Package: libplexus-classworlds-java-doc
Version: 1.5.0-2
Severity: grave
As the subject says: since libplexus-classworlds-java-doc has a Depends on
classpath-doc, which is not in sid nor provided by any package in sid, the
package is uninstallable.
--
Daniel Schepler
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, emai
_test: perl Build test returned exit code 255
> make: *** [build] Error 255
> dpkg-buildpackage: error: debian/rules build gave error exit status 2
> **
> Build finished at 20100815-0038
> FAILED [dpkg-buildpackage died]
Full
Package: installation-reports
Severity: critical
Justification: breaks the whole system
-- Package-specific info:
Boot method: CD
Image version: debian-testing-sparc-CD-1.iso, 8-9-10 build
Date: 08-14-10
Machine: Sun Ultra 10
Partitions:
Base System Installation Checklist:
[O] = OK, [E] = E
Leaving directory
> `/build/salvi-libpoe-api-peek-perl_1.3400-1-amd64-ploNrl/libpoe-api-peek-perl-1.3400-1'
> dh_auto_test: make -j1 test returned exit code 2
> make: *** [build-stamp] Error 29
> dpkg-buildpackage: error: debian/rules build gave error exit status 2
> **
Source: jruby-joni
Version: 1.1.4-1
Severity: serious
Tags: squeeze sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20100815 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
> /usr/bin/faker
Source: libsysactivity
Version: 0.5.4-2
Severity: serious
Tags: squeeze sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20100815 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
> make[4]: Enter
Source: librspec-ruby
Version: 1.3.0-2
Severity: serious
Tags: squeeze sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20100815 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
> /usr/bin/faker
Source: bugzilla
Version: 3.6.2.0-1
Severity: serious
Tags: squeeze sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20100815 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
> make[1]: Enter
Source: gmp-ecm
Version: 6.3-1
Severity: serious
Tags: squeeze sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20100815 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
> /usr/bin/fakeroot deb
Source: tokyocabinet-ruby
Version: 1.30-1
Severity: serious
Tags: squeeze sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20100815 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
> mak
Source: libsexp-processor-ruby
Version: 3.0.4-1
Severity: serious
Tags: squeeze sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20100815 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
> /usr/
Source: solr
Version: 1.4.0+ds1-2
Severity: serious
Tags: squeeze sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20100815 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
> /usr/bin/faker
Source: libspring-2.5-java
Version: 2.5.6.SEC02-1
Severity: serious
Tags: squeeze sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20100815 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
> ** Us
Source: pybtex
Version: 0.13.2-1
Severity: serious
Tags: squeeze sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20100815 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
> make[1]: Enter
Source: dpkg-ruby
Version: 0.3.6
Severity: serious
Tags: squeeze sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20100815 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
> g++ -I. -I/usr/incl
Source: hyperestraier
Version: 1.4.13-1
Severity: serious
Tags: squeeze sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20100815 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
> make[1]: Enter
Source: libfakefs-ruby
Version: 0.2.1-1
Severity: serious
Tags: squeeze sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20100815 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
> /usr/bin/faker
Source: jifty
Version: 0.91117+dfsg-2
Severity: serious
Tags: squeeze sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20100815 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
> make[2]: Enter
Source: libinotify-ruby
Version: 0.0.2-4
Severity: serious
Tags: squeeze sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20100815 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
> make[1]: Enter
Source: antelope
Version: 3.5.1-1
Severity: serious
Tags: squeeze sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20100815 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
> /usr/bin/faker
Source: libimage-size-ruby
Version: 1:0.1.1-4
Severity: serious
Tags: squeeze sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20100815 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
> mak
Source: apache2
Version: 2.2.16-1
Severity: serious
