On Wed, May 15, 2002 at 04:29:20PM +0100, Philip Hands wrote: > On Tue, 2002-05-14 at 19:14, Richard Atterer wrote: > > "jigdo/", not "jigdo-area/". (Not that it really matters...) > > I wasn't overly happy about using jigdo-area, but couldn't think of > anything more appropriate. > > The reason not to call it simply "jigdo" is that the jigdo-area > contains one or more versioned directories, each of which contains a > jigdo and a snapshot directory, so having jigdo appear at two levels > in the hierarchy seemed likely to give rise to confusion.
That's true. Why not call the topmost dir "jigdo" and leave out the second one, i.e. snapshot in "jigdo/2.2r6/snapshot/" jigdo/template files in "jigdo/2.2r6/i386" Or what about "cd-images"? snapshot in "cd-images/2.2r6/snapshot/" jigdo/template files in "cd-images/2.2r6/jigdo/i386" Cheers, Richard -- __ _ |_) /| Richard Atterer | CS student at the Technische | GnuPG key: | \/¯| http://atterer.net | Universität München, Germany | 0x888354F7 ¯ '` ¯ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
