Hi Francesco,
On Sun, 2011-11-13 at 19:30 +0100, Francesco Poli wrote:
> On Sun, 13 Nov 2011 11:49:10 -0500 Adam C Powell IV wrote:
>
> > On Sun, 2011-11-13 at 15:20 +0100, Francesco Poli wrote:
> [...]
> > > Yes, but I think freecad should not be released in a stable ve
On Fri, 2011-12-16 at 09:57 +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 19:45:47 -0500, Adam C Powell IV wrote:
>
> > Found the problem. PETSc built on November 16 with mpi-defaults 0.6
> > which depended on LAM on non-openmpi arches. Now mpi-defaults
On Sat, 2011-12-17 at 17:32 +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 08:00:15 -0500, Adam C Powell IV wrote:
>
> > I think blacs-mpi, scalapack and suitesparse make sense for no-change
> > rebuilds. But I've been procrastinating maintenance on the rest
retitle 652313 Needs mpich2 targets in debian/rules
block 652313 by 652312
thanks
Hi Julien,
On Mon, 2011-12-19 at 21:03 +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 08:43:12 -0500, Adam C Powell IV wrote:
>
> > On Sat, 2011-12-17 at 17:32 +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
tags 652313 patch
thanks
On Wed, 2011-12-21 at 13:23 -0500, Adam C Powell IV wrote:
> retitle 652313 Needs mpich2 targets in debian/rules
> block 652313 by 652312
> thanks
>
> Hi Julien,
>
> On Mon, 2011-12-19 at 21:03 +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
> > On Mon, Dec
tags 653032 patch
tags 653032 pending
block 653032 by 652312
block 653032 by 652313
thanks
This is fixed in alioth and I'll upload it when 652312 and 652313 are
fixed.
-Adam
On Thu, 2011-12-22 at 18:00 -0500, Adam C Powell IV wrote:
> Package: src:mumps
> Version: 4.10.0-1
> Sev
On Fri, 2011-12-23 at 20:50 +0100, Muammar El Khatib wrote:
> Hi Adam,
>
> On Fri, Dec 23, 2011 at 14:41, Adam C Powell IV wrote:
> > Hi Muammar,
> >
> > On Fri, 2011-12-23 at 11:59 +0100, Muammar El Khatib wrote:
> >> On Thu, Dec 22, 2011 at 23:28, Adam C
Hi Muammar,
Reducing the recipients list as this concerns technical details.
On Sun, 2011-12-25 at 20:31 +0100, Muammar El Khatib wrote:
> Source: scalapack
> Followup-For: Bug #652313
>
> Hi,
>
> I have prepared a new revision of scalapack, but I have a doubt which is: do
> I have to provide a
Package: src:scalapack
Severity: serious
Tags: patch
Hi Muammar,
I'm afraid scalapack FTBFS again on three platforms. On all three the
failure mechanism is the same: libmpich2.so is not linked to libmpl.so .
The workaround is in the attached patch: if you explicitly link -lmpich
-lmpl it should
Thanks Muammar, it looks like everything worked and it built everywhere,
except s390x which is waiting for a fix to PVM.
I uploaded the new MUMPS, PETSc will go in as soon as MUMPS is ready.
Thanks again!
-Adam
On Thu, 2011-12-29 at 20:39 +0100, Muammar El Khatib wrote:
> Source: scalapack
> Fo
tags 652061 pending
thanks
On Thu, 2012-01-05 at 12:11 +0100, Jakub Wilk wrote:
> * Christoph Egger , 2011-12-14, 16:01:
> >Your package failed to build on the buildds:
> >
> >checking for dseupd_ in -larpack... yes
> >configure: WARNING: No parallel arpack found.
> >checking for pdneupd_ in -lpar
On Sun, 2012-01-08 at 12:05 +0100, Juergen Riegel wrote:
> Hi together,
> I'm, together with Werner, the maintainer of FreeCAD.
> Based on the long history of license struggle with OCTPL I do not think
> they will change the license soon.
> So I decided to go for GPL free for the 0.13 release of F
. ScaLAPACK works around this by
explicitly linking to all of the MPICH2 libraries, and its dependencies
(MUMPS, PETSc etc.) inherit this linkage so they don't break.
To test I'll need to log into an s390 or mips test machine at some
point...
-Adam
On Sat, 2012-01-07 at 11:54 -08
Package: src:med-fichier
Version: 3.0.3-1
Severity: serious
Greetings,
The "git checkout" in the clean target makes this package FTBFS. What
blithering idiot could have thought that one up? Get rid of it at once!
-Adam
--
GPG fingerprint: D54D 1AEE B11C CE9B A02B C5DD 526F 01E8 564E E4B6
En
On Mon, 2012-02-27 at 21:05 +0100, trophime wrote:
> Hi,
> with the following patches the package builds fine.