Tags: squeeze sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20100815 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
> make[4]: Enter
Source: gcl
Version: 2.6.7-64
Severity: serious
Tags: squeeze sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20100815 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
> gcc -c -g -Wall -D
Source: libffi-ruby
Version: 0.6.3debian-1
Severity: serious
Tags: squeeze sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20100815 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
> mak
Source: unbound
Version: 1.4.5-1
Severity: serious
Tags: squeeze sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20100815 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
> ./libtool --quiet --
Source: imagemagick
Version: 8:6.6.0.4-2.2
Severity: serious
Tags: squeeze sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20100815 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
> g++:
>
Source: testng
Version: 5.11+dfsg-1
Severity: serious
Tags: squeeze sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20100815 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
> make[1]: Enter
Source: python-apt
Version: 0.7.96.1
Severity: serious
Tags: squeeze sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20100815 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
> make[1]: Enter
Source: publican
Version: 2.1-2
Severity: serious
Tags: squeeze sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20100815 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
> make[1]: Enter
Source: diagnostics
Version: 0.3.1-2
Severity: serious
Tags: squeeze sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20100815 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
> make[6]: Enter
Source: libgems-ruby
Version: 1.3.7-1
Severity: serious
Tags: squeeze sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20100815 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
> /usr/bin/faker
Source: python3.1
Version: 3.1.2+20100707-1
Severity: serious
Tags: squeeze sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20100815 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
> mak
Source: ikiwiki
Version: 3.20100804
Severity: serious
Tags: squeeze sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20100815 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
> make[1]: Enter
Source: lusernet.app
Version: 0.4.2-5
Severity: serious
Tags: squeeze sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20100815 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
> /usr/bin/ld: warn
Source: osso-gwconnect
Version: 1.0.12.debian-2
Severity: serious
Tags: squeeze sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20100815 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
> /usr/
Source: eucalyptus
Version: 1.6.2-2
Severity: serious
Tags: squeeze sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20100815 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
> ** Using bu
Source: ltp
Version: 20091231+dfsg-1
Severity: serious
Tags: squeeze sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20100815 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
> gcc
Source: adonthell-data
Version: 0.3.4.cvs.20080529+dfsg-2
Severity: serious
Tags: squeeze sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20100815 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part
Source: yydebug
Version: 1.1.0-1
Severity: serious
Tags: squeeze sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20100815 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
> make[1]: Enter
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> forcemerge 592981 593032
Bug#592981: FTBFS: failed tests t/TestApp-Plugin-SetupWizard/t/001-basic.t with
libyaml-syck-perl 1.12-1
Bug#593032: jifty: FTBFS: tests failed
Forcibly Merged 592981 593032.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please co
Your message dated Sun, 15 Aug 2010 09:47:10 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#590612: fixed in xmedcon 0.10.5-2.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #590612,
regarding xmedcon: FTBFS on mips* ("non-dynamic relocations refer to dynamic
symbol mdcrawprevinput")
to be marked as done.
This m
> Judging from this bug and the statement that Arte regularly changes its
> streaming system, this package is a clear candidate for volatile for
> Squeeze+1.
Well, perhaps this is a good idea, we have time to see ;-)
Fortunately, Arte may stick with the current streaming system for some
times now
The kq and kq-data packages were removed from Debian because of
the unlicensed music: http://bugs.debian.org/575739
