On Mon, 10 Dec 2012 23:58:17 -0800 Ludovico Cavedon wrote: [...] > So basically, are you telling me that *any* code that is dynamically > linked against a gpl library is automatically relicensed under GPL,
Not re-licensed, it "just" has to be licensed in a GPL-compatible manner, so that it is effectively *also* available under the (more restrictive and less permissive) terms of the GNU GPL... > including the python interpreter for example? This does not sound > right to me... The case of language interpreters is a bit different: please see http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-faq.html#InterpreterIncompat -- http://www.inventati.org/frx/frx-gpg-key-transition-2010.txt New GnuPG key, see the transition document! ..................................................... Francesco Poli . GnuPG key fpr == CA01 1147 9CD2 EFDF FB82 3925 3E1C 27E1 1F69 BFFE
pgpnuRRbCP4oF.pgp
Description: PGP signature
