Package: gclcvs
Version: 2.7.0-89
Severity: serious
There was an error while trying to autobuild your package:
> Automatic build of gclcvs_2.7.0-89 on spontini by sbuild/sparc 99.99
> Build started at 20080821-1637
[...]
> ** Using build dependencies supplied by package:
> Build-Depends: autoto
Package: exiftags
Version: 1.01-2
Severity: serious
There was an error while trying to autobuild your package and the log confused
me quite a little bit.
You are compiling stuff, but then there is nothing to be done for binary-arch?
:)
> Automatic build of exiftags_1.01-2 on spontini by sbuil
Hi,
On Thu, Aug 21, 2008 at 06:03:36PM -0500, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
> On 21 August 2008 at 14:40, Sebastian Harl wrote:
> | Package: libgsl0-dev
> | Version: 1.8-2
>
> Any specific reason you looked at a release that is two years old when we
> have one from this year?
That's the first version
Package: havp
Severity: grave
Tags: security, patch
Justification: user security hole
Hi,
the following CVE (Common Vulnerabilities & Exposures) id was
published for havp.
CVE-2008-3688[0]:
| sockethandler.cpp in HTTP Antivirus Proxy (HAVP) 0.88 allows remote
| attackers to cause a denial of serv
Your message dated Fri, 22 Aug 2008 10:32:06 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#495682: fixed in loop-aes-utils 2.13.1-4
has caused the Debian Bug report #495682,
regarding loop-aes-utils: Diverts essential binaries without implementing some
trivial and useful option
t
On Fri, 2008-08-22 at 01:22 +0200, Sven Arvidsson wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I get the same warning if the file doesn't exist, but it doesn't crash
> for me, so it's probably unrelated.
>
> Can you try to capture a backtrace of the crash? See
> http://wiki.debian.org/?HowToGetABacktrace for instructions.
>
tags 495935 + help
quit
On 22 August 2008 at 10:00, Sebastian Harl wrote:
| Hi,
|
| On Thu, Aug 21, 2008 at 06:03:36PM -0500, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
| > On 21 August 2008 at 14:40, Sebastian Harl wrote:
| > | Package: libgsl0-dev
| > | Version: 1.8-2
| >
| > Any specific reason you looked at
Package: am-utils
Version: 6.1.5-10
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Since 2.6.25-rc* vanilla kernels, am-utils has stopped working. Some
debugging reveals that it's a problem with mount version. Since Debian is
using 2.6.26 already, this is a real issue.
am-utils uses ker
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 495935 + help
Bug#495935: libgsl0-dev: contains DFSG non-free documentation
There were no tags set.
Tags added: help
> quit
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrat
Package: am-utils
Version: 6.1.5-10
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
This is also documented in am-utils bugzilla with more details:
https://bugzilla.am-utils.org/show_bug.cgi?id=612
In short, Linux kernel has started validating the fs_hostname field in 2.6.19
and amd-util
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> clone 495729 -1
Bug#495729: unifont: Hangul glyphs use fonts with ambiguous licensing
Bug 495729 cloned as bug 496061.
> reassign -1 grub-pc
Bug#496061: unifont: Hangul glyphs use fonts with ambiguous licensing
Bug reassigned from package `unifont' to
Ross Burton wrote:
> On Tue, 2008-08-12 at 18:36 +0200, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
> > Package: meld
> > Version: 1.1.3-1.2
> > Severity: grave
> > Justification: renders package unusable
> >
> >
> > I simply cannot start meld:
> >
> > $ meld
> > Traceback (most recent call last):
> > File "/usr
Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> Package: ttf-fifthhorseman-dkg-handwriting
> Version: 0.13-1
> Severity: serious
> User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080619 qa-ftbfs
> Justification: FTBFS on i386
>
> Hi,
>
> During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
> i386.
>
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.35
> severity 495391 normal
Bug#495391: gnome-volume-manager: does not start at first login after the
boot/reboot
Severity set to `normal' from `grave'
>
End of message, stopping proces
Your message dated Fri, 22 Aug 2008 13:32:06 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#492434: fixed in pidgin 2.4.3-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #492434,
regarding pidgin: Connects to Jabber server with bad SSL certificates without
warning (CVE-2008-3532)
to be marked
Hi Jurij,
so the BSD people seem to be happy with the fix for 6 weeks:
http://www.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/src/usr.bin/yacc/skeleton.c
Fedora has fixed it as well, they don't mention doing anthing else
than applying the BSD patch, but one might want to look the actual
patched package as w
On Friday 22 August 2008 08:17:27 Valerio Passini wrote:
> Alle venerdì 22 agosto 2008, Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer ha scritto:
> > What about using timidity in the console with the same file?