Thanks very much Christophe! This is incredibly helpful.
Roberto, can you take care of applying these patches and uploading, or
do you want me to do an NMU? This is holding up a pretty
On Tue, 2012-02-28 at 09:31 -0500, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 05:51:14PM -0500, Adam C Powell IV wrote:
> > On Mon, 2012-02-27 at 21:05 +0100, trophime wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > > with the following patches the package builds fine.
> >
> >
severity 619931 serious
thanks
OCC 6.5.0 is now in unstable, so this bug is now serious.
-Adam
On Mon, 2011-03-28 at 09:33 -0400, Adam C Powell IV wrote:
> Package: src:netgen
> Version: 4.9.13.dfsg-1
>
> With OpenCASCADE 6.5.0, now in the NEW queue, netgen FTBFS:
>
> li
Hi Pierre and Johannes,
On Wed, 2011-03-30 at 14:47 +0200, Johannes Ring wrote:
> Hi Pierre,
>
> On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 2:24 PM, Pierre Saramito
> wrote:
> > Hi Adam and Johannes,
> >
> >> > From Adam:
> >> > parser_ll.l:123:31: error: 'yylval' undeclared (first use in this
> >> > function)
>
severity 620241 important
thanks
Hello Julien,
On Thu, 2011-03-31 at 14:51 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
> Package: elmerfem
> Version: 5.5.0.svn.5100.dfsg-1
> Severity: serious
> Justification: fails to build from source
>
> elmerfem/ia64 dependency installability problem:
> elmerfem (= 5.5.0.
ich
> is why it was Cc:ed to the atlas and mumps maintainers.
When a fringe arch or two doesn't build a package properly, and it's
clearly not due to a problem in that package, it's usually not RC (in my
experience). But I'll leave it that way if you prefer.
> On Thu,
Hello Pierre,
On Thu, 2011-03-31 at 16:12 +0200, Pierre Saramito wrote:
> Hi Adam and Johannes,
>
> > From Adam:
> > This is a very strange error in its irreproducibility...
>
> Please find a tarball containing a new version of debian files,
> together with git-status and git-diff files (some fi
On Fri, 2011-04-01 at 14:05 +0200, Johannes Ring wrote:
> Hi Adam and Pierre,
>
> On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 1:38 PM, Adam C Powell IV
> wrote:
> > * I noticed that you removed -I/usr/include/lam from the CCS
> and
> >CCD commands. I don't remem
Package: src:blacs-mpi
Version: 1.1-29
Severity: serious
Justification: causes other packages to FTBFS
Tags: patch
Greetings,
The blacs-mpi package gets the MPI implementation incorrect on alpha.
Because it Build-Depends on libopenmpi-dev, which is not the default on
alpha (LAM is), and because O
Hi again,
On Fri, 2011-04-01 at 07:38 -0400, Adam C Powell IV wrote:
> Hello Pierre,
>
> On Thu, 2011-03-31 at 16:12 +0200, Pierre Saramito wrote:
> > Hi Adam and Johannes,
> >
> > > From Adam:
> > > This is a very strange error in its irreproducib
severity 617729 important
thanks
Thank you for your bug report.
While this shortcoming makes libmedc-dev not usable without
libhdf5-mpi-dev, at the same time, it does not prevent one from using
it. As you pointed out, one can simply install libhdf5-mpi-dev and the
package becomes fully usable.
On Mon, 2011-04-04 at 13:53 +0200, Pierre Saramito wrote:
> Hello !
>
> > > From Adam:
> > > Already I can see a few issues:
> > > * I noticed that you removed -I/usr/include/lam from the CCS and
> > > CCD commands. I don't remember the exact reasons, but those
> > > were re
Hello Anton,
On Tue, 2011-04-05 at 21:41 +0200, Anton Gladky wrote:
> Adam,
>
> what do you think, can this bug be related to #619935?
>
> Anton
Possibly, but I think it's a new bug -- libmetis.so -> libscotchmetis.so
should be linked to libscotch.so but it's not. Yup, Elmer is also
bombing th
Package: src:scotch
Version: 5.1.11.dfsg-5
Severity: serious
Justification: causes other packages to FTBFS
X-DebBugs-CC: gladky.an...@gmail.com
Greetings,
In the last upload or two, the scotch package has lost its inter-library
linkages. libscotchmetis should be linked -lscotch, and libscotch
sh
Pierre & Johannes,
On Tue, 2011-04-05 at 20:13 -0400, Adam C Powell IV wrote:
> Package: src:scotch
> Version: 5.1.11.dfsg-5
> Severity: serious
> Justification: causes other packages to FTBFS
> X-DebBugs-CC: gladky.an...@gmail.com
>
> Greetings,
>
> In the
Hi Christophe,
On Wed, 2011-04-06 at 09:14 +0200, trophime wrote:
> On Tue, 2011-04-05 at 21:41 +0200, Anton Gladky wrote:
> > Adam,
> >
> > what do you think, can this bug be related to #619935?
