Bug#905140: cmake: FTBFS with recent version of libuv1

2018-07-31 Thread Svante Signell
Source: cmake Version: 3.11.2-1 Severity: serious Tags: patch Usertags: linux-any, freebsd-any, hurd-any Hello, cmake FTBFS with recent a version of libuv1: 1.22.0-x. The build for most architectures was made 60+ days ago, then with 1.20.3-x. Since then two upstream versions was released and the

Bug#905708: gcc-6: FTBFS with isl 0.20

2018-08-08 Thread Svante Signell
Source: gcc-6 Version: 6.4.0-19 Severity: serious Tags: ftbfs, patch Hi, gcc-6 FTBFs with the latest version of isl (0.20-1) as well as gcc-7 (see #905539). Attached is a patch, isl-includes.diff fixing this problem. Attached is also the diff for debian/rules.patch. Thanks!--- a/debian_rules.pa

Bug#905539: gcc-7 FTBFS with isl 0.20 + gcc-6

2018-08-08 Thread Svante Signell
tags 905539 patch thanks On Sun, 2018-08-05 at 21:37 +0200, Svante Signell wrote: > On Sun, 2018-08-05 at 20:52 +0200, Helmut Grohne wrote: > > Source: gcc-7 > > Version: 7.3.0-27 > > Severity: serious > > Tags: ftbfs > > User: helm...@debian.org > > Use

Bug#905140: Bug #905140 in cmake marked as pending

2018-08-09 Thread Svante Signell
Hello, What about the bugs with patches, e.g. for Hurd and kFreeBSD. Still somebody needs to NMU this package... You don't seem interested in fixing bugs to your package, except RC ones. Not the ideal way Debian maintainers should work with their packages... On Thu, 2018-08-09 at 19:58 +, F

Bug#797047: kbookmarks: FTBFS: Updated symbols file needed with new default g++

2015-08-27 Thread Svante Signell
Source: kbookmarks Version: 5.12.0-1 Severity: serious Tags: patch Hi, Currently kbookmarks FTBFS due to mismatches in the symbols for libkf5bookmarks5 built with the new gcc default. The attached patch provides updated symbols created when building with g++-5.2.1-15. Thanks! libKF5Bookmarks.so

Bug#923240: #923240: Explain why no desktops are installable w/o systemd

2019-08-09 Thread Svante Signell
Hello, Due to that the patch for polickit-1 in #923420 is not applied no working desktop is possible w/o installing systemd (via libpam-systemd) as pid 1. This effectively excludes usage of other init systems for desktop usage. Please explain your decision on why desktops for other init systems a

Bug#847357: dpkg: dpkg does not reinstall removed/lost conffiles unless forced to

2016-12-07 Thread Svante Signell
Source: dpkg Version: 1.18.15 Severity: serious Affects apt Hello, I'm now filing the bug against dpkg as promised, see below: >From debian-devel on November 30 2016: On Tue, 2016-11-29 at 19:18 +0100, Simon Richter wrote: > Hi, >  > On 29.11.2016 17:58, Svante Signell w

Bug#840073: Bug: #840073 Patch to fix upgrade from jessie to stretch/testing

2016-11-08 Thread Svante Signell
0.21-3/debian/changelog 2016-09-24 02:11:37.0 +0200 +++ openrc-0.21/debian/changelog 2016-11-08 09:32:48.740226951 +0100 @@ -1,3 +1,12 @@ +openrc (0.21-4) unstable; urgency=medium + + [ Svante Signell ] + * Fix upgrade from jessie to stretch by adding openrc.preinst +and modifying op

Bug#840073: [PKG-OpenRC-Debian] Bug#840073: Bug: #840073 Patch to fix upgrade from jessie to stretch/testing

2016-11-12 Thread Svante Signell
ping On Tue, 2016-11-08 at 19:14 +0100, Svante Signell wrote: > tags 840073 patch > thanks > > Hi, > > looking at the problem and setting up piuparts, and using a local repository, > I > think the problem with upgrade from jessie to stretch/sid is solved with the &g

Bug#914897: debootstrap, buster: Please disabled merged /usr by default

2018-12-03 Thread Svante Signell
On Sun, 2018-12-02 at 21:04 +0100, Marc Haber wrote: > > The next debhelper change might choose to give / instead of /usr as a > target directory by default, moving hundreds of megabytes from /usr to / > over time. This solution was proposed by GNU/Hurd several years ago, and was scrapped due to

Bug#914897: debating the wrong thing

2018-12-05 Thread Svante Signell
On Tue, 2018-12-04 at 21:58 +0100, Ansgar Burchardt wrote: > > If we keep merged-/usr as default then we can /recommend/ people to > install usrmerge to switch to merged-/usr; reducing the difference > between newly-installed and existing setups is a good idea IMHO. I > think I filed a report for

Bug#308878: kernel-image-2.6.10+11-1-686-smp fails to boot

2005-05-12 Thread Svante Signell
or directory Not touching initrd symlinks since we are being reinstalled (2.6.10-6) Not updating image symbolic links since we are being updated (2.6.10-6) ... Attached is a diff between the configurations files of 2.6.9 and 2.6.10. Thanks, -- Svante Signell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- /boot/config-2.

