Hi,
Nicolas Boulenguez wrote:
> --- bash-4.2/debian/changelog
> +++ bash-4.2/debian/changelog
> @@ -1,3 +1,10 @@
> +bash (4.2-5.1) unstable; urgency=low
> +
> + * Non-maintainer upload.
> + * debian/bash.preinst-lib.c: typo in fcntl argument (Closes: #679198).
It would be clearer to users (who
Control: tag -1 + pending
Hi Shawn,
Am Dienstag, den 11.12.2012, 22:56 -0800 schrieb Shawn Landden:
> Source: ghc
> Version: 7.6.1-3
> Severity: serious
> Tags: patch
> Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past)
>
> The patch "armhf_llvm_abi" appears to have b
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 + pending
Bug #695739 [src:ghc] ghc: FTBFS on armhf: braindead rebase of patch that
duplicates upstream fix
Added tag(s) pending.
--
695739: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=695739
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org wit
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 695715 pending
Bug #695715 [src:cflow] cflow: includes non-free documentation (GFDL with
unmodifiable sections)
Added tag(s) pending.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
695715: http://b
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Dear release managers,
today, I chose to fix RC bug #694998. It is a security issue with
MediaWiki 1.19.2 currently in testing, and there are two ways of fixing
this issue. The easiest would be to get the new upstream version 1.19.3
into testing.
On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 04:37:02AM -0500, Thomas Dickey wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 09:55:38AM +0100, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> > Package: lynx-cur
> > Version: 2.8.8dev.15-1
> > Severity: grave
> > Justification: renders package unusable
> >
> > On any https URL[*], I get te following error:
On 2012-12-12 05:08:21 -0500, Thomas Dickey wrote:
> I'm not able to reproduce the problem, either by recompiling, or by
> installing this version on my Debian/testing system. For each
> configuration, lynx accepts the certificate and does not prompt.
The problem occurs when $LYNX_CFG is set, incl
On 12/12/12 09:32, adrin wrote:
> I can not upgrade gdm3 as follows.
This does not necessarily look like gdm3's fault to me.
> dpkg: error processing gdm3 (--configure):
> subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit
> status 1
There does seem to be a bug of some sort here
Control: tags -1 + upstream fixed-upstream patch
Control: fixed -1 2.0.3-1
Control: forwarded -1 https://github.com/Pulse-Eight/libcec/issues/30
On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 09:12:22PM +0100, David Härdeman wrote:
> running cec-client or cec-config results in the following error
> messages:
>
> No dev
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 + upstream fixed-upstream patch
Bug #695702 [cec-utils] cec-utils: Cannot load libcec.so
Added tag(s) upstream, fixed-upstream, and patch.
> fixed -1 2.0.3-1
Bug #695702 [cec-utils] cec-utils: Cannot load libcec.so
Marked as fixed in versions libcec/2.0.3-1.
On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 05:08:21AM -0500, Thomas Dickey wrote:
> I'm not able to reproduce the problem, either by recompiling, or by installing
> this version on my Debian/testing system. For each configuration, lynx
> accepts the certificate and does not prompt.
I tested first with LYNX_CFG unse
tags 695689 pending
thanks
I have a patch to fix the compilation of the unit tests. However test
suite indicate some issues. This is beyond a simple fix. I intent to
still close bug -1, since execution is another issue (see #695690 for
instance)
Thanks.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 695689 pending
Bug #695689 [src:openvdb] openvdb: FTBFS on 32-bit systems:
TestParticlesToLevelSet.c mixes size_t and Index64
Added tag(s) pending.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
695689: htt
On 2012-12-12 06:28:56 -0500, Thomas Dickey wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 05:08:21AM -0500, Thomas Dickey wrote:
> > I'm not able to reproduce the problem, either by recompiling, or
> > by installing this version on my Debian/testing system. For each
> > configuration, lynx accepts the certifica
On 2012-12-12 12:03:39 +0100, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> The problem occurs when $LYNX_CFG is set, including to an empty
> config file.
