On Sun, Sep 17, 2006 at 11:09:53AM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote:
> > I can confirm that the fix I proposed earlier
> >
> > DEB_FIXPERMS_EXCLUDE := lockmail.maildrop maildrop$$
> >
> > fixes the sudo-related permission problem.
>
> Well, now that I tried it, it
On Mon, Sep 18, 2006 at 12:37:33PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> > > Notice how it continued to strip setgid from the file "maildrop",
> > > whose name is supposed to match "maildrop$".
> > >
> > > How is this supposed to work, again?
>
> -X excludes any file containing a substring, as documented on
Hi,
Just to explicate this bit - the card is:
(--) Chipset RADEON X1600 XT (RV530 71C0) found
(--) fglrx(0): Chipset: "RADEON X1600 XT (RV530 71C0)" (Chipset = 0x71c0)
(--) fglrx(0): (PciSubVendor = 0x1043, PciSubDevice = 0x0130)
(--) fglrx(0): board vendor info: third party graphics adapter - NO
Package: exim4-config
Version: 4.63-17
Severity: grave
Hi,
After the upgrade to etch, I found myself generating mails with the wrong
headers. When I went to look why, I saw:
% ls -l /etc/exim4/email-addresses*
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 18 2007-04-15 16:55 /etc/exim4/email-addresses ->
../email-a
On Mon, Apr 23, 2007 at 01:43:25PM +0200, Marc Haber wrote:
> > After the upgrade to etch, I found myself generating mails with the wrong
> > headers.
>
> Which package did you upgrade from?
I can't remember exactly (and I trashed my typescript log too :/),
but I'm pretty sure that it was the 4.5
On Tue, Oct 17, 2006 at 02:34:27PM -0700, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
> Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
>
> > tags 392077 + patch
> Bug#392077: joe: execmd with empty command results in SEGV
> There were no tags set.
> Bug#392304: joe: yet another segfault: alt/x enter segfault(lo
On Wed, Oct 18, 2006 at 08:54:28PM +0200, Bas Zoetekouw wrote:
> I just uploaded an NMU of joe, to fix #392077. A diff is attached.
Didn't you notice that I was discussing it with the patch submitter?
I realize it's NMU season, but there's also that little thing called
politeness. >:(
--
2
On Wed, Oct 18, 2006 at 10:02:34PM +0200, Bas Zoetekouw wrote:
> > > I just uploaded an NMU of joe, to fix #392077. A diff is attached.
> >
> > Didn't you notice that I was discussing it with the patch submitter?
> > I realize it's NMU season, but there's also that little thing called
> > politen
Package: wmaker
Version: 0.92.0-6
Severity: serious
Hi,
I see that /etc/WindowMaker/WindowMaker defines:
FocusNextKey = "Mod1+Tab";
Yet, that doesn't actually *work* until I manually add the same setting
into my ~/.GNUstep/Defaults/WindowMaker file. It's reproducible on demand.
Note that I h
On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 05:30:29PM +0100, Marc Brockschmidt wrote:
> > Any chance of upgrading one of the buildds to 2.6.32 to see if it
> > helps?
>
> DSA told me that they do not want to run any non-standard (aka,
> non-Debian stable) kernel on these machines, not even for short
> tests. I'm n
Package: linux-2.6
Severity: serious
Tags: upstream patch
Hi there,
Ever since kernel 2.6.29 came out, several classes of sparc machines have
been unable to upgrade, because they would get stuck while initializing
the new NMI watchdog code.
The process of trying to figure it out is mostly docume
On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 08:36:55PM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote:
> severity 524185 serious
> thanks
>
> This just happened to me after an upgrade from lenny to current sid,
> and it's damned annoying. I've logged into the machine over the network
> and did a sudo killall
Package: grub-pc
Version: 1.97~beta3-1
Justification: renders package unusable
Severity: grave
Hi,
I've upgraded from lenny to sid and tried to chainload, but sadly the new
version won't do anything useful for me. This is what it prints:
Booting 'Chainload into GRUB 2'
root (hd0,1)
Filesyst
On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 11:54:21AM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote:
> I've experienced the same problem. I've got two lenny machines which have
[...]
