, Joachim Wuttke
Reviewing #945824, I believe that even if we were eventually to overrule
the Python maintainers on this, (i) the impact to users in the meantime
is very low, and (ii) we are about to freeze, so it's unlikely we'd make
any decision applying to bookworm.
So I think we should leave this for the Janu
Dear all:
Sandro wrote:
> Please compare the numpy popcon numbers (which we know are not
> detailed, but it's a start) with the handful of people having reported
> this issue. While maintaining numpy, my work caters towards the actual
> numpy users, not people who just want to not have 2 python
>
> How about this?
>
> #!/bin/sh
> ":" """ "
> if which python3.11 >/dev/null 2>&1; then
> exec python3.11 "$0" "$@"
> else
> echo "Please install python3.11 to use this tool" >&2
> fi
> exit 1
> """
> print("hey, I'm running under python3.1
Debian-patched CMake
will handle them? It will do so by inserting the aformentioned -D options?
Thanks again, Joachim
On 11/01/2023 10:48, Timo Röhling wrote:
Hi Joachim,
On Wed, 30 Nov 2022 17:22:08 +0100 Joachim Wuttke
wrote:
Why does python3-numpy under bookworm, since a few days
5 matches
Mail list logo