Source: h5py
Version: 2.9.0-1
Severity: serious
X-Debbugs-CC: debian...@lists.debian.org
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: regression
Hi Maintainer
Since the upload of 2.9.0-1, h5py has been failing its own
autopkgtests [1] with the following error:
Testing with python3.7:
...s.
Control: found -1 4.3~rc5-1~exp1
Control: tags -1 + upstream patch
Upstream patch submission at
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/20190214151720.23563-1-fdman...@kernel.org/
Regards,
Salvatore
Processing control commands:
> found -1 4.3~rc5-1~exp1
Bug #922306 [src:linux] linux: btrfs corruption (compressed data + hole data)
Ignoring request to alter found versions of bug #922306 to the same values
previously set
> tags -1 + upstream patch
Bug #922306 [src:linux] linux: btrfs corruption
Processing control commands:
> found -1 4.3~rc5-1~exp1
Bug #922306 [src:linux] linux: btrfs corruption (compressed data + hole data)
Marked as found in versions linux/4.3~rc5-1~exp1.
> tags -1 + upstream patch
Bug #922306 [src:linux] linux: btrfs corruption (compressed data + hole data)
Ignoring r
If this is not a spam and you are serious, please repost it to
https://notabug.org/themusicgod1/cloudflare-tor/
thanks
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 831835 + jessie stretch
Bug #831835 [iceweasel] iceweasel: Padlock icon indicates a secure SSL
connection established w MitM-ed
Added tag(s) jessie and stretch.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
-
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #921488 in mariadb-10.3 reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
https://salsa.debian.org/mariadb-team/mariadb-10.3/commit/21008f9fdfe0f13a360c
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 pending
Bug #921488 [libmariadb3] libmariadb3: OpenSSL license contamination of GPL
reverse-dependencies
Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #921488 to the same tags previously set
--
921488: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=921488
Debian
Your message dated Sun, 24 Feb 2019 09:57:00 +
with message-id
and subject line Re: coreutils RC bugs not properly closed
has caused the Debian Bug report #780323,
regarding /bin/cp: cp: *deletes* files' contents with --attributes-only option
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim th
Your message dated Sun, 24 Feb 2019 09:57:00 +
with message-id <1599e831-959d-d1a1-2319-15c0e6cce...@thykier.net>
and subject line Re: coreutils RC bugs not properly closed
has caused the Debian Bug report #743955,
regarding coreutils: corrupted files on heavily fragmented ext3 and ext4
partit
On Sun, Feb 24, 2019 at 12:35:02AM +0100, Dominik George wrote:
> Fedora project seems to know how to fix this, but I cannot get my head
> wrapped around how the hell you find out how they did it…
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1645912
>
> -nik
The fix referenced in the RedHat
Source: sssd
Version: 1.16.3-3
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
After fixing #921761, sssd still fails to build in a clean chroot:
dh_install
dh_install: Cannot find (any
Control: tag -1 + patch
The releveant upstream fix is:
https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/commit/08bba3a6e3e4e21f2e20b71cca463d50420aa9ee#diff-7adf0a00d9dca84b2fbdd1759c1ac2a6.patch
With this patch applied, the test passes again.
Unfortunately, sssd still does not build, maybe for some other
incompati
user debian-rele...@lists.debian.org
usertag 92 + bsp-2019-02-de-bonn
tag 92 pending
thank you
Greetings from the BSP taking place at Teckids e.V./tarent solutions
GmbH in Bonn this weekend. I have applied Laure
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> user debian-rele...@lists.debian.org
Setting user to debian-rele...@lists.debian.org (was ben...@debian.org).
> usertag 92 + bsp-2019-02-de-bonn
There were no usertags set.
Usertags are now: bsp-2019-02-de-bonn.
> tag 92 pending
Bug #92000
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 + patch
Bug #921761 [src:sssd] sssd: FTBFS (failing tests)
Added tag(s) patch.
--
921761: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=921761
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Control: tag -1 + pending
Control: tag 921761 + pending
This is due to the check for a matching Kerberos version explicitly
checks all known good versions up to 1.16, but now we have 1.17 in
Debian.
I looked at the upstream changelog and found nothing that could break
the plugin build. Addind 1.1
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 + pending
Bug #923125 [src:sssd] FTBFS: cannot find files in override_dh_install
Added tag(s) pending.
> tag 921761 + pending
Bug #921761 [src:sssd] sssd: FTBFS (failing tests)
Added tag(s) pending.
