Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 503571 unreproducible
Bug#503571: aqualung: does not run: crashes after start
There were no tags set.
Tags added: unreproducible
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system adm
Package: dx
Followup-For: Bug #503631
tags 503631 unreproducible
severity 503631 important
subscribe 503631 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
thanks
David, Daniel,
I am unable to reproduce this RC bug on lenny. I obtain
an empty window titled "Untitled" which allows me to
add network components.
As such I am r
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> Package: dx
Ignoring bugs not assigned to: dx
> Followup-For: Bug #503631
Unknown command or malformed arguments to command.
> tags 503631 unreproducible
Bug#503631: dx: Visual Program Editor doesn't shows networks
There were no tags set.
Tags added:
Hello Mark, Ben
I'm unable to reproduce this issue on my up to date lenny box either.
Ben, are you sure you don't have sid/experimental parts or unofficial
packages ?
Regards, Adam.
Mark Purcell a écrit :
Package: aqualung
Followup-For: Bug #503571
Ben, Adam,
I am unable to reproduce her
On Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 2:59 AM, Brian May
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Steffen Möller wrote:
>> Teodor happened to have nicely explained my objections to rename plink.
>
> Except what he said is wrong, puttygen hasn't been renamed.
Yes, puttygen hasn't been renamed. It was a wrong assumption from
severity 503735 important
tags 503735 l10n
thanks
On Tuesday 28 October 2008 10:05:04 Peter De Wachter wrote:
> Severity: grave
> Justification: renders package unusable
>
> The File/New/Programs and the File/New/Servers menus don't work in
> non-English locales. This makes it impossible to play a
Le Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 09:32:42AM +0200, Teodor a écrit :
>
> I still believe it is best to rename 'plink' to 'puttylink' in
> putty-tools binary package. Anyway, this should be fixed for squeeze
> since in lenny there is no conflict (plink is not included in lenny).
Hi all,
Upstream documented
On Monday 20 October 2008 00:16:23 Thomas Viehmann wrote:
> Package: gvfs
> Version: 0.2.5-1
> Severity: serious
> Reasoning: cripples things that might wait for it
Thomas,
I suspect that your report might be a duplicate of #496269 which has just been
fixed by the upload of version 0.2.5-1.1 by
On dim, 2008-10-26 at 10:17 +0100, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
> On dim, 2008-10-26 at 09:10 +0100, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
> > Hey,
> >
> > as I'm working on splashy, I guess he'll just do a quick NMU for
> this
> > bug. Or are you working on a MU anyway?
>
> Attached intended debdiff.
I've uploa
Hi,
thank you for the 1.96+20081026-1 binary - I just extracted
the grub-probe binary and tested it on the target system.
The output is somewhat different now, but it still ends
with a segfault:
whg:~/tmp# ./grub-probe -vvv -d /dev/md0
/home/fz/grub/grub2-1.96+20081026/kern/disk.c:220: Opening `
Quoting Martin Pala <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Please can you provide your monit configuration? (the "set httpd
..." part is sufficient).
set httpd port 28000 and
use address 123.123.123.123
ssl enable
pemfile /etc/ssl/ca_priv_pub.pem
clientpemfile /etc/monit/client_certificate
tags 501800 +patch
thanks
After further discussions with upstream authors :
Evan Hunt wrotes :
--8<
Thanks to Emmanuel Bouthenot for the assistance, I was able to
reproduce the issue with his instructions. It turned out to be a bug
that was fixed in 9.5.1b2.
T
On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 5:03 PM, Nico Golde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Ludovic,
> * Ludovic Rousseau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-10-27 16:47]:
>> On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 1:06 PM, Matthias Wandel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > So what is the security vulnerability?
>> >
>> > You can use it to de
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 503735 grave
Bug#503735: gnome-chess: menus only work in English language locales
Severity set to `grave' from `grave'
> On Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 06:35:15PM +1100, Mark Purcell wrote:
Unknown command or malformed arguments to command.
