Bug#676817: systemd and dovecot

Jaldhar, We really need to get dovecot compiled on the non-linux platforms to progress with the mysql migration. The systemd dependency puzzles me somewhat as systemd is not available on non-linux platforms and dovecot has previously compiled on those platforms. So at the very leas

Bug#676827: marked as done (veromix: Not installable concurrently with python3)

Your message dated Sun, 17 Jun 2012 07:03:16 + with message-id and subject line Bug#676827: fixed in veromix 0.18.3-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #676827, regarding veromix: Not installable concurrently with python3 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has bee

Bug#677057: mysql-client-5.1: [PATCH] build only libmysqlclient16 package

Followup-For: Bug #677057 * Drop all binary packages except libmysqlclient16 and mysql-source-5.1 as they are built from mysql-5.5 or obsoleted by their -5.5 successors and are no longer installable. (Closes: #677057) diff -u mysql-5.1-5.1.62/debian/control mysql-5.1-5.1.62/debian/contr

Bug#677836: ld: cannot find libncurses.so.5

Package: libncurses5-dev Version: 5.9-8 Severity: serious Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past) Since upgrade from squeeze to wheezy few days ago, "ld" reports that libncurses.so.5 not found. $ gcc -o foo foo.c -lncurses /usr/local/bin/ld: cannot find lib

Bug#668663: backtrace

a backtrace is attached Starting program: /usr/bin/gtimer [Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled] Using host libthread_db library "/lib/i386-linux-gnu/i686/cmov/libthread_db.so.1". ** Message: Building menu Failed: (null) (gtimer:5748): GLib-GObject-CRITICAL **: g_object_ref: assertion `

Bug#676817: systemd and dovecot

On 17/06/12 07:58, Nicholas Bamber wrote: > Jaldhar, > We really need to get dovecot compiled on the non-linux platforms to > progress with the mysql migration. The systemd dependency puzzles me > somewhat as systemd is not available on non-linux platforms and dovecot > has previously compile

Bug#675125: libslang2: jed fails to start with latest libslang2 (2.2.4-12)

On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 04:38:16PM -0700, Omen Wild wrote: > With the latest version of libslang2 (2.2.4-12) jed fails to start. > When I try to load a new instance I get the following errors: > --- begin > Unable to open emacs. Check the value of the S-Lang load path. > Unable to open modeinfo.

Bug#676749: odin: FTBFS: /bin/bash: line 5: 11294 Illegal instruction ${dir}$tst

severity 676749 important tags 676749 + unreproducible moreinfo thanks Hi Lucas, On Sat, Jun 09, 2012 at 10:17:37AM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on > amd64. > > Relevant part: > > UnitTest |check_all : Testing FunctionFit .

Bug#676817: systemd and dovecot

]] Nicholas Bamber > > However, whilst I don't know anything about systemd, this still looks > > like a little broken. I am puzzled that the dependency is on systemd and > > not libsystemd-daemon-dev. After all the libsystemd-daemon-dev package > > contains the "/usr/include/systemd/sd-daemon

Bug#676817: systemd and dovecot

Tollef, Thanks for the response. What about the libsystemd-daemon-dev package? Is that required (on Linux)? On 17/06/12 09:02, Tollef Fog Heen wrote: > ]] Nicholas Bamber > >>> However, whilst I don't know anything about systemd, this still looks >>> like a little broken. I am puzzle

Bug#677836: ld: cannot find libncurses.so.5

On 2012-06-17 09:45 +0200, Vladimir K wrote: > Package: libncurses5-dev > Version: 5.9-8 > Severity: serious > Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past) > > Since upgrade from squeeze to wheezy few days ago, "ld" reports that > libncurses.so.5 not found. Work

Processed: Re: Bug#676749: odin: FTBFS: /bin/bash: line 5: 11294 Illegal instruction ${dir}$tst

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > severity 676749 important Bug #676749 [src:odin] odin: FTBFS: /bin/bash: line 5: 11294 Illegal instruction ${dir}$tst Severity set to 'important' from 'serious' > tags 676749 + unreproducible moreinfo Bug #676749 [src:odin] odin: FTBFS: /bin/

Bug#669466: pynn: FTBFS: tests failed

Hi, I checked whether this issue is still present. I ran the tests in a clean sid chroot and my results are a bit different from Lucas': > > == > > FAIL: unittests.test_basepopulation.test_get_with_no_get_array > > --