FWIW Here's the last upgrade output pasted exactly as it just happened:
% sudo apt-get upgrade
Reading package lists... Done
Buildi
On Sat, Nov 07, 2009 at 07:43:00PM +0100, Bill Allombert wrote:
> Package: xvier
> Version: 1.0-7.4
> Severity: grave
>
> Hello Josip,
>
> This is on lenny-amd64:
> xvier crash when clicking on the fourth row with
> "xvier: read from xvier_prog failed"
Hmm, it's actually randomly crashing, I've
On Sun, Nov 08, 2009 at 09:17:01PM +0100, Serafeim Zanikolas wrote:
> Hi,
>
> update-alternatives fails because the binary in the unstable archive doesn't
> ship /usr/bin/*.maildrop:
>
> dpkg -$ dpkg -c /var/cache/apt/archives/maildrop_2.2.0-2_i386.deb | grep
> usr\/bin
> drwxr-xr-x root/root
On Sat, Nov 07, 2009 at 08:17:04PM +0100, Josip Rodin wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 07, 2009 at 07:43:00PM +0100, Bill Allombert wrote:
> > Package: xvier
> > Version: 1.0-7.4
> > Severity: grave
> >
> > Hello Josip,
> >
> > This is on lenny-amd64:
> &g
On Mon, Nov 09, 2009 at 11:04:46PM +0100, Bill Allombert wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 09, 2009 at 10:17:51PM +0100, Josip Rodin wrote:
> > On Sat, Nov 07, 2009 at 08:17:04PM +0100, Josip Rodin wrote:
> > > On Sat, Nov 07, 2009 at 07:43:00PM +0100, Bill Allombert wrote:
>
On Sat, Jan 02, 2010 at 03:00:39PM +0100, Josip Rodin wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 02, 2010 at 02:29:36PM +0100, Josip Rodin wrote:
> > I've got two disks and a software RAID setup on the partition that holds
> > the /boot directory. I have several Linux software RAID partitions, base
On Sun, Feb 07, 2010 at 11:41:51AM +, Jurij Smakov wrote:
> > > > > Josip, are you running lebrun these days? Can you try reproducing the
> > > > > failure there and getting more information about it (logs are not
> > > > > very
> > > > > informative)? I'm a bit reluctant to do a porter uplo
On Sun, Jan 03, 2010 at 01:14:47PM +0100, Josip Rodin wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 02, 2010 at 03:00:39PM +0100, Josip Rodin wrote:
> > On Sat, Jan 02, 2010 at 02:29:36PM +0100, Josip Rodin wrote:
> > > I've got two disks and a software RAID setup on the partition that holds
>
On Sun, Jan 10, 2010 at 05:06:56PM +0100, Christoph Anton Mitterer wrote:
> Not sure if this actually a hole or if I just misunderstand
> something,... but:
>
> In debian /usr/bin/maildrop ist installed:
> -rwxr-sr-x 1 root mail 163k Nov 9 01:11 /usr/bin/maildrop
>
> So I'd expect that the follo
On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 09:56:21PM -0500, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
> Christoph Anton Mitterer writes:
>> On Sun, 2010-01-10 at 12:29 -0500, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
>>> This depends on the maildrop configuration, but generally setgroupid
>>> won't have any effect if maildrop is invoked as root, since
On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 07:13:50AM -0500, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
> # authtest mr...@courier-mta.com
> Authentication succeeded.
>
> Authenticated: mr...@courier-mta.com (uid 8, gid 12)
>Home Directory: /var/spool/maildir/mrsam
> Maildir: (none)
> Quota: (none)
> Encry
On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 05:54:56PM -0500, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
> Josip Rodin writes:
>> On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 07:13:50AM -0500, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
>>> # authtest mr...@courier-mta.com
>>> Authentication succeeded.
>>>
>>> Authent
On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 08:02:31PM -0500, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
>> % id testmaildrop
>> uid=1006(testmaildrop) gid=1006(testmaildrop) groups=1006(testmaildrop)
>> uid=1006(testmaildrop) gid=0(root) groups=0(root)
>> That's the problem. After using -d, it changes the user but not the group.
>> Can
On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 07:13:38AM -0500, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
% id testmaildrop
uid=1006(testmaildrop) gid=1006(testmaildrop) groups=1006(testmaildrop)
uid=1006(testmaildrop) gid=0(root) groups=0(root)
That's the problem. After using -d, it changes the user but not the group.
On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 07:44:07PM -0500, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
> Let's try the following patch. I do appreciate your help in testing it.
> It's not easy for me to test all possible permutations of distro-specific
> configurations, and platform-specific nuances, that float around.
