Re: bugs.debian.org: ChangeLog closes handling should be changed

2002-08-28 Thread Colin Walters
On Tue, 2002-08-27 at 02:48, Gerfried Fuchs wrote: > What we need is a change here: Bugs should just be closed in unstable. Have fun hacking the debbugs code, and good luck emerging from the experience a sane man :)

Re: Why a package is removed or kept back?

2002-08-28 Thread Carl B. Constantine
* Erich Schubert ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > > Why is it removing the qt3 dev packages? I checked gdk-imlib-dev, > > libpng2-dev and libgnome-dev for conflicts with the qt3 dev libraries, > > but I don't see any mentioned. So why are they being removed on this > > install? it doesn't make sense to

Re: errno=4294936306, Debian 2.2, vacation 3.2.3, Postfix 1.1.3, Sasl 1.5.27

2002-08-28 Thread Jim Weller
All, And the virtual beer goes to Ralf Hildebrandt for spotting the .vacation.db problem. It turns out that the tool I was using to set my .vacation.msg, .vacation.db, and .forward (vacation admin for webmin http://webmin.thirdpartymodules.com/?page=System ) was NOT executing 'vacation -I' afte

Re: Patent problems still exist [Was: Bug#158631: ITP: mp32ogg -- Converts mp3 file to Ogg Vorbis]

2002-08-28 Thread Joe Wreschnig
Regardless of the quality issues, the audio->mp3->ogg encoding process that this does still includes the mp3 process, which is patented. This means, since Ogg is deterministic, as is MP3, it's probably very easy for someone (say, Thomson) to prove a given Ogg was once an MP3. Once they can prove th

Re: Bug#158683: ITP: oggasm -- MP3 to Ogg converter

2002-08-28 Thread Craig Dickson
Robert Millan wrote: > * Package name: oggasm > Upstream: Sean Kellogg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > * URL : http://oggasm.sourceforge.net/ > * License : GPL > Description : MP3 to Ogg converter > > I'm not the ITPer, Sean Kellogg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> packaged > org

Re: errno=4294936306, Debian 2.2, vacation 3.2.3, Postfix 1.1.3, Sasl 1.5.27

2002-08-28 Thread Marco d'Itri
[Removed postfix-users.] >>What vacation is that, it seems very small, my binary on Linux is >>45521b This is not Sean Rima's package but a port of the netbsd source with a few features added. (I have no idea about what is wrong with libdb and not time to investigate it right now, sorry.) --

Re: errno=4294936306, Debian 2.2, vacation 3.2.3, Postfix 1.1.3, Sasl 1.5.27

2002-08-28 Thread Jim Weller
Sean, Thank you for taking the time to look at my problem. Can you add/change to \jim, "/pathto/strace -o /tmp/vacation.err /usr/bin/vacation jim" That is a GREAT idea. I changed it to the below and ran 'vacation -I' -

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Debian Developer Packages Overview

2002-08-28 Thread Martin Michlmayr
* Igor Genibel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-08-28 17:20]: > http://qa.debian.org/developer/ If you want to have it hosted there, you should really a) put the files in CVS (module qa), and follow the current standards for web pages (i.e. have wml files in qa/wml which are build and then copied t

Re: Bug#158631: ITP: mp32ogg -- Converts mp3 file to Ogg Vorbis

2002-08-28 Thread Jeremy Nickurak
In particular, it's important to note that transcoded MP3's, even _legally_ transcoded MP3's, should never ever ever be distributed, lest people associate the degradation in quality (even if it's something most people can't hear) with a problem in vorbis. On Wed, 2002-08-28 at 13:32, Julien Danjou

fpm - password manager

2002-08-28 Thread Brian May
Hello, I am trying to decide what to do with one of my packages, fpm. Put simply, the situation is as follows: * I have added a number of (some of them rather big; eg importing from gpasman) changes to do stuff that should really be done in upstream code. * I have heard rumours that upstream ha

Bug#158684: ITP: package_db_view -- generate an HTML view of the dpkg database

2002-08-28 Thread Florian M. Weps
Package: wnpp Version: N/A; reported 2002-08-29 Severity: wishlist * Package name: pdbv Version : 1.2.0 Upstream Author : Mathieu Roy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * URL : http://savannah.gnu.org/projects/pdbv/ * License : GPL Description : generate an HTML view of

