On Mar 19, Nicolás Lichtmaier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> BTW, the default key bindings in mutt are horribly broken. No key does what
>someone would expect.
mutt does what I expect, and I think what every former elm user expects.
PINE sucks.
If newbies don't have the correct expectations to us
Lars Wirzenius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Kannel is an open source WAP and SMS gateway. It's what I do for a
> living. I intend to make Debian package for it. See http://www.kannel.org
> for more.
This is fine. WAP programming is on my schedule for April. As
a Debian user it would be nice to
On Mon, Mar 20, 2000 at 09:10:08PM +0100, Josip Rodin wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 20, 2000 at 02:41:45AM -0800, Kevin Dalley wrote:
> [sth]
>
> Is it just me or did something make this message go out like 12 times?
Just you. At least, I didn't get more than one copy of it, so I would
guess it's somethin
On 20-Mar-00, 01:46 (CST), Nicolás Lichtmaier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Using the Space and the Backspace keys for up and down movement is absurd,
> it's even stupid. Backspace is back-space. Those keybindings where thought
> for keyboards without arrows, and those keyboards no longer exists..
On Mon, Mar 20, 2000 at 02:41:45AM -0800, Kevin Dalley wrote:
[sth]
Is it just me or did something make this message go out like 12 times?
Each time it had more and more of these:
MBOX-Line: From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Mar 20 13:55:55 2000
X-Envelope-Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
MBOX-Line: From [EM
BugScan reporter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Bug stamp-out list for Mar 18 09:21 (CST)
>
> Total number of release-critical bugs: 192
> Number that will disappear after removing packages marked [REMOVE]: 9
>
> Package: clisp (debian/main)
> Maintainer: Kevin Dalley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> 4605
On Mon, 20 Mar 2000, Wichert Akkerman wrote:
> Previously Adam Heath wrote:
> > However, it has its drawbacks, the 2 most glaring that it hides the
> > source in subtrees, all packed up, and that it doesn't extract into
> > - directly.
>
> You conveniently ignored Ian's biggest con: it does not g
Hamish Moffatt ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Personally I can't stand Mutt's default colours (green on blue? ugh!)
> but the default keybinds are fine. I have a .muttrc which I copy
> around between all my accounts.
>
i bet most people do. probably a .bash{rc,_profile} and .joerc too. that's
why e
Le Mon, Mar 20, 2000 at 03:38:34PM +0100, Santiago Vila écrivait:
> Perhaps we should open the Bug System to upstream maintainers by adding a
> flag to every package. If this flag is on, reports are automatically
> forwarded to a given upstream email address. I'm sure many upstream
> authors would
Hello guys,
I just got forwarded a few messages from a discussion that is going
on at the Debian lists, let me reply:
First of all, this fragment --which started the whole debate-- is
completely wrong:
> I assisted today to a conference by Miguel de Icaza here in Madrid,
> it seems he i
Tom,
I'm looking forward to it very much. This is on Debian Jr.'s list of
programs suitable for children that we'd like to see packaged. (My
children are not yet old enough to make use of it, I think, but it won't
be long.) I'm a programmer and musician. I could've used something like
this bac
Yuanfeng Motor Company is a professional motor manufacturer and are dedicated
to developing and researching high efficient products. Various types of motor
with different specification are for Washing Machine, Electrical Fan,
Refrigerator, Fume Hood, Food Blender, etc. All motors we manufacture
Ive been looking around the manual pages of wprintf and
include files of the latest potato.
Widechar/Multibyte support exist (wchar.h) but almost all
the usefull function is not in the libc distribution of
potato. Functions like wprintf that a vital is no where
to be found and still they have manua
On Sun, Mar 19, 2000 at 11:55:27PM -0700, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
>
> On Mon, 20 Mar 2000, Adam Heath wrote:
>
> > You'll note the addition of 3 fields(Format, Patches, and Tarballs), and the
> > different files specified for the files field. The existance of a Format
>
> Having a .tarballs.tar.