>
> I can reproduce the problem on my two Debian/unstable machines, but
> not on a Debian 6.0.6 machine, where my user config is the same.
Here's what I get with "
On 2012-12-12 12:03:39 +0100, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> The problem occurs when $LYNX_CFG is set, including to an empty
> config file.
>
> I can reproduce the problem on my two Debian/unstable machines, but
> not on a Debian 6.0.6 machine, where my user config is the same.
I've reverted to lynx-cu
Hi Steve,
2012/12/11 Steve Langasek
> reassign 695698 json-c
> clone 695698 -1
> reassign -1 plymouth
> retitle -1 please move libply-boot-client to /lib in support of mountall
> severity 695566 critical
> forcemerge 695566 695698
> affects 695698 upstart
> thanks
>
> (Raising severity of the ex
Your message dated Wed, 12 Dec 2012 12:17:53 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#695689: fixed in openvdb 0.99.0-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #695689,
regarding openvdb: FTBFS on 32-bit systems: TestParticlesToLevelSet.c mixes
size_t and Index64
to be marked as done.
This means that
reassign 695751 insserv
thanks
Hi adrin,
On 12.12.2012 12:14, Simon McVittie wrote:
> On 12/12/12 09:32, adrin wrote:
>> insserv: warning: script 'K25vpnagentd_init' missing LSB tags and overrides
>> insserv: warning: script 'vpnagentd_init' missing LSB tags and overrides
>> insserv: Starting vp
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 695751 insserv
Bug #695751 [gdm3] gdm: gdm3 update fails due to conflict with laptop-mode-tools
Bug reassigned from package 'gdm3' to 'insserv'.
No longer marked as found in versions gdm3/3.4.1-5.
Ignoring request to alter fixed versions
Your message dated Wed, 12 Dec 2012 12:32:39 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#688603: fixed in mlterm 3.1.2-1.3
has caused the Debian Bug report #688603,
regarding mlterm-tools: copyright file missing after upgrade (policy 12.5)
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the p
Your message dated Wed, 12 Dec 2012 12:32:39 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#688604: fixed in mlterm 3.1.2-1.3
has caused the Debian Bug report #688604,
regarding mlterm-im-scim: copyright file missing after upgrade (policy 12.5)
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the
Your message dated Wed, 12 Dec 2012 12:32:39 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#688606: fixed in mlterm 3.1.2-1.3
has caused the Debian Bug report #688606,
regarding mlterm-im-uim: copyright file missing after upgrade (policy 12.5)
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the
Your message dated Wed, 12 Dec 2012 12:32:39 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#688605: fixed in mlterm 3.1.2-1.3
has caused the Debian Bug report #688605,
regarding mlterm-im-m17nlib: copyright file missing after upgrade (policy 12.5)
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that
Your message dated Wed, 12 Dec 2012 12:32:39 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#694153: fixed in mlterm 3.1.2-1.3
has caused the Debian Bug report #694153,
regarding mlterm, mlterm-tiny: after upgrade from squeeze files are missing in
/usr/share/doc/mlterm-common/
to be marked as done.
T
[Michael Biebl]
>>> insserv: warning: script 'K25vpnagentd_init' missing LSB tags and overrides
>>> insserv: warning: script 'vpnagentd_init' missing LSB tags and overrides
>>> insserv: Starting vpnagentd_init depends on laptop-mode and therefore on
>>> system facility `$all' which can not be true
On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 01:41:26PM +0100, Adrin wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Thanks for the fast follow up. Two files are attached and this is the more
> comprehensive report by adding set -x:
Thanks for the files. The trigger for the problem is "vpnagentd_init",
which lacks LSB headers. But there's nothin
Hi Andreas,
On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 04:40:22PM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Isn't creating a clean Wheezy chroot and building the package there the
> best way to go anyway. I know that "usually" building against unstable
> is the right way to go but besides this we are targeting at Wheezy and
>
Hi Ivo,
thanks for your work on this. I just sponsored the package. Will you
file the unblock bug or should I care for it?