Bug#676817: systemd and dovecot

* Nicholas Bamber (nicho...@periapt.co.uk) [120617 08:59]: > We really need to get dovecot compiled on the non-linux platforms to > progress with the mysql migration. The systemd dependency puzzles me > somewhat as systemd is not available on non-linux platforms and dovecot > has previously c

Bug#675125: libslang2: jed fails to start with latest libslang2 (2.2.4-12)

Aha! Thanks. Now I can reproduce too. Down to debugging. regards Alastair On 2012-06-17 09:01, Marc Haber wrote: > On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 04:38:16PM -0700, Omen Wild wrote: >> With the latest version of libslang2 (2.2.4-12) jed fails to start. >> When I try to load a new instance I get the fol

Bug#674785: marked as done (procps: FTBFS on GNU/kFreeBSD)

Your message dated Sun, 17 Jun 2012 08:51:39 + with message-id and subject line Bug#674785: fixed in procps 1:3.3.3-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #674785, regarding procps: FTBFS on GNU/kFreeBSD to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this

Bug#677055: marked as done (procps: FTBFS[!linux]: two regressions breaking build)

Your message dated Sun, 17 Jun 2012 08:51:39 + with message-id and subject line Bug#674785: fixed in procps 1:3.3.3-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #674785, regarding procps: FTBFS[!linux]: two regressions breaking build to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has

Bug#676817: systemd and dovecot

]] Nicholas Bamber > Tollef, > Thanks for the response. What about the libsystemd-daemon-dev package? > Is that required (on Linux)? I don't know in detail why dovecot build-deps on systemd, but I believe it's for the socket activation. It can either include sd-daemon.[ch] in the source t

Bug#676196: marked as done (ruby-grib: FTBFS: grib.c:14:3: error: format not a string literal and no format arguments [-Werror=format-security])

Your message dated Sun, 17 Jun 2012 08:54:33 + with message-id and subject line Bug#676196: fixed in ruby-grib 0.2.2-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #676196, regarding ruby-grib: FTBFS: grib.c:14:3: error: format not a string literal and no format arguments [-Werror=format-security] to be

Bug#676122: gnome-doc-tools: Does not register itself in /etc/sgml/catalog (Re: still not fixed)

On 06/17/2012 02:15 AM, Jonathan Nieder wrote: You'll probably need to reinstall gnome-doc-tools (or run "update-catalog --update-super" by hand). Sorry for the inconvenience. Hope that helps, Jonathan Negative. I run "update-catalog --update-super". The build is still failing with the same

Processed: Bug#676874 marked as pending

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tag 676874 pending Bug #676874 [dpkg] [update-alternatives] Should allow too large priority values for backwards compatibility Added tag(s) pending. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 676874: http://

Bug#676874: marked as pending

tag 676874 pending thanks Hello, Bug #676874 reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository. You can see the changelog below, and you can check the diff of the fix at: http://git.debian.org/?p=dpkg/dpkg.git;a=commitdiff;h=18d9373 --- commit 18d9373b27effd533d386fdf7bfde6e6b3782101 Aut

Bug#677849: xemacs21-support: The package xemacs21-support should be rebuilt with new debhelper to get trigger support

Package: xemacs21-support Version: 21.4.22-3.2 Severity: serious User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: piuparts Hi, I see this in quite a few piuparts logfiles: Setting up xemacs21-support (21.4.22-3.2) ... Ignoring install-info called from maintainer script The package xemacs21-suppo

Bug#676874: marked as done ([update-alternatives] Should allow too large priority values for backwards compatibility)

Your message dated Sun, 17 Jun 2012 09:33:41 + with message-id and subject line Bug#676874: fixed in dpkg 1.16.4.3 has caused the Debian Bug report #676874, regarding [update-alternatives] Should allow too large priority values for backwards compatibility to be marked as done. This means tha

Bug#605370: marked as done (atlas: FTBFS on alpha, armel, ia64, mips, powerpc and s390)

Your message dated Sun, 17 Jun 2012 11:38:02 +0200 with message-id <87haua1dol@brouzouf.villemot.name> and subject line Re: Bug#605370: atlas: FTBFS on alpha, armel, ia64, mips, powerpc and s390 has caused the Debian Bug report #605370, regarding atlas: FTBFS on alpha, armel, ia64, mips, power