--
921761: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bu
Your message dated Sun, 24 Feb 2019 11:21:27 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#921761: fixed in sssd 1.16.3-3.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #921761,
regarding sssd: FTBFS (failing tests)
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is
Your message dated Sun, 24 Feb 2019 11:21:27 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#923125: fixed in sssd 1.16.3-3.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #923125,
regarding FTBFS: cannot find files in override_dh_install
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been de
Your message dated Sun, 24 Feb 2019 11:19:44 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#916702: fixed in freezegun 0.3.11-0.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #916702,
regarding freezegun FTBFS: test failures
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If
Your message dated Sun, 24 Feb 2019 11:19:34 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#922404: fixed in freeipmi 1.6.3-1.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #922404,
regarding freeipmi install fails
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is n
user debian-rele...@lists.debian.org
usertag 917216 + bsp-2019-02-de-bonn
fixed 917216 python-apt 1.8.1
thank you
Greetings from the BSP taking place at Teckids e.V./tarent solutions
GmbH in Bonn this weekend.
This bug can be closed as the fix was added before python-apt/1.8.1 by
yourself:
,
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 pending
Bug #899907 [src:libvorbisidec] libvorbisidec: Invalid maintainer address
pkg-xiph-ma...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Added tag(s) pending.
--
899907: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=899907
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #899907 in libvorbisidec reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
https://salsa.debian.org/multimedia-team/libvorbisidec/commit/1574df22367eef0
Hi everyone,
On Sat, 23 Feb 2019 12:16:37 +0100 Carsten Schoenert
wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 03, 2019 at 11:21:19PM +0100, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> > The plugin is broken with Thunderbird 60 in stretch and sid, after
> > installation it's disabled and only prints "Timeline is
> > incompatible with
Hi,
FYI I prepared a patch for jessie, see:
https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts/2019/02/msg00164.html
For stretch, it is worth noting that the fix depends on whether mysql or
mysqli is enabled, whether open_basedir is in effect, and whether we're
protecting against user SQL queries or phpmyadmin-
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> found 917216 1.8.0
Bug #917216 [python-apt] python-apt FTBFS against apt/1.8.0~alpha3
There is no source info for the package 'python-apt' at version '1.8.0' with
architecture ''
Unable to make a source version for version '1.8.0'
Marked as found
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> user debian-rele...@lists.debian.org
Setting user to debian-rele...@lists.debian.org (was ben...@debian.org).
> usertag 915319 + bsp-2019-02-de-bonn
There were no usertags set.
Usertags are now: bsp-2019-02-de-bonn.
> tag 915319 + confirmed
Bug #9
user debian-rele...@lists.debian.org
usertag 915319 + bsp-2019-02-de-bonn
tag 915319 + confirmed
thank you
Greetings from the BSP taking place at Teckids e.V./tarent
solutions GmbH in Bonn this weekend.
I have been abl
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> close 917216
Bug #917216 [python-apt] python-apt FTBFS against apt/1.8.0~alpha3
Marked Bug as done
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
917216: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=917216
D
Hi,
On Sat, 02 Feb 2019 15:38:01 +0100 Didier 'OdyX' Raboud wrote:
> Gunnar and myself have started working on a draft, the latest version of
> which is available at
>
>
> https://salsa.debian.org/debian/tech-ctte/blob/master/914897_merged_usr/ballot.md
I found that some important argume
Your message dated Sun, 24 Feb 2019 13:19:04 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#921030: fixed in ansible-lint 4.1.0+dfsg.1-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #921030,
regarding Fails to import the ansible module since its migration to Python 3
to be marked as done.
This means that you cla
Your message dated Sun, 24 Feb 2019 14:19:13 +0100
with message-id <20190224131913.ga11...@aurel32.net>
and subject line Re: Bug#921296: ccfits: FTBFS with upcoming doxygen 1.8.15
has caused the Debian Bug report #921296,
regarding ccfits: FTBFS with upcoming doxygen 1.8.15
to be marked as done.
T
Processing control commands:
> reassign -1 lxc
Bug #921176 [apparmor] redis-server inside lxc is failing to start when
apparmor is enabled - apparmor="DENIED" operation="mount" info="failed flags
match" error=-13 profile="lxc-container-default-cgns" name="/" pid=6706
comm="(s-server)" flags="rw
Control: reassign -1 lxc
Control: severity -1 important
Hi,
Pirate Praveen:
> In dmesg inside container (same error on the host as well), so it seems
> apparmor is blocking it.