Bug#308878: kernel-image-2.6.10+11-1-686-smp fails to boot

2005-05-15 Thread Svante Signell
On Sat, 2005-05-14 at 20:19 +0200, maximilian attems wrote: > tags 308878 moreinfo > thanks > > On Fri, 13 May 2005, Svante Signell wrote: > > > Package: kernel-image > > Version: 2.6.10-1-686-smp and 2.6.11-1-686-smp ... > please send in working dmesg of 2.6.8 o

Bug#308878: kernel-image-2.6.10+11-1-686-smp fails to boot

2005-05-15 Thread Svante Signell
On Sun, 2005-05-15 at 12:10 +0200, Svante Signell wrote: > On Sat, 2005-05-14 at 20:19 +0200, maximilian attems wrote: > > tags 308878 moreinfo > > thanks Installing the updated initrd-tools (0.1.79) gives no error in cpio with /lib/ld-linux.so.2 not found: #> apt-get install

Bug#318231: Console gets garbled when starting X

2005-07-14 Thread Svante Signell
Package: xserver-xorg Vsrsion: 6.8.2.dfsg.1-2 Severity: Serious The console screen gets completely garbled when starting X.org. Going back to the console C-A-{F1-F6} or exiting X gives the same result. X works fine, also with C-A-Fx to C-A-F7. The font seems to be black with a black background.

Bug#318231: Console gets garbled when starting X

2005-07-14 Thread Svante Signell
On Thu, 2005-07-14 at 11:48 +0200, David Martínez Moreno wrote: > El Jueves, 14 de Julio de 2005 10:54, Svante Signell escribió: > > Package: xserver-xorg > > Vsrsion: 6.8.2.dfsg.1-2 > > Severity: Serious > > > > The console screen gets completely garbled when star

Bug#289555: Still dpkg-divert problems

2005-01-10 Thread Svante Signell
rrors were encountered while processing: /var/cache/apt/archives/i2c-2.4.27-1-686_1%3a2.9.0-8_i386.deb E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1) -- Svante Signell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#289555: Still dpkg-divert problems

2005-01-10 Thread Svante Signell
On Mon, 2005-01-10 at 09:13 +0100, Aurelien Jarno wrote: > On Mon, Jan 10, 2005 at 09:00:55AM +0100, Svante Signell wrote: > > Problem still not resolved: (same problem since 2.9.0-1 was released) > > > > The following packages will be upgraded: > > i2c-2.4.27-1-

Bug#289555: Still dpkg-divert problems

2005-01-10 Thread Svante Signell
On Mon, 2005-01-10 at 09:13 +0100, Aurelien Jarno wrote: > On Mon, Jan 10, 2005 at 09:00:55AM +0100, Svante Signell wrote: > > Problem still not resolved: (same problem since 2.9.0-1 was released) > > > > The following packages will be upgraded: > > i2c-2.4.27-1-

Bug#289555: Still dpkg-divert problems

2005-01-10 Thread Svante Signell
On Mon, 2005-01-10 at 15:55 +0100, Aurélien Jarno wrote: > Svante Signell wrote: > > diversion of /lib/modules/2.4.27-1-686/kernel/drivers/i2c/i2c-algo-bit.o > > to /lib/modules/2.4.27-1-686/old-i2c/i2c-algo-bit.o by i2c-2.4.27-1-686 > > Everything seems to be normal, so I do

Bug#289555: Still dpkg-divert problems

2005-01-10 Thread Svante Signell
1-686 ... Setting up i2c-2.4.27-1-686 (2.9.0-10) ... Thanks! Maybe the changelog.Debian should also mention and close bug 289555... -- Svante Signell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#289982: ACPI problems with kernel 2.6.x for Dell Inspiron 4100

2005-01-11 Thread Svante Signell
ith error -16 failed. Running update-modules... Loading driver... Starting ALSA.../etc/init.d/alsa: Error: alsactl restore failed with message 'alsactl: load_state:1134: No soundcards found...'. done. Setting default volumes... -- Svante Signell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#289990: ACPI problems with kernels 2.6.x for Dell Inspiron 4100

2005-01-12 Thread Svante Signell
00:1f.5 failed with error -16 failed. Running update-modules... Loading driver... Starting ALSA.../etc/init.d/alsa: Error: alsactl restore failed with message 'alsactl: load_state:1134: No soundcards found...'. done. Setting default volumes... -- Svante Signell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#428650: module-init-tools: Upgrade fails: Tries to overwrite diversion of french man page

2007-06-27 Thread Svante Signell
Package: module-init-tools Version: 3.3-pre11-3,3.3-pre11-2 Severity: grave It seems that upgrading of packeages in unstable is hindered by this bug so the importance should be raised to grave! A temporary workaround is to install module-init-tools-3.3-pre11-1 from testing after the failure to ins

Bug#428650: module-init-tools: Upgrade fails: Tries to overwrite diversion of french man page

2007-06-27 Thread Svante Signell
On Wed, 2007-06-27 at 14:24 -0400, Frédéric Brière wrote: > On Wed, Jun 27, 2007 at 11:14:21AM +0200, Svante Signell wrote: > > so the importance should be raised to grave! A temporary workaround is > > to install module-init-tools-3.3-pre11-1 from testing after the failure > &

Bug#431059: ifupdown-0.7~alpha non-functional!