On Mon, Mar 20, 2000 at 02:30:55AM -0600, Zed Pobre wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 20, 2000 at 04:46:04AM -0300, Nicol?s Lichtmaier wrote:
> > Using the Space and the Backspace keys for up and down movement is absurd,
> > it's even stupid. Backspace is back-space. Those keybindings where thought
> > for ke
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Joey Hess) wrote:
>Ben Collins wrote:
>> The lists already exist, they are just not used at all. Maybe it would be
>> easier to keep just the one debian-devel-changes list to send to and write
>> some extra procmail stuff into sending it to the write outlist.
>
>Well, we could ju
On Fri, 17 Mar 2000, Darren O. Benham wrote:
> > Anyway... there is a second problem you mentioned that deserves to be
> > addressed. Bugs should either be dealt with by the maintainer (if they're
> > involved with mods they made or the packaging) or the bugs are supposed to
> > be forwarded u
Previously Adam Heath wrote:
> However, it has its drawbacks, the 2 most glaring that it hides the
> source in subtrees, all packed up, and that it doesn't extract into
> - directly.
You conveniently ignored Ian's biggest con: it does not gave you a way
to get to the source as it is compiles witho
On Mon, Mar 20, 2000 at 01:51:08AM -0600, Adam Heath wrote:
> Comments? Suggestions?
You still owe me documentation for this :-) bug#52351 on xawtv.
Cheers
Hamish
--
Hamish Moffatt VK3SB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On Mon, Mar 20, 2000 at 02:30:55AM -0600, Zed Pobre wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 20, 2000 at 04:46:04AM -0300, Nicol?s Lichtmaier wrote:
> >
> > It's a tough issue, but there's certainly a line somewhere. And mutt does
> > not have reasonable defaults. In the keyboard, each key has a function,
>
> I
What happened to the ITP for it? I didn't see a package yet.
Michael
--
Michael Meskes | Go SF 49ers!
Th.-Heuss-Str. 61, D-41812 Erkelenz| Go Rhein Fire!
Tel.: (+49) 2431/72651 | Use Debian GNU/Linux!
Email: Michael@Fam-Meskes.De | Use Postgre
Dear Colin,
> I intend to package javawrapper.
>
> Package: javawrapper
> Version: 1.0-1
> Section: utils
> Priority: optional
> Description: A wrapper for kernel execution of Java programs
> javawrapper uses the binfmt_misc feature of newer Linux kernels to execute a
> Java class file directly
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Craig Sanders) wrote:
>On Sun, Mar 19, 2000 at 09:04:24PM -0300, Nicolás Lichtmaier wrote:
>> Pg-down advancing to next message?
>
>PgDn scrolls down the message, as expected. PgUp scrolls back up.
>
>the only annoying thing is that if you are already at the end of a
>message, t
On Mon, Mar 20, 2000 at 10:29:35AM +0100 , Andreas Tille wrote:
> By the way. Shouldn't dpkg at least warn that md5 sums are wrong?
It can't. dpkg doesn't know the md5sum of the .deb.
Petr Cech
--
Debian GNU/Linux maintainer - www.debian.{org,cz}
[EMAIL
Sorry, submitted where it should've gone..
Neil
On Mon, Mar 20, 2000 at 05:57:13PM +0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I am having trouble installing postgresql in woody. I try to install the
> postgresql package and it asks for postgresql-client. Postgresql-client
> gives the following error:-
I am having trouble installing postgresql in woody. I try to install the
postgresql package and it asks for postgresql-client. Postgresql-client gives
the following error:-
Sorry, but the following packages have unmet dependencies:
postgresql-client: Depends: libreadlineg2 (>= 2.1-13.5) but 2
On 20 Mar 2000, Brian May wrote:
> I have to agree with Jason here, I was confused. In this case the
> error is generating by apt-get, in my case the error was generated by
> dpkg.
>
> I will take Jason's word for it that a deb file with bytes missing can
> still be valid...