> [14760.307180] audit: type=1400 audit(1549992481.311:156):
> apparmor="DENIED" operation="mount" info="failed flags
lördag 23 februari 2019 kl. 15:26:25 CET skrev Salvatore Bonaccorso:
> On Sun, Jan 13, 2019 at 06:24:36PM +0100, Magnus Holmgren wrote:
> > söndag 13 januari 2019 kl. 08:31:28 CET skrev Salvatore Bonaccorso:
> > > On Fri, Dec 28, 2018 at 10:22:53AM +0100, Moritz Mühlenhoff wrote:
> > > > On Wed,
Control: severity -1 important
On Sat, 23 Feb 2019 21:20:42 -0500 Michael Gilbert
wrote:
> control: severity -1 serious
>
> Increasing severity since policy 10.7.3 is violated:
>
> "Obsolete configuration files without local changes should be removed
> by the package during upgrade."
>
> The f
Processing control commands:
> severity -1 important
Bug #923001 [chromium-ublock-origin] chromium: failed to load extension message
on start
Severity set to 'important' from 'serious'
--
923001: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=923001
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@b
> All of this seems to be related to the dh-exec usage for putting files
> in the xen-utils-common package with a different name. This is the first
> time this package is using dh-exec.
>
> [...]
>
> Interestingly, 'etc/default/xencommons => /etc/default/xen' does not
> result in a similar error?
Hi,
Pierre-Elliott Bécue:
Setting up lxc (1:3.1.0+really3.0.3-2) ...
Warning from stdin (line 1): config file '/etc/apparmor/parser.conf' not
found
Cache read/write disabled: interface file missing. (Kernel needs
AppArmor 2.4 compatibility patch.)
Warning: u
user debian-rele...@lists.debian.org
usertag 921757 + bsp-2019-02-de-bonn
tag 921757 + unreproducible
thank you
Greetings from the BSP taking place at Teckids e.V./tarent
solutions GmbH in Bonn this weekend.
I have tried to reproduce the bug using an up-to-date sid-amd64 chroot
but couldn't.
My
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> user debian-rele...@lists.debian.org
Setting user to debian-rele...@lists.debian.org (was ben...@debian.org).
> usertag 921757 + bsp-2019-02-de-bonn
There were no usertags set.
Usertags are now: bsp-2019-02-de-bonn.
> tag 921757 + unreproducible
B
tags 912122 patch
user debian-rele...@lists.debian.org
usertags 912122 + bsp-2019-02-de-bonn
thanks
Dear maintainer,
find attached the fix for linux-ftpd.
This goes beyond the usual scope of an NMU but it seemed wise to brush
up the entire build system so it is robust for any forseeable changes
tags 912125 patch
user debian-rele...@lists.debian.org
usertags 912125 + bsp-2019-02-de-bonn
thanks
Dear maintainer,
find attached the fix for netkit-ftp.
This goes beyond the usual scope of an NMU but it seemed wise to brush
up the entire build system so it is robust for any forseeable changes
tags 912123 patch
user debian-rele...@lists.debian.org
usertags 912123 + bsp-2019-02-de-bonn
thanks
Dear maintainer,
find attached the fix for linux-ftpd-ssl.
This goes beyond the usual scope of an NMU but it seemed wise to brush
up the entire build system so it is robust for any forseeable chan
tags 912126 patch
user debian-rele...@lists.debian.org
usertags 859224 + bsp-2019-02-de-bonn
usertags 912126 + bsp-2019-02-de-bonn
thanks
Dear maintainer,
find attached the fix for netkit-ftp-ssl.
For #912126, this goes beyond the usual scope of an NMU but it seemed
wise to brush up the entire b
tags 912132 patch
user debian-rele...@lists.debian.org
usertags 912132 + bsp-2019-02-de-bonn
thanks
Dear maintainer,
find attached the fix for netkit-telnet-ssl.
This goes beyond the usual scope of an NMU but it seemed wise to brush
up the entire build system so it is robust for any forseeable c
tags 912131 patch
user debian-rele...@lists.debian.org
usertags 912131 + bsp-2019-02-de-bonn
thanks
Dear maintainer,
find attached the fix for netkit-telnet.
This goes beyond the usual scope of an NMU but it seemed wise to brush
up the entire build system so it is robust for any forseeable chang
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 912122 patch
Bug #912122 [src:linux-ftpd] linux-ftpd misses the generator for configure
Added tag(s) patch.
> tags 912123 patch
Bug #912123 [src:linux-ftpd-ssl] linux-ftpd-ssl misses the generator for
configure
Added tag(s) patch.