Bug#158683: ITP: oggasm -- MP3 to Ogg converter

2002-08-28 Thread Robert Millan
Package: wnpp Version: N/A; reported 2002-08-29 Severity: wishlist * Package name: oggasm Upstream: Sean Kellogg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * URL : http://oggasm.sourceforge.net/ * License : GPL Description : MP3 to Ogg converter I'm not the ITPer, Sean Kellogg <[

Bug#158679: ITP: adonthell -- A 2D graphical roleplaying game

2002-08-28 Thread Gordon Fraser
Package: wnpp Version: N/A; reported 2002-08-29 Severity: wishlist * Package name: adonthell Version : 0.3.2 Upstream Author : Kai Sterker & Adonthell team <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * URL : http://adonthell.linuxgames.com/ * License : GPL2 Description : A 2D gra

Bug#158681: ITP: adonthell-wastesedge -- Game data for Adonthell

2002-08-28 Thread Gordon Fraser
Package: wnpp Version: N/A; reported 2002-08-29 Severity: wishlist * Package name: adonthell-wastesedge Version : 0.3.1 Upstream Author : Kai Sterker & Adonthell team <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * URL : http://adonthell.linuxgames.com/ * License : GPL2 Description

ITA: netspades

2002-08-28 Thread Roger Ward
retitle 145496 ITA: netspades -- server/client spades system tags 145496 +pending tags 146175 +pending thanks I have been working with Michael Ivey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on some xscorch related bug-fixing - and I intend to start working with this package with his support (NMU/sponsor). Initial c

Re: Bug#158631: ITP: mp32ogg -- Converts mp3 file to Ogg Vorbis

2002-08-28 Thread Nathan Walp
On Wed, Aug 28, 2002 at 06:26:24PM +0200, Russell Coker wrote: > On Wed, 28 Aug 2002 18:17, Craig Dickson wrote: > > Whenever the subject of mp3->vorbis (or wma->vorbis, or any other lossy > > codec to vorbis) transcoding comes up on the vorbis mailing list, the > > reaction from the vorbis develop

errno=4294936306, Debian 2.2, vacation 3.2.3, Postfix 1.1.3, Sasl 1.5.27

2002-08-28 Thread Jim Weller
Greetings All, (Note I'm not yet subscribed to debian-devel or debian-users. Debian majordomo is SLOW. Postfix's majordomo took 5 minutes total. Debian's is at about an hour now. I'm jumping the gun on those lists and notifying folks like the debian list rules say to.) I'm on debian 2.2 potato

Re: Bug#158631: ITP: mp32ogg -- Converts mp3 file to Ogg Vorbis

2002-08-28 Thread Julien Danjou
Le Wed, Aug 28, 2002 at 09:18:41PM +0200, Paul Dwerryhouse a écrit: > > On Wed, Aug 28, 2002 at 02:29:22PM -0300, Ben Armstrong wrote: > > I'm staying neutral on the quality issue. Yes, degrading mp3s into oggs > > sucks. Yes users should have a choice. I don't know which is more important > > i

Re: Bug#158631: ITP: mp32ogg -- Converts mp3 file to Ogg Vorbis

2002-08-28 Thread Richard Braakman
On Wed, Aug 28, 2002 at 07:22:49PM +0200, Russell Coker wrote: > The users can then pay the $0.75 or not at their own choice. $0.75? >From http://www.mp3licensing.com/royalty/software.html Minimum Royalties Annual minimum royalties are payable upon signature and each following year in J

RFD: Reviving Constitutional amendment: Smith/Condorcet vote tallying

2002-08-28 Thread Manoj Srivastava
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, [Please follow up to [EMAIL PROTECTED] In December 2000, Raul Miller proposed a GR to fix the voting process as defined in the constitution. The GR was withdrawn until a committee assigned to study the problem returned with a re

Re: perl 5.6 dependent packages

2002-08-28 Thread Manoj Srivastava
>>"Brendan" == Brendan O'Dea <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Brendan> Note that in addition, since perl 5.8.0 includes some Brendan> modules which were previously stand-alone, any package Brendan> declaring a versioned[0] dependency on: Brendan> libcgi-perl, Brendan> needs to either have

Re: Dumb little utilities

2002-08-28 Thread Mark Ferlatte
begin Oohara Yuuma quote on Wed, Aug 28, 2002 at 11:57:31PM +0900: > > generate id3 tags from file name (probably not generally useful). > It may save some perl one-liner. id3ren does this. M pgp7m14E3fGi3.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: Bug#158631: ITP: mp32ogg -- Converts mp3 file to Ogg Vorbis