Bug#606640: marked as done (src:atlas: FTBFS on alpha, armel, ia64, mips, powerpc, s390)

Your message dated Sun, 17 Jun 2012 11:38:02 +0200 with message-id <87haua1dol@brouzouf.villemot.name> and subject line Re: Bug#605370: atlas: FTBFS on alpha, armel, ia64, mips, powerpc and s390 has caused the Debian Bug report #605370, regarding src:atlas: FTBFS on alpha, armel, ia64, mips, p

Bug#676259: marked as done (telepathy-qt: FTBFS on non-amd64: symbols files mismatch)

Your message dated Sun, 17 Jun 2012 09:39:08 + with message-id and subject line Bug#676259: fixed in telepathy-qt 0.9.1-4 has caused the Debian Bug report #676259, regarding telepathy-qt: FTBFS on non-amd64: symbols files mismatch to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the probl

Bug#677852: prelude-lml: FTBFS[kfreebsd]: testsuite failure

Package: src:prelude-lml Version: 1.0.0-3 Severity: serious Tags: sid wheezy User: debian-...@lists.debian.org Usertags: kfreebsd X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-...@lists.debian.org Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past) Hi! Your package failed to build on the kfreeb

Bug#677853: clang: FTBFS[any-x86]: missing dependency on gcc-4.6

Package: src:clang Version: 3.1-4 Severity: serious Tags: sid wheezy User: debian-...@lists.debian.org Usertags: kfreebsd X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-...@lists.debian.org Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past) Hi! Your package failed to build on the x86 buildds:

Bug#677202: biber packages version 0.9.9+git2012426-3 is beta and requires beta version of biblatex

On Sat, Jun 16, 2012 at 08:18:56AM +0900, Norbert Preining wrote: > On Fr, 15 Jun 2012, Miguel Telleria de Esteban wrote: > > > - I guess we have to add a epoch 1: otherwise the new version is > > > smaller than what is in sid now > > > > I guess that you are talking about the version number of th

Bug#677854: okular: FTBFS[kfreebsd]: symbol changes

Package: src:okular Version: 4:4.8.4-1 Severity: serious Tags: sid wheezy User: debian-...@lists.debian.org Usertags: kfreebsd X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-...@lists.debian.org Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past) Hi! Your package failed to build on the kfreebsd-

Bug#656584: ifupdown's changed hook handling breaks other packages.

On Sat, 16 Jun 2012 19:33:27 +0200 Andrew Shadura wrote: > > If it is a bug in NetworkManager, then please show me where. > > auto eth0 > > #NetworkManager#iface eth0 ... > > is not a valid syntax. > > So when we have interfaces 'defined' like this, initscripts' hook > thinks we've got all 0 i

Processed: tagging 668802

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > # https://flattr.com/thing/47066/Debian-BTS-cleaning-up > # installs fine on squeeze > tags 668802 + wheezy sid Bug #668802 {Done: Debian FTP Masters } [jtex-bin] jtex-bin: fails to install: The format file of `jtex' is NOT built successfully. A

Processed: found 677461 in lapack/3.4.1-2

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > found 677461 lapack/3.4.1-2 Bug #677461 {Done: Sylvestre Ledru } [liblapack-doc-man] liblapack-doc-man and libblas-doc: error when trying to install together Marked as found in versions lapack/3.4.1-2; no longer marked as fixed in versions lapac

Bug#677461: liblapack-doc-man and libblas-doc: error when trying to install together

seems one manpage was forgotten to remove from the package: Unpacking liblapack-doc-man (from .../liblapack-doc-man_3.4.1-2_all.deb) ... dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/liblapack-doc-man_3.4.1-2_all.deb (--unpack): trying to overwrite '/usr/share/man/man3/lsame.3.gz', which is als

Processed: tagging 668791

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > # https://flattr.com/thing/47066/Debian-BTS-cleaning-up > # installs fine on squeeze > tags 668791 + wheezy sid Bug #668791 {Done: Debian FTP Masters } [multex-bin] multex-bin: fails to install: The format file of `multex' is NOT built successfu

Bug#673421: marked as done (calibre: segfault at startup)