OK, I take the word a
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Marco d'Itri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>On Mar 19, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >For an example why I think this is really a bug with severity normal, and
> >not a wish or feature request, see
> >http://duckman.blub.net/~wouter/muttdefaults.png
>Seen. My xterms are
On Mon, 20 Mar 2000, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> That doesn't mean anything, if the file was only 1 byte short chances are
> it would still be entirely valid, dpkg -i would take it, apt would not due
> to a size and md5 mismatch.
Do you expect a file of size 1 byte to install and work without
problem
On Mon, Mar 20, 2000 at 02:30:55AM -0600, Zed Pobre wrote:
> > Besides, configuration should always target the norma-naive
> > user. The tough user can always edit a configfile.
>
> From my experiments with the above, only two things behave in a
> way that I would expect an unfamiliar user to
On Mon, Mar 20, 2000 at 02:30:55AM -0600, Zed Pobre wrote:
> From my experiments with the above, only two things behave in a
> way that I would expect an unfamiliar user to find strange: asymmetry
> in PgUp/PgDown behaviour, and maybe UpArrow and DownArrow moving
> between messages instead of u
On Mon, Mar 20, 2000 at 10:31:40AM +1100, Craig Sanders wrote:
>
> lynx has the same problem. hyper links are blue on black, which makes it
> very difficult to see where you are going. fixed with:
>
> COLOR:1:cyan:black
> COLOR:5:brightcyan:black
I wonder who made up the default lynx
On Sun, Mar 19, 2000 at 09:04:24PM -0300, Nicolás Lichtmaier wrote:
> Up and down arrow keys doesn't scroll a message ap & down?
Nope. But that's the way it is in slrn, too: backspace and enter scroll the
message text, and uparrow and downarrow scroll the message list.
It's good once you get used
On Mon, Mar 20, 2000 at 12:35:22PM +1100, Craig Sanders wrote:
> ps: if you prefer pine, then just use it. there's no need to make every
> mail client as bad as pine...some of us like mutt the way it is and
> don't want to see it mangled into an awkward pine clone.
Hear, hear!
--
enJoy -*/\*- do
On Sun, 19 Mar 2000, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
>
> On Mon, 20 Mar 2000, Adam Heath wrote:
>
> > You'll note the addition of 3 fields(Format, Patches, and Tarballs), and the
> > different files specified for the files field. The existance of a Format
>
> Having a .tarballs.tar.gz seems rather poin
> > I agree. Mutt should by default be much more like pine. I like
>
> This sounds like a lot of recent threads on debian-devel --
> "the defaults should suite MY PREFERENCES!" That's why they're
> defaults -- you can change them.
>
> Personally I can't stand Mutt's default colours (green on blu
> "Jason" == Jason Gunthorpe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Jason> On Mon, 20 Mar 2000, Andreas Tille wrote:
>> output after failing to install 42 packages). I repeat: All
>> packages were installable with dpkg -i after apt-get was unable
>> to install
Jason> That doesn't m
On Mon, 20 Mar 2000, Andreas Tille wrote:
> output after failing to install 42 packages). I repeat: All packages
> were installable with dpkg -i after apt-get was unable to install
That doesn't mean anything, if the file was only 1 byte short chances are
it would still be entirely valid, dpkg -
On Sun, Mar 19, 2000 at 05:21:55PM -0800, Jonathan Walther wrote:
> I agree. Mutt should by default be much more like pine. I like
This sounds like a lot of recent threads on debian-devel --
"the defaults should suite MY PREFERENCES!" That's why they're
defaults -- you can change them.
Personall
On Fri, 17 Mar 2000, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> On 18 Mar 2000, Brian May wrote:
>
> > I believe the original poster used dpkg -i to install the same copy
> > that apt had downloaded - ie only one copy ever downloaded.
>
> Then dpkg should have failed to install it since it is a truncated file.
No
On Fri, 17 Mar 2000, Bas Zoetekouw wrote:
> Accoring to http://www.gnome.org/guppi/#get, Cesar Talon
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> has already packaged it. The deb is at
> ftp://ftp.gnome.org/pub/guppi/Debian
Any reason why this is not included in woody?
Kind regards
Andreas.