Kind regards
Andreas.
On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 12:53:41AM +0100, Ivo De Decker wrote:
> Control: tag -1 patch pending
>
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, Dec 05, 2012 at 02:12:0
Andreas,
On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 01:58:58PM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
> thanks for your work on this. I just sponsored the package. Will you
> file the unblock bug or should I care for it?
Thanks for the upload. I filed the unblock:
http://bugs.debian.org/695769
Cheers,
Ivo
--
To UNSUBS
Processing control commands:
> reopen -1
Bug #656552 {Done: Arnaud Fontaine } [zope2.12-sandbox]
zope2.12-sandbox: fails to install, remove and install again
'reopen' may be inappropriate when a bug has been closed with a version;
all fixed versions will be cleared, and you may need to re-add the
Control: reopen -1
Hi,
On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 01:01:18PM +0900, Arnaud Fontaine wrote:
> Thanks for your reply. I just uploaded zope-common and will upload Zope
> 2.12 with bumped Pre-Depends on zope-common as soon as a patch is
> available for CVE-2012-5505.
Thanks for the fix in zope-
package: src:python2.6
severity: serious
Hi,
It seems python2.6 2.6.8-1 fails to build on some archs:
https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=python2.6
This also prevents the fix for #639405 from reaching unstable (and testing).
Cheers,
Ivo
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-
Control: reopen -1
Control: fixed -1 2.0.9-1
On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 10:02:48PM +, Holger Levsen wrote:
> Subject: Bug#694355: fixed in munin 2.0.9-1
>
> Source: munin
> Source-Version: 2.0.9-1
Holger,
Thanks for your work on this.
As this bug is still present in testing and unstable, I'm
Hi Ivo,
On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 01:59:44PM +0100, Ivo De Decker wrote:
> Hi Andreas,
>
> On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 04:40:22PM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
> > Isn't creating a clean Wheezy chroot and building the package there the
> > best way to go anyway. I know that "usually" building against un
Processing control commands:
> reopen -1
Bug #694355 {Done: Holger Levsen } [munin-doc] munin-doc:
missing Breaks+Replaces: munin-common (<< 2)
'reopen' may be inappropriate when a bug has been closed with a version;
all fixed versions will be cleared, and you may need to re-add them.
Bug reopene
On 2012-10-04 22:45, brian.thoma...@gmail.com wrote:
> Hi,
>
Hi,
> I'm happy to make whatever changes are necessary to this package, but I'm
> not sure what is gained by providing Breaks for every potential package
> affected by a bouncycastle upgrade. It seems to me more proper that if
> packa
Hi Andreas,
On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 02:47:31PM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
> > BTW did you ask for pre-approval from the release team for this upload? The
> > freeze policy requires this for updates that can't go to unstable.
>
> Hmmm, why do you think that the package can't go to unstable? It b
Hi Ivo,
On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 02:55:50PM +0100, Ivo De Decker wrote:
> Hi Andreas,
>
> On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 02:47:31PM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
> > > BTW did you ask for pre-approval from the release team for this upload?
> > > The
> > > freeze policy requires this for updates that can't
Your message dated Wed, 12 Dec 2012 15:10:43 +0100
with message-id <201212121510.44533.hol...@layer-acht.org>
and subject line Re: [Packaging] Bug#694355: fixed in munin 2.0.9-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #694355,
regarding munin-doc: missing Breaks+Replaces: munin-common (<< 2)
to be marked
# Bcc:ing control
retitle 695690 openvdb: FTBFS: TestCurl finds numeric discrepancies
thanks
"Aaron M. Ucko" writes:
> The test suite's output mostly consists of warnings(?) about
> unregistered types, but wraps up with two errors from TestCurl.cc:
Now that the i386 build gets as far as running
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> # Bcc:ing control
> retitle 695690 openvdb: FTBFS: TestCurl finds numeric discrepancies
Bug #695690 [src:openvdb] openvdb: FTBFS on ia64: TestCurl finds numeric
discrepancies
Changed Bug title to 'openvdb: FTBFS: TestCurl finds numeric discrepanc
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> # http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=656552#61
> tags 656552 patch pending
Bug #656552 [zope2.12-sandbox] zope2.12-sandbox: fails to install, remove and
install again
Added tag(s) pending and patch.