2007-06-29 Thread Svante Signell
Package: ifupdown Version: 0.7~alpha2 Severity: grave Tags: experimental The new release of ifupdown does not work! I had to revert to 0.6.8 to get ethernet working again (after buyng a new card to replace the old one, which works perfectly). Everything is OK from kernel, detecting the network car

Bug#456774: lm-sensors3 does not work

2007-12-17 Thread Svante Signell
Package: lm-sensors Version: 1:3.0.0-4 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Some voltage readings are not reported by versions 3 of lm-sensors. Configuration files tried with versions 3 are both the old /etc/sensors.conf and the new /etc/sensors3.conf, same result, see below. W

Bug#457545: Logic error for negative values

2007-12-23 Thread Svante Signell
Package: lm-sensors Version: 3.0.0 Severity: serious Tags: patch The following sensors calculate wrong max and min values for negative inputs in sensors3.conf: chip "lm78-*" "lm79-*" "w83781d-*" chip "as99127f-*" chip "lm87-*" "adm1024-*" The max and min values should be swapped as shown for lm78

Bug#425803: texlive-base-bin: Version 2007-8 does not configure

2007-05-24 Thread Svante Signell
Package: texlive-base-bin Version: 2007-8 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Setting up texlive-base-bin (2007-8) ... Running mktexlsr. This may take some time... done. Building format(s) --all . This may take some time... fmtutil-sys failed. Output has been stored in /tmp/fm

Bug#425803: texlive-base-bin: Version 2007-8 does not configure

2007-05-24 Thread Svante Signell
On Thu, 2007-05-24 at 16:53 +0200, Frank Küster wrote: > retitle 425803 upgrade fails due to missing conffiles (see solved bug #420390) > retitle 425781 upgrade fails due to missing conffiles (see solved bug #420390) > thanks > > Svante Signell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

Bug#425803: texlive-base-bin: Version 2007-8 does not configure

2007-05-24 Thread Svante Signell
On Thu, 2007-05-24 at 22:39 +0200, Svante Signell wrote: > On Thu, 2007-05-24 at 16:53 +0200, Frank Küster wrote: > > retitle 425803 upgrade fails due to missing conffiles (see solved bug > > #420390) > > retitle 425781 upgrade fails due to missing conffiles (see so

Bug#425803: texlive-base-bin: Version 2007-8 does not configure

2007-05-24 Thread Svante Signell
On Thu, 2007-05-24 at 23:19 +0200, Svante Signell wrote: > On Thu, 2007-05-24 at 22:39 +0200, Svante Signell wrote: > > On Thu, 2007-05-24 at 16:53 +0200, Frank Küster wrote: > > > retitle 425803 upgrade fails due to missing conffiles (see solved bug > > > #420390) &

Bug#425803: texlive-base-bin: Version 2007-8 does not configure

2007-05-28 Thread Svante Signell
On Fri, 2007-05-25 at 14:53 +0200, Frank Küster wrote: > Svante Signell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Thu, 2007-05-24 at 23:19 +0200, Svante Signell wrote: > >> On Thu, 2007-05-24 at 22:39 +0200, Svante Signell wrote: > >> > On Thu, 2007-0

Bug#425803: texlive-base-bin: Version 2007-8 does not configure

2007-05-28 Thread Svante Signell
On Tue, 2007-05-29 at 03:23 +0200, Svante Signell wrote: > On Fri, 2007-05-25 at 14:53 +0200, Frank Küster wrote: ... > > After this I successfullly reinstalled jadetex (3.13-8) and > docbook-utils (0.6.14-1), but removing them in the first place does not > seem necessary, since ve

Bug#425803: texlive-base-bin: Version 2007-8 does not configure

2007-05-28 Thread Svante Signell
On Tue, 2007-05-29 at 07:59 +0200, Frank Küster wrote: > Svante Signell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >> And that, together with removing jadetex, solved your problems, although > >> the message from color.sty (No driver specified), correct? > > > > I

Bug#425803: texlive-base-bin: Version 2007-8 does not configure

2007-05-29 Thread Svante Signell
On Tue, 2007-05-29 at 09:17 +0200, Frank Küster wrote: > Svante Signell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I have now upgraded to tetex-base-bin 2007-9 and tetex-base 2007-7 after > > restoring the conffiles. I assume the other packages will install properly > > too,

Bug#444680: libnm-glib0 [0.6.5-2] does not play well with [evolution 2.12.0-1]

2007-09-30 Thread Svante Signell
Package: libnm-glib0 Version: 0.6.5-2 Severity: grave Tags: unstable With the latest libnm-glib installed and starting evolution my X windows log file is filled with entries shown below exhausting the hard disk space: (evolution:23673): Gdk-CRITICAL **: gdk_window_get_origin: assertion `GDK_IS_W

Bug#444680: [Fwd: libnm-glib0 [0.6.5-2] does not play well with [evolution 2.12.0-1]]