2002-08-28 Thread Paul Dwerryhouse
On Wed, Aug 28, 2002 at 02:29:22PM -0300, Ben Armstrong wrote: > I'm staying neutral on the quality issue. Yes, degrading mp3s into oggs > sucks. Yes users should have a choice. I don't know which is more important > in this case. Put it in and whack a f*cking huge warning message everytime the

Re: Dumb little utilities

2002-08-28 Thread Andreas Rottmann
Ola Lundqvist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > convert wave <--> raw audio files > > examine wave/raw audio files and print stats > > change amplitude of wave/raw audio files > > adjust lead in/lead out of wave/raw audio files > Could be packaged together too. > Have a look at sox - do your progra

Re: Why a package is removed or kept back?

2002-08-28 Thread Erich Schubert
> Why is it removing the qt3 dev packages? I checked gdk-imlib-dev, > libpng2-dev and libgnome-dev for conflicts with the qt3 dev libraries, > but I don't see any mentioned. So why are they being removed on this > install? it doesn't make sense to me. Without having looked at the dependencies: May

Why a package is removed or kept back?

2002-08-28 Thread Carl B. Constantine
I've been told that there is a way to determine why apt-get is removing a package or is keeping a package back but I don't know what it is. When you use apt-get to install or upgrade, it lists the packages that are going to be installed,removed, and kept back. However, it doesn't state why a packag

Deine Freunde

2002-08-28 Thread Martin Steeger
Hi, haben uns gestern im Chat leider verloren :( Wollte dir doch noch meine Homepage-URL geben. Die Adresse ist: http://squeezer.5xx.netHoffe, du besuchst die Seite mal.. :) Schreibst du mir zurück?   Küsschen :-)

Re: Bug#158631: ITP: mp32ogg -- Converts mp3 file to Ogg Vorbis

2002-08-28 Thread Julien Danjou
Le Wed, Aug 28, 2002 at 07:22:49PM +0200, Russell Coker a écrit: > On Wed, 28 Aug 2002 18:59, Julien Danjou wrote: > > Maybe, but I think lots of people will have to convert mp3 to vorbis if mp3 > > decoder dispear from Debian. > > No they won't, they can keep their favourite mp3 player installed

Re: Bug#158631: ITP: mp32ogg -- Converts mp3 file to Ogg Vorbis

2002-08-28 Thread Ben Armstrong
On Thu, Aug 29, 2002 at 03:21:42AM +1000, Ben Burton wrote: > > > Maybe, but I think lots of people will have to convert mp3 to vorbis if mp3 > > decoder dispear from Debian. > > mp32ogg is the way to help us. > > But I still don't understand how we can have mp32ogg if mp3 decoders > disappear fr

Re: Bug#158631: ITP: mp32ogg -- Converts mp3 file to Ogg Vorbis

2002-08-28 Thread Russell Coker
On Wed, 28 Aug 2002 18:59, Julien Danjou wrote: > Maybe, but I think lots of people will have to convert mp3 to vorbis if mp3 > decoder dispear from Debian. No they won't, they can keep their favourite mp3 player installed even though dselect will list it as "obsolete", and it will keep working.

Re: Bug#158631: ITP: mp32ogg -- Converts mp3 file to Ogg Vorbis

2002-08-28 Thread Ben Burton
> Maybe, but I think lots of people will have to convert mp3 to vorbis if mp3 > decoder dispear from Debian. > mp32ogg is the way to help us. But I still don't understand how we can have mp32ogg if mp3 decoders disappear from debian, since presumably one must decode the mp3 in order to convert it

Re: Bug#158631: ITP: mp32ogg -- Converts mp3 file to Ogg Vorbis

2002-08-28 Thread Craig Dickson
Reagan Blundell wrote: > However, if I decided to stop using MP3 decoders today, Why do you have to stop? You already have one. Keep using it until you don't need it anymore. In the meantime, gradually re-rip/encode your CDs one by one. Craig pgphngQCMQnYh.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: Bug#158631: ITP: mp32ogg -- Converts mp3 file to Ogg Vorbis

2002-08-28 Thread Reagan Blundell
On Wed, Aug 28, 2002 at 06:46:21PM +0200, Jesus Climent wrote: > On Thu, Aug 29, 2002 at 02:16:07AM +1000, Reagan Blundell wrote: > > On Wed, Aug 28, 2002 at 05:57:03PM +0200, Jesus Climent wrote: > > > After an easy check of the code (trivial) it is obvious it uses a > > > decoder to transform the

Re: Bug#158631: ITP: mp32ogg -- Converts mp3 file to Ogg Vorbis

2002-08-28 Thread Julien Danjou
Le Wed, Aug 28, 2002 at 09:17:52AM -0700, Craig Dickson a écrit: > Julien Danjou wrote: > > > Package: wnpp > > Version: N/A; reported 2002-08-28 > > Severity: wishlist > > > > * Package name: mp32ogg > > Version : 0.11 > > Upstream Author : Nathan Walp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > * U

Re: menu entry for kdm?

