On Sun, Jan 17, 2021 at 12:26:18AM +, Pete Batard wrote:
>On 2021.01.16 23:00, Steve McIntyre wrote:
>
>> I splurged on that Voyager drive too, and
>> tested with it. The problem we have is deep down in the way that Linux
>> / udev describe UAS-attached drives. In d-i we look for CD/DVD media
>
On 2021.01.16 23:00, Steve McIntyre wrote:
On Thu, Jan 14, 2021 at 03:19:09PM +, Steve McIntyre wrote:
On Wed, Jan 13, 2021 at 08:16:39PM +, Pete Batard wrote:
On 2021.01.13 18:49, Steve McIntyre wrote:
I've never seen a UAS device here yet, let alone tested with one. :-)
...
Right
On Thu, Jan 14, 2021 at 03:19:09PM +, Steve McIntyre wrote:
>On Wed, Jan 13, 2021 at 08:16:39PM +, Pete Batard wrote:
>>On 2021.01.13 18:49, Steve McIntyre wrote:
>>> I've never seen a UAS device here yet, let alone tested with one. :-)
...
>Right. I've found and ordered a Startech USB3S2
On Thu, Jan 14, 2021 at 04:59:08PM +0100, Thomas Schmitt wrote:
>Steve McIntyre wrote:
>> [Dropping CC to Lou as we've wandered, re-adding Thomas for the GPT
>> question.]
>
>[Lou and i are subscribed to debian-cd, obviously. :))
>It seems you dropped the original poster: The7up
>who might indeed
Hi,
Steve McIntyre wrote:
> [Dropping CC to Lou as we've wandered, re-adding Thomas for the GPT
> question.]
[Lou and i are subscribed to debian-cd, obviously. :))
It seems you dropped the original poster: The7up
who might indeed not be interested in partitioning.]
> For the
> sake of this kin
[ Dropping CC to Lou as we've wandered, but re-adding Thomas for the
GPT question. ]
On Wed, Jan 13, 2021 at 08:16:39PM +, Pete Batard wrote:
>On 2021.01.13 18:49, Steve McIntyre wrote:
>> I've never seen a UAS device here yet, let alone tested with one. :-)
>
>They've existed for quite a fe
On 2021.01.13 18:49, Steve McIntyre wrote:
I've never seen a UAS device here yet, let alone tested with one. :-)
They've existed for quite a few years.
I think currently have about 4 of those in my arsenal, with the first
one purchased more than 6 or 7 years ago.
So it's not quite such a s
On Tue, Jan 12, 2021 at 12:53:21PM +, Pete Batard wrote:
>On 2021.01.12 11:56, Steve McIntyre wrote:
>> On Sun, Jan 10, 2021 at 08:19:15PM +, Pete Batard wrote:
...
>> > Which brings me nicely to the point that the current Debian Bullseye test
>> > images have broken said mode of operatio
Hi Steve, Happy New Year to you too!
On 2021.01.12 11:56, Steve McIntyre wrote:
Hey Pete,
HNY etc. Thanks for joining the discussion! :-)
On Sun, Jan 10, 2021 at 08:19:15PM +, Pete Batard wrote:
On 2021.01.10 18:56, Lou Poppler wrote:
On Sun, 2021-01-10 at 18:13 +0100, Thomas Schmitt wro
Hey Pete,
HNY etc. Thanks for joining the discussion! :-)
On Sun, Jan 10, 2021 at 08:19:15PM +, Pete Batard wrote:
>On 2021.01.10 18:56, Lou Poppler wrote:
>> On Sun, 2021-01-10 at 18:13 +0100, Thomas Schmitt wrote:
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > Lou Poppler wrote:
>> > > If you want to recommend rufus,
Hi,
Pete Batard wrote:
> Yes, as we've discussed elsewhere, that is pretty much my point.
That's why i summarized the results of our wiggling and fitting with
Ubuntu ISO development.
> symlinks [...] will of course not translate to FAT [...]
Duh. I forgot that aspect in my summary.
So its prop
Hi Thomas,
On 2021.01.11 07:53, Thomas Schmitt wrote:
Hi,
the advantages of putting an unmodified ISO image plainly onto a USB are:
- The boot and installation process is as near to DVD as possible.
