Your message dated Sun, 24 Jun 2012 07:17:48 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#667664: fixed in dansguardian 2.10.1.1-5
has caused the Debian Bug report #667664,
regarding libpcre3: upgrade from 8.12 to 8.30 breaks (oldstable-era)
dansguardian
to be marked as done.
This means that you c
Your message dated Sun, 24 Jun 2012 07:17:48 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#667664: fixed in dansguardian 2.10.1.1-5
has caused the Debian Bug report #667664,
regarding dansguardian ERR_EMPTY_RESPONSE libpcre3 bug
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has be
Are we really sure it's a service to debian users or debian as a
distribution to simply remove compiz from wheezy based on a number of
minor(?) issues that are so obscure that they needed a fake RC bug?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "uns
Package: extplorer
Severity: grave
As per:
http://www.autosectools.com/Advisories/eXtplorer.2.1.RC3_Cross-site.Request.Forgery_174.html
there's a CSRF security issue in eXtplorer.
Patch is on its way, I'm just opening a bug report to track it.
Thomas
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-r
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> # Sunday 24 June 08:03:30 UTC 2012
> # Tagging as pending bugs that are closed by packages in NEW
> # http://ftp-master.debian.org/new.html
> #
> # Source package in NEW: libsidplayfp
> tags 678700 + pending
Bug #678700 [wnpp] ITP: libsidplayfp -
Danai,
On Di, 19 Jun 2012, Danai SAE-HAN wrote:
> Urgh, just got a half working X.org env.
> Still skewed, but slightly workable.
> Thanks for your patience. Off to work now.
Any progress here? Freeze is soon!
Did you also see the email of Werner concerning a stability fix
in CJK?
Best wishes
On So, 24 Jun 2012, jida...@jidanni.org wrote:
> reopen 678484
Yes, I know. I have to upload a version of maildir-utils that
conflcits with mailutils << ... on the way .
Best wishes
Norbert
Norbert Preiningprei
Package: desktop-base
Version: 7.0.0~exp2
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 2.3
Hello,
I read about the new Joy theme [1][2].
[1]
http://blog.pault.ag/post/25614704596/my-quest-to-get-desktop-base-set-before-wheezy
[2]
http://blog.pault.ag/post/25747178764/debian-desktop-7-0-0-exp2-in-exp
Your message dated Sun, 24 Jun 2012 09:17:55 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#678484: fixed in maildir-utils 0.9.8.4-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #678484,
regarding mailutils and maildir-utils: error when trying to install together
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim t
Source: argyll
Version: 1.4.0-4
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120624 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
> gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I.
Source: vsftpd
Version: 3.0.0-2
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120624 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
> /usr/bin/ld: mai
Source: scim-unikey
Version: 0.3.1+debian-3
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120624 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
>
Source: banshee-community-extensions
Version: 2.4.0-1
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120624 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
> m
Source: pyth
Version: 0.5.6-2
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120624 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
> make[1]: Entering direct
Source: psi-translations
Version: 1.10
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120624 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part
Source: cantor
Version: 4:4.7.4-3
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120624 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part
Source: sisu-ioc
Version: 2.3.0-3
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120624 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
> debian/rules bu
Source: mumble
Version: 1.2.3-349-g315b5f5-1
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120624 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part
Source: php-svn
Version: 1.0.1-1.1
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120624 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
> /bin/bash /«PKGBUILD
Source: dragonegg
Version: 3.0-3.2
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120624 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
> make[1]: Enter
Source: node-xmpp
Version: 0.3.2-1
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120624 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
> debian/rules bu
Source: embassy-domsearch
Version: 0.1.0++20100721-3
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120624 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part
Source: activemq
Version: 5.6.0+dfsg-1
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120624 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
> debian/rules bu
Source: jetty8
Version: 8.1.3-3
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120624 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
> debian/rules build
>
Source: librpc-xml-perl
Version: 0.76-2
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120624 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
> make[1]: Enter
Source: linbox
Version: 1.1.6~rc0-4.2
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120624 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
> make[1]: Enter
Source: libextractor
Version: 1:0.6.3-4
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120624 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
> make[4]: Enter
Source: unagi
Version: 0.3.3-1
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120624 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part
Source: libpoe-component-client-http-perl
Version: 0.945-1
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120624 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part
Source: subcommander
Version: 2.0.0~b5p2-4
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120624 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
>
Source: plasma-widget-smooth-tasks
Version: 0.0~wip20100227-1.1
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120624 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant
Source: lintian
Version: 2.5.9
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120624 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part
Source: libpixels-java
Version: 2.1.3+svn.42-1
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120624 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
> deb
Source: sorl-thumbnail
Version: 11.12-3
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120624 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
> make[1]: Enter
Source: assimp
Version: 2.0.863+dfsg-2
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120624 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part
Source: libhtml-data-parser-perl
Version: 0.005-1
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120624 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
> mak
Source: unburden-home-dir
Version: 0.3
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120624 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
> make[1]: Enter
Source: vim-addon-manager
Version: 0.5.0
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120624 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
> make[1]: Enter
Source: flightgear
Version: 2.4.0-1.1
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120624 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
> g++ -DHAVE_CONFI
Source: compiz
Version: 0.8.4-5.2
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120624 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
> if g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H
Source: kalgebra
Version: 4:4.7.4-2
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120624 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
> make[3]: Enter
Source: haskell-llvm-base
Version: 3.0.1.0-1
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120624 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
> debian/ru
Source: github-backup
Version: 1.20120314
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120624 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part
Source: parted
Version: 2.3-9.2
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120624 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
> make[1]: Entering direct
Source: glance
Version: 2012.1-3.1
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120624 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
> make[1]: Enter
Source: kdeutils
Version: 4:4.7.4-2
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120624 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
> make[3]: Enter
Source: libsvn-notify-mirror-perl
Version: 0.03800-1
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120624 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part
Source: python-scrapy
Version: 0.14.1-1
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120624 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
> make[1]: Enter
Your message dated Sun, 24 Jun 2012 09:47:34 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#678737: fixed in extplorer 2.1.0b6+dfsg.3-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #678737,
regarding Cross site request forgery
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
tags 676045 + patch
thanks
Dear maintainer,
Attached is a patch to fix that, as the build needs a writable $HOME
during build. I have not yet prepared a final NMU to upload. But as
the freeze for Wheezy is near, I can do if needed. In any case it will
be delayed if okay.
Regards,
Salvatore
diff
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 676045 + patch
Bug #676045 [src:nautilus-image-manipulator] nautilus-image-manipulator: FTBFS:
IOError: [Errno 2] No such file or directory:
'/sbuild-nonexistent/.nautilus-image-manipulator.ini'
Added tag(s) patch.
> thanks
Stopping process
Hi Adam,
I've grabbed your current git master and tested it locally,
and would happily sponsor the upload to the archive. Let
me know via email, or catch me on IRC (infinity) and tell
me if that's cool.
If I don't hear from you soon(ish), I'll probably just
sponsor your current git head anyway
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> severity 678580 serious
Bug #678580 [kupfer] kupfer: program fails to start
Severity set to 'serious' from 'important'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
678580: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugrepo
On Sun, Jun 24, 2012 at 02:22:06AM +0900, Osamu Aoki wrote:
> So you mean --quiet and error exit is good? I see. I still worry about
> being too quiet to hide source of the trouble. Do you think we need
As far as I can see --quiet never hides error conditions. After all
--quiet is not that quie
Your message dated Sun, 24 Jun 2012 10:49:24 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#673304: fixed in libextractor 1:0.6.3-5
has caused the Debian Bug report #673304,
regarding libextractor: please migrate the libpoppler-dev build dependency to
libpoppler-private-dev
to be marked as done.
Thi
Hi
> On Di, 19 Jun 2012, Danai SAE-HAN wrote:
>> Urgh, just got a half working X.org env.
>> Still skewed, but slightly workable.
>> Thanks for your patience. Off to work now.
>
> Any progress here? Freeze is soon!
>
> Did you also see the email of Werner concerning a stability fix
> in CJK?
I h
Hi tcwardr...@gmail.com,
I confess I'm not entirely certain how to respond to this suggestion
of yours ...
If, on the one hand, you actually are a black-hat, who has put in the
effort to actually analyse this for your own benefit - then I tip my hat
to you and your art, and wish you all the best
Your message dated Sun, 24 Jun 2012 11:17:54 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#678580: fixed in kupfer 0+v208-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #678580,
regarding kupfer: program fails to start
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> clone 678758 -1
Bug #678758 [src:sisu-ioc] sisu-ioc: FTBFS:
org.apache.felix.obrplugin.ObrInstall#execute() caused a linkage error
(java.lang.UnsupportedClassVersionError) and may be out-of-date.
Bug 678758 cloned as bug 678802
> reassign -1 osg
Your message dated Sun, 24 Jun 2012 11:34:19 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#678661: fixed in openssh 1:6.0p1-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #678661,
regarding openssh-server - Fails to start: OpenSSL version mismatch. Built
against 1000103f, you have 107f
to be marked as done.
On Sun, Jun 24, 2012 at 11:13:31AM +0200, Francesco Poli (wintermute) wrote:
> Package: desktop-base
> Version: 7.0.0~exp2
> Severity: serious
> Justification: Policy 2.3
>
> Hello,
> I read about the new Joy theme [1][2].
>
> [1]
> http://blog.pault.ag/post/25614704596/my-quest-to-get-desktop-b
Source: maelstrom
Version: 1.4.3-L3.0.6+main-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Hi,
your package no longer builds on armhf:
| g++ -g -O2 -fPIE -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -Wformat
-Werror=format-security -g -O2 -g -O2 -I/usr/include/SDL -D_GNU_SOURCE=1
-D_REENTRANT -I. -
tag 678583 pending
thanks
On 22.06.2012 23:53, Pino Toscano wrote:
> as a followup of #675497: when doing my rebuilds for the drop of
> libfontconfig1-dev from libpoppler-dev, apparently I noted only
> pkg-config (already fixed, thanks!) as missing for texstudio... while
> there's also zlib1g-dev
Your message dated Sun, 24 Jun 2012 11:47:37 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#677040: fixed in icedove 10.0.5-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #677040,
regarding icedove: New Upstream (10.0.5)
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If thi
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> found 678802 4.3.0-3
Bug #678802 [osgi-core] osgi-core: Build does not ensure backwards compatible
byte-core
There is no source info for the package 'osgi-core' at version '4.3.0-3' with
architecture ''
Unable to make a source version for versio
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> found 678802 4.3.0-2
Bug #678802 [osgi-core] osgi-core: Build does not ensure backwards compatible
byte-core
There is no source info for the package 'osgi-core' at version '4.3.0-2' with
architecture ''
Unable to make a source version for versio
ugreport.cgi?bug=678763
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Source: embassy-domsearch
Version: 0.1.0++20100721-3
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120624 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS
gi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=678770
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Source: libextractor
Version: 1:0.6.3-4
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120624 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
Du
Your message dated Sun, 24 Jun 2012 12:03:35 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#678347: fixed in libffado 2.0.99+svn2171-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #678347,
regarding libffado: FTBFS on powerpc
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
I
gs: qa-ftbfs-20120624 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
> debian/rules build
> test -x debian/rules
> mkdir -p "."
> /usr/share/maven-debian-helper/copy-repo.sh /«PKGBUI
--- Begin Message ---
Source: sisu-ioc
Version: 2.3.0-3
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120624 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part
tags 678791 + confirmed
thanks
Hi
On Sun, Jun 24, 2012 at 11:30:01AM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> Source: libsvn-notify-mirror-perl
> Version: 0.03800-1
> Severity: serious
> Tags: wheezy sid
> User: debian...@lists.debian.org
> Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120624 qa-ftbfs
> Ju
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 678791 + confirmed
Bug #678791 [src:libsvn-notify-mirror-perl] libsvn-notify-mirror-perl: FTBFS:
tests failed
Added tag(s) confirmed.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
678791: http://bugs.debia
verity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120624 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
> gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I.. -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -D_G
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 678780 + confirmed
Bug #678780 [src:unburden-home-dir] unburden-home-dir: FTBFS: tests failed
Added tag(s) confirmed.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
678780: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bug
Package: ttf-root-installer
Version: 5.34.00~rc1-1
Severity: serious
Justification: can't upgrade package
Hi,
Upgrade of ttf-root-installer fails:
Setting up ttf-root-installer (5.34.00~rc1-1) ...
dpkg: error processing ttf-root-installer (--configure):
subprocess installed post-installa
On Sun, 24 Jun 2012 07:34:50 -0400 Paul Tagliamonte wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 24, 2012 at 11:13:31AM +0200, Francesco Poli (wintermute) wrote:
[...]
> >
> > First of all, these debian/copyright paragraphs fail to acknowledge that
> > the Joy theme is based on the Debian “Open Use” (without “Debian” wo
tags 678767 + confirmed
thanks
Hi
On Sun, Jun 24, 2012 at 11:29:56AM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> Source: librpc-xml-perl
> Version: 0.76-2
> Severity: serious
> Tags: wheezy sid
> User: debian...@lists.debian.org
> Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120624 qa-ftbfs
> Justification: F
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 678767 + confirmed
Bug #678767 [src:librpc-xml-perl] librpc-xml-perl: FTBFS: tests failed
Added tag(s) confirmed.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
678767: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugrepo
essage ---
Source: cantor
Version: 4:4.7.4-3
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120624 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevan
ug=678785
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Source: kalgebra
Version: 4:4.7.4-2
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120624 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of
ertags: qa-ftbfs-20120624 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
> debian/rules build
> test -x debian/rules
> mkdir -p "."
> /usr/share/maven-debian-helper/copy-repo.sh
>
Your message dated Sun, 24 Jun 2012 13:04:57 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#677487: fixed in openjdk-6 6b24-1.11.3-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #677487,
regarding Multiple security issues
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If th
Hi,
On Sun, Jun 24, 2012 at 12:46:20PM +0200, Helmut Grohne wrote:
> As laid out above and as can be seen by searching update-catalog for
> '$quiet' the --quiet switch never suppresses messages for failures that
> result in a non-zero exit. So your proposed solution just prints the
> error twice (
Only downgrading libsvn1 and subversion to 1.6.17dfsg-4 let's the
tests succeed again.
Regards,
Salvatore
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> forwarded 678791 http://rt.cpan.org/Public/Bug/Display.html?id=77990
Bug #678791 [src:libsvn-notify-mirror-perl] libsvn-notify-mirror-perl: FTBFS:
tests failed
Set Bug forwarded-to-address to
'http://rt.cpan.org/Public/Bug/Display.html?id=77990'
Hi,
Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> Source: unburden-home-dir
> Version: 0.3
[...]
> During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
> amd64.
[...]
> > prove t/*.t
> >
> > # Failed test 'Check command STDERR output'
Thanks for the report. Cause is a missing build-dependency on
On Sun Jun 24 2012 05:28:38 PM CST, Lucas Nussbaum
wrote:
> Source: glance
> Version: 2012.1-3.1
> Severity: serious
> Tags: wheezy sid
> User: debian...@lists.debian.org
> Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120624 qa-ftbfs
> Justification: FTBFS on amd64
>
> Hi,
>
> During
On 2012-06-15 11:13, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> Once one of these bugs is fixed in sid I'll reschedule a full piuparts check
> of sid to look for more impact of this bug, so please drop me a notice how
> the new warning looks like.
After I rechecked sid/amd64 with piuparts and dpkg 1.16.4.* I did
affects 677057 + bacula
usertags 677700 + debian-packaging
thanks
Hi Andreas!
IMHO bacula-director-mysql_5.2.6+dfsg-1 is not broken at all, but
leaving Severity: to serious and Cc:ing debian-release@ for an advice.
On Sat, 16 Jun 2012 11:49:34 +0200, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> during a test with
On 24-06-12 02:59, Laszlo Boszormenyi (GCS) wrote:
> I'm asking for advice. To be honest, #556573 [1] needs some luck to be
> fixed for Wheezy. There's an usability bug, as one dependency of Zoph is
> not even packaged. As I see, the NEW queue is long, even if I package
> that, may not reach testi
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> affects 677057 + bacula
Bug #677057 [mysql-client-5.1] mysql-client-5.1: uninstallable because
mysql-common Breaks: mysql-client-5.1 (<< 5.5)
Added indication that 677057 affects bacula
> usertags 677700 + debian-packaging
Bug#677700: bacula-dire
reopen 677261
thanks
Hello,
The problem aren't the hardening flags, but the flags set in
Makefile. 3.0.0-2 still fails to build on amd64 and other systems
(in fact it worked before on amd64 because +all and thus +pie was
used). This issue should be reported to upstream.
The attached patches shou
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reopen 677261
Bug #677261 {Done: Daniel Baumann }
[src:vsftpd] vsftpd: FTBFS[kfreebsd-amd64 mips{,el}]: relocation R_X86_64_32
against `.rodata.str1.1' can not be used when making a shared object; recompile
with -fPIC
'reopen' may be inappropri
Greetings,
On 23/06/12 11:58, Nikolai Lusan wrote:
> Hi
>
> On 22/06/12 23:35, Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
>> According to a tester, this error message doesn't seem the root of the
>> problem. Could you please provide a backtrace leading to a crash?
>
> I have attached a file with the full gdb session f
Hi Robert,
Thanks for report. The upstream web/ftp server is offline in last a
few days due to security issues (the upstream claims that it's the
first >1 days outage in >16 years). Although the web server is
recovered today, the ftp port is still blocked, which causes the
failure of postinst scri
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 678780 + pending
Bug #678780 [src:unburden-home-dir] unburden-home-dir: FTBFS: tests failed
Added tag(s) pending.
> tags 678630 + pending
Bug #678630 [unburden-home-dir] unburden-home-dir: README.md is confusing
Added tag(s) pending.
> thanks
Your message dated Mon, 25 Jun 2012 00:10:34 +1000
with message-id <4fe71fda.80...@lusan.id.au>
and subject line Close #678523
has caused the Debian Bug report #678523,
regarding evolution: Evolution crashes without network-manager
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem h
Your message dated Sun, 24 Jun 2012 16:19:34 +0200
with message-id <4fe721f6.9070...@gmx.at>
and subject line Built on all buildds
has caused the Debian Bug report #676050,
regarding ucto: FTBFS: build-dependency not installable: libfolia1-dev (>= 0.9)
to be marked as done.
This means that you cla
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> forwarded 678767 http://rt.cpan.org/Public/Bug/Display.html?id=77992
Bug #678767 [src:librpc-xml-perl] librpc-xml-perl: FTBFS: tests failed
Set Bug forwarded-to-address to
'http://rt.cpan.org/Public/Bug/Display.html?id=77992'.
> thanks
Stopping p
1 - 100 of 227 matches
Mail list logo