> > On T
severity 503735 grave
On Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 06:35:15PM +1100, Mark Purcell wrote:
> On Tuesday 28 October 2008 10:05:04 Peter De Wachter wrote:
> > Severity: grave
> > Justification: renders package unusable
> >
> > The File/New/Programs and the File/New/Servers menus don't work in
> > non-Engli
severity 500418 important
thanks
On Tuesday 28 October 2008 10:57:39 Thiemo Seufer wrote:
> severity 500418 serious
[...]
> Please add hppa mips mipsel to the allowed architectures in debian/control.
Thiemo,
Whilst I agree is is important for hppa mips & mipsel to be supported
architectures I d
Hi all !
The issue can be isolated in this line:
window.openDialog('chrome://pippki/content/deletecert.xul', "",
'chrome,centerscreen,modal', params);
in certManager.js.
If you remove this line, and comment the next if, then you simply remove the
confirmation box.
Package: lucene2
Version: 2.4.0+ds1-1
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: jbc-mismatch
This package builds with openjdk-6 or cacao-oj6, which is not the
default jvm in testing/unstable. The openjdk-6 and cacao-oj6 javac
creates java bytecode for version 50, which cannot be used by
Package: aspectwerkz2
Version: 2.0.dfsg.2-1
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: jbc-mismatch
This package builds with openjdk-6 or cacao-oj6, which is not the
default jvm in testing/unstable. The openjdk-6 and cacao-oj6 javac
creates java bytecode for version 50, which cannot be us
Package: jcc
Version: 1.9-8
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: jbc-mismatch
This package builds with openjdk-6 or cacao-oj6, which is not the
default jvm in testing/unstable. The openjdk-6 and cacao-oj6 javac
creates java bytecode for version 50, which cannot be used by older
jvms
Package: tinylaf
Version: 1.3.8-3
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: jbc-mismatch
This package builds with openjdk-6 or cacao-oj6, which is not the
default jvm in testing/unstable. The openjdk-6 and cacao-oj6 javac
creates java bytecode for version 50, which cannot be used by olde
Package: electric
Version: 8.07-1
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: jbc-mismatch
This package builds with openjdk-6 or cacao-oj6, which is not the
default jvm in testing/unstable. The openjdk-6 and cacao-oj6 javac
creates java bytecode for version 50, which cannot be used by olde
Package: weka
Version: 3.5.8-1
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: jbc-mismatch
This package builds with openjdk-6 or cacao-oj6, which is not the
default jvm in testing/unstable. The openjdk-6 and cacao-oj6 javac
creates java bytecode for version 50, which cannot be used by older
j
Package: solr
Version: 1.2.0+ds2-2
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: jbc-mismatch
This package builds with openjdk-6 or cacao-oj6, which is not the
default jvm in testing/unstable. The openjdk-6 and cacao-oj6 javac
creates java bytecode for version 50, which cannot be used by old
Package: glassfish
Version: 1:2ur2-b04-1
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: jbc-mismatch
This package builds with openjdk-6 or cacao-oj6, which is not the
default jvm in testing/unstable. The openjdk-6 and cacao-oj6 javac
creates java bytecode for version 50, which cannot be used
Package: libjgroups-java
Version: 2.6.3.GA+dfsg1-1
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: jbc-mismatch
This package builds with openjdk-6 or cacao-oj6, which is not the
default jvm in testing/unstable. The openjdk-6 and cacao-oj6 javac
creates java bytecode for version 50, which canno
Package: libcodemodel-java
Version: 2.0-2
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: jbc-mismatch
This package builds with openjdk-6 or cacao-oj6, which is not the
default jvm in testing/unstable. The openjdk-6 and cacao-oj6 javac
creates java bytecode for version 50, which cannot be used
Package: libhamcrest-java
Version: 1.1-1
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: jbc-mismatch
This package builds with openjdk-6 or cacao-oj6, which is not the
default jvm in testing/unstable. The openjdk-6 and cacao-oj6 javac
creates java bytecode for version 50, which cannot be used
Package: carmetal
Version: 2.8.9.dakbug-1
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: jbc-mismatch
