Processing control commands:
> tags -1 + wontfix
Bug #951911 [librelp0] OpenSSL linking without license exception
Added tag(s) wontfix.
--
951911: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=951911
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Control: tags -1 + wontfix
On Sun, 23 Feb 2020 02:04:13 +0100 Bastian Germann
wrote:
> Package: librelp0
> Severity: serious
>
> With the latest version, this package links to OpenSSL even though it
> does not have any license exception for it. ftp-master considers this a
> serious issue. As Gnu
Le Mercredi, Février 26, 2020 06:45 CET, Xavier a écrit:
> Le 25/02/2020 à 22:19, Jonas Smedegaard a écrit :
> > Quoting Bastien ROUCARIES (2020-02-25 21:13:48)
> >> Le mar. 25 févr. 2020 à 19:48, Jonas Smedegaard a écrit :
> >>
> >>> control: reassign -1 node-espree
> >>> control: affects -1 no
Source: spectral-cube
Version: 0.4.5-1
Severity: serious
Astropy was recently updated to support the new version of wcslib.
Unfortunately this fix is being blocked from migrating to testing by an
autopkgtest failure in spectral-cube, this is happening in both in migration
tests and in plain un
On Wed, 26 Feb 2020 08:43:32 +0100 Ansgar wrote:
> block 952399 by 924937
> thanks
>
> Ansgar writes:
> > the OpenSSL ./. GPL problem (if one sees it as a problem) is larger
> > than just libpq5: just looking at a small sample of the direct rdeps of
> > libssl1.1, one can find the following GPL-l
On Sun, 23 Feb 2020 20:35:40 +0100 Bastian Germann
wrote:
> Package: kmod
> Version: 26-1
> Severity: serious
>
> All of the GPL-2+ licensed executables contained in the kmod binary
> package link to libcrypto even though they do not have any OpenSSL
> license exception. ftp-master considers this
On Feb 26, Michael Biebl wrote:
> Doesn't really help to add such a license exception as you also need to
> consider users of libkmod and check the rdep tree recursively.
>
> Imho the only sane way to deal with this is to treat OpenSSL as a system
> library and apparently other distros with actu
Hi David,
I am sorry, I made the php-defaults upload as a mistake, but decided
to fill a transition bug after I did that keeping the upload.
The src:php-defaults transition is blocked until all the extensions are
rebuilt (almost done) and the core PHP components are updated at least.
Ondrej
--
O
Also it builds now just fine in unstable:
+--+
| Summary |
+--+
Build Archit
Processing control commands:
> fixed 951329 user-mode-linux/5.4-1um-2
Bug #951329 [user-mode-linux] FTBFS in buster with linux-source-4.19 4.19.98-1
Marked as fixed in versions user-mode-linux/5.4-1um-2.
--
951329: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=951329
Debian Bug Tracking Syst
Control: fixed 951329 user-mode-linux/5.4-1um-2
El 25/02/20 a las 21:05, Adam D. Barratt escribió:
> Control: tags -1 + moreinfo
>
> On Mon, 2020-02-24 at 14:49 +0100, Santiago R.R. wrote:
> > I would like to upload user-mode-linux to buster to fix this FTBFS:
> > https://bugs.debian.org/951329.
Processing control commands:
> fixed 951329 user-mode-linux/5.4-1um-2
Bug #951329 [user-mode-linux] FTBFS in buster with linux-source-4.19 4.19.98-1
Marked as fixed in versions user-mode-linux/5.4-1um-2; no longer marked as
fixed in versions user-mode-linux/5.4-1um-2.
--
951329: https://bugs.de
Your message dated Wed, 26 Feb 2020 10:08:38 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#915258: fixed in gtk-gnutella 1.1.15-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #915258,
regarding gtk-gnutella FTBFS with glibc 2.28
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt wit
Hi Ritesh,
I've just made another MR to modify the changelog entry.
Also, please, remember to create a tag for the release once it get
approved (and uploaded).