2002-08-28 Thread Andreas Metzler
Michael Renner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I just started to make some _clean_ packages for my users, but I plan to > public them later to the community. > I have a problem with the 'menu' system. [...] > Now I can switch eg. from fvwm to 5dwm, but I habe no entry in the kdm list > to > choose

Re: Bug#158631: ITP: mp32ogg -- Converts mp3 file to Ogg Vorbis

2002-08-28 Thread Jesus Climent
On Thu, Aug 29, 2002 at 02:16:07AM +1000, Reagan Blundell wrote: > On Wed, Aug 28, 2002 at 05:57:03PM +0200, Jesus Climent wrote: > > After an easy check of the code (trivial) it is obvious it uses a > > decoder to transform the mp3 streams to ogg. > > > > Since the Thompson/Fraunhoffer guys have

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Debian Developer Packages Overview

2002-08-28 Thread Michael Piefel
Am 28.08.02 um 17:20:44 schrieb Igor Genibel: > I'm sorry I confused the NMU and the uploader field. There was a bug, > fixed for now. Ah, great! I really don't have anything to complain about now.[1] Bye, Mike [1] Where I come from, "I can't complain" is equivalent to "I think it's bril

Re: Bug#158631: ITP: mp32ogg -- Converts mp3 file to Ogg Vorbis

2002-08-28 Thread Julien Danjou
Le Wed, Aug 28, 2002 at 05:57:03PM +0200, Jesus Climent a écrit: > On Wed, Aug 28, 2002 at 05:43:22PM +0200, Julien Danjou wrote: > > * Package name: mp32ogg > > * URL : http://faceprint.com/software.phtml > > Description : Converts mp3 file to Ogg Vorbis > > I would hold the

Re: Bug#158631: ITP: mp32ogg -- Converts mp3 file to Ogg Vorbis

2002-08-28 Thread Russell Coker
On Wed, 28 Aug 2002 18:17, Craig Dickson wrote: > Whenever the subject of mp3->vorbis (or wma->vorbis, or any other lossy > codec to vorbis) transcoding comes up on the vorbis mailing list, the > reaction from the vorbis developers and the more knowledgeable vorbis > users is "don't do it". Aside f

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Debian Developer Packages Overview

2002-08-28 Thread Kevin Rosenberg
I see an issue with the link to bugs,non-fixed. The web page adds the url tag "raw=yes". I'm not certain of the function of that url tag. But, with it in, the bugs page shows all of the active bugs instead of excluding bugs that marked fixed or done. Is this a bug in the bugs.d.o/cgi-bin/packager

Re: Bug#158631: ITP: mp32ogg -- Converts mp3 file to Ogg Vorbis

2002-08-28 Thread Craig Dickson
Julien Danjou wrote: > Package: wnpp > Version: N/A; reported 2002-08-28 > Severity: wishlist > > * Package name: mp32ogg > Version : 0.11 > Upstream Author : Nathan Walp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > * URL : http://faceprint.com/software.phtml > * License : Artistic L

Re: bugs.debian.org: ChangeLog closes handling should be changed

2002-08-28 Thread Adam Heath
On Tue, 27 Aug 2002, Gerfried Fuchs wrote: > [snip uselss crap] Duh, no shit. Tell us what we don't know. Why don't you get off your soap box, off your ass, and actually make what you suggest work?

