Package: src:linux
Version: 4.16.16-2
--- Please enter the report below this line. ---
Ich kann den Fehler bestätigen und weiter eingrenzen. Ich komme bis zum
Start des X-Servers und dann kommt erst der Fehler. Ein neu kompilieren
des NVIDIA Treibers brachte keinen erfolgt. Mein System friert
voll
Package: aufs-dkms
Version: 4.8+20161010-1
Severity: critical
Tags: d-i
Justification: causes serious data loss
Dear Maintainer,
* What led up to the situation?
I wanted to upgrade from Jessie to Stretch.
* What exactly did you do (or not do) that was effective (or
ineffective)?
I r
debian.org/package/aufs/4.7%2B20160912-2/
Do you know if I can use apt-get build-dep to get this package version?
>
>
> Jan
>
Thanks again! :D
Leo
>
> Am 13.11.2016 um 14:06 schrieb Leo:
> > Hi Jan, thanks a lot for your response! :)
> >
> > 2016-11
b-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1)
#+end_example
I believe that this bug is related to
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1017833
and that the package in unstable fixes this bug.
Leo Butler
-- System Information:
Debian Release: bookworm/sid
APT prefers testin
ync command line
option to change this behavior. You can then get a meaningful
backtrace from your debugger if you break on the gdk_x_error() function.)
I'm not sure it's a tilda bug... But it shows me only in tilda session...
Have a nice day,
Leo.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Ok,
talking with coders I see bug is resolved in CVS version.
You can read more info to this address:
http://sourceforge.net/cvs/?group_id=126081
Bye.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
patch attached.
Enjoy,
Thomas
--
Leo Antunes
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: muine-plugin-trayicon
Version: 0.8.7-1
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 12.5
muine-plugin-trayicon's copyright file mentions only the GPL and fail to
mention the MIT licence that NotificationArea.cs and friends use.
Cheers
-- System Information:
Debian Release: Sid
APT prefers
tags 439466 + help unreproducible
quit
I can't reproduce this on my AMD64 and my ASM is very limited, anyone
can give me a hand?
Cheers
--
Leo Antunes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Package: hugin
Version: 0.6.1-1+lenny1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Depends: hugin-bin (>= 0.6.1-1+lenny1) but it is not going to be installed
Depends: hugin-bin (< 0.6.1-1+lenny1.1~) but it is not going to be installed
Depends: hugin-tools (>= 0.6.1-1+lenny1) but it is
should take a better look.
Thanks for the help
Cheers
--
Leo Antunes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
tags 420723 help
--
I don't have the extra time/interest right now to delve into this
problem. If someone could help I'd be thankful, otherwise I'll
eventually look at it sometime.
Cheers
--
Leo Antunes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
..exactly what to do to remove the conflicting packages? I seem to be in
some kind of dependency loop, where I can't remove stuff but neither
will it install.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@l
Package: gstreamer0.10-plugins-base
Version: 0.10.26-1~bpo50+1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Rhythm box, sound juicer and tome all fail to access CDs, however
cdparanoia and VLC media player work fine
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 5.0.6
APT prefers proposed-u
Sebastian Dröge wrote:
On Tue, 2010-10-26 at 09:47 +0100, Leo Smith wrote:
Sebastian Dröge wrote:
On Tue, 2010-10-26 at 01:54 +0100, Leo Smith wrote:
Package: gstreamer0.10-plugins-base
Version: 0.10.26-1~bpo50+1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Sebastian Dröge wrote:
On Thu, 2010-10-28 at 10:15 +0100, Leo Smith wrote:
Is it some path issue?
I am really put of my depth here.
Ok, so now try
gst-launch-0.10 cdparanoiasrc device=/dev/cdrom ! audioconvert !
audioresample ! alsasink
and
gst-launch-0.10 playbin2 uri=cdda
onvert !
audioresample ! alsasink
>If your CD device is different, try a difference device file :)
No, that's me CD all right :-)
But still don't work
othello:/home/leo# gst-launch-0.10 cdparanoiasrc device=/dev/cdrom !
audioconvert ! audioresample ! alsasink
ERROR: pipeline could not be cons
Sebastian Dröge wrote:
So you're using a backported package from somewhere? Could you please
retry with the packages from testing or experimental?
I will try. I am always nervous about mixing repositories though. Not
sure about how to force a package without blowing half the stuff that
dep
Ok, I am not sure where or why it happened, but there was a self
installed gstreamer package in /usr/local/lib.
removed the lot. and it all now works as expected.
I think I am getting too old for computers ;-)
Many apologies..