Cheers,
-- Santiago
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Your message dated Wed, 26 Feb 2020 10:08:46 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#952170: fixed in libconfig-model-dpkg-perl 2.130
has caused the Debian Bug report #952170,
regarding libconfig-model-dpkg-perl: FTBFS: dh_auto_test: error: perl Build
test --verbose 1 returned exit code 255
to
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 pending
Bug #952005 [src:zaqar] zaqar: FTBFS: make[1]: pyversions: Command not found
Added tag(s) pending.
--
952005: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=952005
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #952005 in zaqar reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
https://salsa.debian.org/openstack-team/services/zaqar/-/commit/e3c098b85833b551d23c8
Your message dated Wed, 26 Feb 2020 00:43:35 -1000
with message-id <66144e76-44a8-d182-21a2-f66017ffe...@tilapin.org>
and subject line Re: [pkg-php-pear] Bug#952337: Bug#952337: php-mockery: FTBFS:
Class 'DOMDocument' not found
has caused the Debian Bug report #952337,
regarding php-mockery: FTBFS
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #951949 in ironic reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
https://salsa.debian.org/openstack-team/services/ironic/-/commit/f5565558d61c6a8ff3e
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 pending
Bug #951949 [src:ironic] ironic: FTBFS: FileNotFoundError: [Errno 2] No such
file or directory: '/tmp/tmpvywf2zgw/tmpsv87ez1t'
Added tag(s) pending.
--
951949: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=951949
Debian Bug Tracking System
Conta
Your message dated Wed, 26 Feb 2020 11:08:13 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#951949: fixed in ironic 1:13.0.1-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #951949,
regarding ironic: FTBFS: FileNotFoundError: [Errno 2] No such file or
directory: '/tmp/tmpvywf2zgw/tmpsv87ez1t'
to be marked as done
On Sun, 09 Feb 2020 at 19:19:24 +, Simon McVittie wrote:
> On Sun, 09 Feb 2020 at 16:45:05 +0100, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> > I see glib2.0 is also failing in the r-b infra:
> > https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian/rb-pkg/unstable/amd64/glib2.0.html
>
> We could probably work around this
Your message dated Wed, 26 Feb 2020 11:35:11 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#947567: fixed in libnxt 0.3-9.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #947567,
regarding FTBFS with scons 3.1.2-1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not
Your message dated Wed, 26 Feb 2020 11:51:22 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#952573: fixed in spectral-cube 0.4.5-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #952573,
regarding spectral-cube: autopkgtest failure (blocks astropy migration)
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the
Source: gnome-builder
Version: 3.35.91-1
Severity: serious
Hello, your package FTBFS with llvm-defaults pointing to 9.
However, it looks like this FTBFS is unrelated to a first guess
[364/1140] cc -Isrc/libide/lsp/c4d0eae@@ide-lsp-3.35@sta -Isrc/libide/lsp
-I../src/libide/lsp -Isrc/libide/code
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 952582 + ftbfs
Bug #952582 [src:gnome-builder] gnome-builder: ftbfs on i386
Added tag(s) ftbfs.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
952582: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=952582
Hi Benjamin,
On Mon, Feb 24, 2020 at 03:47:21PM -0500, Benjamin Redelings wrote:
> I will take a look.
Thanks.
> The cause is not completely obvious: The compile failure goes away when
> using either (i) clang instead of gcc, or (ii) version 3.5 of
> nlohmann-json. It also does not occur with
Package: mps-youtube
Version: 0.2.7.1-2
Severity: grave
Tags: upstream
Justification: renders package unusable
Dear Maintainer,
It seems that google has disabled mps-youtube's api key, so it can no longer
search for videos. Here is the full discussion on the project's github page
https://github.c
Your message dated Wed, 26 Feb 2020 12:37:12 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#951890: fixed in solfege 3.23.4-7
has caused the Debian Bug report #951890,
regarding solfege: Missing build dependency on dh-python
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been de
Source: cgal
Version: 5.0.2-1
Severity: serious
tags: patch
hello, your package FTBFS on armhf
Not sure if the following patch is enough or there is another bug somewhere,
but it works
diff -Nru cgal-5.0.2/debian/changelog cgal-5.0.2/debian/changelog
--- cgal-5.0.2/debian/changelog 2020-02-25 2
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 pending
Bug #952077 [src:ruby-rgen] ruby-rgen: FTBFS: ERROR: Test "ruby2.7" failed:
Error: test_float(MetamodelFromEcoreTest): NoMethodError: undefined method
`new' for BigDecimal:Class
Added tag(s) pending.