>
> diff -U3 -
On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 07:44:07PM -0500, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
> Let's try the following patch. I do appreciate your help in testing it.
> It's not easy for me to test all possible permutations of distro-specific
> configurations, and platform-specific nuances, that float around.
>
> diff -U3 -
On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 10:52:55PM -0500, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
>> OK, it works when I put it in the first block, where it first does setuid()
>> because of the delivery mode. Then the subprocess gets the group mail.
>
> You must be referring to the following.
>
> After giving this another good lo
On Sat, Jan 23, 2010 at 11:13:02AM +, Jurij Smakov wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 01:33:47PM +1300, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> > On 18/01/10 at 23:59 +, Jurij Smakov wrote:
> > > On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 06:58:18AM +1300, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> > > > Package: src:ruby1.9.1
> > > > Version: 1
On Sat, Jan 23, 2010 at 10:42:24PM +, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
> Maintainer: Josip Rodin
> Changed-By: Uwe Kleine-König
> Description:
> xvier - a "Four in a row" game
> Closes: 554987
> Changes:
> xvier (1.0-7.5) unstable; urgency=high
&g
On Sat, Jan 02, 2010 at 02:29:36PM +0100, Josip Rodin wrote:
> I've got two disks and a software RAID setup on the partition that holds
> the /boot directory. I have several Linux software RAID partitions, based
> on this scheme:
>
> sda2+sdb2 -> Linux amd64 /
> s
Hi,
I've reported this bug in the Debian BTS, to no avail, so I'm cc:ing the
upstream address for help.
I've got two disks and a software RAID setup on the partition that holds
the /boot directory. I have several Linux software RAID partitions, based
on this scheme:
sda2+sdb2 -> Linux amd6
On Sat, Jan 02, 2010 at 03:00:39PM +0100, Josip Rodin wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 02, 2010 at 02:29:36PM +0100, Josip Rodin wrote:
> > I've got two disks and a software RAID setup on the partition that holds
> > the /boot directory. I have several Linux software RAID partitions, base
Package: grub-pc
Severity: grave
I'm typing this from Windows because the squeeze upgrade a few minutes ago
rendered all my Linux GRUB menu entries useless - they all report "command
not found" either for "linux" or for "initrd".
During the upgrade, I saw three debconf prompts, and just pressed e
On Sun, Nov 22, 2009 at 01:49:51AM +0100, Josip Rodin wrote:
> Package: grub-pc
> Severity: grave
>
> I'm typing this from Windows because the squeeze upgrade a few minutes ago
> rendered all my Linux GRUB menu entries useless - they all report "command
> not foun
On Mon, Dec 07, 2009 at 11:04:38AM -0500, Michael Gilbert wrote:
> On Mon, 7 Dec 2009 09:16:57 +0100, Josip Rodin wrote:
> > unless this code somehow inexplicalby crept in, there's no bug.
>
> please check your linking process, so that there is no uncertainty
> about th
On Mon, Jan 03, 2011 at 08:16:49PM +, Marcos Marado wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> The problem is in scotch, that changed all the binary names from
> scotch_$binary to just $binary (see [1]).
>
> The "gbase" in scotch is completely different than the one from the gbase
> package. My first idea woul
These defaults are really bad.
I had this happen to a machine running DRBD yesterday:
block drbd0: PingAck did not arrive in time.
block drbd0: peer( Secondary -> Unknown ) conn( Connected -> NetworkFailure )
pdsk( UpToDate -> DUnknown )
block drbd0: asender terminated
block drbd0: Terminating
On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 04:29:47PM +0200, Philipp Hug wrote:
> It should probably be changed into something like this:
> "/usr/lib/drbd/notify-emergency-reboot.sh; reboot -f &; sync &; sleep 30;
> echo
> b > /proc/sysrq-trigger";
> So, we'd have at least time to sync other file systems and try to
Following on Philipp's comment, I went looking for explanation in the old
template config file changes, and found the sysrq calls added with no
obvious explanation here:
http://git.drbd.org/gitweb.cgi?p=drbd-8.3.git;a=commitdiff;h=3b4452d69b4371dbeee5a38f2e248a6360c14c77
But this is still conditio
On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 11:02:39AM +0100, Philipp Hug wrote:
> > In fact, if you had been listening to me from day one, you'd realize
> > that I'm not even asking you to actually fix this problem.
> > I'm merely asking you to make the users who aren't using your personally
> > preferred use case, b
On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 10:24:03AM +0100, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> please see https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=CVE-2011-4966
> for details and a link to the upstream fix.