Your message dated Sun, 17 Jun 2012 12:04:13 +0200 with message-id <4fddab9d.1090...@wm1.at> and subject line fixed according to one of the reporters has caused the Debian Bug report #673421, regarding calibre: segfault at startup to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem ha

Bug#669469: Patch for FTBFS of zeitgeist-sharp

I am the developer of zeitgeist-sharp. The patch is below diff --git a/configure.ac b/configure.ac index acf4cfd..11ed653 100644 --- a/configure.ac +++ b/configure.ac @@ -45,7 +45,7 @@ PKG_CHECK_MODULES([DBUS_SHARP_10], [dbus-sharp-1.0]) PKG_CHECK_MODULES([DBUS_SHARP_GLIB_10], [dbus-sharp-glib-

Processed: reopening 677461

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > reopen 677461 Bug #677461 [liblapack-doc-man] liblapack-doc-man and libblas-doc: error when trying to install together Bug 677461 is not marked as done; doing nothing. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance.

Processed: bug 652084 is forwarded to https://trac.openstreetmap.org/ticket/4450

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > forwarded 652084 https://trac.openstreetmap.org/ticket/4450 Bug #652084 [gosmore] gosmore use 100% CPU and does nothing Set Bug forwarded-to-address to 'https://trac.openstreetmap.org/ticket/4450'. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contac

Bug#677856: dcap: FTBFS[kfreebsd-amd64 linux-i386]: error: inlining failed in call to always_inline 'vasprintf': function not inlinable

Package: src:dcap Version: 2.47.6-2 Severity: serious Tags: sid wheezy Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past) Hi! Your package failed to build on the kfreebsd-* buildds: /bin/bash ../../libtool --tag=CC --mode=compile gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I../../sr

Bug#637488: Ping - remove t1lib

Just to remember... As far as I can see there are no more rdepends left. Are there any more reasons not to remove t1lib? cu AW -- [...] If you don't want to be restricted, don't agree to it. If you are coerced, comply as much as you must to protect yourself, just don't support it. Noone can free

Bug#657055: haskell-hsql-postgresql-doc: fails to upgrade from squeeze - trying to overwrite ...

Hi, JFTR, after the haskell migration http://piuparts.debian.org/squeeze2wheezy/overwrite_other_packages_files_error.html lists no haskell packages any more. Greetings, Joachim -- Joachim "nomeata" Breitner Debian Developer nome...@debian.org | ICQ# 74513189 | GPG-Keyid: 4743206C JID: nome.

Bug#668037: fixed in jwhois 4.0-2

reopen 668037 fixed 668037 4.0-2 thanks * Matej Vela [2012-05-18 14:34:54 CEST]: > On Fri, May 18, 2012 at 01:57:28PM +0200, Matthias Guentert wrote: > > That still doesn't work on my side. > > > > $ jwhois -v 173.194.70.94 > > [Querying whois.arin.net] > > [Unable to connect to remote host] > >

Bug#676817: systemd and dovecot

Tollef, I would be very grateful if you could have a look. Andreas Barth has basically repeated the point I made in the third paragraph of my original post. Nothing you have said is really reassuring me. You talk about how a package needs something to make socket activation to work and sd-d

Processed: Re: Bug#668037: fixed in jwhois 4.0-2

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > reopen 668037 Bug #668037 {Done: Matej Vela } [jwhois] jwhois complains with "[Unable to connect to remote host]" Bug #668040 {Done: Matej Vela } [jwhois] jwhois complains with [Unable to connect to remote host] 'reopen' may be inappropriate whe

Bug#676817: systemd and dovecot

]] Nicholas Bamber Hi, I would be most grateful if you quoted the way is usually done on email lists. > I would be very grateful if you could have a look. Andreas Barth has > basically repeated the point I made in the third paragraph of my > original post. Yes, and you're both mistaken.

