On Fri, 17 May 2002, Richard Atterer wrote:
> On Wed, May 15, 2002 at 04:29:20PM +0100, Philip Hands wrote:
> > On Tue, 2002-05-14 at 19:14, Richard Atterer wrote:
> > > "jigdo/", not "jigdo-area/". (Not that it really matters...)
> >
> > I wasn't overly happy about using jigdo-area, but couldn't
On Wed, May 15, 2002 at 04:29:20PM +0100, Philip Hands wrote:
> On Tue, 2002-05-14 at 19:14, Richard Atterer wrote:
> > "jigdo/", not "jigdo-area/". (Not that it really matters...)
>
> I wasn't overly happy about using jigdo-area, but couldn't think of
> anything more appropriate.
>
> The reason
On Wed, 2002-05-15 at 22:44, jason andrade wrote:
> On 15 May 2002, Philip Hands wrote:
>
> > I wasn't overly happy about using jigdo-area, but couldn't think of
> > anything more appropriate.
> >
> > The reason not to call it simply "jigdo" is that the jigdo-area contains
> > one or more versio
On 15 May 2002, Philip Hands wrote:
> I wasn't overly happy about using jigdo-area, but couldn't think of
> anything more appropriate.
>
> The reason not to call it simply "jigdo" is that the jigdo-area contains
> one or more versioned directories, each of which contains a jigdo and a
> snapshot
On Tue, 2002-05-14 at 19:14, Richard Atterer wrote:
> On Mon, May 13, 2002 at 03:22:37PM +0100, Philip Hands wrote:
> > On Mon, 2002-05-13 at 14:51, jason andrade wrote:
> > > o as a mirror site, where do i produce/get "authoritative" jigdo
> > > files from?
> > > o where do i put them ?
> >
>
On Mon, May 13, 2002 at 03:22:37PM +0100, Philip Hands wrote:
> On Mon, 2002-05-13 at 14:51, jason andrade wrote:
> > o as a mirror site, where do i produce/get "authoritative" jigdo
> > files from?
> > o where do i put them ?
>
> Well, in the absence of a better idea, I settled on /jigdo-area/
> -Original Message-
> From: Philip Hands [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>
> IIRC the .raw extension was chosen because xcdroast (or something
> similar) used that as it's default extension at the time debian-cd (or
> probably slink-cd) was being written.
>
> The .iso extension was chosen fo
On 13 May 2002, Philip Hands wrote:
> It looks like it will all become moot with the new jigdo scheme anyway,
> because jigdo creates .iso files, and the rsync mirror setup is not
> really needed any more, so published .raw files are likely to become a
> thing of the past.
>
> Is this an argumen
On Mon, 2002-05-13 at 12:44, jason andrade wrote:
> On Mon, 13 May 2002, Richard Atterer wrote:
>
> > I could add an entry to the CD FAQ, if someone can give me a good
> > answer to the question... :)
> >
> > What is a .raw file?
> >
> > It is exactly the same as an .iso file; you can just
/CD/faq/#record-unix
http://www.debian.org/CD/faq/#record-windows
http://www.debian.org/CD/faq/#record-mac
Hope this helps.
> -Original Message-
> From: Richard Atterer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, May 13, 2002 5:56 AM
> To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
> Cc:
On Mon, 13 May 2002, Richard Atterer wrote:
> I could add an entry to the CD FAQ, if someone can give me a good
> answer to the question... :)
>
> What is a .raw file?
>
> It is exactly the same as an .iso file; you can just rename it to
> .iso and write it to CD-R. We use .raw for beta a
On Mon, May 13, 2002 at 10:28:10AM +0200, Wuttke Joachim wrote:
> This is the first time I am trying to get a "testing" distribution
> from the net, and so I can confirm that for a first-time user the
> extension ".raw" is indeed quite confusing. It took me quite a while
> to find out that ".raw"
12 matches
Mail list logo