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.de
I updated paprefs here:
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/paprefs/paprefs_0.9.10-1.dsc
Some patches coming from upstream solve this problem.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debia
* Non-maintainer upload.
+ * Added patch to fix error loading module with perl 5.14
+(closes: 660041, LP: #936170).
+
+ -- Leo Iannacone Tue, 21 Feb 2012 00:35:51 +0100
+
flow-tools (1:0.68-12) unstable; urgency=low
* Added a patch so that flow-send compiled with gcc4 won't fail
only i
8.3),
libxml2-dev, libhdf5-serial-dev (>= 1.8.0), libjson0-dev, libarpack2-dev,
openjdk-6-jdk, lua5.1, liblua5.1-0-dev, ruby1.9.1, ruby1.9.1-dev, ruby-narray,
mono-2.0-devel (>= 2.6.0), libsnappy-dev, ant
Please, consider to apply this change ASAP.
Thanks.
Leo Iannacone.
--
To UNS
" 1>&2; exit 1; }
- { echo "configure: error: Please change /etc/services so that the service
name for 80/tcp is www with alias http" 1>&2; exit 1; }
fi
trap '' 1 2 15
diff -u flowscan-1.006/debian/changelog flowscan-1.006/debian/changelog
--- flowscan-1.
Same thing on amd64.
libpcre3-8.30-1
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
On 22 March 2012 14:42, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> My version of /etc/services has:
> # cat /etc/services |grep http
> www 80/tcp http
According with netbase 4.47 [1]:
$ grep http /etc/services
...
http80/tcp www # WorldWideWeb HTTP
...
So, I gue
Subject: cmucl: segfault
Package: cmucl
Version: 20c-2
Justification: renders package unusable
Severity: grave
The current binary segmentation faults on startup
$ /usr/bin/cmucl
Segmentation fault
-- System Information:
Debian Release: jessie/sid
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (500, 'testin
calling "env - /usr/sbin/service gdm3
restart", but this changed nothing.
Incidently, this system is also affected by #728180, so maybe the fact
that I had to kill Xorg (and with it gnome-session) after stopping gdm3
might have something to do with it?
I'm not sure if this is a pr
g. see
> <https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=753882>). There's some
> recent discussion on that bug: Ubuntu developers have been hit badly by
> it too.
If I understand you (and mentioned bug log) correctly, I guess this bug
should be reassigned (or at least cloned
Hey,
i did run into this problem and wanted to ask you if you could upload
the upstream patch to the build servers so this problem could be fixed?
Thanks and greetings
Leo
r the quick response. Sadly its still not visible in PTS. But i
hope the best :)
Thanks and greetings
Leo
y the update is still not available. Maybe a trigger or something
like that is broken. Please can you be so kind an retrigger the package
build again so the new version gets shipped?
Thanks and greetings
Leo
On 15 September 2014 19:42, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> Hi,
>
> As per the title of this bug, node-mocha should be packaged, or should.js
> should not build-depend on it.
Hi Thomas,
node-mocha is provided by mocha package:
Package: mocha
Source: node-mocha
...
Provides: node-mocha
--
To UNSUBSCR
On 15 September 2014 19:42, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> Hi,
>
> As per the title of this bug, node-mocha should be packaged, or should.js
> should not build-depend on it.
Hi Thomas,
node-mocha is provided by "mocha", see:
$ apt-cache show mocha | grep ^Provides
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debia
close 761681
Invalid.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Subject: gcl segfaults on startup
Package: gcl
Version: 2.6.7+dfsga-16
Justification: renders package unusable
Severity: grave
Dear Camm,
After pulling in the latest testing updates for gcl last night, the package is
now unusable:
$ GCL_ANSI='' GCL_PROF='' gcl
Segmentation fault
$ gcl
Segmentati
Dear maintainer,
The attached patch fixes FTBFS with Samba 4.
Can you please consider to apply it ?
Thanks in advance.
Leo.
--
Ubuntu Member - http://launchpad.net/~l3on
Home Page - http://leoiannacone.com
GPG Key Id - 0xD282FC25
Description: Include samba-4.0/libsmbclient.h instead of
Dear maintainer,
please consider to add libswitch-perl as Build-Depends.
Thanks in advance,
Leo.
--
Ubuntu Member - http://launchpad.net/~l3on
Home Page - http://leoiannacone.com
GPG Key Id - 0xD282FC25
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of
Hi,
now in debian we have express 4.x.
.createServer() has been deprecated since express 3.x, so you need to
update your app to the latest version (4.x) of express.