--
952077: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugre
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #952077 in ruby-rgen reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
https://salsa.debian.org/ruby-team/ruby-rgen/-/commit/7188b120be141d6121fdd8909a5
Your message dated Wed, 26 Feb 2020 13:09:32 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#952077: fixed in ruby-rgen 0.8.4-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #952077,
regarding ruby-rgen: FTBFS: ERROR: Test "ruby2.7" failed: Error:
test_float(MetamodelFromEcoreTest): NoMethodError: undefined method
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> severity 952572 grave
Bug #952572 [procps] procps: move binaries back to /bin
Severity set to 'grave' from 'important'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
952572: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugrep
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> affects 952572 postgresql-common
Bug #952572 [procps] procps: move binaries back to /bin
Added indication that 952572 affects postgresql-common
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
952572: https://bugs.
Source: ruby-rspeak
Version: 1.0.4-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: sid
Usertags: ruby2.7-transition
Hi there,
the newly accepted ruby-espeak fails to test successfully with Ruby2.7. The
reason seems that CSV.parse() has a behavior change. It does not parse the file
test/fi
thank you Andreas!!!
re etelemetry&heudiconv: I made it optional for previous version of the
package:
$> quilt series
deb-no-demand-on-etelemetry
$> git describe
debian/0.6.0-1
On Tue, 25 Feb 2020, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Hi,
> here is some update I'm also for
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 pending
Bug #952069 [src:ruby-http-form-data] ruby-http-form-data: FTBFS: ERROR: Test
"ruby2.7" failed: Failure/Error: outbuf = outbuf.to_s.clear
Added tag(s) pending.
--
952069: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=952069
Debian Bug Tracking S
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #952069 in ruby-http-form-data reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
https://salsa.debian.org/ruby-team/ruby-http-form-data/-/commit/b656ecd
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 948974 + fixed-upstream
Bug #948974 [src:logging-tree] logging-tree ftbfs, failing tests
Added tag(s) fixed-upstream.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
948974: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bu
Your message dated Wed, 26 Feb 2020 13:50:39 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#950098: fixed in patsy 0.5.1-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #950098,
regarding patsy: exceptions in documentation, FTBFS with new ipython
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem ha
This error means that your settings.json config file has been corrupted or is
not correctly formatted for the micro version you are using.
Most likely scenario: you ran micro v2.x.x, which changes the setttings.json
format, then tried to go back to using v1.x.x.
Solution:
rm ~/.config/micro/sett
Package: libx11-dev
Version: 2:1.6.9-1
Severity: serious
Justification: fails to install
Dear Maintainer,
When trying to install the latest version of libx11-dev, I get the following
error:
Unpacking libx11-dev:amd64 (2:1.6.9-1) ...
dpkg: error processing archive .../097-libx11-dev_2%3a1.6.9
Package: src:ruby-influxdb
Followup-For: Bug #891743
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Upstream fixed this. The relevant patch is attached. However there seem to be
more issues now:
The error is always the same:
Failure/Error: parsed_response = JSON.parse(response.body)
Package: python3-urllib3
Version: 1.25.8-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Dear Maintainer,
there is an incompatilibity of python3-urllib3 with python3-six
1.14.0-2. I failed to use python3-requests and while analyzing the problem
further found a problem in urllib3...
This
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #891743 in ruby-influxdb reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
https://salsa.debian.org/ruby-team/ruby-influxdb/-/commit/d637f2f3089a9755255
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 pending
Bug #891743 [src:ruby-influxdb] ruby-influxdb: FTBFS with ruby2.5: Failed
examples: rspec ./spec/influxdb/client_spec.rb:47 # InfluxDB::Client#full_url
escapes params
Added tag(s) pending.
--
891743: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bu
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 + moreinfo unreproducible
Bug #952591 [python3-urllib3] python3-urllib3: doesn't work with python3-six
1.14.0-2
Added tag(s) moreinfo and unreproducible.