> >Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer
>
> Timidity plays well every file. I want to underscore he
Package: nvidia-kernel-legacy-2.6-686
Version: 1.0.7184+6
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
The package depends on linux-image-2.6.18-4-686 which is unavailable in
unstable.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: lenny/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstabl
Hi,
> > I'm a bit worried that this needs to be fixed for
> > xpdf-chinese-simplified
> > xpdf-chinese-traditional
> > xpdf-korean
> > xpdf-japanese
> >
> > packages. The fix would probably be simple. It should probably be
> > hardlinks rather than symlinks considering dpkg behavior wrt symlink
On 8/19/08, Sebastien Delafond <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
...
> Anyway, I'm sure Shaun now has enough datapoints to decide what sort
> of solution he'd like to implement. I've removed all my past NMU
> uploads from DELAYED/7, and uploaded a single -3.1 that regroups all
> the fixes needed for my so
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 496078 nvidia-kernel-2.6.18-4-686 1.0.8776+6
Bug#496078: nvidia-kernel-legacy-2.6-686: Depends on linux-image-2.6.18-4-686
but is not available
Bug reassigned from package `nvidia-kernel-legacy-2.6-686' to
`nvidia-kernel-2.6.18-4-686'.
> tha
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 496078 nvidia-kernel-legacy-2.6.18-4-686 1.0.7184+6
Bug#496078: nvidia-kernel-legacy-2.6-686: Depends on linux-image-2.6.18-4-686
but is not available
Bug reassigned from package `nvidia-kernel-2.6.18-4-686' to
`nvidia-kernel-legacy-2.6.18-4-
On 22 Aug 2008, at 8:11 am, Meelis Roos wrote:
Package: am-utils
Version: 6.1.5-10
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Since 2.6.25-rc* vanilla kernels, am-utils has stopped working. Some
debugging reveals that it's a problem with mount version. Since
Debian is
using 2.
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> retitle 496078 nvidia-kernel-legacy-2.6.18-4-686: Depends on
> linux-image-2.6.18-4-686 but is not available
Bug#496078: nvidia-kernel-legacy-2.6-686: Depends on linux-image-2.6.18-4-686
but is not available
Changed Bug title to `nvidia-kernel-legacy-
On 22 Aug 2008, at 8:15 am, Meelis Roos wrote:
Package: am-utils
Version: 6.1.5-10
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
This is also documented in am-utils bugzilla with more details:
https://bugzilla.am-utils.org/show_bug.cgi?id=612
In short, Linux kernel has started vali
在 2008-08-22五的 07:51 -0700，Junichi Uekawa写道：
> 1. poppler was theoretically self-contained, poppler-data was REJECTed
> once and not yet part of non-free as of today.
Which is now sitting in NEW queue again for approval[1]. IMHO, It
doesn't worth to put effort in something to solve problem that i
Hello Neil,
I already uploaded a fixed version to mentors.debian.net, which only fixes
this bug and therefore should be o.k. as freeze exception.
Unfortunately, I'm only a package maintainer without any upload rights.
Would be great if you could do that for me.
The package can be found on ment
Your message dated Fri, 22 Aug 2008 16:17:04 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#496018: fixed in python-libgmail 0.1.10-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #496018,
regarding python-libgmail: uninstallable due to SyntaxError in
gmail_transport.py
to be marked as done.
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.35
> # via tagpending
> #
> # vlc (0.8.6.h-2) unstable; urgency=high
> #
> # * Switch to libdc1394-22-dev (Closes: #484695)
> # * Use objdump -x instead of ldd to check for links on lib
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.35
# via tagpending
#
# vlc (0.8.6.h-2) unstable; urgency=high
#
# * Switch to libdc1394-22-dev (Closes: #484695)
# * Use objdump -x instead of ldd to check for links on libX11 as ldd might
#resolve libvlc to the system's vers
Thanks a lot. It is working now.
On Thu, Aug 14, 2008 at 1:30 AM, Fabian Greffrath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
> Jaime Alberto Silva schrieb:
>
>> Anyway I can't see my files with the official Debian codecs :( I have DIVX
>> and all that stuff.
