On Sun, Aug 25, 2002 at 10:48:22AM +0200, J.H.M. Dassen (Ray) wrote:
> It might be. You may want to do "pbuilder login --distribution woody" and
> try building it by hand in there, then do some traces on the ps2pdf
> conversion.
I found the problem.
I had set TMP to /tmp for pbuilder instead of /
《国内报刊名录大全》（2002年度）收录国内邮局发行和自办发行的报刊名录一万多家（含详细通讯地址、邮编、电话号码等），另有3000多家报刊的电子邮箱、2000多家报刊网址及全国所有出版社的联系方式。
是印刷行业与报刊杂志、出版社联系、开拓书报刊印刷及其他相关业务时必备的工具书。另：可根据客户需求订制电子版报刊名录数据库，可直接打印在信封上。详情请浏览：http://bk.tougao.com
HABERDAR.COM - HABER VE MEDYA PORTALI
Artýk tüm haberleri sadece tek siteden takip edebileceksiniz. Haberdar.com
açýldý!
Haber baþlýklarý, spor haberleri, teknoloji haberleri, kültür ve sanat
haberleri, internet haberleri, bilim ve uzay,
sinema, saðlýk...
Aradýðýnýz içerik http://www.haberdar.co
The shared libraries in ncbi-tools6 and related packages currently
start out as static archives of PIC objects, which then get turned
into shared libraries with commands of the form
gcc -shared -Wl,-soname=libddvlib.so.6 -o libddvlib.so.6.1.20020426 \
-Wl,-whole-archive libddvlib.a -Wl,-no-wh
On Sat, 2002-08-24 at 15:34, James A. Treacy wrote:
> Do entire dependency chains need to be specified for Build-Depends?
No, absolutely not - only the packages the program needs directly. That
is, all Depends: are automatically pulled in.
--
Joe Drew <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
"Th
At Fri, 23 Aug 2002 16:01:15 +0300,
Juhapekka Tolvanen wrote:
>It's free to distribute on the network, but if you distribute for
>the people who cannot access the network (by magazine or CD-ROM),
>please send E-Mail (Inter-Net address) to the author before the
>distribution. That's
Le Sun, Aug 25, 2002 at 01:33:36PM -0700, Ryan Murray écrivait:
> while the build-depends on perl were updated, the build-depends for the
> new libdbi were not. You need to update all build-depends that might be
They were in 1.28-1.1 (NMU by Joey), but during the transition the
maintainer uploade
On Sun, Aug 25, 2002 at 07:39:54PM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> Le Sun, Aug 25, 2002 at 06:44:00AM +1000, Brendan O'Dea ?crivait:
> > On Sat, Aug 24, 2002 at 02:49:10PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> > >perl 5.8 will enter unstable at the next dinstall run. Before it can
> > >make testing though, we
Gerhard Tonn wrote:
> As I have told in another thread, I am currently rebuilding all packages
> depending on c++ on s390. All packages have been touched now. The results are:
>
> 406 packages have been built successfully
> 222 packages depend on other packages built with gcc-3.2
>90 on q
Martin Schulze wrote:
> Ryan Murray told me that there is an override database for the
> Architecture line which is used by the buildds, hence, the buildds
> were ignoring the Architecture line of the debian/control file.
> I've asked him to remove the entry and he's going to do some test
> compile
Mario Lang wrote:
> Hello.
>
> I noticed that buildd doesn't build brltty since 2.98-2.
>
> Well, I know I originally just had i386 in the architecture field, but
> I am currently working with the upstream maintainer to
> fix alot of different architectures, and it would be nice
> if buildd coul
Unsubsribe
On Sat, 2002-08-24 at 14:37, Mark Howard wrote:
> Initial packages for this are available at
> http://tildemh.com/tmp/metacity-themes/
Hmmwhere's the source package?
Le Sun, Aug 25, 2002 at 01:51:18PM -0400, Clint Adams écrivait:
> > Maybe a newer MU came out in between or something. I don't have the NMU
> > anymore, but IIRC it was a simple rebuild.
>
> Yes, two newer MU's actually. The latter was a rebuild for 5.8;
> unfortunately the build-deps weren't upd
> Maybe a newer MU came out in between or something. I don't have the NMU
> anymore, but IIRC it was a simple rebuild.
Yes, two newer MU's actually. The latter was a rebuild for 5.8;
unfortunately the build-deps weren't updated, so it was autobuilt
inconsistently.
Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> What happened to libdbi-perl ?
>
> Joey NMUed it in the pool, but it appears to not have been installed.
Maybe a newer MU came out in between or something. I don't have the NMU
anymore, but IIRC it was a simple rebuild.
--
see shy jo
Le Sun, Aug 25, 2002 at 06:44:00AM +1000, Brendan O'Dea écrivait:
> On Sat, Aug 24, 2002 at 02:49:10PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> >perl 5.8 will enter unstable at the next dinstall run. Before it can
> >make testing though, we have to update the following 84 packages which
> >still depend on perlapi
On Mon, Aug 26, 2002 at 02:34:45AM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> > There was a bug filed on www.debian.org but I can't recall what happened to
> > it. We certainly couldn't just change it, because that's not a random web
> > page, it's "owned" by debian-admin etc.
>
> Change it, then send it to -a
Brendan O'Dea wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 24, 2002 at 02:49:10PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> >perl 5.8 will enter unstable at the next dinstall run. Before it can
> >make testing though, we have to update the following 84 packages which
> >still depend on perlapi-5.6.*. This list should take into account th
On Sun, Aug 25, 2002 at 06:19:36PM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote:
> There was a bug filed on www.debian.org but I can't recall what happened to
> it. We certainly couldn't just change it, because that's not a random web
> page, it's "owned" by debian-admin etc.