This package builds with openjdk-6 or cacao-oj6, which is not the
default jvm in testing/unstable. The openjdk-6 and cacao-oj6 javac
creates java bytecode for version 50, which cannot be used
Package: java-access-bridge
Version: 1.23.0-2
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: jbc-mismatch
This package builds with openjdk-6 or cacao-oj6, which is not the
default jvm in testing/unstable. The openjdk-6 and cacao-oj6 javac
creates java bytecode for version 50, which cannot be
Package: libcobra-java
Version: 0.98.2-1
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: jbc-mismatch
This package builds with openjdk-6 or cacao-oj6, which is not the
default jvm in testing/unstable. The openjdk-6 and cacao-oj6 javac
creates java bytecode for version 50, which cannot be used
Package: libxstream-java
Version: 1.3-3
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: jbc-mismatch
This package builds with openjdk-6 or cacao-oj6, which is not the
default jvm in testing/unstable. The openjdk-6 and cacao-oj6 javac
creates java bytecode for version 50, which cannot be used b
Package: azureus
Version: 3.1.1.0-3.1
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: jbc-mismatch
This package builds with openjdk-6 or cacao-oj6, which is not the
default jvm in testing/unstable. The openjdk-6 and cacao-oj6 javac
creates java bytecode for version 50, which cannot be used by
Package: libjdic-java
Version: 0.9.5-3
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: jbc-mismatch
This package builds with openjdk-6 or cacao-oj6, which is not the
default jvm in testing/unstable. The openjdk-6 and cacao-oj6 javac
creates java bytecode for version 50, which cannot be used by
Package: javassist
Version: 1:3.8.1-1
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: jbc-mismatch
This package builds with openjdk-6 or cacao-oj6, which is not the
default jvm in testing/unstable. The openjdk-6 and cacao-oj6 javac
creates java bytecode for version 50, which cannot be used by
Package: freeguide
Version: 0.10.9-1
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: jbc-mismatch
This package builds with openjdk-6 or cacao-oj6, which is not the
default jvm in testing/unstable. The openjdk-6 and cacao-oj6 javac
creates java bytecode for version 50, which cannot be used by o
Package: easymock
Version: 2.4+ds1-2
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: jbc-mismatch
This package builds with openjdk-6 or cacao-oj6, which is not the
default jvm in testing/unstable. The openjdk-6 and cacao-oj6 javac
creates java bytecode for version 50, which cannot be used by o
Package: sat4j
Version: 2.0.2-1
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: jbc-mismatch
This package builds with openjdk-6 or cacao-oj6, which is not the
default jvm in testing/unstable. The openjdk-6 and cacao-oj6 javac
creates java bytecode for version 50, which cannot be used by older
Package: commons-csv
Version: 0.1-SNAPSHOT+svn678580-1
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: jbc-mismatch
This package builds with openjdk-6 or cacao-oj6, which is not the
default jvm in testing/unstable. The openjdk-6 and cacao-oj6 javac
creates java bytecode for version 50, which c
Package: coco-java
Version: 20081001-2
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: jbc-mismatch
This package builds with openjdk-6 or cacao-oj6, which is not the
default jvm in testing/unstable. The openjdk-6 and cacao-oj6 javac
creates java bytecode for version 50, which cannot be used by
Package: liquidlnf
Version: 2.9.1-6
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: jbc-mismatch
This package builds with openjdk-6 or cacao-oj6, which is not the
default jvm in testing/unstable. The openjdk-6 and cacao-oj6 javac
creates java bytecode for version 50, which cannot be used by ol
Package: libjboss-serialization-java
Version: 1.0.3.GA+dak1-1
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: jbc-mismatch
This package builds with openjdk-6 or cacao-oj6, which is not the
default jvm in testing/unstable. The openjdk-6 and cacao-oj6 javac
creates java bytecode for version 50,
Package: dom4j
Version: 1.6.1+dfsg-3
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: jbc-mismatch
This package builds with openjdk-6 or cacao-oj6, which is not the