> thanks
Stopping processing here
Your message dated Wed, 12 Dec 2012 15:32:30 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#694145: fixed in cipux-cat-web 3.4.0.3-4.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #694145,
regarding cipux-cat-web, libcipux-cat-web-perl: inconsistent permission
handling of /etc/cipux-cat-web/
to be marked as done
Package: python-reportlab-accel
Version: 2.4-4
Severity: critical
Justification: breaks unrelated software
If python-reportlab-accel (or more precisely, the sgmlop.so file it
includes) is installed, software using the python xmlrpclib library
rejects valid xml data containing numerical character e
Package: redmine
Version: 1.4.4+dfsg1-1.1
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 4.2
Today’s dist-upgrade inside wheezy failed. Retrying yields:
0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded.
1 not fully installed or removed.
After this operation, 0 B of additional disk space wil
Source: gmerlin
Version: 1.2.0~dfsg-3
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 2.2.1
The copyright file reads:
| License: GFDL-1.1
| Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document
| under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.1 or
| any later version
Source: gsl
Version: 1.15+dfsg-1
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 2.2.1
Usertags: gfdl
doc/gsl-ref.* has the following license:
| Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document
| under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.3 or
| any later versio
Source: gtypist
Version: 2.9.1-2
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 2.2.1
Usertags: gfdl
doc/gtypist.* has the following license:
| Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document
| under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 or
| any later versio
Source: kbuild
Version: 1:0.1.9998svn2543-2
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 2.2.1
Usertags: gfdl
src/kmk/doc/* contains GNU make documentation, with the following
license:
| Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document
| under the terms of the GNU Free Documenta
Source: libbinio
Version: 1.4-14
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 2.2.1
Usertags: gfdl
doc/libbinio.* has the following license:
| Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document
| under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.1 or
| any later versi
Source: muse-el
Version: 3.20-2
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 2.2.1
Usertags: gfdl
texi/muse.texi has the following license:
| Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document
| under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 or
| any later versio
I don't reproduce.
Could you check you don't have :
1) incompatible gems (gem list)
2) incompatible redmine plugins (ls /usr/share/redmine/vendor/plugins)
3) custom installed rails (ls -l /usr/share/redmine/vendor/rails)
thank you
Jérémy.
On 12/12/2012 17:24, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
> Package: r
On 12 December 2012 at 17:35, Jakub Wilk wrote:
| Source: gsl
| Version: 1.15+dfsg-1
| Severity: serious
| Justification: Policy 2.2.1
| Usertags: gfdl
|
| doc/gsl-ref.* has the following license:
| | Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document
| | under the terms of the
Source: readline6
Version: 6.2-9
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 2.2.1
Usertags: gfdl
Some files in doc/ have the following license:
| Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document
| under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.3 or
| any later
Your message dated Wed, 12 Dec 2012 17:03:48 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#695739: fixed in ghc 7.6.1.20121207-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #695739,
regarding ghc: FTBFS on armhf: braindead rebase of patch that duplicates
upstream fix
to be marked as done.
This means that you
Package: exim4-config
Version: 4.80-6
Severity: serious
Justification: "unknown"
Dear Maintainer,
during a upgrade of my system, I got this error message
thanks for your attention.
maybe this is a bad interaction with the fusionforge package.
