Hi Thomas, On 04/09/2014 05:53 PM, Thomas Schmitt wrote: >>> How to recognize a PALO that is "newer" ? >> It should be palo 1.92 or higher. >>> ... PALOHDRVERSION ... >> I could update it to 5. > > I think it is appropriate. > Readers of libisofs docs and of PALO could make a clear connection.
Ok, committed. I need some testing though until I push a new palo upstream version. >> We shouldn't make xorriso more complicated than necessary. > > Yeah. It already has a sufficient set of dark and dusty corners where > new bugs quickly find a home. > > Notify me when you have more tangible plans for compressed kernels > in ISO. For now i settle with the assessment that it should be well > possible to let libisofs determine the uncompressed sizes. Ok. Helge -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-cd-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/5345a510.1070...@gmx.de