default jvm in testing/unstable. The openjdk-6 and cacao-oj6 javac
creates java bytecode for version 50, which cannot be used by o
Package: mina
Version: 1.1.7.dfsg-4
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: jbc-mismatch
This package builds with openjdk-6 or cacao-oj6, which is not the
default jvm in testing/unstable. The openjdk-6 and cacao-oj6 javac
creates java bytecode for version 50, which cannot be used by ol
Package: libgdata-java
Version: 1.20.0+dak1-1
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: jbc-mismatch
This package builds with openjdk-6 or cacao-oj6, which is not the
default jvm in testing/unstable. The openjdk-6 and cacao-oj6 javac
creates java bytecode for version 50, which cannot be
Package: groovy
Version: 1.5.6-2
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: jbc-mismatch
This package builds with openjdk-6 or cacao-oj6, which is not the
default jvm in testing/unstable. The openjdk-6 and cacao-oj6 javac
creates java bytecode for version 50, which cannot be used by older
Package: josm
Version: 0.0.0.20080713-1
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: jbc-mismatch
This package builds with openjdk-6 or cacao-oj6, which is not the
default jvm in testing/unstable. The openjdk-6 and cacao-oj6 javac
creates java bytecode for version 50, which cannot be used b
Package: imagej
Version: 1.41n-1
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: jbc-mismatch
This package builds with openjdk-6 or cacao-oj6, which is not the
default jvm in testing/unstable. The openjdk-6 and cacao-oj6 javac
creates java bytecode for version 50, which cannot be used by older
Package: dbus-java
Version: 2.5-4
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: jbc-mismatch
This package builds with openjdk-6 or cacao-oj6, which is not the
default jvm in testing/unstable. The openjdk-6 and cacao-oj6 javac
creates java bytecode for version 50, which cannot be used by olde
Package: freecol
Version: 0.7.4.dfsg+1-1
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: jbc-mismatch
This package builds with openjdk-6 or cacao-oj6, which is not the
default jvm in testing/unstable. The openjdk-6 and cacao-oj6 javac
creates java bytecode for version 50, which cannot be used
Package: simplyhtml
Version: 0.12.3+dfsg-1
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: jbc-mismatch
This package builds with openjdk-6 or cacao-oj6, which is not the
default jvm in testing/unstable. The openjdk-6 and cacao-oj6 javac
creates java bytecode for version 50, which cannot be use
Hi Mark,
thank you for looking into the bug I filed.
On 2008-10-28 08:47:49.00 Mark Purcell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I suspect that your report might be a duplicate of #496269 which
has just been fixed by the upload of version 0.2.5-1.1 by Clint
Adams.
Can you confirm that 0.2.5-1.1 fixe
Package: libwoodstox-java
Version: 1:3.9.2.dfsg-1
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: jbc-mismatch
This package builds with openjdk-6 or cacao-oj6, which is not the
default jvm in testing/unstable. The openjdk-6 and cacao-oj6 javac
creates java bytecode for version 50, which cannot
Package: protobuf
Version: 2.0.2-1
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: jbc-mismatch
This package builds with openjdk-6 or cacao-oj6, which is not the
default jvm in testing/unstable. The openjdk-6 and cacao-oj6 javac
creates java bytecode for version 50, which cannot be used by old
Package: pylucene
Version: 2.3.1-1.1
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: jbc-mismatch
This package builds with openjdk-6 or cacao-oj6, which is not the
default jvm in testing/unstable. The openjdk-6 and cacao-oj6 javac
creates java bytecode for version 50, which cannot be used by o
Le mardi 28 octobre 2008 à 11:38 +1100, Tim Lyth a écrit :
> iU python-gobject 2.14.2-1
> Python bindings for the GObject library
> iU python-gtk22.12.1-6
>
Mark,
am Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 07:09:02PM +1100 hast du folgendes geschrieben:
> Whilst I agree is is important for hppa mips & mipsel to be supported
> architectures I don't think the build of istanbul on these arches is
> release critical for lenny nor does it make the package unfit for
> releas
Le mardi 28 octobre 2008 à 10:17 +0200, Romain Beauxis a écrit :
> Hi all !