Bug#677861: lftp: FTBFS[kfreebsd-i386]: error: conflicting declaration 'typedef __int32_t gl_intptr_t'

Package: src:lftp Version: 4.3.7-1 Severity: serious Tags: sid wheezy User: debian-...@lists.debian.org Usertags: kfreebsd X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-...@lists.debian.org Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past) Hi! Your package failed to build on the kfreebsd-i386

Bug#677762: marked as done (Multiarch issues)

Your message dated Sun, 17 Jun 2012 12:38:16 +0200 with message-id and subject line Undoing cpp-4.7: Please mark package as Multi-Arch: foreign has caused the Debian Bug report #677762, regarding Multiarch issues to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with

Processed: unblock 677762 with 677784

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > unblock 677762 with 677784 Bug #677762 {Done: Goswin von Brederlow } [ia32-libs-gtk] Multiarch issues 677762 was blocked by: 677787 650777 677788 661714 676914 677784 650787 641614 676918 677786 641615 68 69 677762 was not blocking any b

Processed: tagging 667063, tagging 666959

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > # https://flattr.com/thing/47066/Debian-BTS-cleaning-up > # not affecting squeeze > tags 667063 + wheezy sid Bug #667063 {Done: Francesco Paolo Lovergine } [src:h5utils] h5utils: Adjust for the new octave package version 3.6.1 Added tag(s) sid an

Bug#675125: Notes

Ok, for those following at home, some debug notes: (1) It isn't arch dependent. Reproduced on i386 and amd64. (2) Its in libslang2 not -modules, etc. (3) jed works with -10 release, not -11 onwards; rebuilding libslang -10 or even -9 release (in up-to-date sid) breaks jed. So, it looks like some

Bug#637488: Ping - remove t1lib

On Sun, 2012-06-17 at 12:14 +0200, Arne Wichmann wrote: > Just to remember... As far as I can see there are no more rdepends left. > Are there any more reasons not to remove t1lib? How did you determine that? Running "dak rm -Rn t1lib" on ftp-master says: Checking reverse dependencies... # Broke

Bug#677864: compiz 0.8 should not release with wheezy

Source: compiz Version: 0.8.4-5.2 Severity: serious I don't think the current compiz package is in a fit state to be released with wheezy. It badly needs love. Cheers, Julien signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Bug#674350: vxl: FTBFS: dimosct.h:124:17: error: 'scaleData' was not declared in this scope, and no declarations were found by argument-dependent lookup at the point of instantiation [-fpermissive]

reopen 674350 found 674350 1.14.0-17 thanks The problem is, vxl is using an embedded copy of dcmtk headers (and btw compiling several of its libraries), and these were not fixed. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Conta

Processed: vxl: FTBFS: dimosct.h:124:17: error: 'scaleData' was not declared in this scope, and no declarations were found by argument-dependent lookup at the point of instantiation [-fpermissive]

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > reopen 674350 Bug #674350 {Done: Mathieu Malaterre } [src:vxl] vxl: FTBFS: dimosct.h:124:17: error: 'scaleData' was not declared in this scope, and no declarations were found by argument-dependent lookup at the point of instantiation [-fpermiss

Processed: reopening 677762

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > reopen 677762 Bug #677762 {Done: Goswin von Brederlow } [ia32-libs-gtk] Multiarch issues Bug reopened Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #677762 to the same values previously set > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me

Bug#676100: xmms2: diff for NMU version 0.8+dfsg-2.1

tags 676100 + patch tags 676100 + pending thanks Dear maintainer, I've prepared an NMU for xmms2 (versioned as 0.8+dfsg-2.1) and uploaded it to DELAYED/2. Please feel free to tell me if I should delay it longer. Cheers, Julien diff -Nru xmms2-0.8+dfsg/debian/changelog xmms2-0.8+dfsg/debian/chang

Processed: xmms2: diff for NMU version 0.8+dfsg-2.1

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 676100 + patch Bug #676100 [src:xmms2] xmms2: FTBFS: dh_install: libxmmsclient-ruby1.8 missing files (usr/lib/ruby/1.8/*), aborting Added tag(s) patch. > tags 676100 + pending Bug #676100 [src:xmms2] xmms2: FTBFS: dh_install: libxmmsclient-r

Processed: can't reproduce the problem

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 677836 + moreinfo unreproducible Bug #677836 [libncurses5-dev] ld: cannot find libncurses.so.5 Added tag(s) unreproducible and moreinfo. > severity 677836 normal Bug #677836 [libncurses5-dev] ld: cannot find libncurses.so.5 Severity set to 'n

Bug#676817: systemd and dovecot

Tollef, Thanks for your responses. Based upon them I wail upload an NMU with a 2 day delay doing nothing more than limiting the systemd changes to linux. I would not normally feel comfortable with such a short delay but in this case ny proposed changes should be self-evident and uncontrover