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Debian Developer Packages Overview

2002-08-28 Thread Igor Genibel
On Wed, Aug 28, 2002 at 11:52:49AM -0400, Joey Hess wrote: > > I don't quite understand these colours right now. What does > > "Packages in blue" refer to? The link colour? And I don't see many > > "Packages version in red" either, even when I'm sure it's an NMU. > > It's talking about the color o

Bug#158633: ITP: search-ccsb -- BibTeX search tool

2002-08-28 Thread Otavio Salvador
Package: wnpp Version: N/A; reported 2002-08-28 Severity: wishlist * Package name: search-ccsb Version : 0.3 Upstream Author : Rodrigo Araujo Real <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * URL : http://www.inf.ufrgs.br/~rreal/ * License : GPL Description : BibTeX search tool

Re: Bug#158631: ITP: mp32ogg -- Converts mp3 file to Ogg Vorbis

2002-08-28 Thread Jesus Climent
On Wed, Aug 28, 2002 at 05:43:22PM +0200, Julien Danjou wrote: > * Package name: mp32ogg > * URL : http://faceprint.com/software.phtml > Description : Converts mp3 file to Ogg Vorbis I would hold the creation/upload of this package. After an easy check of the code (trivial)

bugs.debian.org: ChangeLog closes handling should be changed

2002-08-28 Thread Gerfried Fuchs
Package: bugs.debian.org Severity: wishlist Hi there! With the addition of the testing distribution we have new problems: Bugs are closed in unstable but flow more or less slowly (due to dependency problems) into testing, but are due to the uploads into unstable long closed. What we ne

Bug#158631: ITP: mp32ogg -- Converts mp3 file to Ogg Vorbis

2002-08-28 Thread Julien Danjou
Package: wnpp Version: N/A; reported 2002-08-28 Severity: wishlist * Package name: mp32ogg Version : 0.11 Upstream Author : Nathan Walp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * URL : http://faceprint.com/software.phtml * License : Artistic License Description : Converts mp3

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Debian Developer Packages Overview

2002-08-28 Thread Joey Hess
Michael Piefel wrote: > Am 27.08.02 um 13:38:36 schrieb Joey Hess: > > - It seems to think that analog 2:5.23-0woody1 is a NMU. > > I don't quite understand these colours right now. What does > "Packages in blue" refer to? The link colour? And I don't see many > "Packages version in red" either, e

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Debian Developer Packages Overview

2002-08-28 Thread Igor Genibel
On Wed, Aug 28, 2002 at 04:31:51PM +0200, Michael Piefel wrote: > Because packages are not required to have an "Uploaders" field. I'm > afraid I don't quite understand your algorithm. For which package will > there ever be a red markup? I'm sorry I confused the NMU and the uploader field. There wa

Re: Dumb little utilities

2002-08-28 Thread Oohara Yuuma
On Tue, 27 Aug 2002 21:59:28 -0600 (MDT), "J. Scott Edwards" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > little endian hex dump Can this tackle the length of int? > find a file within a file Can you elaborate? Is it something like tar -x or munpack? > duplicate file remover interesting > file renamer (that ca

Re: How to get rid of non-free packers?

2002-08-28 Thread GOTO Masanori
At Wed, 28 Aug 2002 07:06:58 +0900 (JST), Tatsuya Kinoshita wrote: > On August 27, 2002 at 2:28AM -0700, > Osamu Aoki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > LHa 0.01-1.00: Masaru Oki (LHa original author, 1991-1992) > > Suse.com list e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > He is one of the NetBSD d

想建网站的就进来看

2002-08-28 Thread 中国服务
域名注册主机申请网站建设一条龙为您服务 中国服务全球专业的域名注册提供商,现推出主机、域名注册优惠服务: “特惠1+1企业上网套餐”是中国服务器网络有限公司为您推出的超值服务, “先服务,后收费!”内容包括:    30M asp cgi,php +ACCESS 数据库,送国际顶级域名一个 250元/年 100M asp cgi,php +ACCESS 数据库,送国际顶级域名一个,只需 350元/年 200N asp cgi,php +ACCESS 数据库,送国际顶级域名一个,只需

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Debian Developer Packages Overview

2002-08-28 Thread Raphael Hertzog
Le Wed, Aug 28, 2002 at 12:17:13PM +0100, Thom May écrivait: > > I'm sure some will squirm, but I think my.debian.org would work quite > > nicely :-) > > > uh. E > (developer.debian.org, maybe) The new official name is http://qa.debian.org/developer/ Cheer

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Debian Developer Packages Overview

2002-08-28 Thread Michael Piefel
Am 28.08.02 um 16:03:28 schrieb Igor Genibel: > > For instance 10a-1.1 for package kimwitu-doc. Or 3.37-3.1 for file. > I don't know why there is no Uploader field for those packages. Because packages are not required to have an "Uploaders" field. I'm afraid I don't quite understand your algorith

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Debian Developer Packages Overview

2002-08-28 Thread Igor Genibel
On Wed, Aug 28, 2002 at 03:26:44PM +0200, Michael Piefel wrote: Hi, > Am 28.08.02 um 10:15:45 schrieb Raphael Hertzog: > > Packages in blue are packages where you're listed as co-maintainers (cf > > the Uplpoaders field in the control file). > > Alright, but the description "uploaded by develope

