Sam Morris wrote: > On Tue, 19 Aug 2008 15:13:14 +1000, Tyson Clugg wrote: >
> > Given the current release situation, I think we should just not restart > the bus for now. > As much as I disagree with upstream, that dbus should never be restarted (I find the argument bogus, that a dbus restart is equivalent to a kernel live-restart), I agree with Sam, that given the current situation, and the many breakages a dbus restart produces, we would do our users a favor if we didn't restart dbus in lenny. The problem is, that the dbus package in etch uses the default dh_installinit behaviour, meaning that dbus will be stopped by the old prerm script. So we can't avoid a dbus restart anyway for the etch->lenny upgrade. We can only plan ahead for a lenny->lenny+1 upgrade. Michael -- Why is it that all of the instruments seeking intelligent life in the universe are pointed away from Earth?
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