>
> The issue can be isolated in this line:
> window.openDialog('chrome://pippki/content/deletecert.xul', "",
> 'chrome,centerscreen,modal', params);
>
> in certManager.js.
>
> If you remove t
Your message dated Tue, 28 Oct 2008 09:49:02 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Re: Bug#503784: freecol: java bytecode / java runtime version
mismatch
has caused the Debian Bug report #503784,
regarding freecol: java bytecode / java runtime version mismatch
to be marked as
close 503781
thanks
On Tue Oct 28 09:26, Matthias Klose wrote:
> Package: dbus-java
> Version: 2.5-4
> Severity: serious
> User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Usertags: jbc-mismatch
>
> This package builds with openjdk-6 or cacao-oj6, which is not the
> default jvm in testing/unstable. The openjdk-6 and ca
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> close 503781
Bug#503781: dbus-java: java bytecode / java runtime version mismatch
'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing.
Bug closed, send any further explanations to Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> thanks
Stopping
reassgin 449497 tech-ctte,foo2zjs
thanks
Dear Technical Committee Members
Currently, there is a dispute about a certain part of the foo2zjs package.
Unfortunately, we do not seem to be able to solve it and thus require your
assistance. We have tried to get a paragraph together to state the prob
On Tuesday 28 October 2008 19:02:02 Philipp Kern wrote:
> Did you even try it?
Philipp,
Yes I have tried the menus do work. I can setup a number of remote servers
with the Preferences menu. Then when I click on File/New/Servers it presents
the list of servers I setup. Selecting one attempts
On Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 09:44:49AM +0100, Josselin Mouette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Le mardi 28 octobre 2008 à 10:17 +0200, Romain Beauxis a écrit :
> > Hi all !
> >
> > The issue can be isolated in this line:
> > window.openDialog('chrome://pippki/content/deletecert.xul', "",
> >
Will do. /J
2008/10/27 sean finney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> notfound 478105 1.06-7
> thanks
>
> hi johan,
>
> as far as i can tell, your problem seems to be an entirely different issue.
>
> i downloaded the latest funguloids and both by default and with your config
> it worked for me, so it seems so
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> clone 449497 -1 -2
Bug#449497: foo2zjs: getweb script depends on non-free firmware
Bug 449497 cloned as bugs 503813-503814.
> reassign -1 foo2zjs
Bug#503813: foo2zjs: getweb script depends on non-free firmware
Bug reassigned from package `foo2zjs' to `
On Tuesday 28 October 2008 19:39:16 Philipp Kern wrote:
> The maintainer of the package worked around some buildd problem,
Philipp,
I agree.
The question remains, is it RC, ie serious, or important for the maintainer to
restore the missing archs - hppa mips mipsel.
Mark
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
Hi,
thanks for your feedback.
Sorry for not reporting this - I'm using Debian testing and the Debian
multimedia (deb http://www.debian-multimedia.org/ testing main) packages
- maybe it's related to these libraries...
I just compiled Aqualung R-1032 from source and it works fine for me.
So if it'
On Tuesday 28 October 2008 20:11:20 Benjamin Scherrer wrote:
> So if it's not an issue in the Debian testing but rather a compatibility
> issue with multimedia and testing,
I am using testing & multimedia as well and have no issue.
Adam,
If you could close the report that would help the lenny re
On Mon, 27 Oct 2008, Robert Millan wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 05:45:40PM +0200, Felix Zielcke wrote:
> > Attached is now an ugly patch which would display the grub-probe error
> > "Check your device.map" if it fails.
> >
> > Else I had the idea to make an environment variable like
> > GRUB_P
Le mardi 28 octobre 2008 à 10:05 +0100, Mike Hommey a écrit :
> > Le mardi 28 octobre 2008 à 10:17 +0200, Romain Beauxis a écrit :
> > > If you remove this line, and comment the next if, then you simply remove
> > > the
> > > confirmation box. Could be a workaround perhaps if nothing better can b
Le mardi 28 octobre 2008 à 10:36 +0100, Mike Hommey a écrit :
> > Idea #1: use the confirm() Javascript function instead.
