Package: strongswan-ikev1
Version: 4.6.4-2
Severity: serious
In 4.6.4-2 the package was changed to make the daemons run as a
non-privileged user instead of root. This breaks my virtual IP setup
(leftsourceip=) because after establishing tunnels pluto runs iproute2
commands which now fail because o
tags 679827 + experimental
quit
Soeren Sonnenburg wrote:
> Kernel: Linux 3.5.0-rc3-sonne+ (SMP w/2 CPU cores; PREEMPT)
holisme upstream noticed that this is the relevant variable. Ah.
One less release-critical bug for wheezy. ;-)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.deb
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 679827 + experimental
Bug #679827 [chromium] chromium always hangs on https://github.com
Added tag(s) experimental.
> quit
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
679827: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugrepo
Hi Pino,
On 2012-07-07 21:58, Pino Toscano wrote:
> (As side request: would be possible to have the full compiling/linking
> commands being run while doing a Debian build? Otherwise it is
> difficult to see how fbreader is compiled.)
It was an upstream choice, but I guess it's possible. Separate
tags 680657 + pending
quit
Hi Salvatore,
On 2012-07-08 02:31, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
> Attached is a really miniamal patch, but it can be done better ;-)
Works fine, applied, thanks. Upload will follow shortly.
--
Eugene V. Lyubimkin aka JackYF, JID: jackyf.devel(maildog)gmail.com
C++ GNU
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 680657 + pending
Bug #680657 [src:fbreader] fbreader: FTBFS on binary-only builds
Added tag(s) pending.
> quit
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
680657: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=6
Your message dated Sun, 08 Jul 2012 09:33:02 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#680657: fixed in fbreader 0.12.10dfsg-7
has caused the Debian Bug report #680657,
regarding fbreader: FTBFS on binary-only builds
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt
Thomas Weber writes:
> On Thu, Jul 05, 2012 at 11:54:55PM +0200, Sébastien Villemot wrote:
>> Please try the following (on amd64 if possible) in a clean sid chroot:
>>
>> apt-get install dynare locales(it should install octave-java via the
>> recommends)
>> dpkg-reconfigure locales
Package: salome-gui
Version: 6.5.0-1
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 2.2.1
Hello Debian Science Maintainers,
thanks for your effort to reintroduce SALOME into Debian.
However, it seems to me that one of the licensing issues that
affected the previous package [1] is still present in the
cu
On 18/06/2012 00:20, shawn wrote:
> the skia patch here is tested and critical for armel.
>
> I am unable to test the rest cause I am having issues in the linking
> stage with chromium 20 with symbols that should be provided by the vpx
> library. I was using chromium-browser-20.0.1132.21~r139451-1
Hello ia64 buildd admins,
could you please upgrade the version of dpkg in your buildd
environment to something >= 1.16.4 (e.g. the version in testing
(1.16.4.3) or in sid (1.16.7)) and reschedule goobox 3.0.1-5.
Thanks
Helge
On Sat, Jul 07, 2012 at 07:19:52PM +0200, Helge Kreutzmann wrot
Hi,
1)
I do not understand what the problem is. the build log I can find, on
https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=rdfind&arch=s390&ver=1.3.1-1&stamp=1336438441
shows a cryptic error.
2)
is this related to gcc 4.7? the link in 1) says something about "illegal
seek" and perl.
3)
what does g
On dim., 2012-07-08 at 10:38 +0200, Romain Francoise wrote:
> Package: strongswan-ikev1
> Version: 4.6.4-2
> Severity: serious
>
> In 4.6.4-2 the package was changed to make the daemons run as a
> non-privileged user instead of root. This breaks my virtual IP setup
> (leftsourceip=) because after
tags 613842 + patch
thanks
Hi,
attached is a patch that solves the issue for me.
The reordering would have been enough in most cases,
but I wanted to safeguard it a bit :)
No idea how that could have worked in the first place, or did dpkg
accept non-extisting users in statoverrides before?
No in
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 613842 + patch
Bug #613842 [spread] Uninstall of spread breaks dpkg
Added tag(s) patch.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
613842: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=613842
Debian B
Your message dated Sun, 08 Jul 2012 12:32:25 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#680428: fixed in lapack 3.4.1-5
has caused the Debian Bug report #680428,
regarding liblapacke-dev: Can not link against liblapacke
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dea
Hi,
upstream released version 0.7.5b on July 2, unfortunatelly just after
the wheezy freeze.
In the upstream changelog
http://fritzing.org/download/history-changes/>
the compiler error is mentioned as fixed:
bug fixes:
[...]
armel/linux compiler errors fixed
[...]