- If anything goes wrong during that process, it is clear that debian-cd
is in charge of diag
On 2021.01.11 03:42, Lou Poppler wrote:
On Mon, 2021-01-11 at 02:21 +, Pete Batard wrote:
On 2021.01.11 01:38, Lou Poppler wrote:
This is radically different from what I suggested above.
You mentioned cp, which I interpreted as copying extracted ISO files
onto FAT, since this is the mode
Hi,
the advantages of putting an unmodified ISO image plainly onto a USB are:
- The boot and installation process is as near to DVD as possible.
- If anything goes wrong during that process, it is clear that debian-cd
is in charge of diagnosing and hopefully managing the effort to provide
a co
On Mon, 2021-01-11 at 02:21 +, Pete Batard wrote:
> On 2021.01.11 01:38, Lou Poppler wrote:
> > This is radically different from what I suggested above.
>
> You mentioned cp, which I interpreted as copying extracted ISO files
> onto FAT, since this is the mode I explicitly mentioned in my i
On 2021.01.11 01:38, Lou Poppler wrote:
This is radically different from what I suggested above.
You mentioned cp, which I interpreted as copying extracted ISO files
onto FAT, since this is the mode I explicitly mentioned in my initial reply.
Here is my experiment:
lwp@william:~/Downloads$
Forwarded Message
From: Lou Poppler
To: Pete Batard
Subject: Re: isorecorder
Date: Sun, 10 Jan 2021 18:20:55 -0700
On Sun, 2021-01-10 at 23:57 +, Pete Batard wrote:
> On 2021.01.10 22:23, Lou Poppler wrote:
> > Let me emphasize that the unmodified debian install
On 2021.01.10 22:23, Lou Poppler wrote:
On Sun, 2021-01-10 at 20:19 +, Pete Batard wrote:
The goal of Rufus is to create a bootable USB with content that is as
close as possible to the ISO content *AND* is bootable as USB media, period.
As such, when booting in UEFI mode, the *only* elemen
On Sun, 2021-01-10 at 20:19 +, Pete Batard wrote:
>
> The goal of Rufus is to create a bootable USB with content that is as
> close as possible to the ISO content *AND* is bootable as USB media, period.
>
> As such, when booting in UEFI mode, the *only* element that Rufus may
> modify are t
Adding missing link:
[1]
https://www.raspberrypi.org/forums/viewtopic.php?f=50&t=282839&start=25#p1778729
On 2021.01.10 20:19, Pete Batard wrote:
Hello All,
I am the main developer of Rufus and since I am now being involved in
this discussion, let me reply to a few points:
On 2021.01.10 1
Hello All,
I am the main developer of Rufus and since I am now being involved in
this discussion, let me reply to a few points:
On 2021.01.10 18:56, Lou Poppler wrote:
On Sun, 2021-01-10 at 18:13 +0100, Thomas Schmitt wrote:
Hi,
Lou Poppler wrote:
If you want to recommend rufus, please do
Hi,
The7up originally wrote:
> ... > It looks like isorecorder not available since a while ago. May I
> ... > remove it from the list in w.d.o/faq/CD index page?
> ... > At the same time, rufus (https://rufus.ie/ [rufus.ie]) should be
> ... > mentioned as a great app on Windows to make bootable us
On Sun, 2021-01-10 at 18:13 +0100, Thomas Schmitt wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Lou Poppler wrote:
> > If you want to recommend rufus, please do so ONLY with a prominent,
> > un-ignoreable warning explaining that the user MUST select rufus'
> > "DD mode" at the prompt immediately before writing the media.
>
Hi,
Lou Poppler wrote:
> If you want to recommend rufus, please do so ONLY with a prominent,
> un-ignoreable warning explaining that the user MUST select rufus'
> "DD mode" at the prompt immediately before writing the media.
I understand that manual selection of this mode has been removed in
fav
On Sun, 2021-01-10 at 14:37 +0100, The7up wrote:
> Hi!
>
> It looks like isorecorder not available since a while ago. May I remove it
> from the list in w.d.o/faq/CD index page?
>
> At the same time, rufus (https://rufus.ie/) should be mentioned as a great
> app on Windows to make bootable usb
On Sun, Jan 10, 2021 at 02:37:27PM +0100, The7up wrote:
> Hi!
>
> It looks like isorecorder not available since a while ago. May I remove it
> from the list in w.d.o/faq/CD index page?
>
> At the same time, rufus (https://rufus.ie/) should be mentioned as a great
> app on Windows to make bootable
26 matches
Mail list logo