To achieve this purpose you way want to read this docs:
* https://github.com/visionmedia/express/wiki/Migrating-from-2.x-to-3.x
*
On 25 July 2014 11:44, Xavier Bestel wrote:
> I was unable to install it, apparently it's just a minor problem with version
> numbers.
Hi Xavier,
I can't reproduce this bug in a fresh installation of unstable (I was
able to install, remove, purge it).
Even piuparts reports no error about node-
Package: flashplugin-nonfree
Version: 1:3.7
Followup-For: Bug #851066
Okay, attached is that patch I mentioned in my previous message.
This patch adds a new option to update-flashplugin-nonfree:
--using
Specifies the name of a local tar file instead of attempting to
Package: flashplugin-nonfree
Version: 1:3.7
Followup-For: Bug #851066
Dear Maintainer,
This note is more for followers of this bug than the maintainer.
I decided to spend some non-trivial time to try and craft a patch
that would skip downloading and checking the little informatio
Package: flashplugin-nonfree
Version: 1:3.7
Followup-For: Bug #851819
___ _ _ _
| _ \_ _| \ | |/ ___| |
| |_) | || \| | | _| |
| __/| || |\ | |_| |_|
|_| |___|_| \_|\(_)
$ sudo update-flashplugin-nonfree
es look clean (do not branch from
master) and we can keep the repo's history.
Jonathan, Samual, does that seem ok to you?
Unfortunately the branch-creation involved in the process can't really
be proposed via MR, so if this seems ok, one of us would have to "just
do it" ;)
Cheers,
Leo
On Fri, Sep 24, 2021 at 10:07 PM Samuel Henrique wrote:
> Leo, from my side you're free to push your changes whenever you want.
I will as soon as someone gives me access to the repo ;)
Just requested access to the Gnome group, but that may take a while.
> Let's try to coordin
On Tue, Sep 28, 2021 at 12:27 AM Samuel Henrique wrote:
> I gave you permission to that repo (best I can do on my side), and I
> set an expiration date of the end of this year, until then you will
> end up in the salsa group and inherit permissions so it should be
> good.
Perfect, thanks!
> Awes
, in an NMU or otherwise.
> > The changelog is supposed to *document what has been changed.*
>
> Well, I was working on it:
>
> http://www.amayita.com/debian/xlibs-transition/camorama/camorama-0.17/debian/changelog
>
--
Leo Antunes
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
I'm a slacker :-(
Cheers
--
Leo Antunes
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
2.3.5-6GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii libpcap0.80.9.4-1System interface for user-level pa
ii logrotate 3.7.1-2Log rotation utility
knockd recommends no packages.
-- no debconf information
--
Leo Antunes
<[EMAI
a if you are not already working on
> it, patch is attached.
> Regards Nico
--
Leo Antunes
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
he maintainer) we will reassign
> this bug to either WNPP (in case we propose to orphan it) or
> ftp.debian.org (in case we propose to remove it).
--
Leo Antunes
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
xeption in the licence just to keep Debian's accute sense
of legal problems sane =]
If there's any problem whatsoever, please let me know.
Cheers
[1] http://bugs.debian.org/gaim-encryption
[2] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=301080
[3] http://www.openssl.org/support/faq.html
would not be
> enough, as the plugin is linked with Gaim: this was one of the driving
> factors that prompted me to switch crypto libraries.
>
> I'm not sure why there is still the perception out there that Gaim-Encryption
> uses OpenSSL...
>
> -Bill
--
Leo Antu
I think it's a safe bet:
http://www.mozilla.org/projects/security/pki/nss/faq.html#q3.1
No harm, no foul.
Cheers and thanks again
On Qua, 2005-03-23 at 23:05 +0100, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
> On 10237 March 1977, Leo Antunes wrote:
>
> > About this bug, where is gaim-encryption li
Subject: amavis-ng: Fails to start with perl errors
Package: amavis-ng
Version: 0.1.6.9-1
Severity: critical
Justification: breaks unrelated software
After an upgrade, amavis started spewing a lot of emergency errors and
stoped working (bringing down all mail delivery with it).
I use the Courier m
arge
>
>
> This is a reminder that archived bug #305719 is still present in sarge.
>
> Note that woody's gaim would suffice for the dependency of the package
> in sarge...
>
--
Leo Antunes
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | <[EMAIL PROTECTED]&g
Package: drip
Version: 0.9.0-2
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Upon installing 'drip' 0.9.0-2 for the first time on this
machine, I attempted to run it, and was immediately greeted with the
following error:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ drip
drip: error while loading shared
around it in some other way just let
me know. I was assuming that - as you said - the install and
install-devel targets were all that needed to be called to have a
complete gnokii installation, but perhaps I missed something.