Bug#677202: biber packages version 0.9.9+git2012426-3 is beta and requires beta version of biblatex

It works! Thank you very much. Regards, Anna. -- Anna Chmielińska -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#627508: conflicting binary path for dconf and d-conf

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Hi! Both the package dconf and d-conf with its binary package dconf-tools ship a binary with the path /usr/bin/dconf. d-conf is a utility that originates from gnome, and whose purpose is to manage "Desktop Environment Settings". On the other hand, d

Processed: tagging 677762

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 677762 + sid wheezy Bug #677762 [ia32-libs-gtk] Multiarch issues Added tag(s) sid and wheezy. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 677762: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=677762 De

Processed: tagging 677527

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 677527 + sid wheezy Bug #677527 [wvstreams] wvdial Aborts with error "Assertion `magic_number == -0x123678' failed." Added tag(s) sid and wheezy. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 677527: http:

Bug#677853: marked as done (clang: FTBFS[any-x86]: missing dependency on gcc-4.6)

Your message dated Sun, 17 Jun 2012 12:17:28 + with message-id and subject line Bug#677853: fixed in clang 3.1-5 has caused the Debian Bug report #677853, regarding clang: FTBFS[any-x86]: missing dependency on gcc-4.6 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been d

Bug#676717: Did you use dpkg (1.16.4)?: Bug#676717: debiandoc-sgml:

reopen 676717 thanks Hi Osamu, Thanks for taking care of that matter! On Sa, 16 Jun 2012, Osamu Aoki wrote: > Thanks for d-d list posting warning me not to unplug my PC :-) Huu? No idea what you are talking about??? But anyway ... > See http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=675613

Processed: Re: Did you use dpkg (1.16.4)?: Bug#676717: debiandoc-sgml:

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > reopen 676717 Bug #676717 {Done: Osamu Aoki } [debiandoc-sgml] debiandoc-sgml: does not work at all with minimal document Bug reopened Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #676717 to the same values previously set > thanks Stopping pr

Bug#634131: Ping - import error

This serious problem is now unhandled for almost a year. Is there any plan to handle it? cu AW -- [...] If you don't want to be restricted, don't agree to it. If you are coerced, comply as much as you must to protect yourself, just don't support it. Noone can free you but yourself. (crag, on Deb

Bug#677527: gcc-4.7 issue?

Maybe it helps to recompile this package with new compiler. gcc-4.7 releases after this package was last compiled, have fixed some issues -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#676122: gnome-doc-tools: Does not register itself in /etc/sgml/catalog (Re: still not fixed)

Miroslav Suchý wrote: > Negative. > > I run "update-catalog --update-super". The build is still failing > with the same error. Ok, thanks. What indicates that this is the same bug? If it's the same bug, then reopening would be the right thing, but if I understand

Bug#637488: Ping - remove t1lib

begin quotation from Adam D. Barratt (in <1339930157.7014.2.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org>): > On Sun, 2012-06-17 at 12:14 +0200, Arne Wichmann wrote: > > Just to remember... As far as I can see there are no more rdepends left. > > Are there any more reasons not to remove t1lib? > > How

Bug#555168: Unclear license situation for (e)glibc locales provided by you

Hello, you are listed as contact person/author of the following locale: ka_GE This locale comes with a statement % Distribution and use is free, also % for commercial purposes. Thus it does not allow modification; it is unclear, however, if this statement was meant as a license. As discussed i

Bug#555168: Unclear license situation for (e)glibc locales provided by you

Hello, you are listed as contact person/author of the following locale: kk_KZ This locale comes with a statement % Distribution and use is free, also % for commercial purposes. Thus it does not allow modification; it is unclear, however, if this statement was meant as a license. As discussed i

Bug#555168: Unclear license situation for (e)glibc locales provided by you

Hello, you are listed as contact person/author of the following locale: ko_KR This locale comes with a statement % Distribution and use is free, also % for commercial purposes. Thus it does not allow modification; it is unclear, however, if this statement was meant as a license. As discussed i

Bug#555168: Unclear license situation for (e)glibc locales provided by you

Hello, you are listed as contact person/author of the following locale: ku_TR This locale comes with a statement % Distribution and use is free, also % for commercial purposes. Thus it does not allow modification; it is unclear, however, if this statement was meant as a license. As discussed i

