On 9 Mar 2000 12:56:29 -0500, Jacob Kuntz wrote:
> tom rothamel is working on a project called debdiff that works towards the
> same goal. please read his announcment thread, which is archived at
> http://www.debian.org/Lists-Archives/debian-devel-0002/msg00391.htm.
The code associated with this i
On 9 Mar 2000, Douglas Bates wrote:
> The system has been up for 14 days and /etc/motd was last modified on
> Jan 27. Is it possible that the repairs are complete and someone
> forgot to remove this line from /etc/motd?
No
Jason
I'm not sure if this message should go to debian-devel or
debian-project or ...
For several days the login message on lully.debian.org has ended with
*** This system is being repaired. Please refrain from using it for now.
The system has been up for 14 days and /etc/motd was last modified on
Jan
i had the same problem. just remove your ~/.mozilla and it works (you'll
have to re-setup it, tough).
regards
Stefan
On Thu, Mar 09, 2000 at 01:04:59PM -0800, Kenneth Scharf wrote:
> My latest apt-get update ; apt-get upgrade run this
> morning grabbed a new version of mozilla. It no
> longer wo
> My latest apt-get update ; apt-get upgrade run this
> morning grabbed a new version of mozilla. It no
> longer works, it dies with a segmentation fault.
>
> Profile Manager : Profile Wizard and Manager activites
> : Begin
> Profile Manager : Command Line Options : Begin
> Profile Manager : Comm
Delete your preferences of M13, restart mozilla. You'll get the create
profile wizard, and then mozilla works.
Yes, it's still alpha software, why? ;-)
On Thu, 9 Mar 2000, Kenneth Scharf wrote:
> My latest apt-get update ; apt-get upgrade run this
> morning grabbed a new version of mozilla.
On Thu, Mar 09, 2000 at 01:04:59PM -0800, Kenneth Scharf wrote:
> My latest apt-get update ; apt-get upgrade run this
> morning grabbed a new version of mozilla. It no
> longer works, it dies with a segmentation fault.
I heard that you have to remove ~/.mozilla directory.
bye
Christian
--
| C
My latest apt-get update ; apt-get upgrade run this
morning grabbed a new version of mozilla. It no
longer works, it dies with a segmentation fault.
Profile Manager : Profile Wizard and Manager activites
: Begin
Profile Manager : Command Line Options : Begin
Profile Manager : Command Line Options
On Thu, Mar 09, 2000 at 12:46:05PM -0700, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
>
> On Thu, 9 Mar 2000, David Starner wrote:
>
> > I'm not arguing the rest of your points, but I'm curious about
> > this one. IIRC, the last thing a full bootstrap of GCC does,
> > after building stage one binaries with the nativ
On Thu, 9 Mar 2000, David Starner wrote:
> I'm not arguing the rest of your points, but I'm curious about
> this one. IIRC, the last thing a full bootstrap of GCC does,
> after building stage one binaries with the native compiler,
Hum, It *used* to do this, can't seem to get it to do it today t
On Thu, Mar 09, 2000 at 12:26:30PM -0700, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> differences very, very small. This is particularly true for .debs when you
> add in the fact that gcc never produces binary identical output on
> consecutive runs.
I'm not arguing the rest of your points, but I'm curious about
thi
On Thu, 9 Mar 2000, Andrea Mennucc1 wrote:
> rsync contains a wonderful algorithm to speedup downloads when mirroring
> files which have only minor differences;
> only problem is, this algorithm is ALMOST NEVER used
> when mirroring a debian repository
Small detail here, .debs, like .gz files a
tom rothamel is working on a project called debdiff that works towards the
same goal. please read his announcment thread, which is archived at
http://www.debian.org/Lists-Archives/debian-devel-0002/msg00391.htm.
i like the idea of rsync modules, but the concept you project misses is that
even a sm
On Thu, Mar 09, 2000 at 05:25:42PM +0100, Michael Bramer wrote:
> application: fetchmail 5.3.1
>
> Changes:
> Fixes for a number of minor bugs, including two reported from the RH6.2
> beta and a dozen or so from the Debian bug-tracking system.
>
> Is someone working on it? If no, I download the
On Fri, Mar 03, 2000 at 03:15:05AM -0600, BugScan reporter wrote:
> Package: fetchmail (debian/main)
> Maintainer: Paul Haggart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> [HELP] Maintainer is not responding.
>Someone should take over the package. (RB)
> 43139 fetchmail flushed after failed delivery
> [WAITIN
美國高科技生化公司
徵才
尋求
.有國際事業觀念者
.肯學習
.略通英或他國語言佳
我們將提供您
1.國內外在職訓練
2.免費海外旅遊
3.良好升遷管道及值得的報酬
Enter Me!!
Seems ive been beaten to it.
ftp://ftp.cm.nu/pub/debian/
Oh well, plenty more potential packages out there
bug1 wrote:
>
> Hi, ive created a package of tiotest, which is a small relatively need
> benchmarking program being used a lot recently for raid benchmarks.
>
> Its the first package ive m
hi everybody
I have implemented
a good idea for reducing download stress for everybody who is
mirroring a lot of data using rsync,
like, the people who are mirroring Debian GNU/Linux:
currently, many Debian "leaf mirrors" are using rsync
for mirroring from the main .debian.org hosts.
rsync co
On Wed, Mar 08, 2000 at 08:32:51PM +, Miquel van Smoorenburg wrote:
> It's been a long time since I tried it, but IIRC you do not need a special
> extra package to do transparent proxying with squid - squid can
> do it all itself.