Meanwhile, the upstream KQ developers are tracking the music
licenses in their wiki. So far, the composer of aa_arofl.xm has
granted permission to distribute that file but not to mo
Package: libfeedtools-ruby1.9.1
Version: 0.2.29+dfsg1-3
Severity: serious
Hi,
Loading the library fails with ruby1.9.2:
/usr/lib/ruby/1.9.1/feed_tools.rb:26:in `initialize': No such file or directory
- /usr/share/rails (Errno::ENOENT)
from /usr/lib/ruby/1.9.1/feed_tools.rb:26:in `new'
Package: libfacets-ruby1.9.1
Version: 2.7.0-1
Severity: serious
Hi,
Loading the library fails with ruby1.9.2:
/usr/lib/ruby/1.9.1/facets/string/start_with.rb:34:in `alias_method': undefined
method `ends_with?' for class `String' (NameError)
from /usr/lib/ruby/1.9.1/facets/string/start_wi
Package: libstomp-ruby1.9.1
Version: 1.0.4-2
Severity: serious
Hi,
Loading the library fails with ruby1.9.2:
$ ruby1.9.1 -e 'require "stomp"'
:29:in `require':
/usr/lib/ruby/1.9.1/stomp.rb:289: syntax error, unexpected tLABEL (SyntaxError)
/usr/lib/ruby/1.9.1/stomp.rb:291: syntax error, unexpect
Package: libgettext-activerecord-ruby1.9.1
Version: 2.1.0-3
Severity: serious
Hi,
Loading the library fails with ruby1.9.2:
$ ruby1.9.1 -e 'require "gettext_activerecord"'
/usr/lib/ruby/1.9.1/gettext/runtime/locale_path.rb:56:in `default_path_rules':
undefined method `all_load_paths' for Gem:Mod
Package: libramaze-ruby1.9.1
Version: 2010.06.18-1
Severity: serious
Hi,
Loading the library fails with ruby1.9.2:
$ ruby1.9.1 -e 'require "ramaze"'
:29: stack level too deep
(SystemStackError)
--
| Lucas Nussbaum
| lu...@lucas-nussbaum.net http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net/ |
| jabber: lu...@nu
Package: libxml-parser-ruby1.9.1
Version: 0.7.1-1
Severity: serious
Hi,
Loading the library fails with ruby1.9.2:
$ ruby1.9.1 -e 'require "xmldigest"'
:29:in `require': no such file to load --
rubygems (LoadError)
from :29:in `require'
from :167:in `load_full_rubygems_library'
On 2010-08-15 09:55, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> Source: libsysactivity
> Version: 0.5.4-2
> Severity: serious
> Tags: squeeze sid
> User: debian...@lists.debian.org
> Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20100815 qa-ftbfs
> Justification: FTBFS on amd64
>
> Hi,
>
> During a reb
Package: udev
Version: 160-1
Severity: critical
Tags: squeeze sid
Reproduce bug:
Upgrade udev to 160-1, reboot.
During booting, you will get errors saying "udeverror- udev already running"
acpi_fakekeyd will also not run with an error message.
At the login screen, mouse, keyboard will not work.
If
Package: libdataobjects-ruby1.9.1
Version: 0.10.2-1
Severity: serious
Hi,
Loading the library fails with ruby1.9.2:
:29:in `require': no such file to load --
addressable/uri (LoadError)
from :29:in `require'
from /usr/lib/ruby/1.9.1/data_objects/uri.rb:1:in `'
from :29:in
On Aug 15, Vikram Vincent wrote:
> During booting, you will get errors saying "udeverror- udev already running"
This cannot happen in normal conditions.
I believe your initramfs is broken in some way, what happens if you
force rebuilding it?
> Solution:
> Boot into single user mode -
> cd /etc/r
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> package mc
Limiting to bugs with field 'package' containing at least one of 'mc'
Limit currently set to 'package':'mc'
> unarchive 556922
> tags 556922 +fixed
Bug #556922 {Done: Patrick Winnertz } [mc] Console resize
freezes mc causing system cr
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> severity 579790 important
Bug #579790 [dpkg] courier-authdaemon: uninstallation fails: exec:
/usr/sbin/courierlogger: cannot execute: No such file or directory
Severity set to 'important' from 'serious'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please
2010/8/12 Julian Andres Klode :
> On Do, 2010-08-12 at 11:10 +0200, David Kalnischkies wrote:
>> 0,1% is reserved for packages depending multiarch style on
>> package:{any,native} - which isn't official allowed by now.
>
> IIRC, :native is not part of the spec at all, and no one ever talked
> about
On 15/08/10 at 12:31 +0200, Niels Thykier wrote:
> On 2010-08-15 09:55, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> > Source: libsysactivity
> > Version: 0.5.4-2
> > Severity: serious
> > Tags: squeeze sid
> > User: debian...@lists.debian.org
> > Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20100815 qa-
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> notfound 572920 1.6.2-1
Bug #572920 {Done: Daniel Kobras } [mpg123] libltdl3:
Security update breaks mpg123
Bug #579466 {Done: Daniel Kobras } [mpg123] mpg123 wrongly
searches for output modules.