2007-09-30 Thread Svante Signell
Sorry for the noise, the problem is solely in evolution itself. Close please, I will file a bug towards evolution instead. Forwarded Message From: Svante Signell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: libnm-glib0 [0.6.5-2] does not pla

Bug#444692: Spurious output fills disk space

2007-09-30 Thread Svante Signell
Package: evolution Version: 2.12.0-1 Severity: serious Tags: unstable With the latest evolution my X windows log file is filled with entries shown below exhausting the hard disk space: (evolution:23673): Gdk-CRITICAL **: gdk_window_get_origin: assertion `GDK_IS_WINDOW (window)' failed fff (evol

Bug#479533: Cc: field stillnot filled in when replying

2008-08-19 Thread Svante Signell
Yves-Alexis Perez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I can't reproduce on unstable/amd64 (2,22,3,1-1 and eds 2.22.3-1). > Replying correctly sets the BCC: field I configured. If I do that from > another account, then change the From: Identity, the BCC: field is added > as well. > > Cheers, > -- > Yves

Bug#520771: [evolution-data-server] Possibly duplicate

2009-03-25 Thread Svante Signell
On Wed, 2009-03-25 at 08:43 +0100, Michel Dänzer wrote: > This could be a duplicate of #520132. Svante, can you try the patch > referenced there? > Is there a .deb file somewhere i can try with the patch included? I don't have the time to compile evolution-data-server myself. -- To UNSUBSCRIB

Bug#520771: [evolution-data-server] Possibly duplicate

2009-03-25 Thread Svante Signell
On Wed, 2009-03-25 at 09:19 +0100, Michel Dänzer wrote: > On Wed, 2009-03-25 at 09:08 +0100, Svante Signell wrote: > > On Wed, 2009-03-25 at 08:43 +0100, Michel Dänzer wrote: > > > This could be a duplicate of #520132. Svante, can you try the patch > > > referenced t

Bug#521862: More info about the evolution startup crash

2009-03-31 Thread Svante Signell
More backtrace info at gnome on this bug: http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=577324 http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=577198 I'm using another account since I cannot use evolution with my telia.com account :-( Please fix this ASAP. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-r

Bug#521862: More info about the evolution startup crash

2009-03-31 Thread Svante Signell
009-03-31 at 12:05 +0200, Svante Signell wrote: > > > I had the same problem and solved it by downgrading the sqlite3 > > packages (libsqlite3-0 and sqlite3) that were upgraded today. > > > > > Paulo Silva > > > Eurotux Informática, S.A. > > > &g

Bug#521862: More info about the evolution startup crash

2009-03-31 Thread Svante Signell
has this package installed and has not crashed (yet). There might be some other package involved too. Any dependencies that were recently upgraded (last two days)? On Tue, 2009-03-31 at 09:27 +0200, Svante Signell wrote: > More backtrace info at gnome on this bug: > > http://bugzilla.gnome.o

Bug#515836: [Fwd: Re: gstreamer0.10-plugins-good: 0.10.8-4.1 unistallable due to .mo file clash with normalize]

2009-02-18 Thread Svante Signell
Forwarded Message From: Svante Signell To: Debian Bug Tracking System Cc: Svante Signell Subject: Re: gstreamer0.10-plugins-good: 0.10.8-4.1 unistallable due to .mo file clash with normalize Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 17:44:10 +0100 You can close this bug report. normalize (0.7.6

Bug#518069: Please upload gnome-session 2.24.x to unstable since 2.22.3 does not work!

2009-03-12 Thread Svante Signell
Package: gnome-session Version: 2.22.3-2 Followup-For: Bug #518069 After upgrading the gnome-* packages uploaded gnome-session does no longer start :-( I had to temporary revert to WindowMaker. -- System Information: Debian Release: squeeze/sid APT prefers stable APT policy: (500, 'stable')

Bug#518069: Please upload gnome-session 2.24.x to unstable since 2.22.3 does not work!

2009-03-12 Thread Svante Signell
ssion, when starting X from a tty. BTW: I'm updating according to unstable right now and it seem that not all gnome-* packges are upgraded to 2.24 yet. On Fri, 2009-03-13 at 00:17 +0100, Svante Signell wrote: > Package: gnome-session > Version: 2.22.3-2 > Followup-For: Bug #518069 >

Bug#518069: Please upload gnome-session 2.24.x to unstable since 2.22.3 does not work!

2009-03-13 Thread Svante Signell
On Fri, 2009-03-13 at 00:40 +0100, Svante Signell wrote: > More info. Starting gnome using gdm works! This is a much better > alternative than to run gnome-panel in WindowMaker, it was ages since > used it last time. However, maybe it is still a dbus problem as the bug > postings ind

Bug#403590: ls -l does not work any longer

2006-12-18 Thread Svante Signell
Package: libattr1 Version: 2.4.35-1 Severity: Serious Tags: sid Long directory listings does not work any longer: ls: OK ls -l: ls: relocation error: /lib/libacl.so.1: symbol getxattr, version ATTR_1.0 not defined in file libattr.so.1 with link time reference Reverting to libattr1_2.4.32-1_i386

Bug#392500: Have you tried mga 1.4.4?