--
952591: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=952591
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact
Control: tags -1 + moreinfo unreproducible
On Wed, 26 Feb 2020 at 15:24:26 +0100, Vaclav Ovsik wrote:
> there is an incompatilibity of python3-urllib3 with python3-six
> 1.14.0-2
...
> AttributeError: module 'six' has no attribute 'ensure_str'
Are you sure you're not using an older local copy of
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> severity 944769 serious
Bug #944769 [python3-h5py] python3-h5py fails to import if offline due to
apparent MPI failure
Severity set to 'serious' from 'important'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
94
On Wed, 5 Feb 2020, Scott Talbert wrote:
It's done, there's even a release 1.8.rc3.
I need to convince myself to release 1.8.0 proper :-)
Please convince yourself and I'll upload.
Agree, consider this another prod to convince yourself. :) The wxPython 3.0
reverse depends are dwindling do
Your message dated Wed, 26 Feb 2020 14:52:44 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#952069: fixed in ruby-http-form-data 2.2.0-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #952069,
regarding ruby-http-form-data: FTBFS: ERROR: Test "ruby2.7" failed:
Failure/Error: outbuf = outbuf.to_s.clear
to be marked
On Wed, Feb 26, 2020 at 02:42:31PM +, Simon McVittie wrote:
> Control: tags -1 + moreinfo unreproducible
>
> On Wed, 26 Feb 2020 at 15:24:26 +0100, Vaclav Ovsik wrote:
> > there is an incompatilibity of python3-urllib3 with python3-six
> > 1.14.0-2
> ...
> > AttributeError: module 'six' has no
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> severity 952591 normal
Bug #952591 [python3-urllib3] python3-urllib3: doesn't work with python3-six
1.14.0-2
Severity set to 'normal' from 'grave'
> notfound 952591 1.25.8-1
Bug #952591 [python3-urllib3] python3-urllib3: doesn't work with python3
Processing control commands:
> reassign -1 laptop-mode-tools
Bug #952506 [systemd] Wired interface name maybe changed when reboot
Bug reassigned from package 'systemd' to 'laptop-mode-tools'.
No longer marked as found in versions systemd/244.3-1.
Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #95
Source: gdcm
Version: 3.0.4-2
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
swig3.0 has been replaced with swig4.0,
but in most cases swig is the correct
package to build depend on.
Your message dated Wed, 26 Feb 2020 16:01:18 +0100
with message-id <16e125c8-0ca3-81be-2c9b-4a4993393...@mailbox.org>
and subject line Re: radare2-cutter ftbfs with radare2 3.9
has caused the Debian Bug report #948158,
regarding radare2-cutter ftbfs with radare2 3.9
to be marked as done.
This mean
Source: mathgl
Version: 2.4.4-5
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
swig3.0 has been replaced with swig4.0,
but in most cases swig is the correct
package to build depend on.
Source: gyoto
Version: 1.4.3-1
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
swig3.0 has been replaced with swig4.0,
but in most cases swig is the correct
package to build depend on.
Source: insighttoolkit4
Version: 4.13.2-dfsg1-6
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
swig3.0 has been replaced with swig4.0,
but in most cases swig is the correct
package to build depend on.
Source: siconos
Version: 4.2.0+git20181026.0ee5349+dfsg.2-2
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
swig3.0 has been replaced with swig4.0,
but in most cases swig is the correct
package to build depend on.
Source: znc
Version: 1.7.5-2
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
swig3.0 has been replaced with swig4.0,
but in most cases swig is the correct
package to build depend on.
On Wed, Feb 26, 2020 at 08:37:30AM -0500, Yaroslav Halchenko wrote:
> thank you Andreas!!!
>
> re etelemetry&heudiconv: I made it optional for previous version of the
> package:
>
> $> quilt series
> deb-no-demand-on-etelemetry
>
> $> git describe
> debian/0.6.0-1
Thank
OK, thank you very much! I will wait for all things are fine again! Thank you
again!
> -原始邮件-
> 发件人: "Michael Biebl"
> 发送时间: 2020-02-26 23:09:22 (星期三)
> 收件人: wg...@china.com, 952...@bugs.debian.org,
> laptop-mode-to...@packages.debian.org
> 抄送:
> 主题: Re: Bug#952506: Re: Bug#952506: W
Hi!
