On Wed, May 22, 2002 at 09:49:12PM +0100, Steve Haslam wrote:
> So I'm getting reasonably sized ISOs, although I notice the jigdo
> template file doesn't get significantly smaller :| I guess the
> template just contains a few less "loads of zeroes until this .deb
> file here" entries.
No, it cont
On Wed, May 22, 2002 at 03:07:04PM -0500, Chris Lawrence wrote:
> On May 22, Steve Haslam wrote:
> > OK, I'll poke around with what I've got at the moment and see if I can find
> > out why these packages are being brought in... maybe I'll just drop a load
> > of them into an exclude list
>
>
On May 22, Steve Haslam wrote:
> OK, I'll poke around with what I've got at the moment and see if I can find
> out why these packages are being brought in... maybe I'll just drop a load
> of them into an exclude list
I believe "make status" is responsible for most of the bloat; if you
poke ar
On Wed, May 22, 2002 at 02:10:30PM -0500, Chris Lawrence wrote:
> On May 22, Steve Haslam wrote:
> > How do you manage to persuade debian-cd to produce a 185M ISO? I tried using
> > your .packages file as a "TASK" file for "make list" and ended up with an
> > ISO of over 300M...
>
> My guess is t
On May 22, Steve Haslam wrote:
> On Wed, May 22, 2002 at 11:34:21AM -0500, Chris Lawrence wrote:
> > I've updated the unofficial mini-ISO at www.phy.olemiss.edu to include
> > the 3.0.23 boot-floppies along with a few other goodies; so, go forth
> > and test!
>
> How do you manage to persuade deb
On Wed, May 22, 2002 at 11:34:21AM -0500, Chris Lawrence wrote:
> I've updated the unofficial mini-ISO at www.phy.olemiss.edu to include
> the 3.0.23 boot-floppies along with a few other goodies; so, go forth
> and test!
How do you manage to persuade debian-cd to produce a 185M ISO? I tried using
6 matches
Mail list logo
