
of
87 matches
Mail list logo