Ignoring request to alter found versions of bug #
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> fixed 572920 1.6.2-1
Bug #572920 {Done: Daniel Kobras } [mpg123] libltdl3:
Security update breaks mpg123
Bug #579466 {Done: Daniel Kobras } [mpg123] mpg123 wrongly
searches for output modules.
Bug Marked as fixed in versions mpg123/1.6.2-1.
Bug
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> fixed 575339 1.6.2-4
Bug #575339 [pyscrabble-server] pyscrabble-server: broken in lenny due to no
python 2.5 zodb support
Bug Marked as fixed in versions pyscrabble/1.6.2-4.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assist
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> fixed 586956 0.62-4
Bug #586956 [wmnut] wmnut: FTBFS with /lib-using nut package
Bug Marked as fixed in versions wmnut/0.62-4.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
586956: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> severity 546262 important
Bug #546262 [kdm] kdm crash (due to a bug in libx11-6 o xserver in unstable?)
Severity set to 'important' from 'grave'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
546262: http://bugs
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> notfixed 586389 0.4.4-4.1
Bug #586389 {Done: James Andrewartha }
[service-discovery-applet] service-discovery-applet crashes immediately
Bug No longer marked as fixed in versions 0.4.4-4.1.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> notfixed 591796 0.2-1
Bug #591796 {Done: Alessio Treglia } [vocproc] vocproc:
Vocproc fails to load
Bug No longer marked as fixed in versions vocproc/0.2-1.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
591796:
On Wed, Aug 04, 2010 at 01:00:19PM -0400, ylsdd wrote:
> The 'greylistd-setup-exim4' script added a section 'deny' to
> /etc/exim4/conf.d/acl/30_exim4-config_check_rcpt.
>
> # Deny if blacklisted by greylist
> deny
>message = $sender_host_address is blacklisted from delivering \\
>
Your message dated Sun, 15 Aug 2010 14:32:11 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#591594: fixed in ezmlm-browse 0.10-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #591594,
regarding ezmlm-browse: installation fails
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
I
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 328472 + pending
Bug #328472 [tint] tint: doesn't remove score file on purge
Added tag(s) pending.
> tags 590208 + pending
Bug #590208 [tint] Buffer overflows in tint
Added tag(s) pending.
> tags 591590 + pending
Bug #591590 [tint] tint: inst
Package: oggz-tools
Version: 0.9.8-1
Severity: grave
File: /usr/bin/oggz-chop
Justification: renders package unusable
This is what I get: segmentation fault
Doesn't work.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 5.0.5
APT prefers stable
APT policy: (500, 'stable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Ker
tags 590765 +patch
thanks
Hi
This only happens on sparc as src/osdep/byteorder.h tries to include
sys/byteorder.h when __sparc__ is defined thinking it must be Solaris.
You can fix this by changing this to checking for __sun__ and __sparc__
instead of __sparc__ (as __sun__ is only defined on Sol
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 590765 +patch
Bug #590765 [src:aircrack-ng] aircrack-ng: FTBFS: error: sys/byteorder.h: No
such file or directory
Added tag(s) patch.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
590765: http://bugs.debia
On Thu, Jul 29, 2010 at 03:45:55PM -0400, Anders Kaseorg wrote:
> Versions of OpenConnect before 2.25 do not verify that the server SSL
> certificate matches the server hostname, which enables an attacker to
> perform an MITM attack on the connection. This can be fixed by upgrading
> to OpenCo
On 15 August 2010 17:19, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> On Aug 15, Vikram Vincent wrote:
>
>> During booting, you will get errors saying "udeverror- udev already running"
> This cannot happen in normal conditions.
> I believe your initramfs is broken in some way, what happens if you
> force rebuilding it?
On Thu, Aug 05, 2010 at 07:58:34AM +0900, Ansgar Burchardt wrote:
> Niko Tyni writes:
>
> > While I agree it's potentially harmful, I think fixing it has a very
> > high risk of breaking user scripts. It's definitely not something to do
> > in a stable security update, and I'm not enthusiastic a
Package: gretl
Version: 1.9.1-1
Severity: serious
Hi,
gretl produces uninstallable packages when it is binNMUed.