>
> In fact I must RC, since I wrote the extensions for squid m
On Thu, Mar 09, 2000 at 06:59:01AM +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> On Wed, 8 Mar 2000, Branden Robinson wrote:
> > Eh? There would be no real code changes at all. As I understand it, the
> > license on 5.5 is all that has changed. So why not move it from non-free
> > to main for potato?
>
> The Rel
Hi, ive created a package of tiotest, which is a small relatively need
benchmarking program being used a lot recently for raid benchmarks.
Its the first package ive made, its only been packaged as i386, i havent
tried getting it working on other platforms.
Its a bit short on documentation, but if
On Thu 09 Mar 2000, Jacob Kuntz wrote:
> isn't the problem here that the server is misrepresenting itself? a one bit
> difference may not make a less secure key, but it could quite possibly be an
> indication of some deception. i worry that altering the client to ignore
> this type of error will o
On Wed, Mar 08, 2000 at 10:55:01PM +, Jules Bean wrote:
> > > > > > Can we please close the list from non-member submissions?
> > > > > NO!
> > > > > I, like many users of Debian, post from different mail addresses.
> > > > > Lists which are closed that way are really painful.
> > So sign on w
Hi,
Also... could someone please forward me all logs in regard to this spam,
as well as the original posting as it was received by the list (i.e., with
all headers intact? I intend to take action on its basis.
-Jim
---
Jim Lynch Finger for pgp key
as Laney College CIS admin: [EMAIL PROTEC
James R. Van Zandt uploaded tclx8.0.4 to frozen and unstable today,
with this in the changelog:
* Replaces tclx76 which is no longer installable (closes:bug#56541)
* Satisfy tclx dependency so emacspeak can be installed
(closes:bug#59099)
That takes care of my concerns with tclx76, so
(mail to Heiko Schlittermann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> is bouncing; upon
investigation you two appear to be mentioned in and around lshell so I'm
sending this email to you and Cc:ing it to debian-devel for anyone else's
perusal)
Hi,
I have code based on lshell, which you maintain for Debian, that imple
> "Jules" == Jules Bean <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Jules> It is, for example, against the rules of the institution
Jules> I'm at (the university of cambridge) to emit mail with a
Jules> from: address other than a valid @cam.ac.uk from:
Jules> address. But when I'm at home, I u
> "Wichert" == Wichert Akkerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Wichert> Okay. In theory this works fine, however its not (very
Wichert> well) tested. If you try this I'm very interested to
Wichert> hear if it really works.. The problem with diverting
Wichert> conffiles is that s
On Wed, 8 Mar 2000, Branden Robinson wrote:
> > AFAIK pdftotext is included in xpdf - it's not part of gs 5.5. The
> > differences
> > between 5.10 and 5.50 are not that big and I do not want to risk a stable
> > package just for being up to date.
>
> Eh? There would be no real code changes a
On Wed, 8 Mar 2000, it was written:
> SECRET HOLY CODE REVEALED ALL GENUINE SEEKERS OF TRUTH.
I don't know. Is this dfsg-compliant?
--
Jaldhar H. Vyas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
isn't the problem here that the server is misrepresenting itself? a one bit
difference may not make a less secure key, but it could quite possibly be an
indication of some deception. i worry that altering the client to ignore
this type of error will only open us up to attack, be it man-in-the-middl
On Wed, 8 Mar 2000, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote:
> On Wednesday 8 March 2000, at 7 h 55, the keyboard of Nils Jeppe
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Can we please close the list from non-member submissions?
>
> NO!
>
> I, like many users of Debian, post from different mail addresses.
> Lists
Unless someone else has beat me to it (and I missed it) I'm going to be
uploading soon sqmgrlog. Sqmgrlog generates reports per user/ip/name from
squid log file.
Ivan
--
Ivan E. Moore II
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://snowcrash.tdyc.com
GPG KeyID=90BCE0DD
GPG Fingerprint=F2FC 69FD 0D
On Thu, Mar 09, 2000 at 03:08:31PM +1100, Wichert Akkerman wrote:
> Previously J.H.M. Dassen Ray" wrote:
> > I hardly think lack of hardware acceleration support warrants making these
> > bug reports release-critical. Please set them to 'normal'.
>
> Actually they were already filed as release-cri
On Wed, Mar 08, 2000 at 05:25:42PM +0100, Torsten Landschoff wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 07, 2000 at 08:19:47AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
>
> > As I understand it, pdftotext is a new tool available in 5.5 but not 5.0.
>
> AFAIK pdftotext is included in xpdf - it's not part of gs 5.5. The differenc
Previously J.H.M. Dassen Ray" wrote:
> I hardly think lack of hardware acceleration support warrants making these
> bug reports release-critical. Please set them to 'normal'.
Actually they were already filed as release-critical earlier, and are
probably needed anyway since we have mega-ggi package
I rest my case. ;-)
Best wishes,
Nils
--
"Fool me seven times, shame on you. Fool me eight or more times, shame on me."
-- Amy
On Wed, 8 Mar 2000, Josip Rodin wrote:
> > > One possible technique we could employ is to require that the list
> > > address appear visibly in the headers (to: or cc:). This would
> > > prevent Bcc'ing the lists which is a shame (and care would need to be
> > > taken with -private, which is also
On Wed, Mar 08, 2000 at 03:28:37PM -0500, Joe Block wrote:
> Jules Bean wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Mar 08, 2000 at 10:45:07AM +0100, Nils Jeppe wrote:
> > > On Wed, 8 Mar 2000, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote:
> > >
> > > > > Can we please close the list from non-member submissions?
> > > >
> > > > NO!
> >
39 matches
Mail list logo