On Mon, 20 Mar 2000, Adam Heath wrote:
> You'll note the addition of 3 fields(Format, Patches, and Tarballs), and the
> different files specified for the files field. The existance of a Format
Having a .tarballs.tar.gz seems rather pointless, just have all the tars
seperate - as does including
On Mon, 20 Mar 2000, Dan Nguyen wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 20, 2000 at 12:12:45AM -0600, Adam Heath wrote:
> > On Mon, 20 Mar 2000, Dan Nguyen wrote:
> >
> > > Description: The Eye of Gnome graphics viewer and cataloging program
> > > Gnome is the "GNU Network Object Model Enviroment"
> > > .
> >
On Sun, 19 Mar 2000, Joey Hess wrote:
> [ This is a transcript of a conversation on the Debian developer irc
> channel. Note that Diziet is Ian Jackson. This transcript has been edited
> for clarity and to remove other simulantaneous conversations. ]
Thanks Joey for posting that.
Ok, now for
On Mon, Mar 20, 2000 at 12:12:45AM -0600, Adam Heath wrote:
> On Mon, 20 Mar 2000, Dan Nguyen wrote:
>
> > Hello,
> >
> > I will be packaging eog (Eye of Gnome).
> >
> > Package: eog
> > Priority: optional
> > Section: graphics
> > Version: 0.2-1
> > Description: The Eye of Gnome graphics viewer
On Mon, 20 Mar 2000, Dan Nguyen wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I will be packaging eog (Eye of Gnome).
>
> Package: eog
> Priority: optional
> Section: graphics
> Version: 0.2-1
> Description: The Eye of Gnome graphics viewer and cataloging program
> Gnome is the "GNU Network Object Model Enviroment"
>
Hello,
I will be packaging eog (Eye of Gnome).
Package: eog
Priority: optional
Section: graphics
Version: 0.2-1
Description: The Eye of Gnome graphics viewer and cataloging program
Gnome is the "GNU Network Object Model Enviroment"
.
The Eye of Gnome, an image viewer program. It is meant
MoiN
On Sat, Mar 18, 2000 at 09:46:25AM -0600, BugScan reporter wrote:
> Package: gnofin (debian/main)
> Maintainer: Torsten Landschoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> 60614 LANG=de_DE gnofin does weird things
[...]
> Package: gnucash (debian/main)
> Maintainer: Tyson Dowd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
[...]
> 6
[ This is a transcript of a conversation on the Debian developer irc
channel. Note that Diziet is Ian Jackson. This transcript has been edited
for clarity and to remove other simulantaneous conversations. ]
since both you dpkg guys are here.
Can I ask for something? How about a flag in the
On Sun, Mar 19, 2000 at 05:21:55PM -0800, Jonathan Walther wrote:
> I agree. Mutt should by default be much more like pine. I like all my
> multiple folders, each containing the mail from one mailing list, and
> I like being able to easily navigate between them like pine allows.
huh? mutt's folde
Hi,
I intend to package javawrapper.
Package: javawrapper
Version: 1.0-1
Section: utils
Priority: optional
Description: A wrapper for kernel execution of Java programs
javawrapper uses the binfmt_misc feature of newer Linux kernels to execute a
Java class file directly simply by supplying its f
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
I agree. Mutt should by default be much more like pine. I like
all my multiple folders, each containing the mail from one mailing list,
and I like being able to easily navigate between them like pine allows.
- --sig--
Real Programmers consider "what you see is
On Sun, Mar 19, 2000 at 09:04:24PM -0300, Nicolás Lichtmaier wrote:
> > > > >The /etc/Muttrc in the mutt package makes a fruit salad of mutt.
> > > > Most people like it.
> > >
> > > BTW, the default key bindings in mutt are horribly broken. No key does
> > > what someone would expect.
> >
> > t
> > > >The /etc/Muttrc in the mutt package makes a fruit salad of mutt.
> > > Most people like it.
> >
> > BTW, the default key bindings in mutt are horribly broken. No key does
> > what someone would expect.
>
> that depends on what you're used to. if you've been using elm for years
> then mutt
54 matches
Mail list logo