Change it, then send it to -admin with th
On Sun, Aug 25, 2002 at 04:49:21PM +0100, Oliver Elphick wrote:
> I just took a close look at the machine usage policies at
> http://www.debian.org/devel/dmup
>
> 1. Section 1 says the document contains both policies and guidelines.
> There is a section headed policies, but none headed guidelines
此邮件为商业信函，如果您对此不感兴趣请立即删除；如果您不希望再收到此邮件请到http://filter.21gold.com退订，我们将会把您的邮箱地址过滤出列表。谢谢！;
This mail is a business letter. If you are uninterested in this , please delete
it immediately;If you do not hope to receive this mail again , please go to
http://filter.21gold.com ,fill in your mail address ,
I just took a close look at the machine usage policies at
http://www.debian.org/devel/dmup
1. Section 1 says the document contains both policies and guidelines.
There is a section headed policies, but none headed guidelines. I guess
that the examples section should be part of guidelines. It may
On Sat, Aug 24, 2002 at 02:49:10PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> perl 5.8 will enter unstable at the next dinstall run. Before it can
> make testing though, we have to update the following 84 packages which
> still depend on perlapi-5.6.*. This list should take into account those
> packages that were a
* Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-08-25 16:34]:
> Although not a new package (tix4.1 is in Debian), the 4.1 version is a
> bit rotten, so that it doesn't work with newer packages (visual-tcl
> and PyTix need 8.1). 8.1 was released 20 months ago and should be
Is there any reason to keep ve
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Installer package for F-Prot Antivirus(tm)
F-Prot(tm) is a tool for scanning individual files or directory trees
for viruses.
The license for F-Prot Linux for Small Business is without charge
for personal users, when used on personal workstations.
The packag
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Although not a new package (tix4.1 is in Debian), the 4.1 version is a
bit rotten, so that it doesn't work with newer packages (visual-tcl
and PyTix need 8.1). 8.1 was released 20 months ago and should be
mature. Packages can be found at
http://ftp-master.
On Sun, 25 Aug 2002, Steve Kowalik wrote:
> If they depend on those packages and perl (>= 5.8.0)?
If they have any sort of versioned dependency on provides (we should make a
list of those), actually.
But since this is a non-local check, and hard to write, I guess tailoring it
to detect dependenci
At 11:06 am, Sunday, August 25 2002, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh mumbled:
> On Sun, 25 Aug 2002, Brendan O'Dea wrote:
> > Note that in addition, since perl 5.8.0 includes some modules which were
> > previously stand-alone, any package declaring a versioned[0] dependency
> > on:
> >
> > libdi
At 7:01 pm, Wednesday, August 21 2002, Anthony Towns mumbled:
> linda doesn't run cleanly over the entire archive -- it misbehaves on
> some packages (leaving /tmp/linda-* directories about), and just seems
> to hang on others. I haven't tracked down what's causing this. I don't
> believe it inclu
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sun Aug 25 05:40:57 2002
X-Envelope-Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: (qmail 4964 invoked from network); 25 Aug 2002 10:40:57 -
Received: from master.debian.org ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
by murphy.debian.org with SMTP; 25 Aug 2002 10:40:57 -
Received: from (buddy) [61.14
Package: wnpp
Version: N/A; reported 2002-08-25
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: spiralsynthmodular
Version : 0.1.0
Upstream Author : Dave Griffiths <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://www.pawfal.org/Software/SSM/
* License : GPL
Description : Object orie
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sun Aug 25 03:54:06 2002
X-Envelope-Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: (qmail 23287 invoked from network); 25 Aug 2002 08:54:06 -
Received: from master.debian.org ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
by murphy.debian.org with SMTP; 25 Aug 2002 08:54:06 -
Received: from (buddy) [61.1
On Sun, Aug 25, 2002 at 18:12:54 +1000, Brian May wrote:
> So I wonder what is different about my system that means it doesn't work
> here, but it works everywhere else?
>
> Could it be related to devfs or something?
It might be. You may want to do "pbuilder login --distribution woody" and
try bu
Diamonds as An investment
I took the liberty of getting your email address from the internet. I will
not bother you again after this intrusion.
My name is Anthony Thomas and I am an English diamond dealer.
Diamonds are a great investment with their price rising app 8-10% per year
without the ris
On Sun, Aug 25, 2002 at 10:00:33AM +0200, J.H.M. Dassen (Ray) wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 25, 2002 at 12:52:44 +1000, Brian May wrote:
> > Wehn compiling clamav in a woody chroot with pbuilder, I get
> > the following error:
>
> I can't reproduce that here (freshly generated woody chroot for pbuilder;
>
On Sun, Aug 25, 2002 at 12:52:44 +1000, Brian May wrote:
> Wehn compiling clamav in a woody chroot with pbuilder, I get
> the following error:
I can't reproduce that here (freshly generated woody chroot for pbuilder;
clamav 0.24-1).
> (cd docs && ps2pdf clamdeb.ps clamdeb.pdf)
> Unable to
On Fri, 23 Aug 2002, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Any reason to keep 2.1 ?
Debian is used as a development system for portable apps. Many developers
need to test their software works with Python 2.1.
On Sun, Aug 25, 2002 at 01:46:26AM -0400, Mike wrote:
> hi i have a 6 gig drive on my old puter i wanna put debail on 3 gigs is that
> enough room, thank you
I guess it depends on what you want to do. I've fit debian on a 200MB drive
and I've filled a 2GB drive as well. It just depends on what y
hi i have a 6 gig drive on
my old puter i wanna put debail on 3 gigs is that enough room, thank
you
40 matches
Mail list logo
