The problem here is that conflicting versions of packages are
currently installable in testing. This has been fixed in unstable, but
shouldn't packages be pointing to the right versions so that this
can't happen? libdecoration should be at the same version as the
compizconfig packages same version
2008/9/5 Rafael Laboissiere <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> * Thomas Weber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-06-09 09:11]:
>
>> Am Samstag, den 10.05.2008, 07:33 +0200 schrieb Thomas Weber:
>> > On 09/05/08 18:34 -0500, Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso wrote:
>> > > Package: oc
Package: octave-symbolic
Version: 1.0.9-1+b1
Severity: grave
octave-symbolic is largely unusable. Calling any of its functions
other than "sym" results in C++ exceptions like this one:
error: T& Array::checkelem (2, -1, 2): range error
and eventually the package segfaults Octave.
This repo
On 15 December 2010 16:17, Thomas Weber wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 07:55:58AM -0600, Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso wrote:
>> Package: octave-symbolic
>> Version: 1.0.9-1+b1
>> Severity: grave
>>
>> octave-symbolic is largely unusable. Calling any of its functions
2010/12/15 Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso :
> Checking package...
> warning: mark_as_command is obsolete and will be removed from a
> future version of Octave
> [findsym]
> * test
> symbols
> x=sym("x"); y=sym("y"); f=x^2+3*x*y-y^2;
On 26 December 2010 17:08, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 07:55:58 -0600, Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso wrote:
>
>> This report is mostly a reminder to myself to either fix the package,
>> or to the release managers to remove this package from squeeze if I
>>
Just an update, there's a small update of this package in upstream's
svn that seems to no longer display this problem. Upstream is
reluctant to release it, because this svn version has a similar
problem on Mac OS X.
I'm going to attack the Mac OS X problem. If I solve it, I can work
with upstream
Package: qtoctave
forcemerge 565197 584349
kthxbye
On 3 June 2010 05:08, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> Justification: FTBFS on amd64
[snip]
>> Qt version 4.5 required.
>>
>> Qt version installed is: 4.6
>>
>> Please install required version.
We are preparing with upstream a new release of QtOcta
On 7 June 2010 03:21, Mario 'BitKoenig' Holbe wrote:
> qtoctave upgrade to 0.9.1-1 fails due to a file-conflict with
> quicktime-utils:
We are working with upstream to resolve this issue. QtOctave's private
binaries should be moved to /usr/lib/qtoctave per FHS policy. An
upload is forthcoming.
On 27 August 2010 15:54, Torquil Macdonald Sørensen wrote:
> Ok, it seems that libmesh0.6.4 is incompatible with the current version of
> libpetsc in debian, v3.1. After some time I managed to make a DEB file of
> libmesh SVN.
Are you sure this isn't an RC bug? It's keeping the package out of
squ
On Mon, 5 Jul 2010 22:10:26 -0400 "Joe Nahmias" wrote:
> Yes, I do plan on working on fceu. Just finished some stuff IRL, so
> I should have time to look at this in the near future.
Are you still working on this? The squeeze release managers are
getting itchy to remove leaf packages from squeeze
On 24 October 2012 08:17, Mike Miller wrote:
> The octave package provides the directories, and liboctinterp.so.1 has
> a compiled-in set of paths with its version number that it attempts to
> load.
Ah, this is probably not the greatest idea ever. I'm not sure how to
fix it. Provide a build-time
2010/7/29 Ansgar Burchardt :
> Hi,
>
> Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso writes:
>
>> Simutrans has a non-free license. In the source tree,
>> simutrans/copyright.txt forbids modification and commercial use of
>> Simutrans, despite claiming to otherwise be under the artistic
On 19 August 2011 06:11, Soeren Sonnenburg wrote:
> Package: octave3.2
> Version: 3.2.4-8
> Severity: normal
> Tags: patch
>
> it is sufficient to remove the curl/types.h line - octave builds just
> fine then.
This has already been done in Octave 3.4.2. I think the easiest fix is
to just update t
retitle 621942 FTBFS: Expects Qt 4.6, but system has Qt 4.7
kthxbye
On 9 April 2011 07:23, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> Source: qtoctave
> Version: 0.9.2+svn255-1
> Severity: serious
> Tags: wheezy sid
> User: debian...@lists.debian.org
> Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20110408 qa-ftbfs
> Justification: FTBFS on
On 11 July 2012 12:44, Rafael Laboissiere wrote:
> At any rate, the following is a reproducible bug:
>
> $ sudo rmdir /usr/share/octave/packages/
> $ sudo octave --silent --no-history --no-init-file --no-window-system
> --eval "pkg ('rebuild');"
> error: could not find the file or pat
On 24 May 2012 05:34, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> Source: octave3.2
> Version: 3.2.4-12
> Severity: serious
> Tags: wheezy sid
> User: debian...@lists.debian.org
> Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120524 qa-ftbfs
> Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Time to remove it from the archives, then? ;-)
- Jordi G. H.
--
17 matches
Mail list logo