>
> I think this is related to changes in scotch package.
> We should maybe add a define flag to CCF
On Tue, 2011-04-05 at 21:18 -0400, Adam C Powell IV wrote:
> Pierre & Johannes,
>
> On Tue, 2011-04-05 at 20:13 -0400, Adam C Powell IV wrote:
> > Package: src:scotch
> > Version: 5.1.11.dfsg-5
> > Severity: serious
> > Justification: causes other packages
Hi Johannes,
On Wed, 2011-04-06 at 14:37 +0200, Johannes Ring wrote:
> Hi Adam,
>
> On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 1:47 PM, Adam C Powell IV wrote:
> > Just put a fix in alioth, let me know if it gives you trouble. I plan
> > to upload within 4-5 hours.
>
> Sorry, I tri
Thanks very much Johannes.
On Wed, 2011-04-06 at 16:11 +0200, Johannes Ring wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 3:12 PM, Adam C Powell IV wrote:
> > Hi Johannes,
> >
> > On Wed, 2011-04-06 at 14:37 +0200, Johannes Ring wrote:
> >> Hi Adam,
> >>
> >>
Hello again,
On Tue, 2011-04-05 at 20:04 -0400, Adam C Powell IV wrote:
> Hello Anton,
>
> On Tue, 2011-04-05 at 21:41 +0200, Anton Gladky wrote:
> > Adam,
> >
> > what do you think, can this bug be related to #619935?
> >
> > Anton
>
> Possib
tags 602660 pending
tags 605294 pending
tags 608902 pending
thanks
Finally got some time for this package; these bugs are fixed in alioth
(I think, didn't try to build on any LAM architectures) and I'll upload
as soon as I get around to updating to upstream patch level 8 (bug ).
-Adam
--
GPG fin
Greetings,
Bug 621037 in scotch also bit gmsh [1], at least on amd64 and powerpc.
(armel, mips[el] and s390 FTBFS because of what looks like a LAM bug.)
Can you please give back gmsh on amd64 and powerpc?
[1] http://bugs.debian.org/621003
In the near future, mpi-defaults may switch from LAM to M
found 619931 4.9.13.dfsg-2
thanks
This builds with 6.5.0, but not 6.3.0, so the Build-Dep needs to reflect
that by being versioned.
-Adam
On Wed, 2011-03-30 at 09:33 -0400, Adam C Powell IV wrote:
> severity 619931 serious
> thanks
>
> OCC 6.5.0 is now in unstable, so this bug is
On Wed, 2011-04-13 at 23:00 +0200, Francesco Poli wrote:
> On Wed, 13 Apr 2011 16:43:37 -0400 Adam C Powell IV wrote:
>
> [...]
> > Hi Francesco,
>
> Hi Adam!
>
> >
> > You mentioned elsewhere (I think your bug against salome) that the
> > CeCILL
Source: freecad
Version: 0.11.3729.dfsg-1
Severity: serious
FreeCAD FTBFS on all arches. Looks like the problem is lack of a
Fortran compiler.
-Adam
--
GPG fingerprint: D54D 1AEE B11C CE9B A02B C5DD 526F 01E8 564E E4B6
Engineering consulting with open source tools
http://www.opennovation.com/
found 618241 0.11.3729.dfsg-1
thanks
This is not yet fixed, it requires libqtwebkit-dev in Build-Depends.
-Adam
--
GPG fingerprint: D54D 1AEE B11C CE9B A02B C5DD 526F 01E8 564E E4B6
Engineering consulting with open source tools
http://www.opennovation.com/
signature.asc
Description: This is
tags 622694 pending
thanks
Fixed in alioth.
On Wed, 2011-04-13 at 18:54 -0400, Adam C Powell IV wrote:
> Source: freecad
> Version: 0.11.3729.dfsg-1
> Severity: serious
>
> FreeCAD FTBFS on all arches. Looks like the problem is lack of a
> Fortran compiler.
>
> -Adam
-
On Thu, 2012-04-19 at 21:35 +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> Source: illuminator
> Version: 0.11.0-13
> Severity: serious
> Tags: wheezy sid
> User: debian...@lists.debian.org
> Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120419 qa-ftbfs
> Justification: FTBFS on amd64
>
> Hi,
>
> During a rebuild of all packages in sid,
201 - 242 of 242 matches
Mail list logo