AFAICT this is a year old, so apparently it's not really so important? :)
Do you think we should take the opportu
Package: linux-image-3.2.0-0.bpo.2-amd64
Severity: serious
Hi,
I've experienced this regression from squeeze, so I'm noting it before
I forget and wheezy's released...
I have a desktop machine with a motherboard that has an AMD SB 750
south bridge with an integrated USB controller.
With Linux 2.
Package: postgresql-9.1
Severity: grave
Tags: upstream
Hi,
This is effectively http://bugs.debian.org/632028 but in unstable.
We had the bad change reverted in 8.4.x (stable), but the new version
has remained unfixed.
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-bugs/2011-05/msg00080.php
http://archives
On Wed, Aug 04, 2010 at 02:53:22PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
> > This behaviour seems to be a problem with grub-probe and its usage by the
> > default config scripts, because the simple most straightforward test fails
> > for one of the RAID devices:
> >
> > % sudo tune2fs -l /dev/md0 | grep UUID
On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 08:12:44AM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
> Package: freeradius
> Version: 2.1.10+dfsg-3
> Severity: serious
>
> See the build logs at
> https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=freeradius, dh_install
> fails trying to install radsniff which apparently isn't built for s
On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 12:22:50PM +0200, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> Package: freeradius
> Severity: grave
> Tags: security
> Justification: user security hole
>
> Please see the following links with included references to
> patches:
>
> http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2010-369
Package: php5-pgsql, postgresql-9.0
Version: 5.3.3-7+squeeze1, 9.0.4-1~bpo60+1
Severity: serious
Hi,
After the upgrade of one of our web servers to squeeze, coupled with
PostgreSQL 9 from squeeze-backports, the new pg_pconnect()-caused
connections seem to get created and left idling forever. When
On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 12:32:35PM +0200, Ondřej Surý wrote:
> My first question would be if you can repeat same behaviour under unstable
> (and/or wheezy).
I'll try and get back to you on that. (It'll take me a while to replicate
a machine and then upgrade it.)
--
2. That which causes joy
reassign 630569 postgresql-8.4, postgresql-9.0, php5-pgsql
thanks
On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 12:32:35PM +0200, Ondřej Surý wrote:
> My first question would be if you can repeat same behaviour under unstable
> (and/or wheezy).
Before going forward to wheeze, I first tried to reproduce it on clean
squ
On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 04:28:14PM +0200, Ondřej Surý wrote:
> I still don't see how this could be a php5-pgsql bug since it's caused
> by pgsql version.
I filed it preemptively on all so as to solicit help... if there is no odd
variable behavior in php5-pgsql based on server version, please feel
On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 08:17:00PM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 04:28:14PM +0200, Ondřej Surý wrote:
> > I still don't see how this could be a php5-pgsql bug since it's caused
> > by pgsql version.
>
> I filed it preemptively on all so as to
Package: postgresql-8.4
Version: 8.4.8-0squeeze1
Severity: grave
Hi there,
Unfortunately this "stable" upgrade of PostgreSQL 8.4.7-0squeeze2 to
8.4.8-0squeeze1 introduced a bug apparently from the 9.0 branch that is
now consistently breaking queries on our production "stable" machines.
Upstream
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2011-05/msg00738.php
Another consideration here is that because I back-ported the 9.0
checking code into REL8_4:
http://git.postgresql.org/gitweb?p=postgresql.git;a=commitdiff;h=5d3853a7fa40b28b44b14084863fd83a188c9a9e
On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 12:09:13PM +0200, Philipp Kern wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 10:32:27AM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote:
> > Anyway, this kind of a query fails under PostgreSQL 9.0.4 and 8.4.8:
>
> Would you mind completing this testcase for me? I.e. at least acl_inherits is
On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 12:44:09PM +0200, Philipp Kern wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 12:37:57PM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote:
> > Do you have any packages built with the patch that I could test?
> > amd64 preferably :)
>
> Sure:
>
> http://thrall.0x539.de/~pkern/pos
On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 02:00:48PM +, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
> Dixi quod???
