On So, 17 Jun 2012, Julian Gilbey wrote:
> So you could call this one 0.9.9+release-1 and avoid having to use an
> epoch. 0.9.9.0+git2012415-1 would also work. It seems a shame to
> introduce an epoch for a case like this where the version numbers are
> going to increase pretty soon beyond the troublesome case.
Agreed, Danai, please take this into account!!!
Best wishes
Norbert
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Norbert Preining preining@{jaist.ac.jp, logic.at, debian.org}
JAIST, Japan TeX Live & Debian Developer
DSA: 0x09C5B094 fp: 14DF 2E6C 0307 BE6D AD76 A9C0 D2BF 4AA3 09C5 B094
------------------------------------------------------------------------
"One disk to rule them all, One disk to find them. One disk to bring
them all and in the darkness grind them. In the Land of Redmond
where the shadows lie." -- The Silicon Valley Tarot
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