2006-11-06 Thread Svante Signell
Have you tried the new driver xserver-xorg-video-mga-1.4.4? I made a .deb of this driver, see attached file in bug 395025. In case it works we should convince the Debian X Strike Force to upgrade the 1.4.2 driver to 1.4.4. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubs

Bug#412799: Linux-image-2.6-18-686 does not boot!

2007-02-28 Thread Svante Signell
Package: linux-image-2.6.18-4-686 Version: 2.6.18.dfsg.1-11 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Boot hangs with: ... Starting balanced_irq Using IPI No-Shortcut mode ACPI (supports S0 S4 S5) Time: tsc clocksource has been installed Freeing unused kernel memory: 196k freed Faile

Bug#412799: linux-image-2.6.18-4-686 does not boot

2007-03-20 Thread Svante Signell
On Tue, 2007-03-20 at 15:32 -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: > Hi Svante, > > Do you still have a copy of the unbootable, yaird-generated initramfs > available? Can you post it somewhere for download? (Preferably not to the > bug report, given the size.) Unfortunately not, but I can generate a new

Bug#412799: linux-image-2.6.18-4-686 does not boot

2007-03-21 Thread Svante Signell
On Wed, 2007-03-21 at 01:09 -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: > On Wed, Mar 21, 2007 at 06:22:01AM +0100, Svante Signell wrote: > > On Tue, 2007-03-20 at 15:32 -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: > > > Hi Svante, > > > > Do you still have a copy of the unbootable, yaird-gener

Bug#412799: linux-image-2.6.18-4-686 does not boot

2007-03-21 Thread Svante Signell
On Wed, 2007-03-21 at 04:01 -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: > On Wed, Mar 21, 2007 at 09:40:15AM +0100, Svante Signell wrote: ... > Are you willing to try installing the initramfs you just generated for -4 > and trying to boot with it, to see whether the error is still reproducible >

Bug#412799: linux-image-2.6.18-4-686 does not boot

2007-03-22 Thread Svante Signell
On Wed, 2007-03-21 at 20:30 -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: > On Wed, Mar 21, 2007 at 12:26:40PM +0100, Svante Signell wrote: .. > Ok. First, would it be possible for you to reproduce /all/ the kernel > output prior to this boot failure (or at least, all that's visible on the > sc

Bug#395025: Computer freezes when starting glxgears

2006-10-24 Thread Svante Signell
Package: xserver-xorg-video-mga Version: 1.4.2.dfsg.1-1 Severity: serious Hardware: Matrox Graphics, Inc. MGA G400 AGP glxinfo reports direct rendering supported. Starting glxgears freezes the computer. Remote login and reboot work, not killing any processes. Numerous outputs like this in the X

Bug#395025: Computer freezes when starting glxgears

2006-10-30 Thread Svante Signell
>On Friday 27 October 2006 23:22, Drew Parsons wrote: >> glxinfo reports direct rendering supported. Starting glxgears freezes >> the computer. >mga 1.4.4 was released today with the description "Fix initialization >issues that led to DRI lock-ups on some G400 configurations." >I guess it should

Bug#1056980: [devuan-dev] bug#813: Reopen 1056980

2023-12-08 Thread Svante Signell
On Fri, 2023-12-08 at 16:15 +0100, Svante Signell wrote: > reopen 1056980 > severity 1056980 serious > tags 1056980 patch > thanks Sorry, forgot the patch! --- a/debian/netcat-traditional.postinst 2023-11-27 03:20:27.0 +0100 +++ b/debian/netcat-traditional.postinst 2023

Bug#1056980: Lost mail!

2023-12-09 Thread Svante Signell
Hello, How come I never saw this mail?? https://bugs.devuan.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=813#66 Strange, gmail hickup?? I'll comment inline when/if I find it, else I'd cut and paste from the bug report. Thanks!

Bug#548716: Why not fixed for amd64?

2009-10-01 Thread Svante Signell
Package: xserver-xorg-core Version: 1.6.4-1 reopen 548716 Why is the patched 1.6.4-2 not built for amd64, only i386 and s390? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#548716: Why not fixed for amd64?

2009-10-01 Thread Svante Signell
On Fri, 2009-10-02 at 00:42 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote: > On Fri, Oct 2, 2009 at 00:00:24 +0200, Svante Signell wrote: > > > Why is the patched 1.6.4-2 not built for amd64, only i386 and s390? > > > If you're asking this question, you shouldn't be using debian un

Bug#548716: Why not fixed for amd64?

2009-10-01 Thread Svante Signell
On Fri, 2009-10-02 at 01:08 +0200, Svante Signell wrote: > On Fri, 2009-10-02 at 00:42 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote: > > On Fri, Oct 2, 2009 at 00:00:24 +0200, Svante Signell wrote: > > > > > Why is the patched 1.6.4-2 not built for amd64, only i386 and s390? > >

Bug#566738: Bug #566738 still there!

2010-01-26 Thread Svante Signell
Package: libhdf5-lam-1.8.4 Version: 1.8.4-2 Severity: serious reopen 566738 The bug is still present when libhdf5-serial-1.8.3 is installed! Unpacking libhdf5-lam-1.8.4 (from .../libhdf5-lam-1.8.4_1.8.4-2_i386.deb) ... dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/libhdf5-lam-1.8.4_1.8.4-2_i386.