> tags 912
Hi Magnus,
>Perhaps wanting to run imapd via remote shell is so rare that there's
>no need to write a NEWS.Debian entry?
in case of doubt just write one, it does not hurt.
Are you going to upload within the next five days or so, or
do you need help? (We’re at a BSP and currently fixing stuff…)
Johannes Schauer writes:
> With how merged-/usr is getting deployed via debootstrap, we are placing more
> of the instructions of how a Debian system is supposed to be setup *outside*
> of
> the packages themselves (and into debootstrap). It would make a cleaner design
> if we could have all neces
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 859224 pending
Bug #859224 [netkit-ftp-ssl] netkit-ftp-ssl: Please migrate to openssl1.1 in
Buster
Added tag(s) pending.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
859224: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bi
On Sun, 24 Feb 2019 14:16:03 +0100 Johannes Schauer wrote:
> I found that some important arguments are still missing. A recent mail by
> Guillem [1] nicely summarizes also many of my own thoughts. I'm going to paste
> the relevant content into this mail for convenience of the reader:
I think thos
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> forcemerge 918825 922260
Bug #918825 {Done: Sebastien Badia } [src:python-ncclient]
python-ncclient: FTBFS with Sphinx 1.8: No module named 'sphinx.ext.pngmath'
Bug #922260 [src:python-ncclient] python-ncclient: FTBFS (Could not import
extension
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 921757 - unreproducible
Bug #921757 [src:os-autoinst] os-autoinst: FTBFS (failing tests)
Removed tag(s) unreproducible.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
921757: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/
tags 921757 - unreproducible
thanks
I still can reproduce the failure I reported. Just checked right now:
https://people.debian.org/~sanvila/build-logs/os-autoinst/
and there are also build failures here:
https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian/rb-pkg/unstable/amd64/os-autoinst.html
and h
On 2019-02-24 16:25:32 [+0100], Christoph Biedl wrote:
> diff -Nru netkit-ftp-ssl-0.17.34+0.2/debian/control
> netkit-ftp-ssl-0.17.34+0.2/debian/control
> --- netkit-ftp-ssl-0.17.34+0.2/debian/control 2017-02-08 18:30:50.0
> +0100
> +++ netkit-ftp-ssl-0.17.34+0.2/debian/control 2019-02-24
Le mardi, 19 février 2019, 01.59:18 h CET Steve McIntyre a écrit :
> While I'm not necessarily disagreeing with the overall point(s) here,
> some of the points in this list of arguments seem dubious at
> best. Maybe you could expand?
Sure. Sorry for publishing a new ballot before answering.
> >*
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> forcemerge 921779 921299 921299 921783 921789 921802 921838 921299
Bug #921779 [src:doxygen] cascade of FTBFS
Unable to merge bugs because:
package of #921783 is 'doxygen' not 'src:doxygen'
package of #921299 is 'doxygen' not 'src:doxygen'
package
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 921299 doxygen
Bug #921299 [doxygen] "Doxygen breaks caffe"
Ignoring request to reassign bug #921299 to the same package
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
921299: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 921299 doxygen
Bug #921299 [doxygen] "Doxygen breaks caffe"
Ignoring request to reassign bug #921299 to the same package
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
921299: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> forcemerge 921779 921299 921299 921783 921789 921802 921838 921299
Bug #921779 [doxygen] cascade of FTBFS
Bug #921783 [doxygen] graphite2: FTBFS (LaTeX error)
Removed indication that 921783 affects src:graphite2
Added indication that 921783 affect
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 921838 doxygen
Bug #921838 [doxygen] ppl: FTBFS (LaTeX error)
Ignoring request to reassign bug #921838 to the same package
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
921838: https://bugs.debian.org/c
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 921779 doxygen
Bug #921779 [src:doxygen] cascade of FTBFS
Bug reassigned from package 'src:doxygen' to 'doxygen'.
No longer marked as found in versions doxygen/1.8.13-10.
Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #921779 to the same
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 921783 doxygen
Bug #921783 [doxygen] graphite2: FTBFS (LaTeX error)
Ignoring request to reassign bug #921783 to the same package
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
921783: https://bugs.debian
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 921802 doxygen
Bug #921802 [doxygen] primesieve: FTBFS (LaTeX error)
Ignoring request to reassign bug #921802 to the same package
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
921802: https://bugs.debia
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 921789 doxygen
Bug #921789 [doxygen] librostlab-blast: FTBFS (LaTeX error)
Ignoring request to reassign bug #921789 to the same package
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
921789: https://bugs
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 921299 doxygen
Bug #921299 [doxygen] "Doxygen breaks caffe"
Ignoring request to reassign bug #921299 to the same package
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
921299: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi
Package: src:leiningen-clojure
Version: 2.8.1-9
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
I tried to build this package in buster but it failed:
[...]
debian/rules build-indep
dh build-indep --with bash-comple
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 920459 doxygen
Bug #920459 [doxygen] Doxygen breaks toulbar2
Ignoring request to reassign bug #920459 to the same package
> forcemerge 921779 920459
Bug #921779 [doxygen] cascade of FTBFS
Bug #921299 [doxygen] "Doxygen breaks caffe"
Bug #
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 921779 - help moreinfo
Bug #921779 [texlive-latex-extra] tabu.sty: Breaks with xcolor in many
circumstances
Bug #920459 [texlive-latex-extra] tabu.sty: Breaks with xcolor in many
circumstances
Bug #921299 [texlive-latex-extra] tabu.sty: Bre
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> found 921779 2018.20190131-1
Bug #921779 [texlive-latex-extra] tabu.sty: Breaks with xcolor in many
circumstances
Bug #920459 [texlive-latex-extra] tabu.sty: Breaks with xcolor in many
circumstances
Bug #921299 [texlive-latex-extra] tabu.sty: Br
reopen 919053
found 919053 2.1.6-1
thanks
I don't know why this was closed, but it's definitely not fixed.
There are build failures here:
https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian/rb-pkg/unstable/amd64/golang-gopkg-square-go-jose.v2.html
and TestVectorsRSA fails also here:
https://ci.debian
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reopen 919053
Bug #919053 {Done: Adrian Bunk }
[src:golang-gopkg-square-go-jose.v2] golang-gopkg-square-go-jose.v2 FTBFS:
FAIL: TestVectorsRSA
Bug reopened
Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #919053 to the same values
previously se
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> outlook 920459 I have a patch and am currently testing r-depends. --mirabilos
Outlook recorded from message bug 920459 message
Outlook recorded from message bug 920459 message
Outlook recorded from message bug 920459 message
Outlook recorded fr
Ok, so...
On 2/24/19 3:39 PM, Santiago Vila wrote:
>> All of this seems to be related to the dh-exec usage for putting files
>> in the xen-utils-common package with a different name. This is the first
>> time this package is using dh-exec.
>>
>> [...]
>>
>> Interestingly, 'etc/default/xencommons =
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #917030 in python-pykmip reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
https://salsa.debian.org/openstack-team/python/python-pykmip/commit/e5f467144
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #917030 in python-pykmip reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
https://salsa.debian.org/openstack-team/python/python-pykmip/commit/3a64ac798
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 pending
Bug #917030 [src:python-pykmip] python-pykmip: CVE-2018-1000872
Added tag(s) pending.
--
917030: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=917030
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 pending
Bug #917030 [src:python-pykmip] python-pykmip: CVE-2018-1000872
Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #917030 to the same tags previously set
--
917030: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=917030
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...
On Sun, Feb 24, 2019 at 02:53:41PM +0100, Magnus Holmgren wrote:
> Perhaps wanting to run imapd via remote shell is so rare that there's no need
> to write a NEWS.Debian entry?
I agree, I don't think this needs a NEWS.Debian.
Cheers,
Moritz
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> affects 921779 + frobby
Bug #921779 [texlive-latex-extra] tabu.sty: Breaks with xcolor in many
circumstances
Bug #920459 [texlive-latex-extra] tabu.sty: Breaks with xcolor in many
circumstances
Bug #921299 [texlive-latex-extra] tabu.sty: Breaks
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> affects 921779 + fltk1.3
Bug #921779 [texlive-latex-extra] tabu.sty: Breaks with xcolor in many
circumstances
Bug #920459 [texlive-latex-extra] tabu.sty: Breaks with xcolor in many
circumstances
Bug #921299 [texlive-latex-extra] tabu.sty: Breaks
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> affects 921779 + src:libstxxl
Bug #921779 [texlive-latex-extra] tabu.sty: Breaks with xcolor in many
circumstances
Bug #920459 [texlive-latex-extra] tabu.sty: Breaks with xcolor in many
circumstances
Bug #921299 [texlive-latex-extra] tabu.sty: B
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> affects 921779 - fltk1.3 frobby
Bug #921779 [texlive-latex-extra] tabu.sty: Breaks with xcolor in many
circumstances
Bug #920459 [texlive-latex-extra] tabu.sty: Breaks with xcolor in many
circumstances
Bug #921299 [texlive-latex-extra] tabu.sty:
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> affects 921779 + src:fltk1.3 src:frobby
Bug #921779 [texlive-latex-extra] tabu.sty: Breaks with xcolor in many
circumstances
Bug #920459 [texlive-latex-extra] tabu.sty: Breaks with xcolor in many
circumstances
Bug #921299 [texlive-latex-extra] t
Le jeudi, 21 février 2019, 15.28:23 h CET Ian Jackson a écrit :
> Back in the wider world, of course many people build packages on
> Debian systems for installation `somewhere else'. I have done it
> myself and probably many of the people reading this message have too.