Bug#555168: Unclear license situation for (e)glibc locales provided by you

Let's add some other mail addresses I know for Timur Birsh. Quoting Helge Kreutzmann (deb...@helgefjell.de): > Hello, > you are listed as contact person/author of the following locale: > > ko_KR > > This locale comes with a statement > > % Distribution and use is free, also > % for commercial p

Bug#637488: Ping - remove t1lib

On Sun, 2012-06-17 at 14:41 +0200, Arne Wichmann wrote: > begin quotation from Adam D. Barratt (in > <1339930157.7014.2.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org>): > > Checking reverse dependencies... > > # Broken Depends: > > dvi2ps: dvi2ps [amd64] > > evince: libevdocument3-4 > > grace: grace > >

Bug#676100: xmms2: diff for NMU version 0.8+dfsg-2.1

Am Sonntag, den 17.06.2012, 13:08 +0200 schrieb Julien Cristau: > I've prepared an NMU for xmms2 (versioned as 0.8+dfsg-2.1) and > uploaded it to DELAYED/2. Please feel free to tell me if I > should delay it longer. Dropping the ruby package seems to be the wrong fix. xmms2 fails to build due to t

Processed: tagging 666750

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > # https://flattr.com/thing/47066/Debian-BTS-cleaning-up > # "This bug obviously does not affect squeeze." > tags 666750 + wheezy sid Bug #666750 [debian-installer, grub-installer] [debian-installer] grub-installer prompt mentions other operating

Bug#677883: FTBFS: Nonexistent build-dependency: libtrilinos-dev

Source: deal.ii Version: 7.1.0-1 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Hello, deal.ii currently build-depends on non-existent libtrilinos-dev Samuel -- System Information: Debian Release: wheezy/sid APT prefers testing APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'stable'), (1,

Processed: Re: Processed: severity of 629307 is serious

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > severity 629307 serious Bug #629307 [dasher] dasher: uninstallable binNMU Severity set to 'serious' from 'important' > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 629307: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport

Bug#676717: Did you use dpkg (1.16.4)?: Bug#676717: debiandoc-sgml:

Hi, On Sun, Jun 17, 2012 at 09:31:51PM +0900, Norbert Preining wrote: > reopen 676717 > thanks > > Hi Osamu, > > Thanks for taking care of that matter! > > On Sa, 16 Jun 2012, Osamu Aoki wrote: > > Thanks for d-d list posting warning me not to unplug my PC :-) > > Huu? No idea what you are tal

Bug#677202: biber packages version 0.9.9+git2012426-3 is beta and requires beta version of biblatex

On So, 17 Jun 2012, Julian Gilbey wrote: > So you could call this one 0.9.9+release-1 and avoid having to use an > epoch. 0.9.9.0+git2012415-1 would also work. It seems a shame to > introduce an epoch for a case like this where the version numbers are > going to increase pretty soon beyond the tr

Bug#676077: Patch

tags 676077 + patch thanks Attached is a patch that fixes the FTBFS. Index: raspell-1.2/ext/raspell.c === --- raspell-1.2.orig/ext/raspell.c 2012-06-17 15:14:00.0 +0200 +++ raspell-1.2/ext/raspell.c 2012-06-17 15:37:30.0495860

Bug#676100: xmms2: diff for NMU version 0.8+dfsg-2.1

On Sun, Jun 17, 2012 at 15:23:16 +0200, Benjamin Drung wrote: > Am Sonntag, den 17.06.2012, 13:08 +0200 schrieb Julien Cristau: > > I've prepared an NMU for xmms2 (versioned as 0.8+dfsg-2.1) and > > uploaded it to DELAYED/2. Please feel free to tell me if I > > should delay it longer. > > Droppin

Processed: Patch

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 676077 + patch Bug #676077 [src:raspell] raspell: FTBFS: ext/raspell.c:76:9: error: format not a string literal and no format arguments [-Werror=format-security] Added tag(s) patch. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if yo

Bug#677202: biber packages version 0.9.9+git2012426-3 is beta and requires beta version of biblatex

Hi all I have just returned to Singapore from a business trip to Beijing, and will look into the biber package after my APT upgrade has finished. On 17 June 2012 17:45, Julian Gilbey wrote: > On Sat, Jun 16, 2012 at 08:18:56AM +0900, Norbert Preining wrote: >> On Fr, 15 Jun 2012, Miguel Telleria