RE: Sharp SPAM [marketing@sharpsystems.com: Special Price Offer f or Select Sharp Systems Products]

2002-08-28 Thread Kozikowski, Mark
Erich, Good comment. I too will ensure that Sharp products are not included in any future systems that I or the company that I work for design. Mark -Original Message- From: Erich Schubert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, August 26, 2002 12:33 PM To: debian-laptop@lists.debian.or

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Debian Developer Packages Overview

2002-08-28 Thread Michael Piefel
Am 28.08.02 um 10:15:45 schrieb Raphael Hertzog: > Packages in blue are packages where you're listed as co-maintainers (cf > the Uplpoaders field in the control file). Alright, but the description "uploaded by developer" is a little misleading. > I guess it detects the NMU with a regexp in the ve

menu entry for kdm?

2002-08-28 Thread Michael Renner
Moin, I just started to make some _clean_ packages for my users, but I plan to public them later to the community. I have a problem with the 'menu' system. Making a package for an unusal window manager (5dwm) a added the file usr/lib/menu/5dwm which contains: cut--

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Debian Developer Packages Overview

2002-08-28 Thread Andreas Metzler
On Wed, Aug 28, 2002 at 03:51:11AM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote: > On Tue, Aug 27, 2002 at 02:24:57PM +0200, Igor Genibel wrote: >> I have enhanced the ddpo (http://people.debian.org/~igenibel/index.php) >> following all the request you made me (especially Yann Dirson). >> Now you, developers, can tra

Bug#158610: ITP: pvm++ -- A C++-library for PVM

2002-08-28 Thread Thimo Neubauer
Package: wnpp Version: N/A; reported 2002-08-28 Severity: wishlist * Package name: pvm++ Version : 0.6.0 Upstream Author : Sebastian Wilhelmi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * URL : http://pvm-plus-plus.sourceforge.net/ * License : LGPL Description : A C++-library for

Re: OpenLDAP with TLS support

2002-08-28 Thread Roland Bauerschmidt
Junichi Uekawa wrote: > Hmm.. so diverting is a bad idea, right ? Why? slapd depends on libldap2-tls which will divert libldap2 and install the TLS version as libldap2 instead. -- Roland Bauerschmidt

Re: License-fee exemption for mp3 decoders removed?

2002-08-28 Thread Josip Rodin
This is not for -devel! -- 2. That which causes joy or happiness.

Re: Dumb little utilities

2002-08-28 Thread Peter De Wachter
On Tue, Aug 27, 2002 at 09:59:28PM -0600, J. Scott Edwards wrote: > convert wave <--> raw audio files > examine wave/raw audio files and print stats > change amplitude of wave/raw audio files > adjust lead in/lead out of wave/raw audio files Have you looked at sox? It does these things and a lot m

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Debian Developer Packages Overview

2002-08-28 Thread Thom May
* Hamish Moffatt ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote : > On Wed, Aug 28, 2002 at 10:20:46AM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote: > > For Igor, we could provide him a place somewhere under qa.debian.org if > > he wish I guess. Igor, can you check if satie.debian.org provides > > everything that you need ? > > I'm s

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Debian Developer Packages Overview

2002-08-28 Thread Hamish Moffatt
On Wed, Aug 28, 2002 at 10:20:46AM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote: > For Igor, we could provide him a place somewhere under qa.debian.org if > he wish I guess. Igor, can you check if satie.debian.org provides > everything that you need ? I'm sure some will squirm, but I think my.debian.org would wor

Re: can a non developper become a debian maintainer ?

2002-08-28 Thread Erich Schubert
> well. I can also compile, install, and manage non packaged software, > and occasionnaly find and correct some small or obvious bugs. But I > couldn't really develop anything big, or tackle real big bugs (but > then these are more upstream's task than debian's). Well, actually i'm not too great a

Bug#158602: RFP: snortcenter -- web-based snort management system written in PHP and Perl

2002-08-28 Thread Benjamin Drieu
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist * Package name: snortcenter Version : 0.9.5 Upstream Author : Stefan Dens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * URL : http://users.pandora.be/larc/index.html * License : GPL Description : web-based snort management system written in PHP an

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Debian Developer Packages Overview

2002-08-28 Thread Igor Genibel
On Tue, Aug 27, 2002 at 02:43:29PM +0100, Daniel Silverstone wrote: Hi, > Also, if you search for my GPG key id (20687895) then I get a listing of my > packages and also those maintained by [EMAIL PROTECTED] We've had issues of > my being mistaken for Daniel Stone in the past, and I don't appreci

License-fee exemption for mp3 decoders removed?