Bug#567961: [Evolution] Bug#567961: Evo crashes when composing a mail!

2010-02-06 Thread Svante Signell
On Sat, 2010-02-06 at 15:44 +0100, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote: > On 06/02/2010 15:34, Svante R Signell wrote: > > The versions I have installed are current version from unstable. The > > available version in unstable is > > 2.28-3. It is also in testing, so I cannot download an earlier one (except >

Bug#567961: [Evolution] Bug#567961: Evo crashes when composing a mail!

2010-02-06 Thread Svante Signell
On Sat, 2010-02-06 at 15:58 +0100, Svante Signell wrote: > On Sat, 2010-02-06 at 15:44 +0100, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote: > > On 06/02/2010 15:34, Svante R Signell wrote: > > - if tuning (or removing) spell checking in evolution (or gnome) changes > > anything > > I un

Bug#567961: [Evolution] Bug#567961: Evo crashes when composing a mail!

2010-02-06 Thread Svante Signell
On Sat, 2010-02-06 at 16:09 +0100, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote: > Can you try other gnome tools (like gedit for example) and try spell > checking there? Yes, gedit crashes too (but not emacs): gedit evo_bugreport.txt request spell checking: crash Terminal output: terminate called after throwing an

Bug#567961: [Evolution] Bug#567961: Evo crashes when composing a mail!

2010-02-06 Thread Svante Signell
Thanks for your help. This bug has annoyed me for almost a week now! On Sat, 2010-02-06 at 16:19 +0100, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote: > reassign 567961 libenchant1c2a > forcemerge 567961 568078 > thanks > > On 06/02/2010 16:14, Svante Signell wrote: > > On Sat, 2010-02-06 at 16:

Bug#567961: [Evolution] Bug#567961: Evo crashes when composing a mail!

2010-02-06 Thread Svante Signell
Downgrading libenchant1c2a to the previous version, 1.4.2-3.4, makes the crashes go away. Since 1.4.2-3.x are from the same version is there a miscompilation going on here? On Sat, 2010-02-06 at 16:23 +0100, Svante Signell wrote: > Thanks for your help. This bug has annoyed me for almost a w

Bug#567961: [Evolution] Bug#567961: Evo crashes when composing a mail!

2010-02-07 Thread Svante Signell
On Sun, 2010-02-07 at 07:23 +0100, Raphael Geissert wrote: > On 6 February 2010 10:11, Svante Signell wrote: > > Downgrading libenchant1c2a to the previous version, 1.4.2-3.4, makes the > > crashes go away. Since 1.4.2-3.x are from the same version is there a > > miscomp

Bug#567961: [Evolution] Bug#567961: Evo crashes when composing a mail!

2010-02-07 Thread Svante Signell
On Sun, 2010-02-07 at 10:30 +0100, Svante Signell wrote: > On Sun, 2010-02-07 at 07:23 +0100, Raphael Geissert wrote: > > On 6 February 2010 10:11, Svante Signell wrote: > > > Downgrading libenchant1c2a to the previous version, 1.4.2-3.4, makes the > > > crashes go awa

Bug#567961: [Evolution] Bug#567961: Evo crashes when composing a mail!

2010-02-07 Thread Svante Signell
On Sun, 2010-02-07 at 12:01 +0100, Svante Signell wrote: ... > > Strange, since the 1.4.2-3.4 works and 1.4.2-3.5 don't. > > I built the package myself and it crashes too! > gcc (Debian 4.4.3-2) 4.4.3 > g++ (Debian 4.4.3-2) 4.4.3 > > gdb backtrace when crashing ged

Bug#567961: [Evolution] Bug#567961: Evo crashes when composing a mail!

2010-02-07 Thread Svante Signell
tags 567961 patch On Sun, 2010-02-07 at 12:33 +0100, Svante Signell wrote: > On Sun, 2010-02-07 at 12:01 +0100, Svante Signell wrote: > ... > > > Strange, since the 1.4.2-3.4 works and 1.4.2-3.5 don't. > > > > I built the package myself and it crashes too! >

Bug#567961: [Evolution] Bug#567961: Evo crashes when composing a mail!

2010-02-07 Thread Svante Signell
On Sun, 2010-02-07 at 19:49 +0100, Raphael Geissert wrote: > On 7 February 2010 03:30, Svante Signell wrote: > > Strange, since the 1.4.2-3.4 works and 1.4.2-3.5 don't. > > ... > Looks like you only have ispell dictionaries, could you please try by > installing an aspell

Bug#688201: Bug#682719: Your gcl 2.6.7-107 upload

2012-10-08 Thread Svante Signell
On Mon, 2012-10-08 at 19:22 +0200, Philipp Kern wrote: > Camm, > > am Mon, Oct 08, 2012 at 12:02:52PM -0400 hast du folgendes geschrieben: > > Greetings! This was in line of addressing #682719. I was under the > > impression that the emacsen would cover the absence of emacs24. > > emacs24's for