Perhaps it is
Your message dated Sun, 08 Jul 2012 12:47:15 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#669486: fixed in django-auth-ldap 1.0.19-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #669486,
regarding django-auth-ldap: FTBFS: django.core.exceptions.ImproperlyConfigured:
settings.DATABASES is improperly configured.
Your message dated Sun, 08 Jul 2012 13:02:33 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#676800: fixed in octave-java 1.2.8-5
has caused the Debian Bug report #676800,
regarding octave-java: completely breaks octave
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt wi
Le 2012-07-07 23:42, Daniel Baumann a écrit :
On 07/02/2012 08:10 PM, Sebastien NOEL wrote:
if you don't have time to test a package after a new build, maybe
it's
time to orphan it and let someone who care about vsftpd to maintain
it.
A syntax error like this one means you don't even bother to
On Sat, Jul 07, 2012 at 12:28:52PM +0400, "Dmitry E. Oboukhov"
wrote:
> Of course I (as the most people) read documentation fully if I stumble
> over problem. :)
Unfortunately, you are unable to even answer the most basic questions I asked
you, such as which OS, arch and which perl this is on. p
On 07/08/2012 03:49 PM, Sebastien NOEL wrote:
> yeah right... because uploading lots of untested crap in unstable the
> day of the freeze is perfecly acceptable...
you're apparently a DM since 3 months now, and you're being 'already'
very hostile to other people. i don't think this is an acceptabl
On Sat, Jul 07, 2012 at 12:11:12PM +0400, "Dmitry E. Oboukhov"
wrote:
> 1000 +- 100 hashes with 3-4 fields in 100 asyncs...
> test computer has more than 4G RAM.
Good luck having those 4G of ram allocated to your stack - memory
management doesn't work like you think it does.
> > You can verify
Your message dated Sun, 08 Jul 2012 14:47:49 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#676105: fixed in rbbr 0.6.0-5
has caused the Debian Bug report #676105,
regarding rbbr: FTBFS: missing build-dependency on ruby-gettext
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been
tags 676126 patch
thanks
Hi Mats,
I'm about to upload an NMU for #676126 (FTBFS due to
some changes in Ruby 1.9).
Changelog is the following:
netsed (1.00b-2.1) unstable; urgency=low
.
* Non-maintainer upload.
* Add 05-ftbfs_ruby1.9_testsuite_require_syntax.diff to adjust to
changes
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 676126 patch
Bug #676126 [src:netsed] netsed: FTBFS:
/usr/lib/ruby/1.9.1/rubygems/custom_require.rb:36:in `require': cannot load
such file -- test_helper (LoadError)
Added tag(s) patch.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me
On Sun, 2012-07-08 at 12:40 +0200, Jérémy Lal wrote:
> On 18/06/2012 00:20, shawn wrote:
> > CXXFLAGS += -mno-thumb-interwork
> >
> > under the armel section
>
> If i remember well, I was using a similar 0001 patch for libv8 and
> using that flag was a better solution. I think it poses problem
Hi Paul
On Sun, Jul 08, 2012 at 12:47:41PM +0200, Paul Dreik wrote:
> 1)
> I do not understand what the problem is. the build log I can find, on
> https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=rdfind&arch=s390&ver=1.3.1-1&stamp=1336438441
> shows a cryptic error.
> 2)
> is this related to gcc 4.7
Package: libblas3gf
Version: 1.2.20110419-5
Severity: critical
Justification: breaks unrelated software
Dear Maintainer,
gimp is segfaulting if 'libblas3gf' is installed. If 'libblas3gf' is not
installed, 'libgegl-0.2-0' complains about it being missing if I execute gimp
(but gimp runs fine none
Package: vsftpd
Version: 3.0.0-3
Followup-For: Bug #679710
Dear Maintainer,
*** Please consider answering these questions, where appropriate ***
* What led up to the situation?
When trying to upgrade to 3.0.4 I got the above error. When I then try to
remove the current version I get
the follo
Le 2012-07-08 16:19, Daniel Baumann a écrit :
On 07/08/2012 03:49 PM, Sebastien NOEL wrote:
yeah right... because uploading lots of untested crap in unstable
the
day of the freeze is perfecly acceptable...
you're apparently a DM since 3 months now,
(2 years & 3 mounts)
i bet you misread th
Package: vsftpd
Followup-For: Bug #679710
Dear Maintainer,
*** Please consider answering these questions, where appropriate ***
* What led up to the situation?
The extra '}' character in line 36 needs to be removed manually by the admin.
Then the package manager can complete the upgrade.
*
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> unarchive 649384
Bug #649384 {Done: Gabriele Giacone <1o5g4...@gmail.com>} [gnash] gnash creates
world-readable cookies under /tmp with predictable filenames
Unarchived Bug 649384
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> unarchive 673987
Bug #673987 {Done: Yaroslav Halchenko } [python-tornado]
CVE-2012-2374
Unarchived Bug 673987
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
673987: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugrep
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> severity 679447 normal
Bug #679447 [libcoro-perl] libcoro-perl often segfaults
Severity set to 'normal' from 'grave'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
679447: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport
Your message dated Sun, 08 Jul 2012 15:47:11 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#676126: fixed in netsed 1.00b-2.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #676126,
regarding netsed: FTBFS: /usr/lib/ruby/1.9.1/rubygems/custom_require.rb:36:in
`require': cannot load such file -- test_helper (LoadEr
Hi!
Luk Claes writes:
> When I applied the mentioned patches, the package did not build. Can
> you have a look at them?
I took the patches from upstream and backported them to our 7.1. Current
state is in the packaging git. Feel free to give it a try. Do you want
me to upload the fix after givin
Your message dated Sun, 08 Jul 2012 16:32:16 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#680637: fixed in udj-desktop-client 0.5.1-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #680637,
regarding QSqlQuery::exec: database not open
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been deal
On 07/08/2012 05:30 PM, Sebastien NOEL wrote:
>> you're apparently a DM since 3 months now,
>
> (2 years & 3 mounts)
https://nm.debian.org/public/person/m...@twolife.org
says: "Debian Maintainer since 2012-03-13"
> i was hostil with you because you broke at least 2 packages
> (i'm affected with
Dear maintainer,
Recently you fixed one or more security problems and as a result you closed
this bug. These problems were not serious enough for a Debian Security
Advisory, so they are now on my radar for fixing in the following suites
through point releases:
squeeze (6.0.6) - use target "stable
tags 679649 + patch
tags 679649 + pending
thanks
Dear maintainer,
I've prepared an NMU for ruby-image-science (versioned as 1.2.2-1.1) and
will have it uploaded soon.
Cheers
Luk
diff -Nru ruby-image-science-1.2.2/debian/changelog ruby-image-science-1.2.2/debian/changelog
--- ruby-image-science-
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> severity 679848 grave
Bug #679848 [chromium] chromium: everything related to chrome:// is broken
Severity set to 'grave' from 'important'
> forcemerge 679827 679848
Bug #679827 [chromium] chromium always hangs on https://github.com
Bug #679848 [ch
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 679649 + patch
Bug #679649 [src:ruby-image-science] FTBFS: cannot find -lstdc++
Added tag(s) patch.
> tags 679649 + pending
Bug #679649 [src:ruby-image-science] FTBFS: cannot find -lstdc++
Added tag(s) pending.
> thanks
Stopping processing he
Dear maintainer,
Recently you fixed one or more security problems and as a result you closed
this bug. These problems were not serious enough for a Debian Security
Advisory, so they are now on my radar for fixing in the following suites
through point releases:
squeeze (6.0.6) - use target "stable
Source: libio-async-loop-epoll-perl
Version: 0.12-1
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120708 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
> deb
Source: clamfs
Version: 1.0.1-1.1
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120708 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part
Source: bzr-svn
Version: 1.2.1-1
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120708 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part
Source: zope2.12
Version: 2.12.23-1
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120708 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
> make[2]: Enter
Source: lua-penlight
Version: 1.0.2+htmldoc-1
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120708 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
> mak
Source: scim-skk
Version: 0.5.2-7
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120708 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
> x86_64-linux-gn
Source: libcam-pdf-perl
Version: 1.58-1
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120708 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
> debian/rules bu
Source: libmojomojo-perl
Version: 1.05+dfsg-2
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120708 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
> mak
Source: sitplus
Version: 1.0.3-3
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120708 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part
Source: circuits
Version: 1.6-1
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120708 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
> make[1]: Entering direct
Source: subvertpy
Version: 0.8.10-2
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120708 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
> make[1]: Enter
Source: ed
Version: 1.6-2
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120708 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
> make[1]: Entering direct
Source: piwigo
Version: 2.3.1-1
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120708 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
> fakeroot debian/ru
Source: odin
Version: 1.8.5-2
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120708 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
> cc1: warning: command l
Source: librdf-crypt-perl
Version: 0.002-1
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120708 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
> mak
Source: libio-async-loop-glib-perl
Version: 0.20-1
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120708 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
> mak
Source: poco
Version: 1.3.6p1-1
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120708 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
> g++ -Iinclude
Source: gnome-boxes
Version: 3.4.3+dfsg-1
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120708 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
> debian/ru
Source: libio-socket-ip-perl
Version: 0.16-1
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120708 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part
Source: ruby-rack-test
Version: 0.6.1-2
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120708 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
> fakeroot deb
Source: tunnelx
Version: 20110801-3
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120708 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
> make[1]: Enter
Source: qcake
Version: 0.7.2-2
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120708 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
> g++ -c -m64 -pipe -I/
Source: ffgtk
Version: 0.8.1-1
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120708 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
> gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I.