Cheers
Frederic
ORD03037:/home/picca/Projets/cdpy
On 12/12/2012 12:38 PM, Jakub Wilk wrote:
> Source: gtypist
> Version: 2.9.1-2
> Severity: serious
> Justification: Policy 2.2.1
> Usertags: gfdl
>
> doc/gtypist.* has the following license:
> | Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document
> | under the terms of the GNU Fr
On 12/12/2012 01:20 PM, Ben Armstrong wrote:
> "At the same time, we also consider that works licensed under the GNU
> Free Documentation License that include no invariant sections do fully
> meet the requirements of the Debian Free Software Guidelines.
>
> This means that works that don't include
* Ben Armstrong , 2012-12-12, 13:20:
"At the same time, we also consider that works licensed under the GNU
Free Documentation License that include no invariant sections do fully
meet the requirements of the Debian Free Software Guidelines.
This means that works that don't include any Invariant
Package: mahara
Severity: grave
Tags: security
Hi,
CVE-2012-2253 needs to be fixed in Wheezy:
https://mahara.org/interaction/forum/topic.php?id=5076
Cheers,
Moritz
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact lis
Source: readline5
Version: 5.2-12
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 2.2.1
Usertags: gfdl
Some files in doc/ have the following license:
| Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document
| under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 or
| any later
On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 09:46:41AM -0500, Jay Berkenbilt wrote:
> Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
>
> >
> > Hi Jay,
> > another security issue was discovered by Red Hat's Huzaifa S. Sidhpurwala:
> > The Red Hat bug contains the necessary details:
> > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=867235
>
On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 03:56:49PM +0100, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> Package: libv8
> Severity: grave
> Tags: security
> Justification: user security hole
>
> Please see
> http://googlechromereleases.blogspot.de/2012/11/stable-channel-release-and-beta-channel.html
What's the status?
Cheers,
On Wed, Dec 05, 2012 at 05:25:36AM -0700, LaMont Jones wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 05, 2012 at 09:31:00AM +0100, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> > Package: bind9
> > Severity: grave
> > Tags: security
> > Justification: user security hole
> > Please see https://kb.isc.org/article/AA-00828
> > Stable is not af
Your message dated Wed, 12 Dec 2012 18:52:05 +0100
with message-id <20121212175205.gb19...@inutil.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#695138: dovecot: CVE-2012-5620
has caused the Debian Bug report #695138,
regarding dovecot: CVE-2012-5620
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> forwarded 695777 bug-gtyp...@gnu.org
Bug #695777 [src:gtypist] gtypist: includes non-free documentation (GFDL with
unmodifiable sections)
Set Bug forwarded-to-address to 'bug-gtyp...@gnu.org'.
> tag 695777 upstream
Bug #695777 [src:gtypist] gtypi
On Mon, 10 Dec 2012 23:58:17 -0800 Ludovico Cavedon wrote:
[...]
> So basically, are you telling me that *any* code that is dynamically
> linked against a gpl library is automatically relicensed under GPL,
Not re-licensed, it "just" has to be licensed in a GPL-compatible
manner, so that it is ef
Jérémy Lal dixit:
>I don't reproduce.
Hum. I just installed the packages and not much else (this is a
pretty fresh system used to evaluate redmine).
>Could you check you don't have :
>1) incompatible gems (gem list)
root@redmine:~ # gem list
*** LOCAL GEMS ***
>2) incompatible redmine plugi
Your message dated Wed, 12 Dec 2012 18:33:10 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#695339: fixed in libguestfs 1:1.18.11-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #695339,
regarding uses wrong location for typelib files
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt
Source: source-highlight
Version: 3.1.6-1
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 2.2.1
Usertags: gfdl
doc/source-highlight.* have the following license:
| Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document
| under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.1 or
Source: vcdimager
Version: 0.7.24-1
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 2.2.1
Usertags: gfdl
docs/vcd-info.* and docs/vcdxrip.* have the following license:
| Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document
| under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version
reassign 695786 fusionforge
thanks
On 2012-12-12 Frederic-Emmanuel PICCA wrote:
> Package: exim4-config
> Version: 4.80-6
> Severity: serious
> Justification: "unknown"
> Dear Maintainer,
> during a upgrade of my system, I got this error message
> thanks for your attention.