Bug#688201: Bug#682719: Your gcl 2.6.7-107 upload

2012-10-08 Thread Svante Signell
On Mon, 2012-10-08 at 21:10 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > [recipient list trimmed, although it should probably be even smaller] > > On Mon, 2012-10-08 at 22:03 +0200, Svante Signell wrote: > > Nevertheless, why build-depend on a non-existing > > package emacsen with emacs

Bug#688201: Bug#682719: Your gcl 2.6.7-107 upload

2012-10-08 Thread Svante Signell
On Mon, 2012-10-08 at 22:00 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > On Mon, 2012-10-08 at 22:59 +0200, Svante Signell wrote: > > On Mon, 2012-10-08 at 21:10 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > > > On Mon, 2012-10-08 at 22:03 +0200, Svante Signell wrote: > > > > Nevertheless, why

Bug#640851: local mail spool still unaccessible with evo 3.4.4.-1

2012-10-25 Thread Svante Signell
severity 640851 serious found 640851 3.4.3-1 found 640851 3.4.4-1 thanks I was waiting for the latest bugfix release to see if the local mailbox spool problem was solved. Unfortunately it was not :( Local mails are delivered to /var/mail/ and these are the settings used for the local mail account

Bug#640851: local mail spool still unaccessible with evo 3.4.4.-1

2012-10-25 Thread Svante Signell
On Thu, 2012-10-25 at 11:34 +0200, Svante Signell wrote: > severity 640851 serious > found 640851 3.4.3-1 > found 640851 3.4.4-1 > thanks > > I was waiting for the latest bugfix release to see if the local mailbox > spool problem was solved. Unfortunately it was not :( Local

Bug#640851: [Evolution] [Fwd: Re: local mail spool still unaccessible with evo 3.4.4.-1]

2012-11-29 Thread Svante Signell
On Wed, 2012-11-28 at 19:07 +0100, Svante Signell wrote: > On Wed, 2012-10-31 at 16:14 +0100, Svante Signell wrote: > > On Wed, 2012-10-31 at 13:45 +, Pete Biggs wrote: > > > > > OK. I've done some more Googling on your behalf - there was a > > > Debian/

Bug#648679: guile-2.0: Add build dependencies

2011-11-14 Thread Svante Signell
Hi, The following small patch is needed to enable the build of guile-2.0 on GNU/Linux, amd64. Unfortunately one check fails: Running version.test FAIL: version.test: version reporting works Totals for this test run: passes: 34447 failures: 1 unexpected passes: 0

Bug#582295: Confirming a serious problem with evo

2010-05-21 Thread Svante Signell
Yes, this problem is related to bug #582192. The upstream bug is https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=612082 Looks like there is a workaround available, see the upstream bug for a small patch. I have had several problems, see e.g. upstream bugs 619125, 619160, 619259, 619260. Last problem wa

Bug#618158: Fixed by the patch in #603312

2011-03-17 Thread Svante Signell
merge 618158 602312 tags 618158 patch This problem was solved long time ago due to linker default changes, see bug 603312! Build tested on GNU/Linux and GNU/Hurd (with patches from bug #616290) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe

Bug#625397: memcached: Fix FTBFS with gcc-4.6

2011-08-13 Thread Svante Signell
tags 625397 patch thanks The following patch fixes the FTBFS of memcached with gcc-4.6. In configure.ac a case of gcc-4.6 is added and there no -Werror flag is used, as is for gcc-4.4. Thanks. --- memcached-1.4.5/configure.ac 2010-04-03 09:07:16.0 +0200 +++ memcached-1.4.5.modified/conf

Bug#625355: guile: Fix FTBFS on hurd-i386

2011-08-17 Thread Svante Signell
Package: guile Version: 1.8.8+1-6 Severity: important Tags: patch User: debian-h...@lists.debian.org Usertags: hurd Hi, currently guile does not compile on hurd-i386. The problem is the -Werror in configure.in for gcc-4.6. The attached patch fixes this issue and does also solve the general case i

Bug#625355: guile: Fix FTBFS on hurd-i386

2011-08-17 Thread Svante Signell
On Wed, 2011-08-17 at 18:53 -0500, Jonathan Nieder wrote: > Hi, > > Svante Signell wrote: > > > --- guile-1.8-1.8.8+1/configure.in 2011-08-17 18:18:38.0 + > > +++ guile-1.8-1.8.8+1.modified/configure.in 2011-08-17 16:22:39.0 > > + >

Bug#625355: opensp: openjade1.3 causes FTBFS on hurd-i386

2011-08-19 Thread Svante Signell
Package: opensp Version: 1.5.2-9 Severity: important Tags: patch User: debian-h...@lists.debian.org Usertags: hurd Hi, Currently opensp does not compile on GNU/Hurd. The problem is due to the dependency order of openjade versions. With openjade (1.4devel1-20) opensp builds fine while with openjad

Bug#638903: iceweasel refuses to start after upgrade

2011-08-22 Thread Svante Signell
Package: iceweasel Version: 6.0-2 Severity: serious iceweasel refuses to start after upgrade to 6.0. This is the second computer having the same problem. Is this known? On the other computer I had to create a new account, and restore by coping the bookmark file: bookmarks-2011-08-22.json and the s