>
> What is implicitly goin
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> affects 921779 + src:qevercloud
Bug #921779 [texlive-latex-extra] tabu.sty: Breaks with xcolor in many
circumstances
Bug #920459 [texlive-latex-extra] tabu.sty: Breaks with xcolor in many
circumstances
Bug #921299 [texlive-latex-extra] tabu.sty:
Your message dated Sun, 24 Feb 2019 18:20:16 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#917030: fixed in python-pykmip 0.7.0-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #917030,
regarding python-pykmip: CVE-2018-1000872
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
Control: severity 921297 normal
Control: severity 921298 normal
Control: severity 921294 normal
Control: severity 921300 normal
As the new doxygen will not make it into buster (as apparently, it
causes major breakage), there is no need to block reverse dependencies
as long as they build with the d
Processing control commands:
> severity 921297 normal
Bug #921297 [src:qevercloud] qevercloud: FTBFS with upcoming doxygen 1.8.15
Severity set to 'normal' from 'serious'
> severity 921298 normal
Bug #921298 [src:libstxxl] libstxxl: FTBFS with upcoming doxygen 1.8.15
Severity set to 'normal' from '
Control: tag -1 + moreinfo unreproducible
Control: severity -1 important
Hi,
> During upgrade:
>
> [...]
> Setting up tomcat8 (8.5.38-1) ...
> [ ok ] Stopping Tomcat servlet engine: tomcat8.
> [FAIL] Starting Tomcat servlet engine: tomcat8 failed!
> invoke-rc.d: initscript tomcat8, action "resta
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 + moreinfo unreproducible
Bug #922863 [tomcat8] tomcat8: post-installation script subprocess failed
during upgrade
Added tag(s) unreproducible and moreinfo.
> severity -1 important
Bug #922863 [tomcat8] tomcat8: post-installation script subprocess failed
dur
Hi Samuel,
On Sun, Feb 24, 2019 at 03:25:26AM +, Samuel Henrique wrote:
> I'm working on this: https://salsa.debian.org/debian/ansible-lint
> I think i'm close to an upload now, there's only some problems with .js
> sources.
I review your patches and all is right, in particular your removal o
Dear maintainer
This bug is probably very the root-cause to the following bug chain:
ThisBug#915559: coreutils: Use renameat2 from glibc instead of syscall
Leading to: Bug#921924: fakechroot: mv(1) cannot be used inside fakechroot
Leading to: Bug#922572: debootstrap variant fakeroot fails
retitle 920459 tabu: breaks with color and/or xcolor when spread or negative X
coefficients are used
found 920459 2018.20190131-1
forwarded 920459 https://github.com/tabu-fixed/tabu/pull/14
tags 920459 + patch
thanks
Hi Norbert,
please find attached a patch that fixes tabu when either color or
x
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> retitle 920459 tabu: breaks with color and/or xcolor when spread or negative
> X coefficients are used
Bug #920459 [texlive-latex-extra] tabu.sty: Breaks with xcolor in many
circumstances
Bug #921299 [texlive-latex-extra] tabu.sty: Breaks with x
libjogl2-java still FTBFS on armel, mips64el and mipsel. I don't know
why the build process requires so much time on these platforms excluding
mips64el which never built before. On mips the build succeeded after six
hours.
I don't believe that mips and arm architectures are really supported by
ups
söndag 30 december 2018 kl. 09:38:57 CET skrev Salvatore Bonaccorso:
> There is an alternative approach wich was raised by Magnus in the
> respective bug: https://bugs.debian.org/914632#12 (and see followup
> from Moritz).
So, is it OK to upload this (assuming there's no code out there that actua
1 - 100 of 158 matches
Mail list logo
