On Fri, 2011-04-01 at 14:05 +0200, Johannes Ring wrote: > Hi Adam and Pierre, > > On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 1:38 PM, Adam C Powell IV <hazel...@debian.org> > wrote: > > * I noticed that you removed -I/usr/include/lam from the CCS > and > > CCD commands. I don't remember the exact reasons, but those > > were required for the LAM architectures. /usr/include/mpi > > should be a symlink to /usr/include/lam, but for some reason > > that didn't work. I think it's a worthy goal to try to > remove > > that for the next upload, but would rather leave it in for > this > > one. > > I usually set CCS and CCD to point to mpicc (same as CCP) when I > compile scotch. Would that work on the LAM architectures?
Good point, that should work on all arches. I'll use that, and leave /usr/include/lam for now in CFLAGS as well, then we can take both includes out of CFLAGS in a later upload. -Adam -- GPG fingerprint: D54D 1AEE B11C CE9B A02B C5DD 526F 01E8 564E E4B6 Engineering consulting with open source tools http://www.opennovation.com/
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