Bug#638903: iceweasel refuses to start after upgrade

2011-08-22 Thread Svante Signell
On Mon, 2011-08-22 at 23:13 +0200, Mike Hommey wrote: > On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 11:10:38PM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote: > > On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 10:31:58PM +0200, Svante Signell wrote: > > > Package: iceweasel > > > Version: 6.0-2 > > > Severity: serious >

Bug#638903: iceweasel refuses to start after upgrade

2011-08-22 Thread Svante Signell
On Tue, 2011-08-23 at 06:52 +0200, Mike Hommey wrote: > Does "MOZILLA_DISABLE_PLUGINS=1 iceweasel" do any better? Sorry no it does'nt! Same hang during startup. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@l

Bug#638936: evolution hangs after upgrade

2011-08-22 Thread Svante Signell
Package: evolution Version: 3.0.2-1 Severity: serious Hi after the upgrade to evo 3.0 (and converting from mbox to maildir format) I get hangs of evo. (I have not yet removed the mbox account created). Output on the console below: Starting up: === Gtk-Message: Failed to load module "gnome

Bug#638903: iceweasel refuses to start after upgrade

2011-08-22 Thread Svante Signell
On Tue, 2011-08-23 at 07:38 +0200, Mike Hommey wrote: > On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 07:02:19AM +0200, Svante Signell wrote: > > On Tue, 2011-08-23 at 06:52 +0200, Mike Hommey wrote: > > > > > Does "MOZILLA_DISABLE_PLUGINS=1 iceweasel" do any better? > > &

Bug#638926: emacs23: FTBFS on any-i386: bogus path due to #define i386 1

2011-08-22 Thread Svante Signell
On Tue, 2011-08-23 at 02:41 +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote: > Package: emacs23 > Version: 23.3+1-1 > Severity: serious > Justification: FTBFS > > Hello, > > emacs23 currently FTBFS on any-i386, because gcc #defines i386 to 1, > which gets in the way of include paths: see attached log, in particular

Bug#638936: [Evolution] Bug#638936: evolution hangs after upgrade

2011-08-23 Thread Svante Signell
On Tue, 2011-08-23 at 07:32 +0200, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote: > On mar., 2011-08-23 at 07:15 +0200, Svante Signell wrote: > > Hi after the upgrade to evo 3.0 (and converting from mbox to maildir > > format) I get hangs of evo. (I have not yet removed the mbox account > > c

Bug#638936: [Evolution] Bug#638936: evolution hangs after upgrade

2011-08-23 Thread Svante Signell
On Tue, 2011-08-23 at 09:18 +0200, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote: > On mar., 2011-08-23 at 08:58 +0200, Svante Signell wrote: > > > > Below are links to the backtrace > > http://paste.debian.net/127096/ > > > > and the terminal output (double free) > > http://pa

Bug#638936: [Evolution] Bug#638936: evolution hangs after upgrade

2011-08-23 Thread Svante Signell
On Tue, 2011-08-23 at 09:29 +0200, Svante Signell wrote: > On Tue, 2011-08-23 at 09:18 +0200, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote: > > On mar., 2011-08-23 at 08:58 +0200, Svante Signell wrote: > > > > > > Below are links to the backtrace > > > http://paste.debian.net/1

Bug#638936: [Evolution] Bug#638936: evolution hangs after upgrade

2011-08-23 Thread Svante Signell
On Tue, 2011-08-23 at 10:02 +0200, Svante Signell wrote: > On Tue, 2011-08-23 at 09:29 +0200, Svante Signell wrote: > > On Tue, 2011-08-23 at 09:18 +0200, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote: > > > On mar., 2011-08-23 at 08:58 +0200, Svante Signell wrote: > > > > > >

Bug#638936: [Evolution] Bug#638936: evolution hangs after upgrade

2011-08-23 Thread Svante Signell
On Tue, 2011-08-23 at 10:36 +0200, Svante Signell wrote: > On Tue, 2011-08-23 at 10:02 +0200, Svante Signell wrote: > > On Tue, 2011-08-23 at 09:29 +0200, Svante Signell wrote: > > > On Tue, 2011-08-23 at 09:18 +0200, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote: > > > > On mar., 201

Bug#638936: [Evolution] Bug#638936: evolution hangs after upgrade

2011-08-23 Thread Svante Signell
On Tue, 2011-08-23 at 21:48 +0200, Svante Signell wrote: > > > Update: It crashes too, I'll try to obtain a backtrace of a crash too. > > > > This is from a crash caused by SIGABRT: http://paste.debian.net/127105/ > > > > I was pushing the Send/Receive b

Bug#638936: [Evolution] Bug#638936: evolution hangs after upgrade

2011-08-23 Thread Svante Signell
On Tue, 2011-08-23 at 23:38 +0200, Svante Signell wrote: > On Tue, 2011-08-23 at 21:48 +0200, Svante Signell wrote: > > > > > Update: It crashes too, I'll try to obtain a backtrace of a crash too. > > > > > > This is from a crash caused by SIGABRT: http:

  1   2   >