On Wed, 26 Feb 2020 17:17:03 +0300 Dmitry Shachnev wrote:
>
> Unpacking libx11-dev:amd64 (2:1.6.9-1) ...
> dpkg: error processing archive .../097-libx11-dev_2%3a1.6.9-1_amd64.deb
> (--unpack):
>trying to overwrite '/usr/include/X11/extensions/XKBgeom.h', which is also
> in package x
Your message dated Wed, 26 Feb 2020 15:49:27 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#891743: fixed in ruby-influxdb 0.8.0-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #891743,
regarding ruby-influxdb: FTBFS with ruby2.5: Failed examples: rspec
./spec/influxdb/client_spec.rb:47 # InfluxDB::Client#full_ur
On 26.2.2020 16.17, Dmitry Shachnev wrote:
> Package: libx11-dev
> Version: 2:1.6.9-1
> Severity: serious
> Justification: fails to install
>
> Dear Maintainer,
>
> When trying to install the latest version of libx11-dev, I get the following
> error:
>
> Unpacking libx11-dev:amd64 (2:1.6.9-1)
Package: src:php-defaults
Version: 73
Severity: serious
Justification: at maintainer request
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Block the transition; request by maintainer
- -- System Information:
Debian Release: 10.3
APT prefers stable-updates
APT policy: (500, 'stable-updates'
Source: meson
Version: 0.53.2-1
Severity: serious
Hello, looks like you have an autopkgtest failure left with the new version...
Can you please also consider the following patch to fix some autopkgtest and
include some more test that are now
not run because of rustc/valac not installed in the e
Source: sagemath
Version: 9.0-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20200225 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
This rebuild was done by building only architecture:any binary pack
Source: haskell-cmdargs
Version: 0.10.20-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20200225 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
This rebuild was done by building only architecture:any
Source: libixion
Version: 0.15.0-3
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20200225 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
This rebuild was done by building only architecture:any binary p
Source: sra-sdk
Version: 2.9.3+dfsg-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20200225 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
This rebuild was done by building only architecture:any binar
Source: nheko
Version: 0.6.4-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20200225 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
This rebuild was done by building only architecture:any binary packa
Source: clips
Version: 6.30-4
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20200225 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
This rebuild was done by building only architecture:any binary packag
Source: brig
Version: 0.95+dfsg-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20200225 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
This rebuild was done by building only architecture:any binary pa
Source: skesa
Version: 2.3.0-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20200225 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
This rebuild was done by building only architecture:any binary packa
Source: hinge
Version: 0.5.0-5
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20200225 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
This rebuild was done by building only architecture:any binary packa
Source: myproxy
Version: 6.2.6-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20200225 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
This rebuild was done by building only architecture:any binary pac
Source: dropwatch
Version: 1.5.1-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20200225 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
This rebuild was done by building only architecture:any binary p
Source: deltachat-core
Version: 0.39.0+ds-0.1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20200225 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
This rebuild was done by building only architecture:a
Source: cairo-dock-plug-ins
Version: 3.4.1-5
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20200225 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
This rebuild was done by building only architecture:an
Source: ruby-concurrent-ext
Version: 1.0.5-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20200225 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
This rebuild was done by building only architecture:an
Source: libmemcached-libmemcached-perl
Version: 1.001801+dfsg-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20200225 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
This rebuild was done by building o
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> # fix bts confusion
> notfixed 950608 2:6.2.0+dfsg-3
Bug #950608 {Done: s...@debian.org (Steve M. Robbins)} [src:gmp] gmp 6.2.0
crashes postgresql-pgmp
No longer marked as fixed in versions gmp/2:6.2.0+dfsg-3.
> notfixed 951229 1.9.1-1
Bug #95122
On Wed, 26 Feb 2020 at 17:47:07 +0200, Timo Aaltonen wrote:
> On 26.2.2020 16.17, Dmitry Shachnev wrote:
> > Unpacking libx11-dev:amd64 (2:1.6.9-1) ...