> maybe this is a
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 695786 fusionforge
Bug #695786 [exim4-config] exim4-config: "pgsql_servers" option set for the
second time
Bug reassigned from package 'exim4-config' to 'fusionforge'.
No longer marked as found in versions exim4/4.80-6.
Ignoring request
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tag 692629 +upstream
Bug #692629 [src:php-horde-text-filter] non-free files in upstream tarball
("The Software shall be used for Good, not Evil")
Added tag(s) upstream.
> forward 692629 http://bugs.horde.org/ticket/11870
Unknown command or malfor
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> forwarded 692629 http://bugs.horde.org/ticket/11870
Bug #692629 [src:php-horde-text-filter] non-free files in upstream tarball
("The Software shall be used for Good, not Evil")
Set Bug forwarded-to-address to 'http://bugs.horde.org/ticket/11870'.
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> # Wednesday 12 December 19:03:12 UTC 2012
> # Tagging as pending bugs that are closed by packages in NEW
> # http://ftp-master.debian.org/new.html
> #
> # Source package in NEW: href="http://packages.qa.debian.org/nordugrid-arc";>nordugrid-arc
>
Your message dated Wed, 12 Dec 2012 19:32:30 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#695715: fixed in cflow 1:1.4+dfsg1-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #695715,
regarding cflow: includes non-free documentation (GFDL with unmodifiable
sections)
to be marked as done.
This means that you clai
Source: xemacs21-packages
Version: 2009.02.17.dfsg.1-1
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 2.2.1
Usertags: gfdl
Some of the files in the source packages are licensed under GFDL with
Invariant Sections or with Cover Texts:
./xemacs-packages/ediff/ediff.texi
./xemacs-packages/gnus/texi/emacs
I investigated this some more. According to jenkins.debian.net, the
problem was introduced between 2012-11-27T05:06:19 and
2012-11-28T05:07:29. The first failing log is available from
http://jenkins.debian.net/job/chroot-installation_squeeze_install_gnome_upgrade_to_wheezy/62/
>.
I extracted th
Source: tar
Version: 1.26-4
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 2.2.1
Usertags: gfdl
doc/README says:
Unfortunately, the info document describing tar is licensed under the
GFDL with invariant cover texts, which violates the Debian Free
Software Guidelines. As a result, the info documentati
On Wed, 2012-12-12 at 19:32 +, Serafeim Zanikolas wrote:
> cflow (1:1.4+dfsg1-1) unstable; urgency=high
> .
>* Repackage with non DFSG-free texinfo files stripped out of the source and
> binary package (closes: #695715).
Thanks for fixing this. Unfortunately, the fact that you also
On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 08:22:30PM +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On Wed, 2012-12-12 at 19:32 +, Serafeim Zanikolas wrote:
> > cflow (1:1.4+dfsg1-1) unstable; urgency=high
> > .
> >* Repackage with non DFSG-free texinfo files stripped out of the source
> > and
> > binary package (c
Your message dated Wed, 12 Dec 2012 20:49:27 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#673667: fixed in totem 3.6.3-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #673667,
regarding totem-mozilla: Split out totem-vega or add to Flash alternatives
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the prob
Your message dated Wed, 12 Dec 2012 20:47:58 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#679980: fixed in cacti 0.8.8a+dfsg-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #679980,
regarding cacti: license issue in include/treeview
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt
Am 06.12.2012 20:57, schrieb Tobias Hansen:
> Am 06.12.2012 20:44, schrieb Ludovic Brenta:
>> Tobias Hansen writes:
>>> since we have gnat-4.6 in wheezy and gnat-4.4 does not build anymore
>>> (see #669513), can gnat-4.4 be removed?
>>
>> Yes but maybe notify the maintainers of the sole package sti
Is there a chance you had config files from an earlier redmine
installation ? Do yours have
adapter: postgresql
?
Jérémy.