2002-08-28 Thread Esteban Manchado Velázquez
H just read at Slashdot that Thomson and Fraunhofer have changed their minds and now want to charge for mp3 decoders, too (?). http://www.mp3licensing.com/royalty/software.html http://slashdot.org/articles/02/08/27/1626241.shtml?tid=155 http://www.xiph.org/ogg/vorbis/openletter.ht

Re: can a non developper become a debian maintainer ?

2002-08-28 Thread Wichert Akkerman
Previously Russell Coker wrote: > There are many Debian packages that involve little or no serious programming, > packages of scripts, packages of example files, packages of documentation. There are also lots of things to do that don't involve packages (one of the reasons the nm process doesn't r

Re: First experience with gcc-3.2 recompiles

2002-08-28 Thread Gerhard Tonn
On Sunday 25 August 2002 22:00, you wrote: > Gerhard Tonn wrote: > > As I have told in another thread, I am currently rebuilding all packages > > depending on c++ on s390. All packages have been touched now. The results > > are: > > > > 406 packages have been built successfully > > 222 packages dep

Re: PHP4 + Oracle

2002-08-28 Thread Sobkowiak Krzysztof
Am Die, 2002-08-27 um 19.16 schrieb Rob Bradford: > Can you not use ODBC and the libphp-adodb package? Where can I get Oracle ODBC driver from?

Re: gconf breakage

2002-08-28 Thread Michael Fedrowitz
On Wed, Aug 28, 2002 at 02:39:35AM -0400, Andres Salomon wrote: Hi, > Can someone please apply the patch from #157937 to gconf, and upload? > Galeon is uninstallable, atm. I have a NMU package prepared for gconf, > if no one fixes this soon. I'm pretty sure that I mentioned that gconf and gcon

Re: Dumb little utilities

2002-08-28 Thread Marcelo E. Magallon
>> Ola Lundqvist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > tab and untab (I just discovered that this can be done with pr). > If it can be done with something else it might not be too necessary. It > is your choice though. JFYI, it can also be done with expand. -- Marcelo | This signatur

Re: can a non developper become a debian maintainer ?

2002-08-28 Thread Rémi Letot
Russell Coker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Wed, 28 Aug 2002 01:50, Rémi Letot wrote: >> I have a simple question : can a non developper type become a debian >> maintainer ? The reason is that I use debian on multiple servers and >> workstations, and I'd like to contribute to the project. I'm >

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Debian Developer Packages Overview

2002-08-28 Thread Raphael Hertzog
Le Wed, Aug 28, 2002 at 03:51:11AM +0200, Josip Rodin écrivait: > On Tue, Aug 27, 2002 at 02:24:57PM +0200, Igor Genibel wrote: > > I have enhanced the ddpo (http://people.debian.org/~igenibel/index.php) > > following all the request you made me (especially Yann Dirson). > > Now you, developers, c

Re: OpenLDAP with TLS support

2002-08-28 Thread Junichi Uekawa
On Tue, 27 Aug 2002 16:05:10 +0200 Torsten Landschoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, Aug 27, 2002 at 09:18:43PM +0900, Junichi Uekawa wrote: > > > Using objdump -T to look at it, > > ldap_pvt_tls_get_peer and other things that are ldap_*_tls_* > > seems to be defined only on the TLS versio

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Debian Developer Packages Overview

2002-08-28 Thread Raphael Hertzog
Le Wed, Aug 28, 2002 at 09:25:42AM +0200, Michael Piefel écrivait: > I don't quite understand these colours right now. What does > "Packages in blue" refer to? The link colour? And I don't see many Packages in blue are packages where you're listed as co-maintainers (cf the Uplpoaders field in the

Office2000

2002-08-28 Thread Micros
Title: iboss2000   office2000理财系列软件  ――― (office2000增值产品) 系统消息:本站承接对软件的个性化定制工作,质优价廉,欢迎垂询。   office2000财务系统v2.5   详细介绍    下载软件 注册>> office2000老板理财v1.2   详细介绍    下载软件 注册>>             版权所有:太阳雨软件设计室    联系我们

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Debian Developer Packages Overview