>>
>
> Those files should play flawlessly, please clea
Your message dated Fri, 22 Aug 2008 17:02:11 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#484695: fixed in vlc 0.8.6.h-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #484695,
regarding vlc: Please switch to libdc1394-22
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has be
package barnowl
severity 487113 important
thanks
It turns out this bug is only effecting two users, and happens fairly rarely so
it is not RC.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> package barnowl
Ignoring bugs not assigned to: barnowl
> severity 487113 important
Bug#487113: Barnowl crashes on call to Process
Severity set to `important' from `serious'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
tags 494246 + patch pending
thanks
Hi,
the patch Olivier posted does indeed solve the FTBFS for me.
As there hasn't been a reaction yet, I'd be happy to give the
maintainers a hand by uploading a bzr 1.5-1.1 NMU with attached
diff on Sunday or so (earlier if I get an OK from someone in
charge).
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 494246 + patch pending
Bug#494246: bzr: FTBFS: doc/en/user-reference/bzr_man.txt:2344: (WARNING/2)
Option list ends without a blank line; unexpected unindent.
Tags were: patch
Tags added: patch, pending
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.35
> reopen 496061
Bug#496061: unifont: Hangul glyphs use fonts with ambiguous licensing
Bug reopened, originator not changed.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact
Package: freetalk
Version: 0.69-2
Severity: serious
The build-dependencies of freetalk 0.69-2 cannot be satisfied on amd64
even by taking sid and testing binary packages together :
freetalk (= 0.69-2): FAILED
binary: freetalk
The following constraints cannot be satisfied:
freetalk (= 0.69-2) bu
Package: linux-modules-extra-2.6
Version: 2.6.25-5
Severity: serious
The build-dependencies cannot be satisfied on amd64
even by taking sid and testing binary packages together :
linux-modules-extra-2.6 (= 2.6.25-5): FAILED
The following constraints cannot be satisfied:
linux-modules-extra-2.6
Package: libfile-sharedir-perl
Version: 0.05-1.1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
The directory layout used to store data has changed. It now uses a flat
directory model:
OLD: auto/dist/HTML/FormFu
NEW: auto/dist/HTML-FormFu
This causes programs using recent versi
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 433281 + testing
Unknown tag/s: testing.
Recognized are: patch wontfix moreinfo unreproducible fixed potato woody sid
help security upstream pending sarge sarge-ignore experimental d-i confirmed
ipv6 lfs fixed-in-experimental fixed-upstream l10n
Your message dated Fri, 22 Aug 2008 19:02:04 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#495136: fixed in usepackage 1.6.3-1.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #495136,
regarding usepackage FTBFS when built with -rsudo
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the pr
Package: python2.5
Version: 2.5.2-11
Severity: serious
Hi Matthias ;-)
The build-dependencies of your package cannot be satisfied on amd64
even by taking sid and testing binary packages together :
python2.5 (= 2.5.2-6): FAILED
binary: python2.5
The following constraints cannot be satisfied:
py
Package: swig1.3
Version: 1.3.33-3
Severity: serious
The build-dependencies of your package cannot be satisfied on amd64
even by taking sid and testing binary packages together :
swig1.3 (= 1.3.33-3): FAILED
binary: swig
The following constraints cannot be satisfied:
swig1.3 (= 1.3.33-3) build-
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 433281 + lenny
Bug#433281: palo: FTBFS: Versioned Build-Depends on linux-kernel-headers
Tags were: patch sid
Tags added: lenny
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system admin
Dear e-MAIL Winner,
Your email address won £850,000.00 GBP in this month NATIONAL LOTTERY E-mail
online drew.
Ticket No: 56475600545 188
To file for your claim, contact our agent Mr Mark Vendatine with
the details below(Full Names, Contact Address, Country, Age, Sex, Occupation &
Telephone numbers)
Your message dated Fri, 22 Aug 2008 21:55:22 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Re: Bug#496120: linux-modules-extra-2.6: build-dependencies
not satisfiable an amd64 sid+testing
has caused the Debian Bug report #496120,
regarding linux-modules-extra-2.6: build-dependencies
Version: 2.6.26-2
On Fri, Aug 22, 2008 at 09:28:52PM +0200, Ralf Treinen wrote:
> The build-dependencies cannot be satisfied on amd64
> even by taking sid and testing binary packages together :
Thank you for wasting our time. This is fixed in unstable.
Bastian
--
You! What PLANET is this!
Sam Morris wrote:
> On Tue, 19 Aug 2008 15:13:14 +1000, Tyson Clugg wrote:
>
>
> Given the current release situation, I think we should just not restart
> the bus for now.