On 12/12/2012 19:20, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
> Jérémy Lal dixit:
>
>> I don't reproduce.
>
> Hum. I just installed the packages and not much else (this is a
> pretty fresh sy
Jakub Wilk writes:
> However, the doc/ directory does include the non-free GFDL
> documentation
It appears that the package was built against the full upstream tarball
and not the elided one. My bad.
FWIW, the binary package for tar does not include the GFDL documents,
this is just a source
Tobias Hansen writes:
> Am 06.12.2012 20:57, schrieb Tobias Hansen:
>> Am 06.12.2012 20:44, schrieb Ludovic Brenta:
>>> Tobias Hansen writes:
since we have gnat-4.6 in wheezy and gnat-4.4 does not build anymore
(see #669513), can gnat-4.4 be removed?
>>>
>>> Yes but maybe notify the maint
Package: gksu-polkit
Severity: grave
Tags: security
Hi,
the following vulnerability was published for gksu-polkit.
CVE-2012-5617[0,1]:
privilege escalation due to improper authentication settings in policykit
configuration file
If you fix the vulnerability please also make sure to include the
C
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> found 695807 0.0.2-2
Bug #695807 [gksu-polkit] CVE-2012-5617: gksu-polkit privileged code execution
with unprivileged credentials
Marked as found in versions gksu-polkit/0.0.2-2.
> found 695807 0.0.3-1
Bug #695807 [gksu-polkit] CVE-2012-5617: gks
Control: reopen -1
In 2.7.3-1 changelog you wrote:
The wininst-* files cannot be built within Debian from the included
sources, needing a zlib mingw build, which the zlib maintainer isn't
going to provide. Closes: #639407.
This confirms that the files in question are unbuildable in Debian,
Processing control commands:
> reopen -1
Bug #639407 {Done: Matthias Klose } [python2.7-dev]
python2.X/3.X-dev ships windows binaries which are not built at build time
'reopen' may be inappropriate when a bug has been closed with a version;
all fixed versions will be cleared, and you may need to
Le dimanche 09 décembre 2012 à 12:50 -0600, Rob Browning a écrit :
> Rob Browning writes:
>
> > Sébastien Villemot writes:
>
> >> Since there seem to be no other new-style package in Wheezy, I think
> >> this workaround is sufficient for now. But for Jessie you probably
> >> need to refactor th
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> severity 695604 serious
Bug #695604 [libnih] libnih: upstart test-suite fails on xfs
Severity set to 'serious' from 'normal'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
695604: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/b
Your message dated Wed, 12 Dec 2012 23:18:05 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#690148: fixed in gcc-mingw-w64 8
has caused the Debian Bug report #690148,
regarding gcc-mingw32: missing copyright file after upgrade from squeeze
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the prob
Your message dated Wed, 12 Dec 2012 23:18:05 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#695736: fixed in gcc-mingw-w64 8
has caused the Debian Bug report #695736,
regarding gcc-mingw32: Wheezy transition package missing binaries provided in
Squeeze
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim
Sébastien Villemot writes:
> The code looks good, and it passed the upgrade tests for devscripts-el
> and emms. So I think you can go on.
Great, and thanks for the help.
I'll see about generating another wheezy candidate release soon -- very
happy you tracked this down.
--
Rob Browning
rlb @d
On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 12:44:23PM +0100, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> On 2012-12-12 06:28:56 -0500, Thomas Dickey wrote:
> > On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 05:08:21AM -0500, Thomas Dickey wrote:
> > > I'm not able to reproduce the problem, either by recompiling, or
> > > by installing this version on my Debi
Package: node-async
Version: 0.1.22-1
Severity: serious
Tags: patch
User: ubuntu-de...@lists.ubuntu.com
Usertags: origin-ubuntu raring ubuntu-patch
This patch should be self-evident. libnode-uglify was dropped from
unstable and, as such, node-async would now FTBFS if it was rebuilt
in a tradition
1 - 100 of 116 matches
Mail list logo