This recently happened for the mpfr -> mpfr4 transition. The generated
gretl package has a dependency on "gretl-common (>= 1.9.1-1+b1)" which
cannot be satisfied as gretl-common is a
ror: debian/rules build gave error exit status 2
>
> Build finished at 20100815-1312
> FAILED [dpkg-buildpackage died]
>
> Purg
00
> /usr/bin/perl /usr/bin/sbuild --apt-update --batch
> --stats-dir=/home/buildd/stats --dist=unstable
> --mail-log-to=phil+bui...@philkern.de,l...@buildd.debian.org --arch=powerpc
> scilab_5.2.2-2
> Watcher: Terminating.
> Watcher: Removing lock
* Marcos Talau [2010-08-14 15:27]:
> The BUG related on armel was already correct solved [1].
I don't think disabling some option is the best fix. I searched
around and found http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36466
which explains why the code in ziproxy is buggy. If you forward this
l
...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20100815 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
> make[1]: Entering directory
> `/build/user-ikiwiki_3.20100804-amd64-I1dN7b/ikiwiki-3.20100804'
> PERL_DL_NONL
Package: gnustep-gui
Version: 0.18.0-3
Severity: serious
Hi,
gnustep-gui FTBFS on hppa. From the build log:
/usr/share/GNUstep/Makefiles/mkinstalldirs GSspell.service/Resources
(echo "{"; echo ' NOTE = "Automatically generated, do not edit!";'; \
echo " NSExecutable = \"GSspell\";";
On 15 August 2010 at 16:34, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
| Hi,
|
| gretl produces uninstallable packages when it is binNMUed.
|
| This recently happened for the mpfr -> mpfr4 transition. The generated
| gretl package has a dependency on "gretl-common (>= 1.9.1-1+b1)" which
| cannot be satisfied as gr
On Aug 15, Vikram Vincent wrote:
> > I believe your initramfs is broken in some way, what happens if you
> > force rebuilding it?
> I simply upgraded my kernel version, headers and all to the one currently in
> unstable (2.6.32+28).
This is not what I asked you. See update-initramfs(8) for detail
Package: ziproxy
Version: 3.1.1-1
Severity: normal
FYI: Current buildd log:
https://buildd.debian.org/fetch.cgi?pkg=ziproxy&arch=armel&ver=3.1.1-1&stamp=1281879748&file=log&as=raw
Cheers
-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (700, 'unstable'), (
On Sun, Aug 15, 2010 at 11:32:21AM +0900, Jun Kaneko wrote:
> Sorry to get back to you late.
> I am wishing to replace these flash files
> by more generic solution such as JavaScript and/or HTML5
> at some future MT5 milestone.
> But I believe that we are looking for the immediate solution for MT4.
> However, to mimic the old behavior, it also needs to add
>
> OnTitlebar Mouse1 :Raise
Hmm -- that's not right either. If I add this, then I can't switch
between tabs by clicking on them in the title bar. I'm not sure how to
fix that at all.
--Ken
--
Chanoch (Ken) Bloom. PhD candidate. Linguis
For the record: I personally don't consider this bug fix-worthy for stable.
First of all: The title is not completely accurate:
APT removes as requested the required package 'mawk' -
(the command used is not provided in the report, but as nothing can
conflict with a required package and required p
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 08/15/2010 03:48 AM, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> Source: adonthell-data
> Version: 0.3.4.cvs.20080529+dfsg-2
> Severity: serious
> Tags: squeeze sid
> User: debian...@lists.debian.org
> Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20100815 qa-ftbfs
> Ju
tags 593112 + patch
thanks
On 0, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
>
> Patch?
>
In case you wonder how you should fix it, here is a patch.
Regards,
--
Mehdi Dogguy
diff -Nru gretl-1.9.1/debian/changelog gretl-1.9.1/debian/changelog
--- gretl-1.9.1/debian/changelog 2010-06-25 00:20:14.0 +020
block 593124 with 592751
thanks
Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> gnustep-gui FTBFS on hppa.
Yes, that's the same bug which I reassigned to gnustep-base.
