Hello Andrew,
The strange behaviour that I had experienced was on two differents pc:
1) lenovo w530
2) assemblend wit motherboard asus p8h77-i
Both with more than one usb3 ports, at first boot with live plugged in one
port doesn't start, at the second try with different usb3 port work fine
like a
Am 09.04.2014 00:35, schrieb Andrew M.A. Cater:
Debian Live CD appears to have a problem booting on USB 3.0 ports but boots
well on USB 2.0 ports. No specifics I'm afraid
because a friend reported this to me fron an HP all-in-one desktop that
normally runs Windows 8
Has anybody else seen this
Hi,
uploaded is a new (semi-stable) development snapshot
http://www.gnu.org/software/xorriso/xorriso-1.3.7.tar.gz
with the new features for PALO on HP-PA, which are now promised to
stay compatible in future releases.
MD5: 961939a15cdb2b9893fbe25f453d9ac4
Version timestamp : 2014.04.09.073038
> To Helge Deller:
> Please check-read my descriptions of header versions 4 and 5 beginning at
> doc/boot_sectors.txt line 975
> resp.
>
> http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~libburnia-team/libisofs/scdbackup/view/head:/doc/boot_sectors.txt#L972
> for terminology, unclear or false statements, ...
Th
Hi,
the proposed patch for the boot sector documentation looks at the
topic from the PALO user perspective. But the perspective of the
file boot_sectors.txt is the one of an ISO 9660 producer.
So i would like to re-arrange the info.
How about this for the command line part ? Would it be technica
> the proposed patch for the boot sector documentation looks at the
> topic from the PALO user perspective. But the perspective of the
> file boot_sectors.txt is the one of an ISO 9660 producer.
>
> So i would like to re-arrange the info.
>
> How about this for the command line part ? Would it be
Hi,
> > How to recognize a PALO that is "newer" ?
> It should be palo 1.92 or higher.
> > ... PALOHDRVERSION ...
> I could update it to 5.
I think it is appropriate.
Readers of libisofs docs and of PALO could make a clear connection.
> We shouldn't make xorriso more complicated than necessary.
Hi,
the GPT header CRC of
http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/daily-builds/daily/arch-latest/amd64/iso-cd/debian-testing-amd64-netinst.iso
looks ok now for me and for gdisk of oldstable (which formerly
complained about amd64 ISOs). Now it says:
GPT fdisk (gdisk) version 0.8.1
Partition ta
Hi,
my newest bug about gdisk hating an ISO with GPT and MBR is
not affecting debian-cd. (Further it is not GRUB2 specific.)
I can reproduce the user's symptoms with gdisk 0.8.1 and can work
around them by explicitely disabling multi-session emulation when
producing the ISO. This disabling is def
Hi Thomas,
On 04/09/2014 05:53 PM, Thomas Schmitt wrote:
>>> How to recognize a PALO that is "newer" ?
>> It should be palo 1.92 or higher.
>>> ... PALOHDRVERSION ...
>> I could update it to 5.
>
> I think it is appropriate.
> Readers of libisofs docs and of PALO could make a clear connection.
O
10 matches
Mail list logo