>
> >Josip Rodin dixit:
> >
> >>You can prepare a patch, sure, but while you're at it, do first test the
> >>situation where 'editorrc' is a slave to 'editor&#
reassign 640874 tech-ctte
thanks
On Thu, Sep 08, 2011 at 08:21:32AM +0200, Niels Thykier wrote:
> Package: leave
> Severity: serious
> Justification: Policy 4.9 - must directive
> User: lint-ma...@debian.org
> Usertags: debian-rules-not-a-makefile debian-rules-missing-required-target
> debian-rul
On Thu, Sep 08, 2011 at 10:43:44AM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
> Would you mind explaining here why you feel it is important to retain the
> flexibility of multiple implementation languages for debian/rules?
Now, I wouldn't actually put it that way - because that would imply that we
could suddenly
On Thu, Sep 08, 2011 at 10:50:33AM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
> Nevertheless, merely having that doubt in developers' minds is a cost;
> 17058 packages can definitely use this technique, while for 1 package we
> have to think about it ... so I would still want to hear of a clear
> benefit to allowi
On Thu, Sep 08, 2011 at 03:38:39PM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> Hi Josip,
>
> On Thu, 08 Sep 2011, Josip Rodin wrote:
> > Instead, it is important to retain the age-old idea that the rules file has
> > its own calling convention (an API) that isn't linked to one speci
On Thu, Sep 08, 2011 at 04:53:01PM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> > > And still, this is a Makefile so you can quickly reuse Makefile snippets
> > > that others have been writing to add support for supplementary targets
> > > (like get-orig-source) or even to influence the environment (like the
>
On Thu, Sep 08, 2011 at 04:18:34PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
> (I don't recall if anyone tried to loop you into that discussion; if that
> didn't happen, that was a flaw in that discussion process to be sure.)
Nope, sorry, I missed that.
--
2. That which causes joy or happiness.
--
To
Since my reasoning here didn't seem to leave a particular positive dent with
those tech-ctte members who have responded so far, I would just like to
solicit Ian Jackson's input, given his role in defining and implementing the
debian/rules calling convention originally. In other worse, if I can't
c
On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 01:30:02PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
> Control: tag -1 patch pending
>
> Dear maintainer,
>
> I've prepared an NMU for libapache-mod-auth-radius (versioned as
> 1.5.8-1.2) and uploaded it to DELAYED/2. Please feel free to tell me if
> I should delay it longer.
>
> Apolo
Package: xen-hypervisor-4.1-amd64
Version: 4.1.4-3+deb7u4
Severity: critical
Hi,
Not sure how come I'm the first one to file this kind of a bug report :)
but here goes JFTR...
http://xenbits.xen.org/xsa/advisory-123.html was embargoed, but advance
warning was given to several big Xen VM farms, w
On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 09:57:31AM +0100, Michael Tautschnig wrote:
> apxs2 -c mod_auth_radius-2.0.c
> /usr/share/apr-1.0/build/libtool --silent --mode=compile --tag=disable-static
> x86_64-linux-gnu-gcc -std=gnu99 -prefer-pic -pipe -g -O2
> -fstack-protector-strong -Wformat -Werror=format-securi
On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 09:42:30PM +0100, Michael Tautschnig wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 09:57:31AM +0100, Michael Tautschnig wrote:
> > > apxs2 -c mod_auth_radius-2.0.c
> > > /usr/share/apr-1.0/build/libtool --silent --mode=compile
> > > --tag=disable-static x86_64-linux-gnu-gcc -std=gnu99
On Tue, Aug 30, 2016 at 11:20:50AM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> Josip, do you really still care about this package?
I'm pretty sure I told Sam to take it over a few years back...?
If you want to fix that, by all means, just work on it.
--
2. That which causes joy or happiness.
reassign 819198 www.debian.org
thanks
On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 03:49:28PM -0300, Js wrote:
> Package: libapache2-mod-auth-radius
> Version: 1.5
> Severity: serious
> Tags: upstream
> Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past)
>
> The package libapache2-mod-auth-
Hi again,
Err, another startx attempt a few minutes later - worked!
I'll try to reboot and reproduce...
--
2. That which causes joy or happiness.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debia
On Sat, May 12, 2012 at 05:59:31PM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote:
> Hi again,
>
> Err, another startx attempt a few minutes later - worked!
>
> I'll try to reboot and reproduce...
Reproduced, it works the second time around. Some sort of race condition
on the initial run?
--
On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 10:09:02PM +0200, Rafael Varela Pet wrote:
> Are there any plans to fix this in a near future? Even though we have a
> fail over system with three servers, this bug is becoming very annoying...
I'm just being tardy with uploading the new version, sorry.