Still no clues about the problem, unfortunately :-(
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscri
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> block 593124 with 592751
Bug #593124 [gnustep-gui] gnustep-gui: FTBFS on hppa (make_services:
malloc.c:3097: sYSMALLOc: Assertion ... failed)
Was not blocked by any bugs.
Added blocking bug(s) of 593124: 592751
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 593112 + patch
Bug #593112 [gretl] gretl: Not bin-NMU safe
Added tag(s) patch.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
593112: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=593112
Debian Bug Tracki
On 15 August 2010 at 20:24, Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
| tags 593112 + patch
| thanks
Nice, thanks -- applied to my sources too. I am surprised lintian hadn't
flagged me for that wrong use of binary:version.
Dirk
| On 0, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
| >
| > Patch?
| >
|
| In case you wonder how you
On Thu, Aug 05, 2010 at 10:25:24PM +0300, Niko Tyni wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 03, 2010 at 12:01:36PM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> > Source: speedy-cgi-perl
> > Version: 2.22-11
> > Severity: serious
> > Tags: squeeze sid
> > User: debian...@lists.debian.org
> > Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20100602 qa-ftbfs
>
Source: ruby1.9.1
Version: 1.9.2~svn28788-1
Severity: serious
Ruby's test suite (make test-all) hangs on sparc. I had to do a manual
upload after disabling the test suite.
There's an history of sparc problems with ruby 1.9.*. See #545345 and
#565765.
Since it works fine on amd64, armel, i386, mi
Source: ruby1.9.1
Version: 1.9.2~svn28788-1
Severity: serious
Ruby's test suite fails on kfreebsd-i386 and kfreebsd-amd64, and then hangs.
i386:
> Loaded suite ./test/runner
> Started
> /build/buildd-ruby1.9.1_1.9.2~svn28788-1-kfreebsd-i386-8LdWDu/ruby1.9.1-1.9.2~svn28788/lib/timeout.rb:50:
> [B
Source: ruby1.9.1
Version: 1.9.2~svn28788-1
Severity: serious
Ruby's test suite segfaults on hppa:
> Loaded suite ./test/runner
> Started
> /build/buildd-ruby1.9.1_1.9.2~svn28788-1-hppa-HqbNKl/ruby1.9.1-1.9.2~svn28788/lib/drb/extservm.rb:82:
> [BUG] Segmentation fault
> ruby 1.9.2dev (2010-07-30)
Source: ruby1.9.1
Version: 1.9.2~svn28788-1
Severity: serious
Ruby's test suite segfaults on ia64:
> Loaded suite ./test/runner
> Started
> /build/buildd-ruby1.9.1_1.9.2~svn28788-1-ia64-di4imI/ruby1.9.1-1.9.2~svn28788/test/ruby/test_float.rb:249:
> [BUG] Segmentation fault
> ruby 1.9.2dev (2010-0
Hello,
sorry for the stupid question but does this patch also goes into Squeeze? I'm
also in the situation that i'm not able to build a Squeeze system using Debian
live-helper when the mdadm is included in the live system. I think this is
essential to be included in Squeeze.
Regards
Volker
--
Package: chrony
Version: 1.24-2
Severity: serious
Oh dear
Setting up chrony (1.24-2) ...
Starting /usr/sbin/chronyd...
/usr/sbin/chronyd failed to start.
invoke-rc.d: initscript chrony, action "start" failed.
dpkg: error processing chrony (--configure):
subprocess installed post-installation
On 15/08/10 at 21:45 +0300, Niko Tyni wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 05, 2010 at 10:25:24PM +0300, Niko Tyni wrote:
> > On Thu, Jun 03, 2010 at 12:01:36PM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> > > Source: speedy-cgi-perl
> > > Version: 2.22-11
> > > Severity: serious
> > > Tags: squeeze sid
> > > User: debian...@li
On Tue, 10 Aug 2010 14:11:12 +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> Could you get a full backtrace? The function causing the illegal instruction
> seems unused and upstream wants to know what called it, but looking at
> empathy,
> clutter, clutter-gtk and libchamplain I can't find it.
(Sorry for
1 - 100 of 158 matches
Mail list logo