Cheers
--
Leo "costela" Antunes
[insert a witty retort here]
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
tag 453211 confirmed pending
found 453211 0.6.21-1
thanks
Unfortunately I had just uploaded a new gnokii version with new binary
packages, so its on waiting on NEW.
Cheers
--
Leo "costela" Antunes
[insert a witty retort here]
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
et around to it.
Cheers
--
Leo "costela" Antunes
[insert a witty retort here]
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> Btw, it's better to Cc the reporter if you want him to help ;) Reporters
> don't receive the mails sent to the bugs automatically.
True. Totally slipped my mind.
Thanks anyway!
Cheers
- --
Leo "costela&qu
oesn't have the file
libgnokii.so.4.0.0 [0], did you perhaps compile it yourself with the
newer version (0.6.27), or get it from another source?
Cheers
[0] http://packages.debian.org/sid/amd64/libgnokii3/filelist
--
Leo "costela" Antunes
[insert a witty retort here]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE
Marcus Better wrote:
> Ah, yes! I did compile it myself. Don't know how I could forget. Very
> sorry about that!
No problem at all, thanks for the heads-up! (it's the thought that
counts :) )
Cheers
--
Leo "costela" Antunes
[insert a witty retort here]
--
To UN
Hi,
Lars Eric Scheidler wrote:
> With more than 25 torrent-files transmission ends in a busy loop with
> 100% cpu usage and is unusable.
>
Can you please test some packages I prepared at[0] ?
Cheers
[0] http://stuff.costela.net/
--
Leo "costela" Antunes
[insert
Hi,
>> can You please compile it as i386?
>>
>> Cheers
--
Leo "costela" Antunes
[insert a witty retort here]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
o I can close this bug for Lenny?
Cheers
--
Leo "costela" Antunes
[insert a witty retort here]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
Can you please try to replicate this bug after a dist-upgrade? I can't
reproduce it here, but I have a feeling it's related to some indirect
dependencies.
At any rate I'm uploading 1.11 now, which could also fix it.
Please let me know how it goes.
Cheers
--
Leo "cost
ackport of the entire package at
backports.org when time allows. That will probably happen once 1.73 hits
testing.
Cheers
--
Leo "costela" Antunes
[insert a witty retort here]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "un
For the record, I'm not sure when I'll be able to take a look at this
problem (pearpc is pretty low on my priority list, hence RFA), so if
someone's reading this: feel free to NMU!
Cheers
--
Leo "costela" Antunes
[insert a witty retort here]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, ema
On Sat, Jan 09, 2010 at 10:00:35PM +, Julien Cristau wrote:
> found 550977 2.6.30-8
Also persisted in 2.6.32-rc8. I haven't tried anything past that.
> tag 560126 - unreproducible
Actually, I was able reproduce it fairly reliably on this machine
(which is of limited help to
x27;re an ubuntu dev I
should sponsor this debian-NMU for you, right?... which actually sounds
kinda strange, since I'm uploading an NMU to my own package, but
nevermind that! :) )
Cheers
--
Leo "costela" Antunes
[insert a witty retort here]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bu
the offending
patch with the next upload.
The proper solution will require some reworking, so it might take a
while. Better patches are of course welcome, as long as interoperability
is maintained.
Cheers and thanks for the heads-up!
[0] http://bugs.debian.org/557581
--
Leo "costela"
n.org/Bugs/Developer#severities
--
Leo "costela" Antunes
[insert a witty retort here]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
On Wed, Dec 09, 2009 at 07:45:35AM +0100, Brice Goglin wrote:
> Leo L. Schwab wrote:
> > I've upgraded to the 'unstable' mesa libraries, and to the
> > 2.6.32-rc8 kernel. Same problems.
> >
>
> You may try upgrading to experimental now...
>
Further information:
- An extended 'smartctl' test revealed no errors. So it's probably
not the disk.
- 'debsums -s' reported errors for a couple of files in OpenOffice;
everything else was fine.
I also did some fiddling with options in xorg.co
Hi,
This has been fixed upstream by replacing JSON_parser.* with jsonsl. The
solution for wheezy depends on whether the release-team accepts such a
potentially disruptive change. For more info, see:
https://lists.debian.org/debian-release/2012/11/msg00531.html
Cheers
--
Leo "costela&quo
g an backported
> patch instead of updating to 2.61.
Thanks for the heads-up. Working on it.
> Can you please also check, whether stable is affected?
It seems to be affected, but backporting the fix is less trivial. I may
need some help for that (especially with the testing).
Cheers
--
Le
tag 569089 help
--
I'll try to take a look at this as soon as possible, but it's pretty low
on my TODO list, so if anyone else gets a chance to review the patches,
feel free to NMU.
