Your message dated Wed, 26 Feb 2020 17:08:54 +0000
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Bug#952088: fixed in ruby-tins 1.1.0-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #952088,
regarding ruby-tins: FTBFS: ERROR: Test "ruby2.7" failed: 
/usr/lib/ruby/2.7.0/rubygems/core_ext/kernel_require.rb:92:in `require': cannot 
load such file -- sync (LoadError)
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)


-- 
952088: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=952088
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Source: ruby-tins
Version: 1.1.0-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: buster sid
Usertags: ftbfs-20200222 ftbfs-buster

Hi,

During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.

Relevant part (hopefully):
> /usr/lib/ruby/2.7.0/rubygems/core_ext/kernel_require.rb:92:in `require': 
> cannot load such file -- sync (LoadError)
>       from /usr/lib/ruby/2.7.0/rubygems/core_ext/kernel_require.rb:92:in 
> `require'
>       from 
> /<<PKGBUILDDIR>>/debian/ruby-tins/usr/lib/ruby/vendor_ruby/tins/dslkit.rb:3:in
>  `<top (required)>'
>       from /usr/lib/ruby/2.7.0/rubygems/core_ext/kernel_require.rb:92:in 
> `require'
>       from /usr/lib/ruby/2.7.0/rubygems/core_ext/kernel_require.rb:92:in 
> `require'
>       from 
> /<<PKGBUILDDIR>>/debian/ruby-tins/usr/lib/ruby/vendor_ruby/tins.rb:51:in 
> `<module:Tins>'
>       from 
> /<<PKGBUILDDIR>>/debian/ruby-tins/usr/lib/ruby/vendor_ruby/tins.rb:1:in `<top 
> (required)>'
>       from /usr/lib/ruby/2.7.0/rubygems/core_ext/kernel_require.rb:92:in 
> `require'
>       from /usr/lib/ruby/2.7.0/rubygems/core_ext/kernel_require.rb:92:in 
> `require'
>       from 
> /<<PKGBUILDDIR>>/debian/ruby-tins/usr/lib/ruby/vendor_ruby/tins/xt.rb:1:in 
> `<top (required)>'
>       from /usr/lib/ruby/2.7.0/rubygems/core_ext/kernel_require.rb:92:in 
> `require'
>       from /usr/lib/ruby/2.7.0/rubygems/core_ext/kernel_require.rb:92:in 
> `require'
>       from /<<PKGBUILDDIR>>/tests/deep_dup_test.rb:2:in `<top (required)>'
>       from /usr/lib/ruby/2.7.0/rubygems/core_ext/kernel_require.rb:92:in 
> `require'
>       from /usr/lib/ruby/2.7.0/rubygems/core_ext/kernel_require.rb:92:in 
> `require'
>       from debian/ruby-tests.rb:2:in `block in <main>'
>       from debian/ruby-tests.rb:2:in `each'
>       from debian/ruby-tests.rb:2:in `<main>'
> ERROR: Test "ruby2.7" failed: 

The full build log is available from:
   http://qa-logs.debian.net/2020/02/22/ruby-tins_1.1.0-1_unstable.log

A list of current common problems and possible solutions is available at
http://wiki.debian.org/qa.debian.org/FTBFS . You're welcome to contribute!

About the archive rebuild: The rebuild was done on EC2 VM instances from
Amazon Web Services, using a clean, minimal and up-to-date chroot. Every
failed build was retried once to eliminate random failures.

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: ruby-tins
Source-Version: 1.1.0-2
Done: Lucas Kanashiro <[email protected]>

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
ruby-tins, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive.

A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [email protected],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Lucas Kanashiro <[email protected]> (supplier of updated ruby-tins 
package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [email protected])


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

Format: 1.8
Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2020 13:50:05 -0300
Source: ruby-tins
Architecture: source
Version: 1.1.0-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian Ruby Extras Maintainers 
<[email protected]>
Changed-By: Lucas Kanashiro <[email protected]>
Closes: 952088
Changes:
 ruby-tins (1.1.0-2) unstable; urgency=medium
 .
   * Team upload.
 .
   [ Cédric Boutillier ]
   * Bump debhelper compatibility level to 9
   * Remove version in the gem2deb build-dependency
   * Use https:// in Vcs-* fields
   * Use https:// in Vcs-* fields
   * Bump Standards-Version to 3.9.7 (no changes needed)
   * Run wrap-and-sort on packaging files
 .
   [ Utkarsh Gupta ]
   * Add salsa-ci.yml
 .
   [ Lucas Kanashiro ]
   * Add b-d on ruby-sync, it is not bundled in ruby anymore (Closes: #952088)
   * Update VCS urls to point to salsa
   * Bump debhelper compatibility level to 12
   * d/control: rules does not require root
   * Declare compliance with Debian Policy 4.5.0
   * d/copyright: use secure urls in Format and Source fields
   * d/watch: update to use gemwatch.debian.net
   * Enable autodep8 ruby tests
Checksums-Sha1:
 241fe5d03f7be32a2609b5035e4050612a5fda94 2054 ruby-tins_1.1.0-2.dsc
 77b67cba8a1b7779249c66a9185a9fb890f9feed 2652 ruby-tins_1.1.0-2.debian.tar.xz
Checksums-Sha256:
 734ef37e31c0373428c89bf7a7af1f079502a0149b80fc07b804b75841f7c698 2054 
ruby-tins_1.1.0-2.dsc
 bb733c2877fcf7b90e96e16aa4acf8268c03514c9cabdb9dc3e5a20be8e77e94 2652 
ruby-tins_1.1.0-2.debian.tar.xz
Files:
 668520b8c871c766e2d75972230ec230 2054 ruby optional ruby-tins_1.1.0-2.dsc
 86fe3425e8347d1de686331be6e41a4c 2652 ruby optional 
ruby-tins_1.1.0-2.debian.tar.xz

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=hoIa
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--- End Message ---

Reply via email to