2002-08-28 Thread Igor Genibel
On Wed, Aug 28, 2002 at 03:57:14AM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote: > > Although, I have one request -- please skip the ampersand in URLs like > > 'build.php?&pkg=foo', they are redundant and they waste bytes :) > > On the same note, please add the missing / in pool URLs, to skip the > redirect and follo

Re: [gwolf@gwolf.cx: Bug#158547: imp: Excessive packages listed as dependencies]

2002-08-28 Thread Stefano Zacchiroli
On Wed, Aug 28, 2002 at 07:17:02AM +0200, Ola Lundqvist wrote: > Is this really a bug? Packages are not required to declare any dependencies they have on other packages which are marked `Essential' (see below), and should not do so unless they depend on a particular version of that package.

Re: Dumb little utilities

2002-08-28 Thread Romain Lerallut
Thus spake J. Scott Edwards on Tue, Aug 27, 2002 at 09:59:28PM -0600: > file renamer (that can change case). Just asking: anything that mmv can't do ? regards, Romain

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Debian Developer Packages Overview

2002-08-28 Thread Igor Genibel
On Tue, Aug 27, 2002 at 08:53:11AM -0500, Steve Langasek wrote: > Hi Igor, Hi, > > I have enhanced the ddpo (http://people.debian.org/~igenibel/index.php) > > following all the request you made me (especially Yann Dirson). > > The site looks great! One request, is it possible to add submit but

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Debian Developer Packages Overview

2002-08-28 Thread Michael Koch
Hello, I found another bug. In the list of available packages the source libsigc++-1.1 is visibile/accessible but libsigc++ does not seem to exist. Michael

Re: Dumb little utilities

2002-08-28 Thread Tollef Fog Heen
* "J. Scott Edwards" | file renamer (that can change case). what's wrong with rename(1)? -- Tollef Fog Heen,''`. UNIX is user friendly, it's just picky about who its friends are : :' :

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Debian Developer Packages Overview

2002-08-28 Thread Tollef Fog Heen
* Igor Genibel | I have enhanced the ddpo (http://people.debian.org/~igenibel/index.php) | following all the request you made me (especially Yann Dirson). | Now you, developers, can track all the informations about all your | packages such as: | - the pts related page about packages (Thank

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Debian Developer Packages Overview

2002-08-28 Thread Michael Piefel
Am 27.08.02 um 13:38:36 schrieb Joey Hess: > - It seems to think that analog 2:5.23-0woody1 is a NMU. I don't quite understand these colours right now. What does "Packages in blue" refer to? The link colour? And I don't see many "Packages version in red" either, even when I'm sure it's an NMU. >

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Debian Developer Packages Overview

2002-08-28 Thread Igor Genibel
On Tue, Aug 27, 2002 at 06:02:24PM +0200, Michael Piefel wrote: > Am 27.08.02 um 14:24:57 schrieb Igor Genibel: > > - the number of opened bugs (All, RC, ...); > > Either I don't understand the statistics, or it's not correct. For > instance, on http://people.debian.org/~igenibel/index.php?login=n

Re: New package netfilter-init to experimental?

2002-08-28 Thread Marc Haber
On Tue, 27 Aug 2002 08:47:41 -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >On Tue, 27 Aug 2002, Marc Haber wrote: >> machine takes seven minutes to build a new rule set. It is so slow >> because everything is implemented as shell scripts. There are plans to >> convert the significa

gconf breakage

2002-08-28 Thread Andres Salomon
Can someone please apply the patch from #157937 to gconf, and upload? Galeon is uninstallable, atm. I have a NMU package prepared for gconf, if no one fixes this soon. -- Buying a Unix machine guarantees you a descent into Hell. It starts when you plug the computer in and it won't boot. Yes, th

Re: Dumb little utilities

2002-08-28 Thread Ola Lundqvist
On Tue, Aug 27, 2002 at 09:59:28PM -0600, J. Scott Edwards wrote: > > I guess I was worried that they are so trivial that any of the real > programmers on this list could recreate them in 5 minutes with sed, awk, > and perl. :) > > But, well ok: > > little endian hex dump May be interesting. >

[gwolf@gwolf.cx: Bug#158547: imp: Excessive packages listed as dependencies]

2002-08-28 Thread Ola Lundqvist
Hi Is this really a bug? Regards, // Ola - Forwarded message from [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Envelope-to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivery-date: Tue, 27 Aug 2002 23:48:06 +0200 X-Loop: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Bug#158547: imp: Excessive packages listed as dependencies Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED],