On Sun, 24 Jun 2012 07:34:50 -0400 Paul Tagliamonte wrote: > On Sun, Jun 24, 2012 at 11:13:31AM +0200, Francesco Poli (wintermute) wrote: [...] > > > > First of all, these debian/copyright paragraphs fail to acknowledge that > > the Joy theme is based on the Debian “Open Use” (without “Debian” word) > > logo. But this may be fixed easily. > > ACK'd. I'll fix this tonight. Thank you!
You're welcome! > > > > > > > The major issue seems to be that the Joy plymouth theme mixes parts > > released under CC-by-sa-v3.0 and parts released under GPLv2+. > > Since CC-by-sa-v3.0 is incompatible with GPLv2+, I would say that the > > resulting work is legally undistributable. > > This *might* be true if it was two bits of code that get linked > together, but since Plymouth (and the plugin, which is GPLv2) only > render the CC-BY-SA 3.0 work, it should be fine. Well, if what you mean is that a GPL-licensed program loads a CC-licensed image (as input data) and renders it on the screen, then it seems that the license incompatibility is irrelevant. Sorry for the misunderstanding, but the debian/copyright file is not very clear on this. Hence, please, at least, clarify the debian/copyright file. > > I'll CC debian-leagl for comment OK, I am keeping debian-legal copied. [...] > In this case, I'll modify this line to show the files that I edited are > still GPLv2, and the images it's self is CC-BY-SA 3.0. No problem, no > big deal. Yes, please: as I said above, a clarification is needed. [...] > > > > > Since everything else in the desktop-base package is GPL-compatible, > > I strongly recommend to persuade Adrien Aubourg and Paul Tagliamonte > > I'm fine with whatever license comes up. I just wanted to keep > consistancy. > > > to re-license their work under the terms of the GNU GPL v2 or later. > > Or, at least, to dual-license it under CC-by-sa-v3.0 and GPLv2+. > > (In the latter case, the complete text of CC-by-sa-v3.0 should be > > included in the debian/copyright file, though.) My recommendation is very much related to consistency. Since rest of the package is all GPL-compatible, it would be really great if this new theme were GPL-compatible as well. Hence, I *still* recommend you to persuade Adrien Aubourg to re-license (or dual-license) under GPLv2+ ! I really hope this may be achieved. -- http://www.inventati.org/frx/frx-gpg-key-transition-2010.txt New GnuPG key, see the transition document! ..................................................... Francesco Poli . GnuPG key fpr == CA01 1147 9CD2 EFDF FB82 3925 3E1C 27E1 1F69 BFFE
pgpC18hWPhlWJ.pgp
Description: PGP signature