Bug#677202: biber packages version 0.9.9+git2012426-3 is beta and requires beta version of biblatex

Ha, seems like your mail just crossed mine. ;) BR -- Danai -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#676717: marked as done (debiandoc-sgml: does not work at all with minimal document)

Your message dated Sun, 17 Jun 2012 23:20:19 +0900 with message-id <20120617142019.GA738@goofy.localdomain> and subject line Re: Bug#676717: Did you use dpkg (1.16.4)?: Bug#676717: debiandoc-sgml: has caused the Debian Bug report #676717, regarding debiandoc-sgml: does not work at all with minimal

Bug#677893: cpl: FTBFS on armel, ia64, kfreebsd-*, s390x, sparc

Source: cpl Version: 6.0-1 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Hi, we have test failures on Linux archs, and missing files to install on kfreebsd-*. This prevents your package from migrating to testing, and the cpl transition to be processed. https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=cpl

Processed: notfound 677679 in 3.0.6.RELEASE-5

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > notfound 677679 3.0.6.RELEASE-5 Bug #677679 {Done: Miguel Landaeta } [libspring-java] CVE-2011-2731 There is no source info for the package 'libspring-java' at version '3.0.6.RELEASE-5' with architecture '' Unable to make a source version for ve

Processed: notfound 677680 in 3.0.6.RELEASE-5

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > notfound 677680 3.0.6.RELEASE-5 Bug #677680 {Done: Miguel Landaeta } [libspring-java] CVE-2011-2732 There is no source info for the package 'libspring-java' at version '3.0.6.RELEASE-5' with architecture '' Unable to make a source version for ve

Processed: notfound 677681 in 3.0.6.RELEASE-5

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > notfound 677681 3.0.6.RELEASE-5 Bug #677681 {Done: Miguel Landaeta } [libspring-java] CVE-2011-2894 There is no source info for the package 'libspring-java' at version '3.0.6.RELEASE-5' with architecture '' Unable to make a source version for ve

Bug#676817: systemd and dovecot

Jaldhar assures me he is working on an upload so obviously I'm not. However I got quite far double checking a few builds (attached diff) and I found that there seems to be an issue with sqlite3. I had better investigate that. checking for sqlite3_open in -lsqlite3... yes checking sqlite3.h usabil

Bug#677202: biber packages version 0.9.9+git2012426-3 is beta and requires beta version of biblatex

On Sun, 17 Jun 2012 22:22:49 +0800 Danai SAE-HAN (韓達耐) wrote: > Hi all > > I have just returned to Singapore from a business trip to Beijing, and > will look into the biber package after my APT upgrade has finished. Cool, Just for completion I have also uploaded a 0.9.9+release-1 package (which

Processed: Re: Bug#671853: Transition: cpl

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > block 671853 by 677893 Bug #671853 [release.debian.org] Transition: cpl 671853 was blocked by: 671675 671853 was not blocking any bugs. Added blocking bug(s) of 671853: 677893 > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assis

Bug#677202: biber packages version 0.9.9+git2012426-3 is beta and requires beta version of biblatex

Hi Miguel! On 17 June 2012 22:46, Miguel Telleria de Esteban wrote: > > Just for completion I have also uploaded a 0.9.9+release-1 package > (which is nothing more that the previous 1:0.9.9-1 with the version > number changed in debian/changelog). > > http://mtelleria.com/biber/0.9.9_release/ > >

Bug#669433: marked as done (grafx2: FTBFS: fileformats.c:30:17: fatal error: png.h: No such file or directory)

Your message dated Sun, 17 Jun 2012 15:05:17 + with message-id and subject line Bug#669433: fixed in grafx2 2.3-1.1 has caused the Debian Bug report #669433, regarding grafx2: FTBFS: fileformats.c:30:17: fatal error: png.h: No such file or directory to be marked as done. This means that you

Bug#666641: Can't reproduce

tags 41 + moreinfo thanks Hi Lucas, I can't reproduce this bug. It seems to be fixed with recent versions of texlive-fonts-recommended. Are you still able to reproduce this issue? Kind regards -- Sebastian Ramacher signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

  1   2   3   >