> >
> > Idea #2: for epiphany, provide a certManager2.xul that has the changes
> > so that Iceweasel is not affected.
>
> Idea #3: override certManager.xul with a custom versi
On Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 10:40:29AM +0100, Josselin Mouette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Le mardi 28 octobre 2008 à 10:36 +0100, Mike Hommey a écrit :
> > > Idea #1: use the confirm() Javascript function instead.
> > >
> > > Idea #2: for epiphany, provide a certManager2.xul that has the changes
>
On Sat, Oct 25, 2008 at 09:17:04PM +0300, Niko Tyni wrote:
> I'm leaving the local changes one at 'serious' because it affects upgrades
> from earlier versions like the one currently in Ubuntu (1.5a-1). I just
> tested the upgrade, and it indeed ignores local changes. I don't think
> 'important' is
Georges Toth wrote:
Quoting Martin Pala <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Please can you provide your monit configuration? (the "set httpd ..."
part is sufficient).
set httpd port 28000 and
use address 123.123.123.123
ssl enable
pemfile /etc/ssl/ca_priv_pub.pem
clientpemfile /etc/mo
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> close 503770
Bug#503770: carmetal: java bytecode / java runtime version mismatch
'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing.
Bug closed, send any further explanations to Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> thanks
Stopping
Hello,
Matthias Klose wrote:
Package: carmetal
Version: 2.8.9.dakbug-1
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: jbc-mismatch
This package builds with openjdk-6 or cacao-oj6, which is not the
default jvm in testing/unstable. The openjdk-6 and cacao-oj6 javac
creates java bytecode for
close 503770
thanks
On Tue Oct 28 10:35, Yves Combe wrote:
>> This package builds with openjdk-6 or cacao-oj6, which is not the
>> default jvm in testing/unstable. The openjdk-6 and cacao-oj6 javac
>> creates java bytecode for version 50, which cannot be used by older
>> jvms. Binary packages expl
On Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 10:32:44AM +0100, Josselin Mouette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Le mardi 28 octobre 2008 à 10:05 +0100, Mike Hommey a écrit :
> > > Le mardi 28 octobre 2008 à 10:17 +0200, Romain Beauxis a écrit :
> > > > If you remove this line, and comment the next if, then you simply
>
Mark Purcell a écrit :
On Tuesday 28 October 2008 20:11:20 Benjamin Scherrer wrote:
So if it's not an issue in the Debian testing but rather a compatibility
issue with multimedia and testing,
I am using testing & multimedia as well and have no issue.
Adam,
If you could close the repo
Charles Plessy schrieb:
> Le Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 09:32:42AM +0200, Teodor a écrit :
>
>> I still believe it is best to rename 'plink' to 'puttylink' in
>> putty-tools binary package. Anyway, this should be fixed for squeeze
>> since in lenny there is no conflict (plink is not included in lenny)
Steffen Möller schrieb am Dienstag, dem 28. Oktober 2008:
> To summarise things up: the renaming of the executable of plink to
> snplink renders the plink package inferior to a manual installation of
> plink under the proper name. What I'll do now unless I hear some
> objections that I am mentally
severity 500418 serious
thanks
Mark Purcell wrote:
> severity 500418 important
> thanks
>
> On Tuesday 28 October 2008 10:57:39 Thiemo Seufer wrote:
> > severity 500418 serious
> [...]
> > Please add hppa mips mipsel to the allowed architectures in debian/control.
>
> Thiemo,
>
> Whilst I agree
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 500418 serious
Bug#500418: Please re-enable istanbul builds on mips/mipsel
Severity set to `serious' from `serious'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(admini
Package: linux-image-2.6.26-1-xen-amd64
Version: 2.6.26-9
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
I'm trying to run Xen in Lenny with the new 2.6.26-kernel as Dom0.