Package: python-osmgpsmap
Version: 0.7.3-2
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 3.5
In a minimal chroot:
$ python -c 'import osmgpsmap'
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "", line 1, in
ImportError: No module named osmgpsmap
Installing python-gtk2 fixes this problem.
-- System Inf
Source: libcatalyst-plugin-unicode-encoding-perl
Version: 1.7-1
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120708 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant
Source: tryton-proteus
Version: 2.2.2-2
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120708 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
> make[1]: Enter
Source: yate
Version: 4.1.0-1~dfsg-2
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120708 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part
Source: osmosis
Version: 0.40.1+ds1-6
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120708 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
> make[1]: Enter
Source: libconfig-model-backend-augeas-perl
Version: 0.111-1
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120708 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part
Source: pyside
Version: 1.1.1-3
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120708 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part
Source: gpsshogi
Version: 0.5.0-1
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120708 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part
Source: xdotool
Version: 1:2.20110530.1-3
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120708 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
> make[6]: Enter
Source: gromacs
Version: 4.5.5-2
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120708 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
> make[4]: Enter
Source: libtest-www-mechanize-catalyst-perl
Version: 0.57-1
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120708 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part
Source: mecab-cannadic
Version: 0.94h-2.1
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120708 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
> make[1]: Enter
Source: pycode-browser
Version: 20120614+git+b041dd2-1
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120708 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part
Source: libcatalystx-simplelogin-perl
Version: 0.15-1
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120708 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
> m
Source: scim
Version: 1.4.14-1
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120708 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
> make[1]: Entering direct
Source: libtext-recordparser-perl
Version: 1.5.0-1
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120708 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
> mak
Source: libio-async-perl
Version: 0.51-1
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120708 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part
Source: glunarclock
Version: 1:0.34.1-1
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120708 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part
Source: ipadic
Version: 2.7.0+main-1
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120708 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
> debian/rules bu
Source: ruby-uglifier
Version: 1.2.5-1
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120708 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
> make[1]: Enter
Source: ruby-execjs
Version: 1.4.0-1
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120708 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
> fakeroot debian/ru
Source: weboob
Version: 0.c-4
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120708 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
> make[2]: Entering direct
Source: libfprint
Version: 1:0.4.0-4-gdfff16f-3
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120708 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
> /bin/b
Source: commons-vfs
Version: 2.0-3
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120708 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
> debian/rules bu
Source: plplot
Version: 5.9.9-4
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120708 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
> /usr/bin/ld: CMakeFi
Source: libcatalyst-view-component-subinclude-perl
Version: 0.10-1
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120708 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant
Source: tomcat7
Version: 7.0.28-1
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120708 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
> debian/rules bu
Source: derivations
Version: 0.53.20120414-1.1
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120708 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
> mak
On 08/07/2012 17:12, shawn wrote:
> On Sun, 2012-07-08 at 12:40 +0200, Jérémy Lal wrote:
>> On 18/06/2012 00:20, shawn wrote:
>>> CXXFLAGS += -mno-thumb-interwork
>>>
>>> under the armel section
>>
>> If i remember well, I was using a similar 0001 patch for libv8 and
>> using that flag was a bette
Source: ruby-compass
Version: 0.12.2~dfsg-1
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120708 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
> faker
tags 680797 + confirmed
thanks
confirmed, FTBFS both in wheezy and unstable.
Regards,
Salvatore
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
reassign 680808 libspice-client-gtk-3.0-dev
forcemerge 680290 680808
severity 680290 serious
thanks
On 08.07.2012 19:07, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> Source: gnome-boxes
> Version: 3.4.3+dfsg-1
> Severity: serious
> Tags: wheezy sid
> User: debian...@lists.debian.org
> Usertags: qa
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 680808 libspice-client-gtk-3.0-dev
Bug #680808 [src:gnome-boxes] gnome-boxes: FTBFS: Requested
'spice-client-gtk-3.0 >= 0.9' but version of spice-client-gtk-3.0 is UNKNOWN
Bug reassigned from package 'src:gnome-boxes' to 'libspice-client
1 - 100 of 218 matches
Mail list logo