>
As much as I disagree with upstream, that dbus should never be restarted
(I find the argument bogus, that a dbus restar
Package: libxml2
Version: 2.6.32.dfsg-2+lenny
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
See the thread "Lenny users: attn about Gnome/libxml2 breakage" on the
debian-user mailing list (at the time of writing this bug report, the
archive didn't index those mails yet so I can't give a
Hi,
I tried Sam's patch (build-dependency ftgl-dev -> libftgl-dev) and also removed
xlibs-static-dev from the build-dependencies (bugs #484190, #421560).
Unfortunately
this makes compilation fail on my amd64/sid box:
g++ -o Gem.pd_linux -shared ../Manips/*.o ../Particles/*.o ../Base/*.o
../Mark
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 496030 unreproducible
Bug#496030: gclcvs_2.7.0-89(sparc/unstable): FTBFS on sparc, Segmentation
violation
There were no tags set.
Tags added: unreproducible
> severity 496030 important
Bug#496030: gclcvs_2.7.0-89(sparc/unstable): FTBFS on sparc,
Hi,
Before going offline for some weeks I wanted to publish my second try :
http://rzr.online.fr/docs/contribs/patches/eclipse_3.2.2-6.0~rzr1.debdiff
Regards
--
# mailto:rzr[a]users.sf.net -- gpg:0x467094BC#
# http://rzr.online.fr/contribs.htm -- Libre Software Addict
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.35
> forwarded 495984 http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=548985
Bug#495984: brasero: Brasero crashes when clicked
Noted your statement that Bug has been forwarded to
http://bugzil
Your message dated Fri, 22 Aug 2008 21:33:45 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#494969: fixed in sympa 5.3.4-5.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #494969,
regarding sympa: Leftover debug code may lead to data loss
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that th
Your message dated Fri, 22 Aug 2008 21:33:41 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#405630: fixed in scalable-cyrfonts 4.12+nmu1
has caused the Debian Bug report #405630,
regarding t1-cyrillic: missing dependency on xfonts-utils
to be marked as done.
This means that you cl
Package: proftpd
Version: 1.3.1-13
Severity: grave
Hi,
I seem to have problems upgrading from proftpd 1.3.1-11 to proftpd-basic
1.3.1-13.
I first only installed proftpd-basic, which removed (but not purged)
proftpd. At that point proftpd doesn't want to start anymore. I don't
know why. It did
Hi,
On Fri, Aug 22, 2008 at 07:51:36AM -0700, Junichi Uekawa wrote:
> > > I'm a bit worried that this needs to be fixed for
> > > xpdf-chinese-simplified
> > > xpdf-chinese-traditional
> > > xpdf-korean
> > > xpdf-japanese
> > >
> > > packages. The fix would probably be simple. It should probabl
Your message dated Sat, 23 Aug 2008 02:44:31 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line re: checkpolicy: FTBFS in lenny: policy_parse.y:2736: error:
too few arguments to function 'role_set_expand'
has caused the Debian Bug report #494326,
regarding checkpolicy: FTBFS in lenny: pol
found 496123 2.5.2-6
notfound 496123 2.5.2-11
thanks
no, 2.5.2-11 doesn't have libgpmg1 as a build dependency.
there is is still an unanswered question why this package is not moved
to testing. asked Neil at Debconf about Nico's comment on my request,
but apparently he never said anything like th
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> found 496123 2.5.2-6
Bug#496123: pyton2.5: build-dependencies unsatisfiable on amd64 sid+testing
Bug marked as found in version 2.5.2-6.
> notfound 496123 2.5.2-11
Bug#496123: pyton2.5: build-dependencies unsatisfiable on amd64 sid+testing
Bug no longe
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 494943 lsb-base
Bug#494943: cpufreqd: initscript does not do restart ok
Bug reassigned from package `cpufreqd' to `lsb-base'.
> forcemerge 495587 494943
Bug#495587: lsb-base: "fix" for killproc breaks many things
Bug#494943: cpufreqd: initscri
On Sat, Aug 23, 2008 at 04:36:48AM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> found 496123 2.5.2-6
> notfound 496123 2.5.2-11
> thanks
>
> no, 2.5.2-11 doesn't have libgpmg1 as a build dependency.
Acknowledged, I meant to file that bug against 2.5.2-6 and not 2.5.2-11.
-Ralf.
--
Ralf Treinen
Laboratoire Pr
在 2008-08-23六的 11:39 +1000，Hamish Moffatt写道：
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, Aug 22, 2008 at 07:51:36AM -0700, Junichi Uekawa wrote:
> > > > I'm a bit worried that this needs to be fixed for
> > > > xpdf-chinese-simplified
> > > > xpdf-chinese-traditional
> > > > xpdf-korean
> > > > xpdf-japanese
> > > >
> >
64 matches
Mail list logo