> > dpkg: error processing archive .../097-libx11-dev_2%3a1.6.9-1_amd64.deb
> > (--unpack):
> >trying to overwrite '/usr/include/X11/exten
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 951247 + sid bullseye
Bug #951247 {Done: Debian FTP Masters }
[src:html2canvas] html2canvas: build-depends on removed package libjs-mocha
Added tag(s) bullseye and sid.
> found 933439 1:2.3.2-6
Bug #933439 [src:amule] amule: Please rebuild a
Your message dated Wed, 26 Feb 2020 16:50:30 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#952602: fixed in znc 1.7.5-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #952602,
regarding znc build depends on the removed swig3.0
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
I
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 pending
Bug #952088 [src:ruby-tins] ruby-tins: FTBFS: ERROR: Test "ruby2.7" failed:
/usr/lib/ruby/2.7.0/rubygems/core_ext/kernel_require.rb:92:in `require': cannot
load such file -- sync (LoadError)
Added tag(s) pending.
--
952088: https://bugs.debian.org/
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #952088 in ruby-tins reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
https://salsa.debian.org/ruby-team/ruby-tins/-/commit/efb385459283ff994f24640c950
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 951423 libphobos76 9.2.1-28
Bug #951423 [gunroar] gunroar: symbol lookup error: gunroar: undefined symbol:
_D4core4stdc5errno5errnoFNbNdNiNeZi
Bug reassigned from package 'gunroar' to 'libphobos76'.
Warning: Unknown package 'libphobos76'
Control: reassign -1 haskell-devscripts 0.15.2
On Wed, Feb 26, 2020 at 05:13PM, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> Hi,
>
> During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
> amd64.
Hey Lucas,
Thanks for reporting this. The latest version of haskell-devscripts now
ensures that the
Processing control commands:
> reassign -1 haskell-devscripts 0.15.2
Bug #952617 [src:haskell-cmdargs] haskell-cmdargs: FTBFS: ln: extra operand
'debian/libghc-cmdargs-doc/usr/lib/ghc-doc/hoogle/libghc-cmdargs-doc.txt'
Bug reassigned from package 'src:haskell-cmdargs' to 'haskell-devscripts'.
No
Processing control commands:
> reassign -1 procps
Bug #952612 [src:libmemcached-libmemcached-perl]
libmemcached-libmemcached-perl: FTBFS: /bin/sh: 1: /bin/kill: not found
Bug reassigned from package 'src:libmemcached-libmemcached-perl' to 'procps'.
No longer marked as found in versions
libmemcac
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> retitle 952625 libspdlog-dev: .pc Requires: fmt which doesn't have a .pc
> file, breaking pkg-config on spdlog.pc
Bug #952625 [src:libixion] libixion: FTBFS: configure: error: Package
requirements (spdlog >= 0.16.0) were not met
Changed Bug titl
Control: reassign -1 procps
Control: forcemerge 952612 -1
Control: affects -1 src:libmemcached-libmemcached-perl
On Wed, 26 Feb 2020 17:15:24 +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> Source: libmemcached-libmemcached-perl
> Version: 1.001801+dfsg-2
> Severity: serious
> Justification: FTBFS on amd64
> Tags
Your message dated Wed, 26 Feb 2020 17:08:54 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#952088: fixed in ruby-tins 1.1.0-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #952088,
regarding ruby-tins: FTBFS: ERROR: Test "ruby2.7" failed:
/usr/lib/ruby/2.7.0/rubygems/core_ext/kernel_require.rb:92:in `require': c
Your message dated Wed, 26 Feb 2020 17:08:00 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#952589: fixed in libx11 2:1.6.9-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #952589,
regarding libx11-dev: trying to overwrite
'/usr/include/X11/extensions/XKBgeom.h', which is also in package x11proto-dev
2018.4-4
to
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 952625 - sid
Bug #952625 [libspdlog-dev] libspdlog-dev: .pc Requires: fmt which doesn't have
a .pc file, breaking pkg-config on spdlog.pc
Removed tag(s) sid.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
9
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 952625 - bullseye
Bug #952625 [libspdlog-dev] libspdlog-dev: .pc Requires: fmt which doesn't have
a .pc file, breaking pkg-config on spdlog.pc
Removed tag(s) bullseye.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assista
1 - 100 of 194 matches
Mail list logo