It seems to be some problems on the amd64 architecture.
After approx 10-20 hours of uptime, the Dom0 crash (even if
tags 501306 + patch
thanks
Hello,
here's the patch that I announced sooner. I tested here by changing
device.map to not reference my /boot and / partitions. Running
udpdate-grub still works but it displays one line more saying that
device.map got regenerated.
I don't think that find_device() nee
Hi Niko,
* [28.10.08 11:29]:
> One more problem is that the package both ships /etc/mxallowd.conf
> as a dpkg conffile and modifies it with maintainer scripts. This
> is explicitly forbidden by the policy, see section 10.7.3.
Thanks for the hint. I'll rebuild the package later without the entry in
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 501306 + patch
Bug#501306: update-grub fails silently with wrong device.map
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administ
Your message dated Tue, 28 Oct 2008 10:30:32 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#502757: fixed in nut 2.2.2-6.2
has caused the Debian Bug report #502757,
regarding nut-cgi: piuparts test fails: chmod: cannot access `/etc/nut': No
such file or directory
to be marked as d
Your message dated Tue, 28 Oct 2008 10:27:36 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#482140: fixed in docbook-xml 4.5-6
has caused the Debian Bug report #482140,
regarding docbook-xml: Package does not install: update-xmlcatalog: error:
entity already registered
to be marke
Your message dated Tue, 28 Oct 2008 10:27:36 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#482140: fixed in docbook-xml 4.5-6
has caused the Debian Bug report #482140,
regarding docbook-xml: upgrading from etch to lenny - need to remove this
package
to be marked as done.
This me
On Tuesday 28 October 2008 21:30:12 Adam Cécile (Le_Vert) wrote:
> Do you mean I should close the bug right now, even Ben has still this
> issue ?
No if Ben still has the issue, then we shouldn't close, but from the tone of
his last email I was under the impression that the problem has gone away.
Package: sysprof-module-source
Version: 1.0.10-1
Hi,
I informed Soeren Sandmann, the upstream author of the package. He
indicated that the bug should be fixed in the now available version 1.0.11
of the package.
With kind regards, Lutz Lehmann
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Your message dated Tue, 28 Oct 2008 11:47:06 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#393837: fixed in epiphany-browser 2.22.3-6
has caused the Debian Bug report #393837,
regarding epiphany-extensions: can't delete certificate using certificate
manager
to be marked as done.
Your message dated Tue, 28 Oct 2008 11:47:06 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#393837: fixed in epiphany-browser 2.22.3-6
has caused the Debian Bug report #393837,
regarding epiphany-extensions: Unable to edit or delete certificates
to be marked as done.
This means th
Hi Ludovic,
* Ludovic Rousseau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-10-28 12:27]:
> On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 5:03 PM, Nico Golde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > * Ludovic Rousseau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-10-27 16:47]:
> >> On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 1:06 PM, Matthias Wandel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> > So w
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.26
> severity 503821 important
Bug#503821: linux-image-2.6.26-1-xen-amd64: Kernel crash in Dom0 (Eeek!
page_mapcount(page) went negative! (-1))
Severity set to `important' from `grave'
>
Hi Steffen!
Disclaimer: I'm a biologist [1] and I performed genome-wide analyses.
On Tue, 28 Oct 2008 12:00:02 +0100, Peter Palfrader wrote:
> Steffen Möller schrieb am Dienstag, dem 28. Oktober 2008:
>> To summarise things up: the renaming of the executable of plink to
>> snplink renders the pli
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.35
> tags 503750 + experimental
Bug#503750: Save directory defaults to /tmp/balazar3_v0.1_saves
Tags were: security
Tags added: experimental
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Hi,
> wicd needs dependencies on some of the external tools it uses. In
> particular, it should have a dependency on dhcpcd | dhcp3-client |
> pump, a dependency on net-tools | ethtool, and a dependency on
> net-tools | iproute.
Are this really dependencies or are this tool commonly needed in us
1 - 100 of 208 matches
Mail list logo