Cheers
--
Leo "costela" Antunes
[insert a witty retort here]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, ema
note, this also fixes the current binary version in unstable,
which had "symbol not found" issues probably from the lack of a BinNMU
somewhere.
Cheers
--
Leo "costela" Antunes
[insert a witty retort here]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
On 18/05/10 18:58, Alessio Treglia wrote:
> I intend to NMU this and the debdiff is attached, are there any
> objections from your side?
>
No, quite the opposite. I'm totally swamped!
Thanks for the help! :)
Cheers
--
Leo "costela" Antunes
[insert a witty
Package: ecl
Version: 9.6.1-1squeeze1
Severity: grave
I am using Debian testing
# uname -a
Linux squeeeze 2.6.32-3-686 #1 SMP Thu Feb 25 06:14:20 UTC 2010 i686 GNU/Linux
When I attempted to install ecl, all goes fine til I get
Setting up ecl (9.6.1-1squeeze1) ...
/usr/lib/common-lisp/bin/ecl.sh
ind us. I'll get right to it as soon as
possible (probably during the weekend).
Cheers
--
Leo "costela" Antunes
[insert a witty retort here]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
feel free to jump into the discussion!
Cheers
[0] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=631018
--
Leo "costela" Antunes
[insert a witty retort here]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Package: libnatpmp1
Version: 20110808-1
Severity: critical
Justification: breaks other packages (see #638824)
Hi,
Making libnatpmp1 provide libnatpmp0 means packages in practice ignore
the soname bump, which is obviously wrong.
First, the package doesn't provide libnatpmp.so.0, which is the obvi
t is good time to upload it :)
Yup, I'm aware of that. It's been sitting in an "almost-ready" state on
my home-pc for a while. :) Just didn't get around to uploading it.
Cheers
[0] http://bugs.debian.org/638828
--
Leo "costela" Antunes
[insert a witty retort h
Package: tex-common
Version: 6.05
Followup-For: Bug #824862
Dear Maintainer,
Also fails on x84_64. Failure log attached.
Schwab
-- System Information:
Debian Release: stretch/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'test
Package: flashplugin-nonfree
Version: 1:3.6.1+b1
Followup-For: Bug #832493
Same problem here, for about two weeks so far. And now
v11.2.202.626 has been blacklisted by Mozilla/Firefox, so all Flash-based
Web content is inaccessible until this is fixed.
-- Package-specific info:
Debian
s
is really what you wanted, just let me know and we can try to find the
problem.
Cheers
[0] http://code.google.com/p/transmission-remote-gtk/
--
Leo "costela" Antunes
[insert a witty retort here]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Package: dnet-common
Version: 2.56
Followup-For: Bug #635604
Concur with previous reporters. I was experiencing mysterious
network stalls on the two machines on which dnet-common had been hauled in
as a dependency. It was only by serendipity that I figured out it was
decnet stomping on m
Hi,
On 10/08/11 10:54, Alessio Treglia wrote:
> I've prepared an NMU for camorama (versioned as 0.19-2.2). The diff
> is attached to this message.
Thanks for taking the time. This package is definitely in need of some care.
Cheers
--
Leo "costela" Antunes
[inser
would keep the logical
separation between the configure and build steps.
Cheers
--
Leo "costela" Antunes
[insert a witty retort here]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
n-Debian system, just to make sure there are no side-effects.
Should I forward this to the trac?
Cheers
--
Leo "costela" Antunes
[insert a witty retort here]
Index: repo/qt/qtr.pro
===
--- repo.orig/qt/qtr.pro 2011-07-04 16
MU changes be committed to the collab-maint repo)
Thanks again and sorry for the uselessness! :/
Cheers
--
Leo "costela" Antunes
[insert a witty retort here]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
issue. I'll keep looking after some long overdue sleep... ;)
Cheers
[0] https://developer.gnome.org/glib/2.36/glib-GVariant.html
--
Leo "costela" Antunes
[insert a witty retort here]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
tation that -ffloat-store is more correct because it ensures correct
rounding for both single and double precision variables. Do you agree?
Thanks,
Leo
I am the developer of ruffus. I am sorry that I have only just see this. I
will get the patches in Ruffus itself to allow the tests to run on 3.5.
Thanks again.
Leo
On 15 January 2016 at 09:56, Dmitry Shachnev wrote:
> Hi Andreas,
>
> On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 10:15:14AM +0100, Andr
Tags: fixed-upstream
See https://github.com/astropy/astropy-healpix/pull/234
96 matches
Mail list logo