Hope to get to it so
On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 10:38:46AM +0200, Alan T DeKok wrote:
> Josip Rodin wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 04:42:51PM +0200, Alan T DeKok wrote:
> >> Josip Rodin wrote:
> >>> FYI:
> >> If I recall correctly, this was a bad pointer in 2.1.10. It was fix
On Mon, Aug 01, 2011 at 08:20:21PM +, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I just ran into a funny problem regarding update-alternatives
> and editorrc: if joe is installed, it wants /etc/joe/editorrc
> whereas jupp reads /etc/jupp/editorrc (I???ll use joe???s for now
> and symlink to it but that
On Mon, Aug 01, 2011 at 10:28:17PM +, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
> >Maybe simply coding it differently inside joe will be the best solution -
> >if it notices that $self is 'editor', then don't just look for
> >/etc/joe/${self}rc but instead look itself up once again through
> >/etc/alternatives/ed
On Tue, Aug 02, 2011 at 08:03:40AM +, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
> Josip Rodin dixit:
>
> >And if you no longer have /etc/joe/editorrc but instead /etc/editorrc,
> >then that still requires source patching for joe to actually *read* it,
> >so you're back to square o
On Tue, Aug 02, 2011 at 09:10:20AM +, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
> Josip Rodin dixit:
>
> >The only question would be whether having a symlink called /etc/editorrc
> >would confuse non-joe users.
>
> Hm. Too bad we can't directly link to /etc/alternatives/editorr
On Tue, Aug 02, 2011 at 04:42:01PM +, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
> Josip Rodin dixit:
>
> >/var/lib/misc/editorrc could work?
>
> Sure would. Do you want me to prepare a patch for joe?
> If so, should I version it as NMU or regularily?
You can prepare a patch, sure, but w
On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 11:18:17AM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> Source: freeradius
> Version: 2.1.10+dfsg-3
> Severity: serious
> Tags: wheezy sid
> User: debian...@lists.debian.org
> Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120330 qa-ftbfs qa-ftbfs-buildarch
> Justification: FTBFS on amd64
>
> Hi,
>
> During a re
On Wed, Jul 04, 2012 at 01:08:59PM +0200, José Antonio Antelo wrote:
> Is it possible to backport freeradius to stable version?
Yes, I'll get to it eventually. You can also request that someone else does
it in the backports support channels.
> And try to add the new FR to debian 7 before being f
On Mon, Jul 02, 2012 at 06:08:53AM +0200, Fabio M. Di NItto wrote:
> On 07/01/2012 02:50 PM, Arno Töll wrote:
> > tags 667629 + patch
> > tags 667629 + pending
> > thanks
> >
> > Dear maintainer,
> >
> > I've prepared an NMU for libapache-mod-auth-radius (versioned as
> > 1.5.8-1.1) and
> > uplo
Control: retitle -1 AMD SB 750 + Logitech USB keyboard brokenness with Linux
3.2 (regression from 3.1)
On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 06:26:42PM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote:
> I'll try to bisect this now with my config.
It looks like it's definitely in some way related with the in
On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 12:46:29AM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 06:26:42PM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote:
> > I'll try to bisect this now with my config.
>
> It looks like it's definitely in some way related with the introduction of
> CONFIG_HID_
On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 12:57:06PM +0200, Jiri Kosina wrote:
> On Wed, 12 Sep 2012, Nestor Lopez Casado wrote:
>
> > Take a look at this thread ... where a patch was published ...
> >
> > https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/958174
> >
> > Your issue may come from the same problem.
> >
> > I
On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 09:36:52PM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> Source: libapache-mod-auth-radius
> Version: 1.5.8-1
> Severity: serious
> Tags: wheezy sid
> User: debian...@lists.debian.org
> Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120419 qa-ftbfs
> Justification: FTBFS on amd64
>
> Hi,
>
> During a rebuild of a
Package: php5-memcache
Version: 3.0.4-4
Severity: grave
Hi,
Something in the squeeze upgrade completely demolished one of our internal
PHP applications... our class that extends Memcache and calls parent::get()
never returns from the call into memcache.so, whenever memcached is up.
If I stop the
On Thu, Jun 09, 2011 at 12:10:07PM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote:
> Package: php5-memcache
> Version: 3.0.4-4
> Severity: grave
>
> Hi,
>
> Something in the squeeze upgrade completely demolished one of our internal
> PHP applications... our class that extends Memcache and cal
101 - 190 of 190 matches
Mail list logo
